Fire Safety of Grounded Corrugating Stainless Steel Tubing in a Structure Energized by Lightning
Corrugated stainless steel tubing (CSST) has been used for more than 20 years as a replacement for conventional black iron gas piping. CSST has a thinner tubing wall and is susceptible to damage from lightning activity when discharges enter a structure, potentially resulting in perforation of the CS...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Fire technology 2016-03, Vol.52 (2), p.581-606 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 606 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 581 |
container_title | Fire technology |
container_volume | 52 |
creator | Haslam, Bryan Galler, Donald Eagar, Thomas W. |
description | Corrugated stainless steel tubing (CSST) has been used for more than 20 years as a replacement for conventional black iron gas piping. CSST has a thinner tubing wall and is susceptible to damage from lightning activity when discharges enter a structure, potentially resulting in perforation of the CSST wall and fire ignition. Grounding has been promoted by CSST manufacturers as a solution to this problem. We use modeling and simulation of voltage potentials and arc currents to evaluate the effects of grounding on the voltage potential across CSST, which can result in arc initiation, and charge through the arc, which can result in melting and perforation of the CSST wall. Our results show multiple scenarios where a 10 kA 10 × 350 s current waveform with 1
Ω
grounding of the CSST still results in voltages greater than the arc initiation threshold of 25 kV and charge through the arc greater than 1.2 C, the perforation threshold we measured. For the case where lightning enters the structure through an outdoor light fixture or chimney, the presence of a grounding wire increases the charge through the arc from 0.13 C to 2.22 C. These results indicate that good grounding of CSST will not necessarily prevent arc initiation nor perforation of the CSST wall by lightning. Good grounding may in fact exacerbate the problem of lightning damage to CSST depending on where lightning enters the building and the electrical parameters of the path to ground. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10694-015-0557-z |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1800499977</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1800499977</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c382t-e388de25314b6666cc422cc4934f7306c29a2b7d2c4f6ef54dbfc8b2ed46d3003</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkT9PwzAQxS0EEqXwAdgisbAEzn8SxyOq2oJUiaFlNolzCalSp9jJ0H56HJUBISE8nE93v_dk6xFyS-GBAshHTyFVIgaaxJAkMj6ekQlNJIszUOqcTGDcsDQTl-TK-y0AKJnChLwvGofROq-wP0RdFS1dN9gSy2jWOTfUed_YOlr3eWNb9D50iG20GYpx3NgoDxM3mH4IJnOLrm6OQVscolVTf_Q2UNfkospbjzff95S8Leab2XO8el2-zJ5WseEZ62PkWVYiSzgVRRqOMYKxUBQXleSQGqZyVsiSGVGlWCWiLCqTFQxLkZYcgE_J_cl377rPAX2vd4032La5xW7wmmYAQikl5f-olOEFXCka0Ltf6LYbnA0fGSnKOE8ECxQ9UcZ13jus9N41u9wdNAU9xqNP8egQgh7j0cegYSeND6yt0f1w_lP0Bf8Zkmk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1771233542</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Fire Safety of Grounded Corrugating Stainless Steel Tubing in a Structure Energized by Lightning</title><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><creator>Haslam, Bryan ; Galler, Donald ; Eagar, Thomas W.</creator><creatorcontrib>Haslam, Bryan ; Galler, Donald ; Eagar, Thomas W.</creatorcontrib><description>Corrugated stainless steel tubing (CSST) has been used for more than 20 years as a replacement for conventional black iron gas piping. CSST has a thinner tubing wall and is susceptible to damage from lightning activity when discharges enter a structure, potentially resulting in perforation of the CSST wall and fire ignition. Grounding has been promoted by CSST manufacturers as a solution to this problem. We use modeling and simulation of voltage potentials and arc currents to evaluate the effects of grounding on the voltage potential across CSST, which can result in arc initiation, and charge through the arc, which can result in melting and perforation of the CSST wall. Our results show multiple scenarios where a 10 kA 10 × 350 s current waveform with 1
Ω
grounding of the CSST still results in voltages greater than the arc initiation threshold of 25 kV and charge through the arc greater than 1.2 C, the perforation threshold we measured. For the case where lightning enters the structure through an outdoor light fixture or chimney, the presence of a grounding wire increases the charge through the arc from 0.13 C to 2.22 C. These results indicate that good grounding of CSST will not necessarily prevent arc initiation nor perforation of the CSST wall by lightning. Good grounding may in fact exacerbate the problem of lightning damage to CSST depending on where lightning enters the building and the electrical parameters of the path to ground.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0015-2684</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1572-8099</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10694-015-0557-z</identifier><identifier>CODEN: FITCAA</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>Assaults ; Characterization and Evaluation of Materials ; Charge ; Civil Engineering ; Classical Mechanics ; Electric arc melting ; Electric currents ; Electric potential ; Engineering ; Fire hazards ; Fire prevention ; Fire protection ; Gases ; Grounding ; Lightning ; Perforation ; Physics ; Pipes ; Simulation ; Stainless steel ; Voltage ; Walls</subject><ispartof>Fire technology, 2016-03, Vol.52 (2), p.581-606</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c382t-e388de25314b6666cc422cc4934f7306c29a2b7d2c4f6ef54dbfc8b2ed46d3003</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c382t-e388de25314b6666cc422cc4934f7306c29a2b7d2c4f6ef54dbfc8b2ed46d3003</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10694-015-0557-z$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10694-015-0557-z$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Haslam, Bryan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Galler, Donald</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eagar, Thomas W.</creatorcontrib><title>Fire Safety of Grounded Corrugating Stainless Steel Tubing in a Structure Energized by Lightning</title><title>Fire technology</title><addtitle>Fire Technol</addtitle><description>Corrugated stainless steel tubing (CSST) has been used for more than 20 years as a replacement for conventional black iron gas piping. CSST has a thinner tubing wall and is susceptible to damage from lightning activity when discharges enter a structure, potentially resulting in perforation of the CSST wall and fire ignition. Grounding has been promoted by CSST manufacturers as a solution to this problem. We use modeling and simulation of voltage potentials and arc currents to evaluate the effects of grounding on the voltage potential across CSST, which can result in arc initiation, and charge through the arc, which can result in melting and perforation of the CSST wall. Our results show multiple scenarios where a 10 kA 10 × 350 s current waveform with 1
Ω
grounding of the CSST still results in voltages greater than the arc initiation threshold of 25 kV and charge through the arc greater than 1.2 C, the perforation threshold we measured. For the case where lightning enters the structure through an outdoor light fixture or chimney, the presence of a grounding wire increases the charge through the arc from 0.13 C to 2.22 C. These results indicate that good grounding of CSST will not necessarily prevent arc initiation nor perforation of the CSST wall by lightning. Good grounding may in fact exacerbate the problem of lightning damage to CSST depending on where lightning enters the building and the electrical parameters of the path to ground.</description><subject>Assaults</subject><subject>Characterization and Evaluation of Materials</subject><subject>Charge</subject><subject>Civil Engineering</subject><subject>Classical Mechanics</subject><subject>Electric arc melting</subject><subject>Electric currents</subject><subject>Electric potential</subject><subject>Engineering</subject><subject>Fire hazards</subject><subject>Fire prevention</subject><subject>Fire protection</subject><subject>Gases</subject><subject>Grounding</subject><subject>Lightning</subject><subject>Perforation</subject><subject>Physics</subject><subject>Pipes</subject><subject>Simulation</subject><subject>Stainless steel</subject><subject>Voltage</subject><subject>Walls</subject><issn>0015-2684</issn><issn>1572-8099</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkT9PwzAQxS0EEqXwAdgisbAEzn8SxyOq2oJUiaFlNolzCalSp9jJ0H56HJUBISE8nE93v_dk6xFyS-GBAshHTyFVIgaaxJAkMj6ekQlNJIszUOqcTGDcsDQTl-TK-y0AKJnChLwvGofROq-wP0RdFS1dN9gSy2jWOTfUed_YOlr3eWNb9D50iG20GYpx3NgoDxM3mH4IJnOLrm6OQVscolVTf_Q2UNfkospbjzff95S8Leab2XO8el2-zJ5WseEZ62PkWVYiSzgVRRqOMYKxUBQXleSQGqZyVsiSGVGlWCWiLCqTFQxLkZYcgE_J_cl377rPAX2vd4032La5xW7wmmYAQikl5f-olOEFXCka0Ltf6LYbnA0fGSnKOE8ECxQ9UcZ13jus9N41u9wdNAU9xqNP8egQgh7j0cegYSeND6yt0f1w_lP0Bf8Zkmk</recordid><startdate>20160301</startdate><enddate>20160301</enddate><creator>Haslam, Bryan</creator><creator>Galler, Donald</creator><creator>Eagar, Thomas W.</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RQ</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>883</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M0F</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>U9A</scope><scope>7U2</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160301</creationdate><title>Fire Safety of Grounded Corrugating Stainless Steel Tubing in a Structure Energized by Lightning</title><author>Haslam, Bryan ; Galler, Donald ; Eagar, Thomas W.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c382t-e388de25314b6666cc422cc4934f7306c29a2b7d2c4f6ef54dbfc8b2ed46d3003</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Assaults</topic><topic>Characterization and Evaluation of Materials</topic><topic>Charge</topic><topic>Civil Engineering</topic><topic>Classical Mechanics</topic><topic>Electric arc melting</topic><topic>Electric currents</topic><topic>Electric potential</topic><topic>Engineering</topic><topic>Fire hazards</topic><topic>Fire prevention</topic><topic>Fire protection</topic><topic>Gases</topic><topic>Grounding</topic><topic>Lightning</topic><topic>Perforation</topic><topic>Physics</topic><topic>Pipes</topic><topic>Simulation</topic><topic>Stainless steel</topic><topic>Voltage</topic><topic>Walls</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Haslam, Bryan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Galler, Donald</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eagar, Thomas W.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Career & Technical Education Database</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Trade & Industry (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Trade & Industry</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Safety Science and Risk</collection><jtitle>Fire technology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Haslam, Bryan</au><au>Galler, Donald</au><au>Eagar, Thomas W.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Fire Safety of Grounded Corrugating Stainless Steel Tubing in a Structure Energized by Lightning</atitle><jtitle>Fire technology</jtitle><stitle>Fire Technol</stitle><date>2016-03-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>52</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>581</spage><epage>606</epage><pages>581-606</pages><issn>0015-2684</issn><eissn>1572-8099</eissn><coden>FITCAA</coden><abstract>Corrugated stainless steel tubing (CSST) has been used for more than 20 years as a replacement for conventional black iron gas piping. CSST has a thinner tubing wall and is susceptible to damage from lightning activity when discharges enter a structure, potentially resulting in perforation of the CSST wall and fire ignition. Grounding has been promoted by CSST manufacturers as a solution to this problem. We use modeling and simulation of voltage potentials and arc currents to evaluate the effects of grounding on the voltage potential across CSST, which can result in arc initiation, and charge through the arc, which can result in melting and perforation of the CSST wall. Our results show multiple scenarios where a 10 kA 10 × 350 s current waveform with 1
Ω
grounding of the CSST still results in voltages greater than the arc initiation threshold of 25 kV and charge through the arc greater than 1.2 C, the perforation threshold we measured. For the case where lightning enters the structure through an outdoor light fixture or chimney, the presence of a grounding wire increases the charge through the arc from 0.13 C to 2.22 C. These results indicate that good grounding of CSST will not necessarily prevent arc initiation nor perforation of the CSST wall by lightning. Good grounding may in fact exacerbate the problem of lightning damage to CSST depending on where lightning enters the building and the electrical parameters of the path to ground.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><doi>10.1007/s10694-015-0557-z</doi><tpages>26</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0015-2684 |
ispartof | Fire technology, 2016-03, Vol.52 (2), p.581-606 |
issn | 0015-2684 1572-8099 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1800499977 |
source | SpringerLink Journals |
subjects | Assaults Characterization and Evaluation of Materials Charge Civil Engineering Classical Mechanics Electric arc melting Electric currents Electric potential Engineering Fire hazards Fire prevention Fire protection Gases Grounding Lightning Perforation Physics Pipes Simulation Stainless steel Voltage Walls |
title | Fire Safety of Grounded Corrugating Stainless Steel Tubing in a Structure Energized by Lightning |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-03T03%3A10%3A21IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Fire%20Safety%20of%20Grounded%20Corrugating%20Stainless%20Steel%20Tubing%20in%20a%20Structure%20Energized%20by%20Lightning&rft.jtitle=Fire%20technology&rft.au=Haslam,%20Bryan&rft.date=2016-03-01&rft.volume=52&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=581&rft.epage=606&rft.pages=581-606&rft.issn=0015-2684&rft.eissn=1572-8099&rft.coden=FITCAA&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10694-015-0557-z&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1800499977%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1771233542&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |