Comparative study among different time series models applied to monthly rainfall forecasting in semi-arid climate condition
The aim of this study is to investigate the ability of different time series models in forecasting monthly rainfall. In order to do this, monthly rainfall data were collected from 9 rainfall stations in North Khorasan province (North east of Iran) from 1989 to 2012. R software was used to predict th...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Natural hazards (Dordrecht) 2016-04, Vol.81 (3), p.1811-1827 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1827 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 1811 |
container_title | Natural hazards (Dordrecht) |
container_volume | 81 |
creator | Dastorani, Mostafa Mirzavand, Mohammad Dastorani, Mohammad Taghi Sadatinejad, Seyyed Javad |
description | The aim of this study is to investigate the ability of different time series models in forecasting monthly rainfall. In order to do this, monthly rainfall data were collected from 9 rainfall stations in North Khorasan province (North east of Iran) from 1989 to 2012. R software was used to predict the highest rainfall in these 9 rain gage stations for the time period 2002–2012 using monthly highest rainfall data of 1989–2002. In this study, AR, MA, ARMA, ARIMA, and SARIMA with 11 different structures based on trial and error were examined. Because the trend, seasonal and jump components are deterministic components, it is not necessary to model these components, but modeling of random component is very important for rainfall forecasting. So, the main data series was decomposed (for AR, MA and ARMA models) and the random part has been modeled. After that, the random component was collected with the seasonal and trend component and the amount of rainfall was simulated. But for ARIMA and SARIMA, models fitted on original series. The result showed that in 33 % of data MA(2), in 22 % of data AR(1) and ARMA(2, 1) and in 11.11 % of data MA(1) and ARIMA(1, 1, 2) had the best performance in monthly rainfall forecasting. On the other hand, best time series model by change of data could vary. So, it is important to assess all the time series models for any area and any hydrological parameter. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s11069-016-2163-x |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1800494852</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1800494852</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c382t-9f017bde0e8a96aeb87fb801dc7d036f07cdfcc6f95f78773c38179089f62ca43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkcuKVDEURYMoWLZ-gLOAEyexz8mtymMohS9o6ImCs5DKo01zb3JNUtKFP2-KciCCOAqcrLUPySbkJcIbBJDXDRGEZoCCcRQTe3hENriTEwO1hcdkA5ojgwm-PiXPWrsHQBRcb8jPfVlWW21PPwJt_ehP1C4l31GfYgw15E57WsZVqCk0uhQf5kbtus4peNrLmOT-bT7RalOOdp5pLDU423oaISkPcUnM1uSpm9Nie6CuZJ96Kvk5eTKMFl78Pq_Il_fvPu8_spvbD5_2b2-YmxTvTEdAefABgrJa2HBQMh4UoHfSwyQiSOejcyLqXZRKymloKDUoHQV3djtdkdeX3LWW78fQullSc2GebQ7l2AwqgK3eqh3_PyqlEIIj3w301V_ofTnWPB5yplAq4Py8Gy-Uq6W1GqJZ6_iGejII5tycuTRnRnPm3Jx5GA6_OG2w-S7UP5L_Kf0CW3meDg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1771780224</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparative study among different time series models applied to monthly rainfall forecasting in semi-arid climate condition</title><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Dastorani, Mostafa ; Mirzavand, Mohammad ; Dastorani, Mohammad Taghi ; Sadatinejad, Seyyed Javad</creator><creatorcontrib>Dastorani, Mostafa ; Mirzavand, Mohammad ; Dastorani, Mohammad Taghi ; Sadatinejad, Seyyed Javad</creatorcontrib><description>The aim of this study is to investigate the ability of different time series models in forecasting monthly rainfall. In order to do this, monthly rainfall data were collected from 9 rainfall stations in North Khorasan province (North east of Iran) from 1989 to 2012. R software was used to predict the highest rainfall in these 9 rain gage stations for the time period 2002–2012 using monthly highest rainfall data of 1989–2002. In this study, AR, MA, ARMA, ARIMA, and SARIMA with 11 different structures based on trial and error were examined. Because the trend, seasonal and jump components are deterministic components, it is not necessary to model these components, but modeling of random component is very important for rainfall forecasting. So, the main data series was decomposed (for AR, MA and ARMA models) and the random part has been modeled. After that, the random component was collected with the seasonal and trend component and the amount of rainfall was simulated. But for ARIMA and SARIMA, models fitted on original series. The result showed that in 33 % of data MA(2), in 22 % of data AR(1) and ARMA(2, 1) and in 11.11 % of data MA(1) and ARIMA(1, 1, 2) had the best performance in monthly rainfall forecasting. On the other hand, best time series model by change of data could vary. So, it is important to assess all the time series models for any area and any hydrological parameter.