Influence of Drift Velocity and Distance Between Jet Particles on the Penetration Depth of Shaped Charges
The penetration depth of shaped charge jet into target is strongly affected by the stand‐off. The penetration process terminates even when the jet velocity is still high, and the penetration capability of jet particles degrades after jet breakup at a large stand‐off. This work presents an analytical...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Propellants, explosives, pyrotechnics explosives, pyrotechnics, 2016-02, Vol.41 (1), p.76-83 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 83 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 76 |
container_title | Propellants, explosives, pyrotechnics |
container_volume | 41 |
creator | Xiao, Qiang-Qiang Huang, Zheng-Xiang Zu, Xu-Dong Jia, Xin |
description | The penetration depth of shaped charge jet into target is strongly affected by the stand‐off. The penetration process terminates even when the jet velocity is still high, and the penetration capability of jet particles degrades after jet breakup at a large stand‐off. This work presents an analytical model to describe the radial drift velocity and distance between jet particles, which leads to decreased penetration depth. The results show that jet particles with low drift velocity impact the crater wall easily. Furthermore, the jet particles cannot reach the crater bottom to increase depth because the crater diameter generated by the jet is quite small. Moreover, the distances between jet particles also play an important role in penetration depth under the influences of strain hardening of target, as well as tumbling and dispersion of jet particles. The radial drift velocity and distance between jet particles are investigated by applying the model to non‐precision charge and precision charge penetrations into target at different stand‐offs. The cutoff jet velocity and cutoff penetration velocity also are determined based on the analytical model. With increased stand‐off, the cutoff jet velocity increases, and the cutoff penetration velocity is almost constant. This result is proven by a number of experiments. The stand‐off curves of two charges are also calculated, and results are in good agreement with experiments. The stand‐off curve can be determined with only two or three experiments using the proposed method. Notably, jet particles should have a slow drift velocity and great penetration capability after breakup for suitable shaped charge. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/prep.201500051 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1800491907</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3949868761</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3881-bf466566c09344b325d11d33bc9cc5af7f012d98a93f2a37c9ea6394ac0d052e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE2P0zAQhi0EEmXhytkSFy4pM3HsxEdol_0UVOVjj5brjKmXbBJsV0v__aYqWiEunGZG8zyj0cvYa4Q5ApTvxkjjvASUACDxCZuhLLGooKmfshnUUy8Q5XP2IqVbgEkBnLFw0ftuR70jPni-jMFn_p26wYW857Zv-TKkbA_rD5TviXp-SZmvbMzBdZT40PO8Jb6innK0OUzzksa8PVz7srUjtXyxtfEHpZfsmbddold_6gn79vH06-K8uP58drF4f1040TRYbHyllFTKgRZVtRGlbBFbITZOOyetrz1g2erGauFLK2qnySqhK-ugBVmSOGFvj3fHOPzaUcrmLiRHXWd7GnbJYANQadRQT-ibf9DbYRf76TuDtapUqZWUEzU_Ui4OKUXyZozhzsa9QTCH5M0hefOY_CToo3AfOtr_hzar9enqb7c4ulPs9PvRtfGnUbWopbn5dGbWzfrqpro6N0vxAIojlf8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1764629655</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Influence of Drift Velocity and Distance Between Jet Particles on the Penetration Depth of Shaped Charges</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Xiao, Qiang-Qiang ; Huang, Zheng-Xiang ; Zu, Xu-Dong ; Jia, Xin</creator><creatorcontrib>Xiao, Qiang-Qiang ; Huang, Zheng-Xiang ; Zu, Xu-Dong ; Jia, Xin</creatorcontrib><description>The penetration depth of shaped charge jet into target is strongly affected by the stand‐off. The penetration process terminates even when the jet velocity is still high, and the penetration capability of jet particles degrades after jet breakup at a large stand‐off. This work presents an analytical model to describe the radial drift velocity and distance between jet particles, which leads to decreased penetration depth. The results show that jet particles with low drift velocity impact the crater wall easily. Furthermore, the jet particles cannot reach the crater bottom to increase depth because the crater diameter generated by the jet is quite small. Moreover, the distances between jet particles also play an important role in penetration depth under the influences of strain hardening of target, as well as tumbling and dispersion of jet particles. The radial drift velocity and distance between jet particles are investigated by applying the model to non‐precision charge and precision charge penetrations into target at different stand‐offs. The cutoff jet velocity and cutoff penetration velocity also are determined based on the analytical model. With increased stand‐off, the cutoff jet velocity increases, and the cutoff penetration velocity is almost constant. This result is proven by a number of experiments. The stand‐off curves of two charges are also calculated, and results are in good agreement with experiments. The stand‐off curve can be determined with only two or three experiments using the proposed method. Notably, jet particles should have a slow drift velocity and great penetration capability after breakup for suitable shaped charge.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0721-3115</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1521-4087</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/prep.201500051</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Weinheim: WILEY-VCH Verlag</publisher><subject>Atoms & subatomic particles ; Charge ; Craters ; Distance between jet particles ; Drift ; Drift velocity ; Experiments ; Mass spectrometry ; Mathematical analysis ; Mathematical models ; Penetration ; Penetration depth ; Shaped charge ; Shaped charges ; Stand-off ; Velocity</subject><ispartof>Propellants, explosives, pyrotechnics, 2016-02, Vol.41 (1), p.76-83</ispartof><rights>2016 WILEY‐VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim</rights><rights>2016 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3881-bf466566c09344b325d11d33bc9cc5af7f012d98a93f2a37c9ea6394ac0d052e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3881-bf466566c09344b325d11d33bc9cc5af7f012d98a93f2a37c9ea6394ac0d052e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fprep.201500051$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fprep.201500051$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,1412,27905,27906,45555,45556</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Xiao, Qiang-Qiang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huang, Zheng-Xiang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zu, Xu-Dong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jia, Xin</creatorcontrib><title>Influence of Drift Velocity and Distance Between Jet Particles on the Penetration Depth of Shaped Charges</title><title>Propellants, explosives, pyrotechnics</title><addtitle>Propellants, Explosives, Pyrotechnics</addtitle><description>The penetration depth of shaped charge jet into target is strongly affected by the stand‐off. The penetration process terminates even when the jet velocity is still high, and the penetration capability of jet particles degrades after jet breakup at a large stand‐off. This work presents an analytical model to describe the radial drift velocity and distance between jet particles, which leads to decreased penetration depth. The results show that jet particles with low drift velocity impact the crater wall easily. Furthermore, the jet particles cannot reach the crater bottom to increase depth because the crater diameter generated by the jet is quite small. Moreover, the distances between jet particles also play an important role in penetration depth under the influences of strain hardening of target, as well as tumbling and dispersion of jet particles. The radial drift velocity and distance between jet particles are investigated by applying the model to non‐precision charge and precision charge penetrations into target at different stand‐offs. The cutoff jet velocity and cutoff penetration velocity also are determined based on the analytical model. With increased stand‐off, the cutoff jet velocity increases, and the cutoff penetration velocity is almost constant. This result is proven by a number of experiments. The stand‐off curves of two charges are also calculated, and results are in good agreement with experiments. The stand‐off curve can be determined with only two or three experiments using the proposed method. Notably, jet particles should have a slow drift velocity and great penetration capability after breakup for suitable shaped charge.</description><subject>Atoms & subatomic particles</subject><subject>Charge</subject><subject>Craters</subject><subject>Distance between jet particles</subject><subject>Drift</subject><subject>Drift velocity</subject><subject>Experiments</subject><subject>Mass spectrometry</subject><subject>Mathematical analysis</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Penetration</subject><subject>Penetration depth</subject><subject>Shaped charge</subject><subject>Shaped charges</subject><subject>Stand-off</subject><subject>Velocity</subject><issn>0721-3115</issn><issn>1521-4087</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkE2P0zAQhi0EEmXhytkSFy4pM3HsxEdol_0UVOVjj5brjKmXbBJsV0v__aYqWiEunGZG8zyj0cvYa4Q5ApTvxkjjvASUACDxCZuhLLGooKmfshnUUy8Q5XP2IqVbgEkBnLFw0ftuR70jPni-jMFn_p26wYW857Zv-TKkbA_rD5TviXp-SZmvbMzBdZT40PO8Jb6innK0OUzzksa8PVz7srUjtXyxtfEHpZfsmbddold_6gn79vH06-K8uP58drF4f1040TRYbHyllFTKgRZVtRGlbBFbITZOOyetrz1g2erGauFLK2qnySqhK-ugBVmSOGFvj3fHOPzaUcrmLiRHXWd7GnbJYANQadRQT-ibf9DbYRf76TuDtapUqZWUEzU_Ui4OKUXyZozhzsa9QTCH5M0hefOY_CToo3AfOtr_hzar9enqb7c4ulPs9PvRtfGnUbWopbn5dGbWzfrqpro6N0vxAIojlf8</recordid><startdate>201602</startdate><enddate>201602</enddate><creator>Xiao, Qiang-Qiang</creator><creator>Huang, Zheng-Xiang</creator><creator>Zu, Xu-Dong</creator><creator>Jia, Xin</creator><general>WILEY-VCH Verlag</general><general>WILEY‐VCH Verlag</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>L7M</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201602</creationdate><title>Influence of Drift Velocity and Distance Between Jet Particles on the Penetration Depth of Shaped Charges</title><author>Xiao, Qiang-Qiang ; Huang, Zheng-Xiang ; Zu, Xu-Dong ; Jia, Xin</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3881-bf466566c09344b325d11d33bc9cc5af7f012d98a93f2a37c9ea6394ac0d052e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Atoms & subatomic particles</topic><topic>Charge</topic><topic>Craters</topic><topic>Distance between jet particles</topic><topic>Drift</topic><topic>Drift velocity</topic><topic>Experiments</topic><topic>Mass spectrometry</topic><topic>Mathematical analysis</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Penetration</topic><topic>Penetration depth</topic><topic>Shaped charge</topic><topic>Shaped charges</topic><topic>Stand-off</topic><topic>Velocity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Xiao, Qiang-Qiang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huang, Zheng-Xiang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zu, Xu-Dong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jia, Xin</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>Propellants, explosives, pyrotechnics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Xiao, Qiang-Qiang</au><au>Huang, Zheng-Xiang</au><au>Zu, Xu-Dong</au><au>Jia, Xin</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Influence of Drift Velocity and Distance Between Jet Particles on the Penetration Depth of Shaped Charges</atitle><jtitle>Propellants, explosives, pyrotechnics</jtitle><addtitle>Propellants, Explosives, Pyrotechnics</addtitle><date>2016-02</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>41</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>76</spage><epage>83</epage><pages>76-83</pages><issn>0721-3115</issn><eissn>1521-4087</eissn><abstract>The penetration depth of shaped charge jet into target is strongly affected by the stand‐off. The penetration process terminates even when the jet velocity is still high, and the penetration capability of jet particles degrades after jet breakup at a large stand‐off. This work presents an analytical model to describe the radial drift velocity and distance between jet particles, which leads to decreased penetration depth. The results show that jet particles with low drift velocity impact the crater wall easily. Furthermore, the jet particles cannot reach the crater bottom to increase depth because the crater diameter generated by the jet is quite small. Moreover, the distances between jet particles also play an important role in penetration depth under the influences of strain hardening of target, as well as tumbling and dispersion of jet particles. The radial drift velocity and distance between jet particles are investigated by applying the model to non‐precision charge and precision charge penetrations into target at different stand‐offs. The cutoff jet velocity and cutoff penetration velocity also are determined based on the analytical model. With increased stand‐off, the cutoff jet velocity increases, and the cutoff penetration velocity is almost constant. This result is proven by a number of experiments. The stand‐off curves of two charges are also calculated, and results are in good agreement with experiments. The stand‐off curve can be determined with only two or three experiments using the proposed method. Notably, jet particles should have a slow drift velocity and great penetration capability after breakup for suitable shaped charge.</abstract><cop>Weinheim</cop><pub>WILEY-VCH Verlag</pub><doi>10.1002/prep.201500051</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0721-3115 |
ispartof | Propellants, explosives, pyrotechnics, 2016-02, Vol.41 (1), p.76-83 |
issn | 0721-3115 1521-4087 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1800491907 |
source | Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
subjects | Atoms & subatomic particles Charge Craters Distance between jet particles Drift Drift velocity Experiments Mass spectrometry Mathematical analysis Mathematical models Penetration Penetration depth Shaped charge Shaped charges Stand-off Velocity |
title | Influence of Drift Velocity and Distance Between Jet Particles on the Penetration Depth of Shaped Charges |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-18T09%3A06%3A20IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Influence%20of%20Drift%20Velocity%20and%20Distance%20Between%20Jet%20Particles%20on%20the%20Penetration%20Depth%20of%20Shaped%20Charges&rft.jtitle=Propellants,%20explosives,%20pyrotechnics&rft.au=Xiao,%20Qiang-Qiang&rft.date=2016-02&rft.volume=41&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=76&rft.epage=83&rft.pages=76-83&rft.issn=0721-3115&rft.eissn=1521-4087&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/prep.201500051&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3949868761%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1764629655&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |