Comparative study among different time series models applied to monthly rainfall forecasting in semi-arid climate condition

The aim of this study is to investigate the ability of different time series models in forecasting monthly rainfall. In order to do this, monthly rainfall data were collected from 9 rainfall stations in North Khorasan province (North east of Iran) from 1989 to 2012. R software was used to predict th...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Natural hazards (Dordrecht) 2016-04, Vol.81 (3), p.1811-1827
Hauptverfasser: Dastorani, Mostafa, Mirzavand, Mohammad, Dastorani, Mohammad Taghi, Sadatinejad, Seyyed Javad
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1827
container_issue 3
container_start_page 1811
container_title Natural hazards (Dordrecht)
container_volume 81
creator Dastorani, Mostafa
Mirzavand, Mohammad
Dastorani, Mohammad Taghi
Sadatinejad, Seyyed Javad
description The aim of this study is to investigate the ability of different time series models in forecasting monthly rainfall. In order to do this, monthly rainfall data were collected from 9 rainfall stations in North Khorasan province (North east of Iran) from 1989 to 2012. R software was used to predict the highest rainfall in these 9 rain gage stations for the time period 2002–2012 using monthly highest rainfall data of 1989–2002. In this study, AR, MA, ARMA, ARIMA, and SARIMA with 11 different structures based on trial and error were examined. Because the trend, seasonal and jump components are deterministic components, it is not necessary to model these components, but modeling of random component is very important for rainfall forecasting. So, the main data series was decomposed (for AR, MA and ARMA models) and the random part has been modeled. After that, the random component was collected with the seasonal and trend component and the amount of rainfall was simulated. But for ARIMA and SARIMA, models fitted on original series. The result showed that in 33 % of data MA(2), in 22 % of data AR(1) and ARMA(2, 1) and in 11.11 % of data MA(1) and ARIMA(1, 1, 2) had the best performance in monthly rainfall forecasting. On the other hand, best time series model by change of data could vary. So, it is important to assess all the time series models for any area and any hydrological parameter.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s11069-016-2163-x
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1800494852</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1800494852</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c382t-9f017bde0e8a96aeb87fb801dc7d036f07cdfcc6f95f78773c38179089f62ca43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkcuKVDEURYMoWLZ-gLOAEyexz8mtymMohS9o6ImCs5DKo01zb3JNUtKFP2-KciCCOAqcrLUPySbkJcIbBJDXDRGEZoCCcRQTe3hENriTEwO1hcdkA5ojgwm-PiXPWrsHQBRcb8jPfVlWW21PPwJt_ehP1C4l31GfYgw15E57WsZVqCk0uhQf5kbtus4peNrLmOT-bT7RalOOdp5pLDU423oaISkPcUnM1uSpm9Nie6CuZJ96Kvk5eTKMFl78Pq_Il_fvPu8_spvbD5_2b2-YmxTvTEdAefABgrJa2HBQMh4UoHfSwyQiSOejcyLqXZRKymloKDUoHQV3djtdkdeX3LWW78fQullSc2GebQ7l2AwqgK3eqh3_PyqlEIIj3w301V_ofTnWPB5yplAq4Py8Gy-Uq6W1GqJZ6_iGejII5tycuTRnRnPm3Jx5GA6_OG2w-S7UP5L_Kf0CW3meDg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1771780224</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparative study among different time series models applied to monthly rainfall forecasting in semi-arid climate condition</title><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Dastorani, Mostafa ; Mirzavand, Mohammad ; Dastorani, Mohammad Taghi ; Sadatinejad, Seyyed Javad</creator><creatorcontrib>Dastorani, Mostafa ; Mirzavand, Mohammad ; Dastorani, Mohammad Taghi ; Sadatinejad, Seyyed Javad</creatorcontrib><description>The aim of this study is to investigate the ability of different time series models in forecasting monthly rainfall. In order to do this, monthly rainfall data were collected from 9 rainfall stations in North Khorasan province (North east of Iran) from 1989 to 2012. R software was used to predict the highest rainfall in these 9 rain gage stations for the time period 2002–2012 using monthly highest rainfall data of 1989–2002. In this study, AR, MA, ARMA, ARIMA, and SARIMA with 11 different structures based on trial and error were examined. Because the trend, seasonal and jump components are deterministic components, it is not necessary to model these components, but modeling of random component is very important for rainfall forecasting. So, the main data series was decomposed (for AR, MA and ARMA models) and the random part has been modeled. After that, the random component was collected with the seasonal and trend component and the amount of rainfall was simulated. But for ARIMA and SARIMA, models fitted on original series. The result showed that in 33 % of data MA(2), in 22 % of data AR(1) and ARMA(2, 1) and in 11.11 % of data MA(1) and ARIMA(1, 1, 2) had the best performance in monthly rainfall forecasting. On the other hand, best time series model by change of data could vary. So, it is important to assess all the time series models for any area and any hydrological parameter.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0921-030X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-0840</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11069-016-2163-x</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>Arid climates ; Civil Engineering ; Climatic conditions ; Comparative studies ; Earth and Environmental Science ; Earth Sciences ; Environmental Management ; Error analysis ; Forecasting ; Geophysics/Geodesy ; Geotechnical Engineering &amp; Applied Earth Sciences ; Hydrogeology ; Hydrologic data ; Hydrology ; Mathematical models ; Natural Hazards ; Original Paper ; Rain ; Rain gages ; Rain gauges ; Rainfall ; Semiarid climates ; Stations ; Time series ; Trends ; Weather forecasting</subject><ispartof>Natural hazards (Dordrecht), 2016-04, Vol.81 (3), p.1811-1827</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c382t-9f017bde0e8a96aeb87fb801dc7d036f07cdfcc6f95f78773c38179089f62ca43</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c382t-9f017bde0e8a96aeb87fb801dc7d036f07cdfcc6f95f78773c38179089f62ca43</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11069-016-2163-x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11069-016-2163-x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Dastorani, Mostafa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mirzavand, Mohammad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dastorani, Mohammad Taghi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sadatinejad, Seyyed Javad</creatorcontrib><title>Comparative study among different time series models applied to monthly rainfall forecasting in semi-arid climate condition</title><title>Natural hazards (Dordrecht)</title><addtitle>Nat Hazards</addtitle><description>The aim of this study is to investigate the ability of different time series models in forecasting monthly rainfall. In order to do this, monthly rainfall data were collected from 9 rainfall stations in North Khorasan province (North east of Iran) from 1989 to 2012. R software was used to predict the highest rainfall in these 9 rain gage stations for the time period 2002–2012 using monthly highest rainfall data of 1989–2002. In this study, AR, MA, ARMA, ARIMA, and SARIMA with 11 different structures based on trial and error were examined. Because the trend, seasonal and jump components are deterministic components, it is not necessary to model these components, but modeling of random component is very important for rainfall forecasting. So, the main data series was decomposed (for AR, MA and ARMA models) and the random part has been modeled. After that, the random component was collected with the seasonal and trend component and the amount of rainfall was simulated. But for ARIMA and SARIMA, models fitted on original series. The result showed that in 33 % of data MA(2), in 22 % of data AR(1) and ARMA(2, 1) and in 11.11 % of data MA(1) and ARIMA(1, 1, 2) had the best performance in monthly rainfall forecasting. On the other hand, best time series model by change of data could vary. So, it is important to assess all the time series models for any area and any hydrological parameter.</description><subject>Arid climates</subject><subject>Civil Engineering</subject><subject>Climatic conditions</subject><subject>Comparative studies</subject><subject>Earth and Environmental Science</subject><subject>Earth Sciences</subject><subject>Environmental Management</subject><subject>Error analysis</subject><subject>Forecasting</subject><subject>Geophysics/Geodesy</subject><subject>Geotechnical Engineering &amp; Applied Earth Sciences</subject><subject>Hydrogeology</subject><subject>Hydrologic data</subject><subject>Hydrology</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Natural Hazards</subject><subject>Original Paper</subject><subject>Rain</subject><subject>Rain gages</subject><subject>Rain gauges</subject><subject>Rainfall</subject><subject>Semiarid climates</subject><subject>Stations</subject><subject>Time series</subject><subject>Trends</subject><subject>Weather forecasting</subject><issn>0921-030X</issn><issn>1573-0840</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkcuKVDEURYMoWLZ-gLOAEyexz8mtymMohS9o6ImCs5DKo01zb3JNUtKFP2-KciCCOAqcrLUPySbkJcIbBJDXDRGEZoCCcRQTe3hENriTEwO1hcdkA5ojgwm-PiXPWrsHQBRcb8jPfVlWW21PPwJt_ehP1C4l31GfYgw15E57WsZVqCk0uhQf5kbtus4peNrLmOT-bT7RalOOdp5pLDU423oaISkPcUnM1uSpm9Nie6CuZJ96Kvk5eTKMFl78Pq_Il_fvPu8_spvbD5_2b2-YmxTvTEdAefABgrJa2HBQMh4UoHfSwyQiSOejcyLqXZRKymloKDUoHQV3djtdkdeX3LWW78fQullSc2GebQ7l2AwqgK3eqh3_PyqlEIIj3w301V_ofTnWPB5yplAq4Py8Gy-Uq6W1GqJZ6_iGejII5tycuTRnRnPm3Jx5GA6_OG2w-S7UP5L_Kf0CW3meDg</recordid><startdate>20160401</startdate><enddate>20160401</enddate><creator>Dastorani, Mostafa</creator><creator>Mirzavand, Mohammad</creator><creator>Dastorani, Mohammad Taghi</creator><creator>Sadatinejad, Seyyed Javad</creator><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160401</creationdate><title>Comparative study among different time series models applied to monthly rainfall forecasting in semi-arid climate condition</title><author>Dastorani, Mostafa ; Mirzavand, Mohammad ; Dastorani, Mohammad Taghi ; Sadatinejad, Seyyed Javad</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c382t-9f017bde0e8a96aeb87fb801dc7d036f07cdfcc6f95f78773c38179089f62ca43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Arid climates</topic><topic>Civil Engineering</topic><topic>Climatic conditions</topic><topic>Comparative studies</topic><topic>Earth and Environmental Science</topic><topic>Earth Sciences</topic><topic>Environmental Management</topic><topic>Error analysis</topic><topic>Forecasting</topic><topic>Geophysics/Geodesy</topic><topic>Geotechnical Engineering &amp; Applied Earth Sciences</topic><topic>Hydrogeology</topic><topic>Hydrologic data</topic><topic>Hydrology</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Natural Hazards</topic><topic>Original Paper</topic><topic>Rain</topic><topic>Rain gages</topic><topic>Rain gauges</topic><topic>Rainfall</topic><topic>Semiarid climates</topic><topic>Stations</topic><topic>Time series</topic><topic>Trends</topic><topic>Weather forecasting</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Dastorani, Mostafa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mirzavand, Mohammad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dastorani, Mohammad Taghi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sadatinejad, Seyyed Javad</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Natural hazards (Dordrecht)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Dastorani, Mostafa</au><au>Mirzavand, Mohammad</au><au>Dastorani, Mohammad Taghi</au><au>Sadatinejad, Seyyed Javad</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparative study among different time series models applied to monthly rainfall forecasting in semi-arid climate condition</atitle><jtitle>Natural hazards (Dordrecht)</jtitle><stitle>Nat Hazards</stitle><date>2016-04-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>81</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>1811</spage><epage>1827</epage><pages>1811-1827</pages><issn>0921-030X</issn><eissn>1573-0840</eissn><abstract>The aim of this study is to investigate the ability of different time series models in forecasting monthly rainfall. In order to do this, monthly rainfall data were collected from 9 rainfall stations in North Khorasan province (North east of Iran) from 1989 to 2012. R software was used to predict the highest rainfall in these 9 rain gage stations for the time period 2002–2012 using monthly highest rainfall data of 1989–2002. In this study, AR, MA, ARMA, ARIMA, and SARIMA with 11 different structures based on trial and error were examined. Because the trend, seasonal and jump components are deterministic components, it is not necessary to model these components, but modeling of random component is very important for rainfall forecasting. So, the main data series was decomposed (for AR, MA and ARMA models) and the random part has been modeled. After that, the random component was collected with the seasonal and trend component and the amount of rainfall was simulated. But for ARIMA and SARIMA, models fitted on original series. The result showed that in 33 % of data MA(2), in 22 % of data AR(1) and ARMA(2, 1) and in 11.11 % of data MA(1) and ARIMA(1, 1, 2) had the best performance in monthly rainfall forecasting. On the other hand, best time series model by change of data could vary. So, it is important to assess all the time series models for any area and any hydrological parameter.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Netherlands</pub><doi>10.1007/s11069-016-2163-x</doi><tpages>17</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0921-030X
ispartof Natural hazards (Dordrecht), 2016-04, Vol.81 (3), p.1811-1827
issn 0921-030X
1573-0840
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1800494852
source SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects Arid climates
Civil Engineering
Climatic conditions
Comparative studies
Earth and Environmental Science
Earth Sciences
Environmental Management
Error analysis
Forecasting
Geophysics/Geodesy
Geotechnical Engineering & Applied Earth Sciences
Hydrogeology
Hydrologic data
Hydrology
Mathematical models
Natural Hazards
Original Paper
Rain
Rain gages
Rain gauges
Rainfall
Semiarid climates
Stations
Time series
Trends
Weather forecasting
title Comparative study among different time series models applied to monthly rainfall forecasting in semi-arid climate condition
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-31T00%3A10%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparative%20study%20among%20different%20time%20series%20models%20applied%20to%20monthly%20rainfall%20forecasting%20in%20semi-arid%20climate%20condition&rft.jtitle=Natural%20hazards%20(Dordrecht)&rft.au=Dastorani,%20Mostafa&rft.date=2016-04-01&rft.volume=81&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=1811&rft.epage=1827&rft.pages=1811-1827&rft.issn=0921-030X&rft.eissn=1573-0840&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11069-016-2163-x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1800494852%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1771780224&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true