Safety concerns over the use of intestinal permeation enhancers: A mini-review
Intestinal permeation enhancers (PEs) are key components in ∼12 oral peptide formulations in clinical trials for a range of molecules, primarily insulin and glucagon-like-peptide 1 (GLP-1) analogs. The main PEs comprise medium chain fatty acid-based systems (sodium caprate, sodium caprylate, and N-[...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Tissue barriers 2016-04, Vol.4 (2), p.e1176822-e1176822 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | e1176822 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | e1176822 |
container_title | Tissue barriers |
container_volume | 4 |
creator | McCartney, Fiona Gleeson, John P. Brayden, David J. |
description | Intestinal permeation enhancers (PEs) are key components in ∼12 oral peptide formulations in clinical trials for a range of molecules, primarily insulin and glucagon-like-peptide 1 (GLP-1) analogs. The main PEs comprise medium chain fatty acid-based systems (sodium caprate, sodium caprylate, and N-[8-(2-hydroxybenzoyl) amino] caprylate (SNAC)), bile salts, acyl carnitines, and EDTA. Their mechanism of action is complex with subtle differences between the different molecules. With the exception of SNAC and EDTA, most PEs fluidize the plasma membrane causing plasma membrane perturbation, as well as enzymatic and intracellular mediator changes that lead to alteration of intestinal epithelial tight junction protein expression. The question arises as to whether PEs can cause irreversible epithelial damage and tight junction openings sufficient to permit co-absorption of payloads with bystander pathogens, lipopolysaccharides and its fragment, or exo- and endotoxins that may be associated with sepsis, inflammation and autoimmune conditions. Most PEs seem to cause membrane perturbation to varying extents that is rapidly reversible, and overall evidence of pathogen co-absorption is generally lacking. It is unknown however, whether the intestinal epithelial damage-repair cycle is sustained during repeat-dosing regimens for chronic therapy. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1080/21688370.2016.1176822 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1801433868</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1801433868</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c468t-8a05eb229c048aa3cd8e697e424904fbbb92e1cf7cadc091531a6f200432be433</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UctuGyEURVGqOErzCalYdjMur2GYLqpEUfqQrHSRZI0YfKmpZsCBsSP_fRnZsZpN2IC45wHnIHRFyZwSRb4wKpXiDZkzQuWc0kYqxk7Q-XRfTYPT41myGbrM-S8pSzFJGnGGZqzhtWpqeY7uH4yDcYdtDBZSyDhuIeFxBXiTAUeHfRghjz6YHq8hDWBGHwOGsDITIX_FN3jwwVcJth5ePqIPzvQZLg_7BXr6fvd4-7Na_P7x6_ZmUVkh1VgpQ2roGGstEcoYbpcKZNuAYKIlwnVd1zKg1jXWLC1pac2pkY4RIjjrQHB-gb7tddebboClhTAm0-t18oNJOx2N128nwa_0n7jVoi0B8roIfD4IpPi8KT_Ug88W-t4EiJusqSK0-CipCrTeQ22KOSdwRxtK9FSHfq1DT3XoQx2F9-n_Nx5Zr-EXwPUe4IOLaTAvMfVLPZpdH5NLJV-fNX_f4x9Gzpqz</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1801433868</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Safety concerns over the use of intestinal permeation enhancers: A mini-review</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>McCartney, Fiona ; Gleeson, John P. ; Brayden, David J.</creator><creatorcontrib>McCartney, Fiona ; Gleeson, John P. ; Brayden, David J.</creatorcontrib><description>Intestinal permeation enhancers (PEs) are key components in ∼12 oral peptide formulations in clinical trials for a range of molecules, primarily insulin and glucagon-like-peptide 1 (GLP-1) analogs. The main PEs comprise medium chain fatty acid-based systems (sodium caprate, sodium caprylate, and N-[8-(2-hydroxybenzoyl) amino] caprylate (SNAC)), bile salts, acyl carnitines, and EDTA. Their mechanism of action is complex with subtle differences between the different molecules. With the exception of SNAC and EDTA, most PEs fluidize the plasma membrane causing plasma membrane perturbation, as well as enzymatic and intracellular mediator changes that lead to alteration of intestinal epithelial tight junction protein expression. The question arises as to whether PEs can cause irreversible epithelial damage and tight junction openings sufficient to permit co-absorption of payloads with bystander pathogens, lipopolysaccharides and its fragment, or exo- and endotoxins that may be associated with sepsis, inflammation and autoimmune conditions. Most PEs seem to cause membrane perturbation to varying extents that is rapidly reversible, and overall evidence of pathogen co-absorption is generally lacking. It is unknown however, whether the intestinal epithelial damage-repair cycle is sustained during repeat-dosing regimens for chronic therapy.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2168-8362</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 2168-8370</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2168-8370</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/21688370.2016.1176822</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27358756</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Taylor & Francis</publisher><subject>Animals ; Cell Membrane - drug effects ; Decanoic Acids - adverse effects ; Decanoic Acids - chemistry ; Drug Carriers - adverse effects ; Drug Carriers - chemistry ; epithelial toxicity ; Humans ; Intestinal Absorption ; intestinal permeation enhancers ; medium chain fatty acids ; oral peptide delivery ; Review ; SNAC ; sodium caprate</subject><ispartof>Tissue barriers, 2016-04, Vol.4 (2), p.e1176822-e1176822</ispartof><rights>2016 Taylor & Francis 2016</rights><rights>2016 Taylor & Francis 2016 Taylor & Francis</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c468t-8a05eb229c048aa3cd8e697e424904fbbb92e1cf7cadc091531a6f200432be433</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c468t-8a05eb229c048aa3cd8e697e424904fbbb92e1cf7cadc091531a6f200432be433</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4910835/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4910835/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27358756$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>McCartney, Fiona</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gleeson, John P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brayden, David J.</creatorcontrib><title>Safety concerns over the use of intestinal permeation enhancers: A mini-review</title><title>Tissue barriers</title><addtitle>Tissue Barriers</addtitle><description>Intestinal permeation enhancers (PEs) are key components in ∼12 oral peptide formulations in clinical trials for a range of molecules, primarily insulin and glucagon-like-peptide 1 (GLP-1) analogs. The main PEs comprise medium chain fatty acid-based systems (sodium caprate, sodium caprylate, and N-[8-(2-hydroxybenzoyl) amino] caprylate (SNAC)), bile salts, acyl carnitines, and EDTA. Their mechanism of action is complex with subtle differences between the different molecules. With the exception of SNAC and EDTA, most PEs fluidize the plasma membrane causing plasma membrane perturbation, as well as enzymatic and intracellular mediator changes that lead to alteration of intestinal epithelial tight junction protein expression. The question arises as to whether PEs can cause irreversible epithelial damage and tight junction openings sufficient to permit co-absorption of payloads with bystander pathogens, lipopolysaccharides and its fragment, or exo- and endotoxins that may be associated with sepsis, inflammation and autoimmune conditions. Most PEs seem to cause membrane perturbation to varying extents that is rapidly reversible, and overall evidence of pathogen co-absorption is generally lacking. It is unknown however, whether the intestinal epithelial damage-repair cycle is sustained during repeat-dosing regimens for chronic therapy.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Cell Membrane - drug effects</subject><subject>Decanoic Acids - adverse effects</subject><subject>Decanoic Acids - chemistry</subject><subject>Drug Carriers - adverse effects</subject><subject>Drug Carriers - chemistry</subject><subject>epithelial toxicity</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Intestinal Absorption</subject><subject>intestinal permeation enhancers</subject><subject>medium chain fatty acids</subject><subject>oral peptide delivery</subject><subject>Review</subject><subject>SNAC</subject><subject>sodium caprate</subject><issn>2168-8362</issn><issn>2168-8370</issn><issn>2168-8370</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9UctuGyEURVGqOErzCalYdjMur2GYLqpEUfqQrHSRZI0YfKmpZsCBsSP_fRnZsZpN2IC45wHnIHRFyZwSRb4wKpXiDZkzQuWc0kYqxk7Q-XRfTYPT41myGbrM-S8pSzFJGnGGZqzhtWpqeY7uH4yDcYdtDBZSyDhuIeFxBXiTAUeHfRghjz6YHq8hDWBGHwOGsDITIX_FN3jwwVcJth5ePqIPzvQZLg_7BXr6fvd4-7Na_P7x6_ZmUVkh1VgpQ2roGGstEcoYbpcKZNuAYKIlwnVd1zKg1jXWLC1pac2pkY4RIjjrQHB-gb7tddebboClhTAm0-t18oNJOx2N128nwa_0n7jVoi0B8roIfD4IpPi8KT_Ug88W-t4EiJusqSK0-CipCrTeQ22KOSdwRxtK9FSHfq1DT3XoQx2F9-n_Nx5Zr-EXwPUe4IOLaTAvMfVLPZpdH5NLJV-fNX_f4x9Gzpqz</recordid><startdate>20160402</startdate><enddate>20160402</enddate><creator>McCartney, Fiona</creator><creator>Gleeson, John P.</creator><creator>Brayden, David J.</creator><general>Taylor & Francis</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160402</creationdate><title>Safety concerns over the use of intestinal permeation enhancers: A mini-review</title><author>McCartney, Fiona ; Gleeson, John P. ; Brayden, David J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c468t-8a05eb229c048aa3cd8e697e424904fbbb92e1cf7cadc091531a6f200432be433</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Cell Membrane - drug effects</topic><topic>Decanoic Acids - adverse effects</topic><topic>Decanoic Acids - chemistry</topic><topic>Drug Carriers - adverse effects</topic><topic>Drug Carriers - chemistry</topic><topic>epithelial toxicity</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Intestinal Absorption</topic><topic>intestinal permeation enhancers</topic><topic>medium chain fatty acids</topic><topic>oral peptide delivery</topic><topic>Review</topic><topic>SNAC</topic><topic>sodium caprate</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>McCartney, Fiona</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gleeson, John P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brayden, David J.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Tissue barriers</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>McCartney, Fiona</au><au>Gleeson, John P.</au><au>Brayden, David J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Safety concerns over the use of intestinal permeation enhancers: A mini-review</atitle><jtitle>Tissue barriers</jtitle><addtitle>Tissue Barriers</addtitle><date>2016-04-02</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>4</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>e1176822</spage><epage>e1176822</epage><pages>e1176822-e1176822</pages><issn>2168-8362</issn><issn>2168-8370</issn><eissn>2168-8370</eissn><abstract>Intestinal permeation enhancers (PEs) are key components in ∼12 oral peptide formulations in clinical trials for a range of molecules, primarily insulin and glucagon-like-peptide 1 (GLP-1) analogs. The main PEs comprise medium chain fatty acid-based systems (sodium caprate, sodium caprylate, and N-[8-(2-hydroxybenzoyl) amino] caprylate (SNAC)), bile salts, acyl carnitines, and EDTA. Their mechanism of action is complex with subtle differences between the different molecules. With the exception of SNAC and EDTA, most PEs fluidize the plasma membrane causing plasma membrane perturbation, as well as enzymatic and intracellular mediator changes that lead to alteration of intestinal epithelial tight junction protein expression. The question arises as to whether PEs can cause irreversible epithelial damage and tight junction openings sufficient to permit co-absorption of payloads with bystander pathogens, lipopolysaccharides and its fragment, or exo- and endotoxins that may be associated with sepsis, inflammation and autoimmune conditions. Most PEs seem to cause membrane perturbation to varying extents that is rapidly reversible, and overall evidence of pathogen co-absorption is generally lacking. It is unknown however, whether the intestinal epithelial damage-repair cycle is sustained during repeat-dosing regimens for chronic therapy.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Taylor & Francis</pub><pmid>27358756</pmid><doi>10.1080/21688370.2016.1176822</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2168-8362 |
ispartof | Tissue barriers, 2016-04, Vol.4 (2), p.e1176822-e1176822 |
issn | 2168-8362 2168-8370 2168-8370 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1801433868 |
source | MEDLINE; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central |
subjects | Animals Cell Membrane - drug effects Decanoic Acids - adverse effects Decanoic Acids - chemistry Drug Carriers - adverse effects Drug Carriers - chemistry epithelial toxicity Humans Intestinal Absorption intestinal permeation enhancers medium chain fatty acids oral peptide delivery Review SNAC sodium caprate |
title | Safety concerns over the use of intestinal permeation enhancers: A mini-review |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T07%3A29%3A07IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Safety%20concerns%20over%20the%20use%20of%20intestinal%20permeation%20enhancers:%20A%20mini-review&rft.jtitle=Tissue%20barriers&rft.au=McCartney,%20Fiona&rft.date=2016-04-02&rft.volume=4&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=e1176822&rft.epage=e1176822&rft.pages=e1176822-e1176822&rft.issn=2168-8362&rft.eissn=2168-8370&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/21688370.2016.1176822&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1801433868%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1801433868&rft_id=info:pmid/27358756&rfr_iscdi=true |