Biological Indices for Soil Quality Evaluation: Perspectives and Limitations
Soil quality is threatened by the increase in human population and by the fact that most of the cultivable land is intensively used. The initial interest in this topic focused on defining soil quality but shifted into how to measure soil quality in the late 1990s. There is a general agreement that s...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Land degradation & development 2016-01, Vol.27 (1), p.14-25 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 25 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 14 |
container_title | Land degradation & development |
container_volume | 27 |
creator | Paz‐Ferreiro, Jorge Fu, Shenglei |
description | Soil quality is threatened by the increase in human population and by the fact that most of the cultivable land is intensively used. The initial interest in this topic focused on defining soil quality but shifted into how to measure soil quality in the late 1990s. There is a general agreement that soil biochemical, microbiological and biological properties are more suitable than physical and/or chemical properties for the purpose of estimating alterations in soil quality and hence soil degradation. To date, most studies have used microbial biomass, soil respiration and enzymatic activities to obtain soil quality indices, whereas less focus has been given to soil fauna (microarthropods and nematodes). This article aims to do a critical review of soil quality indices based on soil biological and biochemical activities, mainly microbial biomass, soil respiration and the activity of several enzymes. Limitations within the database of articles that are focussed on broad scale application of soil quality indices include the difficulty of selecting the highest quality soils for comparison purposes, lack of standardisation of analytical methods, and inclusion of an insufficient number of soil types and ecosystems. There is a need to validate soil quality indices, both, spatially and temporally and to explore the use of indices that integrate faunal and microbial measurements. Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/ldr.2262 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1800504156</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3919284661</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5572-b02fb1535e554010ef7e01cba7474f5b94ca40ea399c135beed88ab825a49eb73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0d9rFDEQB_BFFKyt4H_ggi--bJ0kO5usb9rWa2H9WYvSl5DNzZbU3OZMdqv33zfniaIgPs3AfBhm-BbFIwaHDIA_88t4yHnD7xR7DNq2YjV-vrvtFVaCS3W_eJDSNQAwWcu9onvpgg9Xzhpfno1LZymVQ4jleXC-fD8b76ZNeXJj_GwmF8bn5TuKaU12cjdZmnFZdm7lph_DdFDcG4xP9PBn3S8uXp18PDqtureLs6MXXWURJa964EPPUCAh1sCABknAbG_yRfWAfVtbUwMZ0baWCeyJlkqZXnE0dUu9FPvF093edQxfZ0qTXrlkyXszUpiTZgoAoWbY_J9KhRw5Q5bpk7_odZjjmB_JChsQqhH4e6GNIaVIg15HtzJxoxnobQI6J6C3CWRa7eg352nzT6e74w9_epcm-v7Lm_hFN1JI1J_eLDTvXl8u2uZUX2b_eOcHE7S5ii7pi3MOrMnhCqa4ErcZDp4R</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1756038635</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Biological Indices for Soil Quality Evaluation: Perspectives and Limitations</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Paz‐Ferreiro, Jorge ; Fu, Shenglei</creator><creatorcontrib>Paz‐Ferreiro, Jorge ; Fu, Shenglei</creatorcontrib><description>Soil quality is threatened by the increase in human population and by the fact that most of the cultivable land is intensively used. The initial interest in this topic focused on defining soil quality but shifted into how to measure soil quality in the late 1990s. There is a general agreement that soil biochemical, microbiological and biological properties are more suitable than physical and/or chemical properties for the purpose of estimating alterations in soil quality and hence soil degradation. To date, most studies have used microbial biomass, soil respiration and enzymatic activities to obtain soil quality indices, whereas less focus has been given to soil fauna (microarthropods and nematodes). This article aims to do a critical review of soil quality indices based on soil biological and biochemical activities, mainly microbial biomass, soil respiration and the activity of several enzymes. Limitations within the database of articles that are focussed on broad scale application of soil quality indices include the difficulty of selecting the highest quality soils for comparison purposes, lack of standardisation of analytical methods, and inclusion of an insufficient number of soil types and ecosystems. There is a need to validate soil quality indices, both, spatially and temporally and to explore the use of indices that integrate faunal and microbial measurements. Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1085-3278</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1099-145X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/ldr.2262</identifier><identifier>CODEN: LDDEF6</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chichester: John Wiley & Sons</publisher><subject>analytical methods ; arthropods ; Biochemistry ; Biological ; Biomass ; Degradation ; ecosystems ; enzyme activity ; enzymes ; human population ; Land ; microbial biomass ; Microorganisms ; Nematoda ; nematodes ; physicochemical properties ; Respiration ; review ; Soil (material) ; soil degradation ; soil enzymes ; soil fauna ; soil quality ; soil quality index ; soil respiration ; soil treatment ; soil types</subject><ispartof>Land degradation & development, 2016-01, Vol.27 (1), p.14-25</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5572-b02fb1535e554010ef7e01cba7474f5b94ca40ea399c135beed88ab825a49eb73</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5572-b02fb1535e554010ef7e01cba7474f5b94ca40ea399c135beed88ab825a49eb73</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fldr.2262$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fldr.2262$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Paz‐Ferreiro, Jorge</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fu, Shenglei</creatorcontrib><title>Biological Indices for Soil Quality Evaluation: Perspectives and Limitations</title><title>Land degradation & development</title><addtitle>Land Degrad. Develop</addtitle><description>Soil quality is threatened by the increase in human population and by the fact that most of the cultivable land is intensively used. The initial interest in this topic focused on defining soil quality but shifted into how to measure soil quality in the late 1990s. There is a general agreement that soil biochemical, microbiological and biological properties are more suitable than physical and/or chemical properties for the purpose of estimating alterations in soil quality and hence soil degradation. To date, most studies have used microbial biomass, soil respiration and enzymatic activities to obtain soil quality indices, whereas less focus has been given to soil fauna (microarthropods and nematodes). This article aims to do a critical review of soil quality indices based on soil biological and biochemical activities, mainly microbial biomass, soil respiration and the activity of several enzymes. Limitations within the database of articles that are focussed on broad scale application of soil quality indices include the difficulty of selecting the highest quality soils for comparison purposes, lack of standardisation of analytical methods, and inclusion of an insufficient number of soil types and ecosystems. There is a need to validate soil quality indices, both, spatially and temporally and to explore the use of indices that integrate faunal and microbial measurements. Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</description><subject>analytical methods</subject><subject>arthropods</subject><subject>Biochemistry</subject><subject>Biological</subject><subject>Biomass</subject><subject>Degradation</subject><subject>ecosystems</subject><subject>enzyme activity</subject><subject>enzymes</subject><subject>human population</subject><subject>Land</subject><subject>microbial biomass</subject><subject>Microorganisms</subject><subject>Nematoda</subject><subject>nematodes</subject><subject>physicochemical properties</subject><subject>Respiration</subject><subject>review</subject><subject>Soil (material)</subject><subject>soil degradation</subject><subject>soil enzymes</subject><subject>soil fauna</subject><subject>soil quality</subject><subject>soil quality index</subject><subject>soil respiration</subject><subject>soil treatment</subject><subject>soil types</subject><issn>1085-3278</issn><issn>1099-145X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqF0d9rFDEQB_BFFKyt4H_ggi--bJ0kO5usb9rWa2H9WYvSl5DNzZbU3OZMdqv33zfniaIgPs3AfBhm-BbFIwaHDIA_88t4yHnD7xR7DNq2YjV-vrvtFVaCS3W_eJDSNQAwWcu9onvpgg9Xzhpfno1LZymVQ4jleXC-fD8b76ZNeXJj_GwmF8bn5TuKaU12cjdZmnFZdm7lph_DdFDcG4xP9PBn3S8uXp18PDqtureLs6MXXWURJa964EPPUCAh1sCABknAbG_yRfWAfVtbUwMZ0baWCeyJlkqZXnE0dUu9FPvF093edQxfZ0qTXrlkyXszUpiTZgoAoWbY_J9KhRw5Q5bpk7_odZjjmB_JChsQqhH4e6GNIaVIg15HtzJxoxnobQI6J6C3CWRa7eg352nzT6e74w9_epcm-v7Lm_hFN1JI1J_eLDTvXl8u2uZUX2b_eOcHE7S5ii7pi3MOrMnhCqa4ErcZDp4R</recordid><startdate>201601</startdate><enddate>201601</enddate><creator>Paz‐Ferreiro, Jorge</creator><creator>Fu, Shenglei</creator><general>John Wiley & Sons</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201601</creationdate><title>Biological Indices for Soil Quality Evaluation: Perspectives and Limitations</title><author>Paz‐Ferreiro, Jorge ; Fu, Shenglei</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5572-b02fb1535e554010ef7e01cba7474f5b94ca40ea399c135beed88ab825a49eb73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>analytical methods</topic><topic>arthropods</topic><topic>Biochemistry</topic><topic>Biological</topic><topic>Biomass</topic><topic>Degradation</topic><topic>ecosystems</topic><topic>enzyme activity</topic><topic>enzymes</topic><topic>human population</topic><topic>Land</topic><topic>microbial biomass</topic><topic>Microorganisms</topic><topic>Nematoda</topic><topic>nematodes</topic><topic>physicochemical properties</topic><topic>Respiration</topic><topic>review</topic><topic>Soil (material)</topic><topic>soil degradation</topic><topic>soil enzymes</topic><topic>soil fauna</topic><topic>soil quality</topic><topic>soil quality index</topic><topic>soil respiration</topic><topic>soil treatment</topic><topic>soil types</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Paz‐Ferreiro, Jorge</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fu, Shenglei</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Land degradation & development</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Paz‐Ferreiro, Jorge</au><au>Fu, Shenglei</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Biological Indices for Soil Quality Evaluation: Perspectives and Limitations</atitle><jtitle>Land degradation & development</jtitle><addtitle>Land Degrad. Develop</addtitle><date>2016-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>27</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>14</spage><epage>25</epage><pages>14-25</pages><issn>1085-3278</issn><eissn>1099-145X</eissn><coden>LDDEF6</coden><abstract>Soil quality is threatened by the increase in human population and by the fact that most of the cultivable land is intensively used. The initial interest in this topic focused on defining soil quality but shifted into how to measure soil quality in the late 1990s. There is a general agreement that soil biochemical, microbiological and biological properties are more suitable than physical and/or chemical properties for the purpose of estimating alterations in soil quality and hence soil degradation. To date, most studies have used microbial biomass, soil respiration and enzymatic activities to obtain soil quality indices, whereas less focus has been given to soil fauna (microarthropods and nematodes). This article aims to do a critical review of soil quality indices based on soil biological and biochemical activities, mainly microbial biomass, soil respiration and the activity of several enzymes. Limitations within the database of articles that are focussed on broad scale application of soil quality indices include the difficulty of selecting the highest quality soils for comparison purposes, lack of standardisation of analytical methods, and inclusion of an insufficient number of soil types and ecosystems. There is a need to validate soil quality indices, both, spatially and temporally and to explore the use of indices that integrate faunal and microbial measurements. Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</abstract><cop>Chichester</cop><pub>John Wiley & Sons</pub><doi>10.1002/ldr.2262</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1085-3278 |
ispartof | Land degradation & development, 2016-01, Vol.27 (1), p.14-25 |
issn | 1085-3278 1099-145X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1800504156 |
source | Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
subjects | analytical methods arthropods Biochemistry Biological Biomass Degradation ecosystems enzyme activity enzymes human population Land microbial biomass Microorganisms Nematoda nematodes physicochemical properties Respiration review Soil (material) soil degradation soil enzymes soil fauna soil quality soil quality index soil respiration soil treatment soil types |
title | Biological Indices for Soil Quality Evaluation: Perspectives and Limitations |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-04T07%3A02%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Biological%20Indices%20for%20Soil%20Quality%20Evaluation:%20Perspectives%20and%20Limitations&rft.jtitle=Land%20degradation%20&%20development&rft.au=Paz%E2%80%90Ferreiro,%20Jorge&rft.date=2016-01&rft.volume=27&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=14&rft.epage=25&rft.pages=14-25&rft.issn=1085-3278&rft.eissn=1099-145X&rft.coden=LDDEF6&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/ldr.2262&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3919284661%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1756038635&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |