Survey and Risk Assessment of Apis mellifera (Hymenoptera: Apidae) Exposure to Neonicotinoid Pesticides in Urban, Rural, and Agricultural Settings
A comparative assessment of apiaries in urban, rural, and agricultural areas was undertaken in 2013 and 2014 to examine potential honey bee colony exposure to neonicotinoid insecticides from pollen foraging. Apiaries ranged in size from one to hundreds of honey bee colonies, and included those opera...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of economic entomology 2016-04, Vol.109 (2), p.520-528 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 528 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 2 |
| container_start_page | 520 |
| container_title | Journal of economic entomology |
| container_volume | 109 |
| creator | Lawrence, T. J Culbert, E. M Felsot, A. S Hebert, V. R Sheppard, W. S |
| description | A comparative assessment of apiaries in urban, rural, and agricultural areas was undertaken in 2013 and 2014 to examine potential honey bee colony exposure to neonicotinoid insecticides from pollen foraging. Apiaries ranged in size from one to hundreds of honey bee colonies, and included those operated by commercial, sideline (semicommercial), and hobbyist beekeepers. Residues in and on wax and beebread (stored pollen in the hive) were evaluated for the nitro-substituted neonicotinoid insecticides imidacloprid and its olefin metabolite and the active ingredients clothianidin, thiamethoxam, and dinotefuran. Beebread and comb wax collected from hives in agricultural landscapes were more likely to have detectable residues of thiamethoxam and clothianidin than that collected from hives in rural or urban areas (∼50% of samples vs. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1093/jee/tov397 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1801435677</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><oup_id>10.1093/jee/tov397</oup_id><sourcerecordid>4303472911</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b378t-e3d500c31262d77ceb056164f81b2daa71746a238524427b63cdea914d3fbaa73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kd1u1DAQhS0EokvhhgdAlhBSQQ31T2In3K2q0laqALVU4i5y4knlJbGDfyr2NXjiertLL3rRK2t8vjkzo4PQW0o-U9LwoxXAUXS3vJHP0II2vC5YQ389RwtCGCtI2fA99CqEFSFUMEpeoj0mZENrKhbo31Xyt7DGymp8acJvvAwBQpjARuwGvJxNwBOMoxnAK3xwts6Km2MuvmxEreAjPvk7u5A84OjwN3DW9C4a64zGPyBE0xsNARuLr32n7CG-TF6Nh_cTlzfe9GmMmx98BTG33YTX6MWgxgBvdu8-uv568vP4rLj4fnp-vLwoOi7rWADXFSE9p0wwLWUPHakEFeVQ045ppSSVpVCM1xUrSyY7wXsNqqGl5kOXZb6PDra-s3d_Ut60nUzo863KgkuhpTWhJa-E3KDvH6Erl7zN22WqakpS17LK1Kct1XsXgoehnb2ZlF-3lLSbpNqcVLtNKsPvdpapm0A_oP-jycCHLeDS_LTR7ozOOGfhKfQOqxCq5w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1859408875</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Survey and Risk Assessment of Apis mellifera (Hymenoptera: Apidae) Exposure to Neonicotinoid Pesticides in Urban, Rural, and Agricultural Settings</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Lawrence, T. J ; Culbert, E. M ; Felsot, A. S ; Hebert, V. R ; Sheppard, W. S</creator><creatorcontrib>Lawrence, T. J ; Culbert, E. M ; Felsot, A. S ; Hebert, V. R ; Sheppard, W. S</creatorcontrib><description>A comparative assessment of apiaries in urban, rural, and agricultural areas was undertaken in 2013 and 2014 to examine potential honey bee colony exposure to neonicotinoid insecticides from pollen foraging. Apiaries ranged in size from one to hundreds of honey bee colonies, and included those operated by commercial, sideline (semicommercial), and hobbyist beekeepers. Residues in and on wax and beebread (stored pollen in the hive) were evaluated for the nitro-substituted neonicotinoid insecticides imidacloprid and its olefin metabolite and the active ingredients clothianidin, thiamethoxam, and dinotefuran. Beebread and comb wax collected from hives in agricultural landscapes were more likely to have detectable residues of thiamethoxam and clothianidin than that collected from hives in rural or urban areas (∼50% of samples vs. <10%). The maximum neonicotinoid residue detected in either wax or beebread was 3.9 ppb imidacloprid. A probabilistic risk assessment was conducted on the residues recovered from beebread in apiaries located in commercial, urban, and rural landscapes. The calculated risk quotient based on a dietary no observable adverse effect concentration (NOAEC) suggested low potential for negative effects on bee behavior or colony health.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-0493</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1938-291X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/jee/tov397</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26791816</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Entomological Society of America</publisher><subject>agricultural entomology ; Agricultural land ; Agrochemicals ; Anabasine ; Animals ; APICULTURE AND SOCIAL INSECTS ; Apis ; Beekeeping ; Bees ; Cities ; Environmental Exposure ; Foraging behavior ; Honey ; Insecticides ; landscape ; Metabolites ; Pesticides ; Pollen ; Residues ; Risk Assessment ; Toxicity ; Urban agriculture ; Urban areas ; Washington</subject><ispartof>Journal of economic entomology, 2016-04, Vol.109 (2), p.520-528</ispartof><rights>The Authors 2016. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Entomological Society of America. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com journals.permissions@oup.com</rights><rights>The Authors 2016. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Entomological Society of America. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com 2016</rights><rights>Copyright Oxford University Press, UK Apr 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b378t-e3d500c31262d77ceb056164f81b2daa71746a238524427b63cdea914d3fbaa73</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-b378t-e3d500c31262d77ceb056164f81b2daa71746a238524427b63cdea914d3fbaa73</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1584,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26791816$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lawrence, T. J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Culbert, E. M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Felsot, A. S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hebert, V. R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sheppard, W. S</creatorcontrib><title>Survey and Risk Assessment of Apis mellifera (Hymenoptera: Apidae) Exposure to Neonicotinoid Pesticides in Urban, Rural, and Agricultural Settings</title><title>Journal of economic entomology</title><addtitle>J Econ Entomol</addtitle><description>A comparative assessment of apiaries in urban, rural, and agricultural areas was undertaken in 2013 and 2014 to examine potential honey bee colony exposure to neonicotinoid insecticides from pollen foraging. Apiaries ranged in size from one to hundreds of honey bee colonies, and included those operated by commercial, sideline (semicommercial), and hobbyist beekeepers. Residues in and on wax and beebread (stored pollen in the hive) were evaluated for the nitro-substituted neonicotinoid insecticides imidacloprid and its olefin metabolite and the active ingredients clothianidin, thiamethoxam, and dinotefuran. Beebread and comb wax collected from hives in agricultural landscapes were more likely to have detectable residues of thiamethoxam and clothianidin than that collected from hives in rural or urban areas (∼50% of samples vs. <10%). The maximum neonicotinoid residue detected in either wax or beebread was 3.9 ppb imidacloprid. A probabilistic risk assessment was conducted on the residues recovered from beebread in apiaries located in commercial, urban, and rural landscapes. The calculated risk quotient based on a dietary no observable adverse effect concentration (NOAEC) suggested low potential for negative effects on bee behavior or colony health.</description><subject>agricultural entomology</subject><subject>Agricultural land</subject><subject>Agrochemicals</subject><subject>Anabasine</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>APICULTURE AND SOCIAL INSECTS</subject><subject>Apis</subject><subject>Beekeeping</subject><subject>Bees</subject><subject>Cities</subject><subject>Environmental Exposure</subject><subject>Foraging behavior</subject><subject>Honey</subject><subject>Insecticides</subject><subject>landscape</subject><subject>Metabolites</subject><subject>Pesticides</subject><subject>Pollen</subject><subject>Residues</subject><subject>Risk Assessment</subject><subject>Toxicity</subject><subject>Urban agriculture</subject><subject>Urban areas</subject><subject>Washington</subject><issn>0022-0493</issn><issn>1938-291X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kd1u1DAQhS0EokvhhgdAlhBSQQ31T2In3K2q0laqALVU4i5y4knlJbGDfyr2NXjiertLL3rRK2t8vjkzo4PQW0o-U9LwoxXAUXS3vJHP0II2vC5YQ389RwtCGCtI2fA99CqEFSFUMEpeoj0mZENrKhbo31Xyt7DGymp8acJvvAwBQpjARuwGvJxNwBOMoxnAK3xwts6Km2MuvmxEreAjPvk7u5A84OjwN3DW9C4a64zGPyBE0xsNARuLr32n7CG-TF6Nh_cTlzfe9GmMmx98BTG33YTX6MWgxgBvdu8-uv568vP4rLj4fnp-vLwoOi7rWADXFSE9p0wwLWUPHakEFeVQ045ppSSVpVCM1xUrSyY7wXsNqqGl5kOXZb6PDra-s3d_Ut60nUzo863KgkuhpTWhJa-E3KDvH6Erl7zN22WqakpS17LK1Kct1XsXgoehnb2ZlF-3lLSbpNqcVLtNKsPvdpapm0A_oP-jycCHLeDS_LTR7ozOOGfhKfQOqxCq5w</recordid><startdate>20160401</startdate><enddate>20160401</enddate><creator>Lawrence, T. J</creator><creator>Culbert, E. M</creator><creator>Felsot, A. S</creator><creator>Hebert, V. R</creator><creator>Sheppard, W. S</creator><general>Entomological Society of America</general><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160401</creationdate><title>Survey and Risk Assessment of Apis mellifera (Hymenoptera: Apidae) Exposure to Neonicotinoid Pesticides in Urban, Rural, and Agricultural Settings</title><author>Lawrence, T. J ; Culbert, E. M ; Felsot, A. S ; Hebert, V. R ; Sheppard, W. S</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b378t-e3d500c31262d77ceb056164f81b2daa71746a238524427b63cdea914d3fbaa73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>agricultural entomology</topic><topic>Agricultural land</topic><topic>Agrochemicals</topic><topic>Anabasine</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>APICULTURE AND SOCIAL INSECTS</topic><topic>Apis</topic><topic>Beekeeping</topic><topic>Bees</topic><topic>Cities</topic><topic>Environmental Exposure</topic><topic>Foraging behavior</topic><topic>Honey</topic><topic>Insecticides</topic><topic>landscape</topic><topic>Metabolites</topic><topic>Pesticides</topic><topic>Pollen</topic><topic>Residues</topic><topic>Risk Assessment</topic><topic>Toxicity</topic><topic>Urban agriculture</topic><topic>Urban areas</topic><topic>Washington</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lawrence, T. J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Culbert, E. M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Felsot, A. S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hebert, V. R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sheppard, W. S</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of economic entomology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lawrence, T. J</au><au>Culbert, E. M</au><au>Felsot, A. S</au><au>Hebert, V. R</au><au>Sheppard, W. S</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Survey and Risk Assessment of Apis mellifera (Hymenoptera: Apidae) Exposure to Neonicotinoid Pesticides in Urban, Rural, and Agricultural Settings</atitle><jtitle>Journal of economic entomology</jtitle><addtitle>J Econ Entomol</addtitle><date>2016-04-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>109</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>520</spage><epage>528</epage><pages>520-528</pages><issn>0022-0493</issn><eissn>1938-291X</eissn><abstract>A comparative assessment of apiaries in urban, rural, and agricultural areas was undertaken in 2013 and 2014 to examine potential honey bee colony exposure to neonicotinoid insecticides from pollen foraging. Apiaries ranged in size from one to hundreds of honey bee colonies, and included those operated by commercial, sideline (semicommercial), and hobbyist beekeepers. Residues in and on wax and beebread (stored pollen in the hive) were evaluated for the nitro-substituted neonicotinoid insecticides imidacloprid and its olefin metabolite and the active ingredients clothianidin, thiamethoxam, and dinotefuran. Beebread and comb wax collected from hives in agricultural landscapes were more likely to have detectable residues of thiamethoxam and clothianidin than that collected from hives in rural or urban areas (∼50% of samples vs. <10%). The maximum neonicotinoid residue detected in either wax or beebread was 3.9 ppb imidacloprid. A probabilistic risk assessment was conducted on the residues recovered from beebread in apiaries located in commercial, urban, and rural landscapes. The calculated risk quotient based on a dietary no observable adverse effect concentration (NOAEC) suggested low potential for negative effects on bee behavior or colony health.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Entomological Society of America</pub><pmid>26791816</pmid><doi>10.1093/jee/tov397</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0022-0493 |
| ispartof | Journal of economic entomology, 2016-04, Vol.109 (2), p.520-528 |
| issn | 0022-0493 1938-291X |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1801435677 |
| source | MEDLINE; Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); Alma/SFX Local Collection |
| subjects | agricultural entomology Agricultural land Agrochemicals Anabasine Animals APICULTURE AND SOCIAL INSECTS Apis Beekeeping Bees Cities Environmental Exposure Foraging behavior Honey Insecticides landscape Metabolites Pesticides Pollen Residues Risk Assessment Toxicity Urban agriculture Urban areas Washington |
| title | Survey and Risk Assessment of Apis mellifera (Hymenoptera: Apidae) Exposure to Neonicotinoid Pesticides in Urban, Rural, and Agricultural Settings |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T05%3A32%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Survey%20and%20Risk%20Assessment%20of%20Apis%20mellifera%20(Hymenoptera:%20Apidae)%20Exposure%20to%20Neonicotinoid%20Pesticides%20in%20Urban,%20Rural,%20and%20Agricultural%20Settings&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20economic%20entomology&rft.au=Lawrence,%20T.%20J&rft.date=2016-04-01&rft.volume=109&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=520&rft.epage=528&rft.pages=520-528&rft.issn=0022-0493&rft.eissn=1938-291X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/jee/tov397&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E4303472911%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1859408875&rft_id=info:pmid/26791816&rft_oup_id=10.1093/jee/tov397&rfr_iscdi=true |