The 2011 Tohoku tsunami south of Oahu: High‐frequency Doppler radio observations and model simulations of currents
A 16 MHz high‐frequency Doppler radio (HFDR) deployed on the south shore of Oahu (Hawaii) detected oscillatory radial currents following the arrival of the 2011 Tohoku tsunami. The observations over a two‐dimensional area provided an opportunity for intercomparison with the spatial patterns of curre...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of geophysical research. Oceans 2016-02, Vol.121 (2), p.1133-1144 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1144 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 1133 |
container_title | Journal of geophysical research. Oceans |
container_volume | 121 |
creator | Benjamin, L. R. Flament, P. Cheung, K. F. Luther, D. S. |
description | A 16 MHz high‐frequency Doppler radio (HFDR) deployed on the south shore of Oahu (Hawaii) detected oscillatory radial currents following the arrival of the 2011 Tohoku tsunami. The observations over a two‐dimensional area provided an opportunity for intercomparison with the spatial patterns of currents and the resonant modes predicted by a nonhydrostatic model. Over the 50 m deep Penguin Bank, extending west from Molokai, the observed currents are intensified in two areas: 43 min period currents of 0.27 m s−1 lasting 6 h are observed on the south part of the bank, while 27 min period currents of 0.14 m s−1 lasting 2 h are observed on the north. The spatial EOFs suggest that standing full‐waves and 3/2 waves formed over the bank. Modeled currents over Penguin Bank are similar to the observations but their north‐south asymmetry is less pronounced than observed. Nearshore, observed alongshore currents showed long‐period oscillations of 43 min that stretched along the entire coastline, while modeled currents show strong evidence for edge waves. EOF analysis of the nearshore signal suggests that the HFDR and model reveal different processes. The discrepancy might be attributed to the fact that both the Penguin Bank and nearshore observations are limited by HFDR sensitivity to azimuthal sidelobe contamination and decreased angular resolution at high steering angles.
Key Points:
HF Doppler radar observed currents from the 2011 Tohoku tsunami south of Oahu
Model hindcast agrees with observed resonance modes over Penguin Bank |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/2015JC011207 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_wiley</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1800495348</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1780526765</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a4204-678656dbeb6d79e03f4cf39a562ac2a57041c48a9555a28781767547ea0fc8823</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkc9Kw0AQxoMoWGpvPsCCFy_V2c3-9SZRW0uhIPUctsnGpCbZuptVevMRfEafxEiLiBfnMsPwm49v-KLoFMMFBiCXBDCbJYAxAXEQDQjmaqyIwoc_s2DH0cj7NfQlsaRUDaJuWRrUn2K0tKV9DqjzodVNhbwNXYlsgRa6DFdoWj2Vn-8fhTMvwbTZFt3YzaY2DjmdVxbZlTfuVXeVbT3SbY4am5sa-aoJ9X7bS2XBOdN2_iQ6KnTtzWjfh9Hj3e0ymY7ni8l9cj0fa0qAjrmQnPF8ZVY8F8pAXNCsiJVmnOiMaCaA4oxKrRhjmkghseCCUWE0FJmUJB5G5zvdjbO9bd-lTeUzU9e6NTb4FEsAqlhM5f-okMAIF5z16NkfdG2Da_tHUgLAJaexUD0V76i3qjbbdOOqRrttiiH9Tiv9nVY6mzwkBDNF4y8i4Ygw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2006864379</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The 2011 Tohoku tsunami south of Oahu: High‐frequency Doppler radio observations and model simulations of currents</title><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><source>Wiley Online Library (Open Access Collection)</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Benjamin, L. R. ; Flament, P. ; Cheung, K. F. ; Luther, D. S.</creator><creatorcontrib>Benjamin, L. R. ; Flament, P. ; Cheung, K. F. ; Luther, D. S.</creatorcontrib><description>A 16 MHz high‐frequency Doppler radio (HFDR) deployed on the south shore of Oahu (Hawaii) detected oscillatory radial currents following the arrival of the 2011 Tohoku tsunami. The observations over a two‐dimensional area provided an opportunity for intercomparison with the spatial patterns of currents and the resonant modes predicted by a nonhydrostatic model. Over the 50 m deep Penguin Bank, extending west from Molokai, the observed currents are intensified in two areas: 43 min period currents of 0.27 m s−1 lasting 6 h are observed on the south part of the bank, while 27 min period currents of 0.14 m s−1 lasting 2 h are observed on the north. The spatial EOFs suggest that standing full‐waves and 3/2 waves formed over the bank. Modeled currents over Penguin Bank are similar to the observations but their north‐south asymmetry is less pronounced than observed. Nearshore, observed alongshore currents showed long‐period oscillations of 43 min that stretched along the entire coastline, while modeled currents show strong evidence for edge waves. EOF analysis of the nearshore signal suggests that the HFDR and model reveal different processes. The discrepancy might be attributed to the fact that both the Penguin Bank and nearshore observations are limited by HFDR sensitivity to azimuthal sidelobe contamination and decreased angular resolution at high steering angles.