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0921-030X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-0840</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11069-016-2163-x</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>Arid climates ; Civil Engineering ; Climatic conditions ; Comparative studies ; Earth and Environmental Science ; Earth Sciences ; Environmental Management ; Error analysis ; Forecasting ; Geophysics/Geodesy ; Geotechnical Engineering & Applied Earth Sciences ; Hydrogeology ; Hydrologic data ; Hydrology ; Mathematical models ; Natural Hazards ; Original Paper ; Rain ; Rain gages ; Rain gauges ; Rainfall ; Semiarid climates ; Stations ; Time series ; Trends ; Weather forecasting</subject><ispartof>Natural hazards (Dordrecht), 2016-04, Vol.81 (3), p.1811-1827</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c382t-9f017bde0e8a96aeb87fb801dc7d036f07cdfcc6f95f78773c38179089f62ca43</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c382t-9f017bde0e8a96aeb87fb801dc7d036f07cdfcc6f95f78773c38179089f62ca43</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11069-016-2163-x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11069-016-2163-x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Dastorani, Mostafa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mirzavand, Mohammad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dastorani, Mohammad Taghi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sadatinejad, Seyyed Javad</creatorcontrib><title>Comparative study among different time series models applied to monthly rainfall forecasting in semi-arid climate condition</title><title>Natural hazards (Dordrecht)</title><addtitle>Nat Hazards</addtitle><description>The aim of this study is to investigate the ability of different time series models in forecasting monthly rainfall. In order to do this, monthly rainfall data were collected from 9 rainfall stations in North Khorasan province (North east of Iran) from 1989 to 2012. R software was used to predict the highest rainfall in these 9 rain gage stations for the time period 2002–2012 using monthly highest rainfall data of 1989–2002. In this study, AR, MA, ARMA, ARIMA, and SARIMA with 11 different structures based on trial and error were examined. Because the trend, seasonal and jump components are deterministic components, it is not necessary to model these components, but modeling of random component is very important for rainfall forecasting. So, the main data series was decomposed (for AR, MA and ARMA models) and the random part has been modeled. After that, the random component was collected with the seasonal and trend component and the amount of rainfall was simulated. But for ARIMA and SARIMA, models fitted on original series. The result showed that in 33 % of data MA(2), in 22 % of data AR(1) and ARMA(2, 1) and in 11.11 % of data MA(1) and ARIMA(1, 1, 2) had the best performance in monthly rainfall forecasting. On the other hand, best time series model by change of data could vary. So, it is important to assess all the time series models for any area and any hydrological parameter.</description><subject>Arid climates</subject><subject>Civil Engineering</subject><subject>Climatic conditions</subject><subject>Comparative studies</subject><subject>Earth and Environmental Science</subject><subject>Earth Sciences</subject><subject>Environmental Management</subject><subject>Error analysis</subject><subject>Forecasting</subject><subject>Geophysics/Geodesy</subject><subject>Geotechnical Engineering & Applied Earth Sciences</subject><subject>Hydrogeology</subject><subject>Hydrologic data</subject><subject>Hydrology</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Natural Hazards</subject><subject>Original Paper</subject><subject>Rain</subject><subject>Rain gages</subject><subject>Rain gauges</subject><subject>Rainfall</subject><subject>Semiarid climates</subject><subject>Stations</subject><subject>Time series</subject><subject>Trends</subject><subject>Weather forecasting</subject><issn>0921-030X</issn><issn>1573-0840</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkcuKVDEURYMoWLZ-gLOAEyexz8mtymMohS9o6ImCs5DKo01zb3JNUtKFP2-KciCCOAqcrLUPySbkJcIbBJDXDRGEZoCCcRQTe3hENriTEwO1hcdkA5ojgwm-PiXPWrsHQBRcb8jPfVlWW21PPwJt_ehP1C4l31GfYgw15E57WsZVqCk0uhQf5kbtus4peNrLmOT-bT7RalOOdp5pLDU423oaISkPcUnM1uSpm9Nie6CuZJ96Kvk5eTKMFl78Pq_Il_fvPu8_spvbD5_2b2-YmxTvTEdAefABgrJa2HBQMh4UoHfSwyQiSOejcyLqXZRKymloKDUoHQV3djtdkdeX3LWW78fQullSc2GebQ7l2AwqgK3eqh3_PyqlEIIj3w301V_ofTnWPB5yplAq4Py8Gy-Uq6W1GqJZ6_iGejII5tycuTRnRnPm3Jx5GA6_OG2w-S7UP5L_Kf0CW3meDg</recordid><startdate>20160401</startdate><enddate>20160401</enddate><creator>Dastorani, Mostafa</creator><creator>Mirzavand, Mohammad</creator><creator>Dastorani, Mohammad Taghi</creator><creator>Sadatinejad, Seyyed Javad</creator><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160401</creationdate><title>Comparative study among different time series models applied to monthly rainfall forecasting in semi-arid climate condition</title><author>Dastorani, Mostafa ; Mirzavand, Mohammad ; Dastorani, Mohammad Taghi ; Sadatinejad, Seyyed Javad</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c382t-9f017bde0e8a96aeb87fb801dc7d036f07cdfcc6f95f78773c38179089f62ca43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Arid climates</topic><topic>Civil Engineering</topic><topic>Climatic conditions</topic><topic>Comparative studies</topic><topic>Earth and Environmental Science</topic><topic>Earth Sciences</topic><topic>Environmental Management</topic><topic>Error analysis</topic><topic>Forecasting</topic><topic>Geophysics/Geodesy</topic><topic>Geotechnical Engineering & Applied Earth Sciences</topic><topic>Hydrogeology</topic><topic>Hydrologic data</topic><topic>Hydrology</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Natural Hazards</topic><topic>Original Paper</topic><topic>Rain</topic><topic>Rain gages</topic><topic>Rain gauges</topic><topic>Rainfall</topic><topic>Semiarid climates</topic><topic>Stations</topic><topic>Time series</topic><topic>Trends</topic><topic>Weather forecasting</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Dastorani, Mostafa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mirzavand, Mohammad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dastorani, Mohammad Taghi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sadatinejad, Seyyed Javad</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Natural hazards (Dordrecht)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Dastorani, Mostafa</au><au>Mirzavand, Mohammad</au><au>Dastorani, Mohammad Taghi</au><au>Sadatinejad, Seyyed Javad</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparative study among different time series models applied to monthly rainfall forecasting in semi-arid climate condition</atitle><jtitle>Natural hazards (Dordrecht)</jtitle><stitle>Nat Hazards</stitle><date>2016-04-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>81</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>1811</spage><epage>1827</epage><pages>1811-1827</pages><issn>0921-030X</issn><eissn>1573-0840</eissn><abstract>The aim of this study is to investigate the ability of different time series models in forecasting monthly rainfall. In order to do this, monthly rainfall data were collected from 9 rainfall stations in North Khorasan province (North east of Iran) from 1989 to 2012. R software was used to predict the highest rainfall in these 9 rain gage stations for the time period 2002–2012 using monthly highest rainfall data of 1989–2002. In this study, AR, MA, ARMA, ARIMA, and SARIMA with 11 different structures based on trial and error were examined. Because the trend, seasonal and jump components are deterministic components, it is not necessary to model these components, but modeling of random component is very important for rainfall forecasting. So, the main data series was decomposed (for AR, MA and ARMA models) and the random part has been modeled. After that, the random component was collected with the seasonal and trend component and the amount of rainfall was simulated. But for ARIMA and SARIMA, models fitted on original series. The result showed that in 33 % of data MA(2), in 22 % of data AR(1) and ARMA(2, 1) and in 11.11 % of data MA(1) and ARIMA(1, 1, 2) had the best performance in monthly rainfall forecasting. On the other hand, best time series model by change of data could vary. So, it is important to assess all the time series models for any area and any hydrological parameter.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Netherlands</pub><doi>10.1007/s11069-016-2163-x</doi><tpages>17</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0921-030X |
ispartof | Natural hazards (Dordrecht), 2016-04, Vol.81 (3), p.1811-1827 |
issn | 0921-030X 1573-0840 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1800494852 |
source | SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
subjects | Arid climates Civil Engineering Climatic conditions Comparative studies Earth and Environmental Science Earth Sciences Environmental Management Error analysis Forecasting Geophysics/Geodesy Geotechnical Engineering & Applied Earth Sciences Hydrogeology Hydrologic data Hydrology Mathematical models Natural Hazards Original Paper Rain Rain gages Rain gauges Rainfall Semiarid climates Stations Time series Trends Weather forecasting |
title | Comparative study among different time series models applied to monthly rainfall forecasting in semi-arid climate condition |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-31T00%3A10%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparative%20study%20among%20different%20time%20series%20models%20applied%20to%20monthly%20rainfall%20forecasting%20in%20semi-arid%20climate%20condition&rft.jtitle=Natural%20hazards%20(Dordrecht)&rft.au=Dastorani,%20Mostafa&rft.date=2016-04-01&rft.volume=81&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=1811&rft.epage=1827&rft.pages=1811-1827&rft.issn=0921-030X&rft.eissn=1573-0840&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11069-016-2163-x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1800494852%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1771780224&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |