Observational validation of the diffusive convection flux laws in the Amundsen Basin, Arctic Ocean

The low levels of mechanically driven mixing in many regions of the Arctic Ocean make double diffusive convection virtually the only mechanism for moving heat up from the core of Atlantic Water towards the surface. In an attempt to quantify double diffusive heat fluxes in the Arctic Ocean, a tempera...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of geophysical research. Oceans 2015-12, Vol.120 (12), p.7880-7896
Hauptverfasser: Guthrie, John D., Fer, Ilker, Morison, James
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 7896
container_issue 12
container_start_page 7880
container_title Journal of geophysical research. Oceans
container_volume 120
creator Guthrie, John D.
Fer, Ilker
Morison, James
description The low levels of mechanically driven mixing in many regions of the Arctic Ocean make double diffusive convection virtually the only mechanism for moving heat up from the core of Atlantic Water towards the surface. In an attempt to quantify double diffusive heat fluxes in the Arctic Ocean, a temperature microstructure experiment was performed as a part of the North Pole Environmental Observatory (NPEO) 2013 field season from the drifting ice station Barneo located in the Amundsen Basin near the Lomonosov Ridge (89.5°N, 75°W). A diffusive convective thermohaline staircase was present between 150 and 250 m in nearly all of the profiles. Typical vertical heat fluxes across the high‐gradient interfaces were consistently small, O(10−1) W m−2. Our experiment was designed to resolve the staircase and differed from earlier Arctic studies that utilized inadequate instrumentation or sampling. Our measured fluxes from temperature microstructure agree well with the laboratory derived flux laws compared to previous studies, which could find agreement only to within a factor of two to four. Correlations between measured and parameterized heat fluxes are slightly higher when using the more recent Flanagan et al. [2013] laboratory derivation than the more commonly used derivation presented in Kelley [1990]. Nusselt versus Rayleigh number scaling reveals the convective exponent, η, to be closer to 0.29 as predicted by recent numerical simulations of single‐component convection rather than the canonical 1/3 assumed for double diffusion. However, the exponent appears to be sensitive to how convective layer height is defined. Key Points: Laboratory flux laws of diffusive convection agree well with microstructure observations Observations support a downward revision of the convective exponent from 1/3 to 0.29 Double diffusive heat fluxes could account for 2 TW of heat loss from the Atlantic Water
doi_str_mv 10.1002/2015JC010884
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_wiley</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1800485052</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2084308239</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a5568-b98b8fadbd2d3e98115694b816ad8729893cee6820046d22a1fd224d0f7ea5373</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU1PGzEQhlcVlRoBt_4AS71w6IK_PT6GFaRNUQOoiKPlXXtVh80uXWeT8O_rJAghDjCHmbHmeWesmSz7SvApwZieUUzEtMAEA_BP2YgSqXNNNTl4yZX4kh3HOMfJgADnepSVszL6fmWXoWttg1a2CW73QF2Nln89cqGuhxhWHlVdu_LVrlY3wwY1dh1RaHfUeDG0LvoWndsY2u9o3CewQrPK2_Yo-1zbJvrj53iY3V1e_Cl-5Fezyc9ifJVbISTkpYYSautKRx3zGggRUvMSiLQOFNWgWeW9BIoxl45SS-rkucO18lYwxQ6zk33fx777N_i4NIsQK980tvXdEA2BpASBBf0YVUpKxTDnCf32Bp13Q592FQ3FwBkGyvR7FFESU5G2vx3L9tQ6NP7JPPZhYfsnQ7DZXtC8vqCZTm4LSriGpMr3qhCXfvOisv2DSX9Uwtz_nhh9eX17I_UvU7D_gE6cLQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1760259272</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Observational validation of the diffusive convection flux laws in the Amundsen Basin, Arctic Ocean</title><source>Wiley Online Library Free Content</source><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Guthrie, John D. ; Fer, Ilker ; Morison, James</creator><creatorcontrib>Guthrie, John D. ; Fer, Ilker ; Morison, James</creatorcontrib><description>The low levels of mechanically driven mixing in many regions of the Arctic Ocean make double diffusive convection virtually the only mechanism for moving heat up from the core of Atlantic Water towards the surface. In an attempt to quantify double diffusive heat fluxes in the Arctic Ocean, a temperature microstructure experiment was performed as a part of the North Pole Environmental Observatory (NPEO) 2013 field season from the drifting ice station Barneo located in the Amundsen Basin near the Lomonosov Ridge (89.5°N, 75°W). A diffusive convective thermohaline staircase was present between 150 and 250 m in nearly all of the profiles. Typical vertical heat fluxes across the high‐gradient interfaces were consistently small, O(10−1) W m−2. Our experiment was designed to resolve the staircase and differed from earlier Arctic studies that utilized inadequate instrumentation or sampling. Our measured fluxes from temperature microstructure agree well with the laboratory derived flux laws compared to previous studies, which could find agreement only to within a factor of two to four. Correlations between measured and parameterized heat fluxes are slightly higher when using the more recent Flanagan et al. [2013] laboratory derivation than the more commonly used derivation presented in Kelley [1990]. Nusselt versus Rayleigh number scaling reveals the convective exponent, η, to be closer to 0.29 as predicted by recent numerical simulations of single‐component convection rather than the canonical 1/3 assumed for double diffusion. However, the exponent appears to be sensitive to how convective layer height is defined. Key Points: Laboratory flux laws of diffusive convection agree well with microstructure observations Observations support a downward revision of the convective exponent from 1/3 to 0.29 Double diffusive heat fluxes could account for 2 TW of heat loss from the Atlantic Water</description><identifier>ISSN: 2169-9275</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2169-9291</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/2015JC010884</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Arctic Ocean ; Computer simulation ; Convection ; Correlation analysis ; Derivation ; Diffusion ; Diffusion layers ; Double diffusion ; Dye dispersion ; Exponents ; Fluctuations ; Flux ; Fluxes ; Geophysics ; Heat ; Heat flux ; Heat transfer ; Ice drift ; Instrumentation ; Interfaces ; Laboratories ; Marine ; Mathematical models ; Microstructure ; North Pole ; Numerical prediction ; Numerical simulations ; Oceanic convection ; Oceans ; Profiles ; Rayleigh number ; Scaling ; Temperature ; turbulence</subject><ispartof>Journal of geophysical research. Oceans, 2015-12, Vol.120 (12), p.7880-7896</ispartof><rights>2015. American Geophysical Union. All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2F2015JC010884$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2F2015JC010884$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,1433,27924,27925,45574,45575,46409,46833</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Guthrie, John D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fer, Ilker</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morison, James</creatorcontrib><title>Observational validation of the diffusive convection flux laws in the Amundsen Basin, Arctic Ocean</title><title>Journal of geophysical research. Oceans</title><addtitle>J. Geophys. Res. Oceans</addtitle><description>The low levels of mechanically driven mixing in many regions of the Arctic Ocean make double diffusive convection virtually the only mechanism for moving heat up from the core of Atlantic Water towards the surface. In an attempt to quantify double diffusive heat fluxes in the Arctic Ocean, a temperature microstructure experiment was performed as a part of the North Pole Environmental Observatory (NPEO) 2013 field season from the drifting ice station Barneo located in the Amundsen Basin near the Lomonosov Ridge (89.5°N, 75°W). A diffusive convective thermohaline staircase was present between 150 and 250 m in nearly all of the profiles. Typical vertical heat fluxes across the high‐gradient interfaces were consistently small, O(10−1) W m−2. Our experiment was designed to resolve the staircase and differed from earlier Arctic studies that utilized inadequate instrumentation or sampling. Our measured fluxes from temperature microstructure agree well with the laboratory derived flux laws compared to previous studies, which could find agreement only to within a factor of two to four. Correlations between measured and parameterized heat fluxes are slightly higher when using the more recent Flanagan et al. [2013] laboratory derivation than the more commonly used derivation presented in Kelley [1990]. Nusselt versus Rayleigh number scaling reveals the convective exponent, η, to be closer to 0.29 as predicted by recent numerical simulations of single‐component convection rather than the canonical 1/3 assumed for double diffusion. However, the exponent appears to be sensitive to how convective layer height is defined. Key Points: Laboratory flux laws of diffusive convection agree well with microstructure observations Observations support a downward revision of the convective exponent from 1/3 to 0.29 Double diffusive heat fluxes could account for 2 TW of heat loss from the Atlantic Water</description><subject>Arctic Ocean</subject><subject>Computer simulation</subject><subject>Convection</subject><subject>Correlation analysis</subject><subject>Derivation</subject><subject>Diffusion</subject><subject>Diffusion layers</subject><subject>Double diffusion</subject><subject>Dye dispersion</subject><subject>Exponents</subject><subject>Fluctuations</subject><subject>Flux</subject><subject>Fluxes</subject><subject>Geophysics</subject><subject>Heat</subject><subject>Heat flux</subject><subject>Heat transfer</subject><subject>Ice drift</subject><subject>Instrumentation</subject><subject>Interfaces</subject><subject>Laboratories</subject><subject>Marine</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Microstructure</subject><subject>North Pole</subject><subject>Numerical prediction</subject><subject>Numerical simulations</subject><subject>Oceanic convection</subject><subject>Oceans</subject><subject>Profiles</subject><subject>Rayleigh number</subject><subject>Scaling</subject><subject>Temperature</subject><subject>turbulence</subject><issn>2169-9275</issn><issn>2169-9291</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkU1PGzEQhlcVlRoBt_4AS71w6IK_PT6GFaRNUQOoiKPlXXtVh80uXWeT8O_rJAghDjCHmbHmeWesmSz7SvApwZieUUzEtMAEA_BP2YgSqXNNNTl4yZX4kh3HOMfJgADnepSVszL6fmWXoWttg1a2CW73QF2Nln89cqGuhxhWHlVdu_LVrlY3wwY1dh1RaHfUeDG0LvoWndsY2u9o3CewQrPK2_Yo-1zbJvrj53iY3V1e_Cl-5Fezyc9ifJVbISTkpYYSautKRx3zGggRUvMSiLQOFNWgWeW9BIoxl45SS-rkucO18lYwxQ6zk33fx777N_i4NIsQK980tvXdEA2BpASBBf0YVUpKxTDnCf32Bp13Q592FQ3FwBkGyvR7FFESU5G2vx3L9tQ6NP7JPPZhYfsnQ7DZXtC8vqCZTm4LSriGpMr3qhCXfvOisv2DSX9Uwtz_nhh9eX17I_UvU7D_gE6cLQ</recordid><startdate>201512</startdate><enddate>201512</enddate><creator>Guthrie, John D.</creator><creator>Fer, Ilker</creator><creator>Morison, James</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201512</creationdate><title>Observational validation of the diffusive convection flux laws in the Amundsen Basin, Arctic Ocean</title><author>Guthrie, John D. ; Fer, Ilker ; Morison, James</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a5568-b98b8fadbd2d3e98115694b816ad8729893cee6820046d22a1fd224d0f7ea5373</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Arctic Ocean</topic><topic>Computer simulation</topic><topic>Convection</topic><topic>Correlation analysis</topic><topic>Derivation</topic><topic>Diffusion</topic><topic>Diffusion layers</topic><topic>Double diffusion</topic><topic>Dye dispersion</topic><topic>Exponents</topic><topic>Fluctuations</topic><topic>Flux</topic><topic>Fluxes</topic><topic>Geophysics</topic><topic>Heat</topic><topic>Heat flux</topic><topic>Heat transfer</topic><topic>Ice drift</topic><topic>Instrumentation</topic><topic>Interfaces</topic><topic>Laboratories</topic><topic>Marine</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Microstructure</topic><topic>North Pole</topic><topic>Numerical prediction</topic><topic>Numerical simulations</topic><topic>Oceanic convection</topic><topic>Oceans</topic><topic>Profiles</topic><topic>Rayleigh number</topic><topic>Scaling</topic><topic>Temperature</topic><topic>turbulence</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Guthrie, John D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fer, Ilker</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morison, James</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>Journal of geophysical research. Oceans</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Guthrie, John D.</au><au>Fer, Ilker</au><au>Morison, James</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Observational validation of the diffusive convection flux laws in the Amundsen Basin, Arctic Ocean</atitle><jtitle>Journal of geophysical research. Oceans</jtitle><addtitle>J. Geophys. Res. Oceans</addtitle><date>2015-12</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>120</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>7880</spage><epage>7896</epage><pages>7880-7896</pages><issn>2169-9275</issn><eissn>2169-9291</eissn><abstract>The low levels of mechanically driven mixing in many regions of the Arctic Ocean make double diffusive convection virtually the only mechanism for moving heat up from the core of Atlantic Water towards the surface. In an attempt to quantify double diffusive heat fluxes in the Arctic Ocean, a temperature microstructure experiment was performed as a part of the North Pole Environmental Observatory (NPEO) 2013 field season from the drifting ice station Barneo located in the Amundsen Basin near the Lomonosov Ridge (89.5°N, 75°W). A diffusive convective thermohaline staircase was present between 150 and 250 m in nearly all of the profiles. Typical vertical heat fluxes across the high‐gradient interfaces were consistently small, O(10−1) W m−2. Our experiment was designed to resolve the staircase and differed from earlier Arctic studies that utilized inadequate instrumentation or sampling. Our measured fluxes from temperature microstructure agree well with the laboratory derived flux laws compared to previous studies, which could find agreement only to within a factor of two to four. Correlations between measured and parameterized heat fluxes are slightly higher when using the more recent Flanagan et al. [2013] laboratory derivation than the more commonly used derivation presented in Kelley [1990]. Nusselt versus Rayleigh number scaling reveals the convective exponent, η, to be closer to 0.29 as predicted by recent numerical simulations of single‐component convection rather than the canonical 1/3 assumed for double diffusion. However, the exponent appears to be sensitive to how convective layer height is defined. Key Points: Laboratory flux laws of diffusive convection agree well with microstructure observations Observations support a downward revision of the convective exponent from 1/3 to 0.29 Double diffusive heat fluxes could account for 2 TW of heat loss from the Atlantic Water</abstract><cop>Washington</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1002/2015JC010884</doi><tpages>17</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2169-9275
ispartof Journal of geophysical research. Oceans, 2015-12, Vol.120 (12), p.7880-7896
issn 2169-9275
2169-9291
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1800485052
source Wiley Online Library Free Content; Access via Wiley Online Library; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Arctic Ocean
Computer simulation
Convection
Correlation analysis
Derivation
Diffusion
Diffusion layers
Double diffusion
Dye dispersion
Exponents
Fluctuations
Flux
Fluxes
Geophysics
Heat
Heat flux
Heat transfer
Ice drift
Instrumentation
Interfaces
Laboratories
Marine
Mathematical models
Microstructure
North Pole
Numerical prediction
Numerical simulations
Oceanic convection
Oceans
Profiles
Rayleigh number
Scaling
Temperature
turbulence
title Observational validation of the diffusive convection flux laws in the Amundsen Basin, Arctic Ocean
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T19%3A21%3A51IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_wiley&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Observational%20validation%20of%20the%20diffusive%20convection%20flux%20laws%20in%20the%20Amundsen%20Basin,%20Arctic%20Ocean&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20geophysical%20research.%20Oceans&rft.au=Guthrie,%20John%20D.&rft.date=2015-12&rft.volume=120&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=7880&rft.epage=7896&rft.pages=7880-7896&rft.issn=2169-9275&rft.eissn=2169-9291&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/2015JC010884&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_wiley%3E2084308239%3C/proquest_wiley%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1760259272&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true