Key Points:
HF Doppler radar observed currents from the 2011 Tohoku tsunami south of Oahu
Model hindcast agrees with observed resonance modes over Penguin Bank</description><identifier>ISSN: 2169-9275</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2169-9291</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/2015JC011207</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Angular resolution ; Banks ; Computer simulation ; Contamination ; Doppler ; Doppler effect ; Doppler sonar ; Edge waves ; Geophysics ; high‐frequency radar ; Intercomparison ; Marine ; Mathematical models ; Oscillations ; Radio ; Seabirds ; Sidelobes ; Signal processing ; Tohoku ; tsunami ; Tsunamis</subject><ispartof>Journal of geophysical research. Oceans, 2016-02, Vol.121 (2), p.1133-1144</ispartof><rights>2016. American Geophysical Union. All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2F2015JC011207$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2F2015JC011207$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,782,786,1419,1435,27931,27932,45581,45582,46416,46840</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Benjamin, L. R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Flament, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cheung, K. F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Luther, D. S.</creatorcontrib><title>The 2011 Tohoku tsunami south of Oahu: High‐frequency Doppler radio observations and model simulations of currents</title><title>Journal of geophysical research. Oceans</title><description>A 16 MHz high‐frequency Doppler radio (HFDR) deployed on the south shore of Oahu (Hawaii) detected oscillatory radial currents following the arrival of the 2011 Tohoku tsunami. The observations over a two‐dimensional area provided an opportunity for intercomparison with the spatial patterns of currents and the resonant modes predicted by a nonhydrostatic model. Over the 50 m deep Penguin Bank, extending west from Molokai, the observed currents are intensified in two areas: 43 min period currents of 0.27 m s−1 lasting 6 h are observed on the south part of the bank, while 27 min period currents of 0.14 m s−1 lasting 2 h are observed on the north. The spatial EOFs suggest that standing full‐waves and 3/2 waves formed over the bank. Modeled currents over Penguin Bank are similar to the observations but their north‐south asymmetry is less pronounced than observed. Nearshore, observed alongshore currents showed long‐period oscillations of 43 min that stretched along the entire coastline, while modeled currents show strong evidence for edge waves. EOF analysis of the nearshore signal suggests that the HFDR and model reveal different processes. The discrepancy might be attributed to the fact that both the Penguin Bank and nearshore observations are limited by HFDR sensitivity to azimuthal sidelobe contamination and decreased angular resolution at high steering angles.
Key Points:
HF Doppler radar observed currents from the 2011 Tohoku tsunami south of Oahu
Model hindcast agrees with observed resonance modes over Penguin Bank</description><subject>Angular resolution</subject><subject>Banks</subject><subject>Computer simulation</subject><subject>Contamination</subject><subject>Doppler</subject><subject>Doppler effect</subject><subject>Doppler sonar</subject><subject>Edge waves</subject><subject>Geophysics</subject><subject>high‐frequency radar</subject><subject>Intercomparison</subject><subject>Marine</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Oscillations</subject><subject>Radio</subject><subject>Seabirds</subject><subject>Sidelobes</subject><subject>Signal processing</subject><subject>Tohoku</subject><subject>tsunami</subject><subject>Tsunamis</subject><issn>2169-9275</issn><issn>2169-9291</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkc9Kw0AQxoMoWGpvPsCCFy_V2c3-9SZRW0uhIPUctsnGpCbZuptVevMRfEafxEiLiBfnMsPwm49v-KLoFMMFBiCXBDCbJYAxAXEQDQjmaqyIwoc_s2DH0cj7NfQlsaRUDaJuWRrUn2K0tKV9DqjzodVNhbwNXYlsgRa6DFdoWj2Vn-8fhTMvwbTZFt3YzaY2DjmdVxbZlTfuVXeVbT3SbY4am5sa-aoJ9X7bS2XBOdN2_iQ6KnTtzWjfh9Hj3e0ymY7ni8l9cj0fa0qAjrmQnPF8ZVY8F8pAXNCsiJVmnOiMaCaA4oxKrRhjmkghseCCUWE0FJmUJB5G5zvdjbO9bd-lTeUzU9e6NTb4FEsAqlhM5f-okMAIF5z16NkfdG2Da_tHUgLAJaexUD0V76i3qjbbdOOqRrttiiH9Tiv9nVY6mzwkBDNF4y8i4Ygw</recordid><startdate>201602</startdate><enddate>201602</enddate><creator>Benjamin, L. R.</creator><creator>Flament, P.</creator><creator>Cheung, K. F.</creator><creator>Luther, D. S.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201602</creationdate><title>The 2011 Tohoku tsunami south of Oahu: High‐frequency Doppler radio observations and model simulations of currents</title><author>Benjamin, L. R. ; Flament, P. ; Cheung, K. F. ; Luther, D. S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a4204-678656dbeb6d79e03f4cf39a562ac2a57041c48a9555a28781767547ea0fc8823</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Angular resolution</topic><topic>Banks</topic><topic>Computer simulation</topic><topic>Contamination</topic><topic>Doppler</topic><topic>Doppler effect</topic><topic>Doppler sonar</topic><topic>Edge waves</topic><topic>Geophysics</topic><topic>high‐frequency radar</topic><topic>Intercomparison</topic><topic>Marine</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Oscillations</topic><topic>Radio</topic><topic>Seabirds</topic><topic>Sidelobes</topic><topic>Signal processing</topic><topic>Tohoku</topic><topic>tsunami</topic><topic>Tsunamis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Benjamin, L. R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Flament, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cheung, K. F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Luther, D. S.</creatorcontrib><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>Journal of geophysical research. Oceans</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Benjamin, L. R.</au><au>Flament, P.</au><au>Cheung, K. F.</au><au>Luther, D. S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The 2011 Tohoku tsunami south of Oahu: High‐frequency Doppler radio observations and model simulations of currents</atitle><jtitle>Journal of geophysical research. Oceans</jtitle><date>2016-02</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>121</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>1133</spage><epage>1144</epage><pages>1133-1144</pages><issn>2169-9275</issn><eissn>2169-9291</eissn><abstract>A 16 MHz high‐frequency Doppler radio (HFDR) deployed on the south shore of Oahu (Hawaii) detected oscillatory radial currents following the arrival of the 2011 Tohoku tsunami. The observations over a two‐dimensional area provided an opportunity for intercomparison with the spatial patterns of currents and the resonant modes predicted by a nonhydrostatic model. Over the 50 m deep Penguin Bank, extending west from Molokai, the observed currents are intensified in two areas: 43 min period currents of 0.27 m s−1 lasting 6 h are observed on the south part of the bank, while 27 min period currents of 0.14 m s−1 lasting 2 h are observed on the north. The spatial EOFs suggest that standing full‐waves and 3/2 waves formed over the bank. Modeled currents over Penguin Bank are similar to the observations but their north‐south asymmetry is less pronounced than observed. Nearshore, observed alongshore currents showed long‐period oscillations of 43 min that stretched along the entire coastline, while modeled currents show strong evidence for edge waves. EOF analysis of the nearshore signal suggests that the HFDR and model reveal different processes. The discrepancy might be attributed to the fact that both the Penguin Bank and nearshore observations are limited by HFDR sensitivity to azimuthal sidelobe contamination and decreased angular resolution at high steering angles.
Key Points:
HF Doppler radar observed currents from the 2011 Tohoku tsunami south of Oahu
Model hindcast agrees with observed resonance modes over Penguin Bank</abstract><cop>Washington</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1002/2015JC011207</doi><tpages>12</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2169-9275 |
ispartof | Journal of geophysical research. Oceans, 2016-02, Vol.121 (2), p.1133-1144 |
issn | 2169-9275 2169-9291 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1800495348 |
source | Access via Wiley Online Library; Wiley Online Library (Open Access Collection); Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Angular resolution Banks Computer simulation Contamination Doppler Doppler effect Doppler sonar Edge waves Geophysics high‐frequency radar Intercomparison Marine Mathematical models Oscillations Radio Seabirds Sidelobes Signal processing Tohoku tsunami Tsunamis |
title | The 2011 Tohoku tsunami south of Oahu: High‐frequency Doppler radio observations and model simulations of currents |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-03T22%3A59%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_wiley&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%202011%20Tohoku%20tsunami%20south%20of%20Oahu:%20High%E2%80%90frequency%20Doppler%20radio%20observations%20and%20model%20simulations%20of%20currents&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20geophysical%20research.%20Oceans&rft.au=Benjamin,%20L.%20R.&rft.date=2016-02&rft.volume=121&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=1133&rft.epage=1144&rft.pages=1133-1144&rft.issn=2169-9275&rft.eissn=2169-9291&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/2015JC011207&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_wiley%3E1780526765%3C/proquest_wiley%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2006864379&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |