Global magnetohydrodynamic simulation of the 15 March 2013 coronal mass ejection event--Interpretation of the 30-80MeV proton flux

The coronal mass ejection (CME) event on 15 March 2013 is one of the few solar events in Cycle 24 that produced a large solar energetic particle (SEP) event and severe geomagnetic activity. Observations of SEP from the ACE spacecraft show a complex time-intensity SEP profile that is not easily under...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of geophysical research. Space physics 2016-01, Vol.121 (1), p.56-76
Hauptverfasser: Wu, Chin-Chun, Liou, Kan, Vourlidas, Angelos, Plunkett, Simon, Dryer, Murray, Wu, S T, Mewaldt, Richard A
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 76
container_issue 1
container_start_page 56
container_title Journal of geophysical research. Space physics
container_volume 121
creator Wu, Chin-Chun
Liou, Kan
Vourlidas, Angelos
Plunkett, Simon
Dryer, Murray
Wu, S T
Mewaldt, Richard A
description The coronal mass ejection (CME) event on 15 March 2013 is one of the few solar events in Cycle 24 that produced a large solar energetic particle (SEP) event and severe geomagnetic activity. Observations of SEP from the ACE spacecraft show a complex time-intensity SEP profile that is not easily understood with current empirical SEP models. In this study, we employ a global three-dimensional (3-D) magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) simulation to help interpret the observations. The simulation is based on the H3DMHD code and incorporates extrapolations of photospheric magnetic field as the inner boundary condition at a solar radial distance (r) of 2.5 solar radii. A Gaussian-shaped velocity pulse is imposed at the inner boundary as a proxy for the complex physical conditions that initiated the CME. It is found that the time-intensity profile of the high-energy (>10MeV) SEPs can be explained by the evolution of the CME-driven shock and its interaction with the heliospheric current sheet and the nonuniform solar wind. We also demonstrate in more detail that the simulated fast-mode shock Mach number at the magnetically connected shock location is well correlated (rcc≥0.7) with the concurrent 30-80MeV proton flux. A better correlation occurs when the 30-80MeV proton flux is scaled by r-1.4(rcc=0.87). When scaled by r-2.8, the correlation for 10-30MeV proton flux improves significantly from rcc=0.12 to rcc=0.73, with 1h delay. The present study suggests that (1) sector boundary can act as an obstacle to the propagation of SEPs; (2) the background solar wind is an important factor in the variation of IP shock strength and thus plays an important role in manipulation of SEP flux; (3) at least 50% of the variance in SEP flux can be explained by the fast-mode shock Mach number. This study demonstrates that global MHD simulation, despite the limitation implied by its physics-based ideal fluid continuum assumption, can be a viable tool for SEP data analysis. Key Points Sector boundary can act as an obstacle to the propagation of SEPs Background solar wind is an important factor in the variation of shock strength At least 50% of the variance in SEP flux can be explained by the shock Mach number
doi_str_mv 10.1002/2015JA021051
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1800480268</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3957381081</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p1228-7826733c04336e8f617e2b64db2c9e723e1e580c6070a209dcb667e3a7c1b2803</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkDFPwzAQhS0EElXpxg-wxMISONuJ7YxVBaWoFQuwVo5zoanSuMQOoiu_HFNggAFuudPTd--djpBTBhcMgF9yYNntGDiDjB2QAWcyT_IU-OH3LDQck5H3a4ilo8SyAXmbNq4wDd2YpxaDW-3KzpW71mxqS3296RsTatdSV9GwQsoyujCdXdEYJqh1nWv3u95TXKPdo_iCbUiSWRuw23YYfhgISDQs8JFuOxeiXDX96wk5qkzjcfTVh-Th-up-cpPM76azyXiebBnnOlGaSyWEhVQIibqSTCEvZFoW3OaouECGmQYrQYHhkJe2kFKhMMqygmsQQ3L-6Ruzn3v0YbmpvcWmMS263i-ZBkg1cKn_R5WSMh7APtCzX-ja9V18S6RyyHSeqZz_SUUrAYynUrwDooWHyQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1766301246</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Global magnetohydrodynamic simulation of the 15 March 2013 coronal mass ejection event--Interpretation of the 30-80MeV proton flux</title><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><source>Wiley Online Library (Open Access Collection)</source><creator>Wu, Chin-Chun ; Liou, Kan ; Vourlidas, Angelos ; Plunkett, Simon ; Dryer, Murray ; Wu, S T ; Mewaldt, Richard A</creator><creatorcontrib>Wu, Chin-Chun ; Liou, Kan ; Vourlidas, Angelos ; Plunkett, Simon ; Dryer, Murray ; Wu, S T ; Mewaldt, Richard A</creatorcontrib><description>The coronal mass ejection (CME) event on 15 March 2013 is one of the few solar events in Cycle 24 that produced a large solar energetic particle (SEP) event and severe geomagnetic activity. Observations of SEP from the ACE spacecraft show a complex time-intensity SEP profile that is not easily understood with current empirical SEP models. In this study, we employ a global three-dimensional (3-D) magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) simulation to help interpret the observations. The simulation is based on the H3DMHD code and incorporates extrapolations of photospheric magnetic field as the inner boundary condition at a solar radial distance (r) of 2.5 solar radii. A Gaussian-shaped velocity pulse is imposed at the inner boundary as a proxy for the complex physical conditions that initiated the CME. It is found that the time-intensity profile of the high-energy (&gt;10MeV) SEPs can be explained by the evolution of the CME-driven shock and its interaction with the heliospheric current sheet and the nonuniform solar wind. We also demonstrate in more detail that the simulated fast-mode shock Mach number at the magnetically connected shock location is well correlated (rcc≥0.7) with the concurrent 30-80MeV proton flux. A better correlation occurs when the 30-80MeV proton flux is scaled by r-1.4(rcc=0.87). When scaled by r-2.8, the correlation for 10-30MeV proton flux improves significantly from rcc=0.12 to rcc=0.73, with 1h delay. The present study suggests that (1) sector boundary can act as an obstacle to the propagation of SEPs; (2) the background solar wind is an important factor in the variation of IP shock strength and thus plays an important role in manipulation of SEP flux; (3) at least 50% of the variance in SEP flux can be explained by the fast-mode shock Mach number. This study demonstrates that global MHD simulation, despite the limitation implied by its physics-based ideal fluid continuum assumption, can be a viable tool for SEP data analysis. Key Points Sector boundary can act as an obstacle to the propagation of SEPs Background solar wind is an important factor in the variation of shock strength At least 50% of the variance in SEP flux can be explained by the shock Mach number</description><identifier>ISSN: 2169-9380</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2169-9402</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/2015JA021051</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Boundaries ; Boundary conditions ; Computational fluid dynamics ; Computer simulation ; Coronal mass ejection ; Correlation ; Data analysis ; Delay ; Empirical analysis ; Evolution ; Extrapolation ; Fluctuations ; Fluid flow ; Flux ; Geomagnetic activity ; Geomagnetism ; Heliospheric current sheet ; Mach number ; Magnetic fields ; Magnetohydrodynamic simulation ; Magnetohydrodynamics ; Photosphere ; Propagation ; Proton flux ; Simulation ; Solar corona ; Solar wind ; Spacecraft ; Strength ; Three dimensional models ; Variance</subject><ispartof>Journal of geophysical research. Space physics, 2016-01, Vol.121 (1), p.56-76</ispartof><rights>2016. American Geophysical Union. All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,27928,27929</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wu, Chin-Chun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liou, Kan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vourlidas, Angelos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Plunkett, Simon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dryer, Murray</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wu, S T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mewaldt, Richard A</creatorcontrib><title>Global magnetohydrodynamic simulation of the 15 March 2013 coronal mass ejection event--Interpretation of the 30-80MeV proton flux</title><title>Journal of geophysical research. Space physics</title><description>The coronal mass ejection (CME) event on 15 March 2013 is one of the few solar events in Cycle 24 that produced a large solar energetic particle (SEP) event and severe geomagnetic activity. Observations of SEP from the ACE spacecraft show a complex time-intensity SEP profile that is not easily understood with current empirical SEP models. In this study, we employ a global three-dimensional (3-D) magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) simulation to help interpret the observations. The simulation is based on the H3DMHD code and incorporates extrapolations of photospheric magnetic field as the inner boundary condition at a solar radial distance (r) of 2.5 solar radii. A Gaussian-shaped velocity pulse is imposed at the inner boundary as a proxy for the complex physical conditions that initiated the CME. It is found that the time-intensity profile of the high-energy (&gt;10MeV) SEPs can be explained by the evolution of the CME-driven shock and its interaction with the heliospheric current sheet and the nonuniform solar wind. We also demonstrate in more detail that the simulated fast-mode shock Mach number at the magnetically connected shock location is well correlated (rcc≥0.7) with the concurrent 30-80MeV proton flux. A better correlation occurs when the 30-80MeV proton flux is scaled by r-1.4(rcc=0.87). When scaled by r-2.8, the correlation for 10-30MeV proton flux improves significantly from rcc=0.12 to rcc=0.73, with 1h delay. The present study suggests that (1) sector boundary can act as an obstacle to the propagation of SEPs; (2) the background solar wind is an important factor in the variation of IP shock strength and thus plays an important role in manipulation of SEP flux; (3) at least 50% of the variance in SEP flux can be explained by the fast-mode shock Mach number. This study demonstrates that global MHD simulation, despite the limitation implied by its physics-based ideal fluid continuum assumption, can be a viable tool for SEP data analysis. Key Points Sector boundary can act as an obstacle to the propagation of SEPs Background solar wind is an important factor in the variation of shock strength At least 50% of the variance in SEP flux can be explained by the shock Mach number</description><subject>Boundaries</subject><subject>Boundary conditions</subject><subject>Computational fluid dynamics</subject><subject>Computer simulation</subject><subject>Coronal mass ejection</subject><subject>Correlation</subject><subject>Data analysis</subject><subject>Delay</subject><subject>Empirical analysis</subject><subject>Evolution</subject><subject>Extrapolation</subject><subject>Fluctuations</subject><subject>Fluid flow</subject><subject>Flux</subject><subject>Geomagnetic activity</subject><subject>Geomagnetism</subject><subject>Heliospheric current sheet</subject><subject>Mach number</subject><subject>Magnetic fields</subject><subject>Magnetohydrodynamic simulation</subject><subject>Magnetohydrodynamics</subject><subject>Photosphere</subject><subject>Propagation</subject><subject>Proton flux</subject><subject>Simulation</subject><subject>Solar corona</subject><subject>Solar wind</subject><subject>Spacecraft</subject><subject>Strength</subject><subject>Three dimensional models</subject><subject>Variance</subject><issn>2169-9380</issn><issn>2169-9402</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkDFPwzAQhS0EElXpxg-wxMISONuJ7YxVBaWoFQuwVo5zoanSuMQOoiu_HFNggAFuudPTd--djpBTBhcMgF9yYNntGDiDjB2QAWcyT_IU-OH3LDQck5H3a4ilo8SyAXmbNq4wDd2YpxaDW-3KzpW71mxqS3296RsTatdSV9GwQsoyujCdXdEYJqh1nWv3u95TXKPdo_iCbUiSWRuw23YYfhgISDQs8JFuOxeiXDX96wk5qkzjcfTVh-Th-up-cpPM76azyXiebBnnOlGaSyWEhVQIibqSTCEvZFoW3OaouECGmQYrQYHhkJe2kFKhMMqygmsQQ3L-6Ruzn3v0YbmpvcWmMS263i-ZBkg1cKn_R5WSMh7APtCzX-ja9V18S6RyyHSeqZz_SUUrAYynUrwDooWHyQ</recordid><startdate>20160101</startdate><enddate>20160101</enddate><creator>Wu, Chin-Chun</creator><creator>Liou, Kan</creator><creator>Vourlidas, Angelos</creator><creator>Plunkett, Simon</creator><creator>Dryer, Murray</creator><creator>Wu, S T</creator><creator>Mewaldt, Richard A</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>7TG</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L7M</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160101</creationdate><title>Global magnetohydrodynamic simulation of the 15 March 2013 coronal mass ejection event--Interpretation of the 30-80MeV proton flux</title><author>Wu, Chin-Chun ; Liou, Kan ; Vourlidas, Angelos ; Plunkett, Simon ; Dryer, Murray ; Wu, S T ; Mewaldt, Richard A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p1228-7826733c04336e8f617e2b64db2c9e723e1e580c6070a209dcb667e3a7c1b2803</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Boundaries</topic><topic>Boundary conditions</topic><topic>Computational fluid dynamics</topic><topic>Computer simulation</topic><topic>Coronal mass ejection</topic><topic>Correlation</topic><topic>Data analysis</topic><topic>Delay</topic><topic>Empirical analysis</topic><topic>Evolution</topic><topic>Extrapolation</topic><topic>Fluctuations</topic><topic>Fluid flow</topic><topic>Flux</topic><topic>Geomagnetic activity</topic><topic>Geomagnetism</topic><topic>Heliospheric current sheet</topic><topic>Mach number</topic><topic>Magnetic fields</topic><topic>Magnetohydrodynamic simulation</topic><topic>Magnetohydrodynamics</topic><topic>Photosphere</topic><topic>Propagation</topic><topic>Proton flux</topic><topic>Simulation</topic><topic>Solar corona</topic><topic>Solar wind</topic><topic>Spacecraft</topic><topic>Strength</topic><topic>Three dimensional models</topic><topic>Variance</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wu, Chin-Chun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liou, Kan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vourlidas, Angelos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Plunkett, Simon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dryer, Murray</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wu, S T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mewaldt, Richard A</creatorcontrib><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>Journal of geophysical research. Space physics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wu, Chin-Chun</au><au>Liou, Kan</au><au>Vourlidas, Angelos</au><au>Plunkett, Simon</au><au>Dryer, Murray</au><au>Wu, S T</au><au>Mewaldt, Richard A</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Global magnetohydrodynamic simulation of the 15 March 2013 coronal mass ejection event--Interpretation of the 30-80MeV proton flux</atitle><jtitle>Journal of geophysical research. Space physics</jtitle><date>2016-01-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>121</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>56</spage><epage>76</epage><pages>56-76</pages><issn>2169-9380</issn><eissn>2169-9402</eissn><abstract>The coronal mass ejection (CME) event on 15 March 2013 is one of the few solar events in Cycle 24 that produced a large solar energetic particle (SEP) event and severe geomagnetic activity. Observations of SEP from the ACE spacecraft show a complex time-intensity SEP profile that is not easily understood with current empirical SEP models. In this study, we employ a global three-dimensional (3-D) magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) simulation to help interpret the observations. The simulation is based on the H3DMHD code and incorporates extrapolations of photospheric magnetic field as the inner boundary condition at a solar radial distance (r) of 2.5 solar radii. A Gaussian-shaped velocity pulse is imposed at the inner boundary as a proxy for the complex physical conditions that initiated the CME. It is found that the time-intensity profile of the high-energy (&gt;10MeV) SEPs can be explained by the evolution of the CME-driven shock and its interaction with the heliospheric current sheet and the nonuniform solar wind. We also demonstrate in more detail that the simulated fast-mode shock Mach number at the magnetically connected shock location is well correlated (rcc≥0.7) with the concurrent 30-80MeV proton flux. A better correlation occurs when the 30-80MeV proton flux is scaled by r-1.4(rcc=0.87). When scaled by r-2.8, the correlation for 10-30MeV proton flux improves significantly from rcc=0.12 to rcc=0.73, with 1h delay. The present study suggests that (1) sector boundary can act as an obstacle to the propagation of SEPs; (2) the background solar wind is an important factor in the variation of IP shock strength and thus plays an important role in manipulation of SEP flux; (3) at least 50% of the variance in SEP flux can be explained by the fast-mode shock Mach number. This study demonstrates that global MHD simulation, despite the limitation implied by its physics-based ideal fluid continuum assumption, can be a viable tool for SEP data analysis. Key Points Sector boundary can act as an obstacle to the propagation of SEPs Background solar wind is an important factor in the variation of shock strength At least 50% of the variance in SEP flux can be explained by the shock Mach number</abstract><cop>Washington</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1002/2015JA021051</doi><tpages>21</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2169-9380
ispartof Journal of geophysical research. Space physics, 2016-01, Vol.121 (1), p.56-76
issn 2169-9380
2169-9402
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1800480268
source Access via Wiley Online Library; Wiley Online Library (Open Access Collection)
subjects Boundaries
Boundary conditions
Computational fluid dynamics
Computer simulation
Coronal mass ejection
Correlation
Data analysis
Delay
Empirical analysis
Evolution
Extrapolation
Fluctuations
Fluid flow
Flux
Geomagnetic activity
Geomagnetism
Heliospheric current sheet
Mach number
Magnetic fields
Magnetohydrodynamic simulation
Magnetohydrodynamics
Photosphere
Propagation
Proton flux
Simulation
Solar corona
Solar wind
Spacecraft
Strength
Three dimensional models
Variance
title Global magnetohydrodynamic simulation of the 15 March 2013 coronal mass ejection event--Interpretation of the 30-80MeV proton flux
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-17T04%3A43%3A31IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Global%20magnetohydrodynamic%20simulation%20of%20the%2015%20March%202013%20coronal%20mass%20ejection%20event--Interpretation%20of%20the%2030-80MeV%20proton%20flux&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20geophysical%20research.%20Space%20physics&rft.au=Wu,%20Chin-Chun&rft.date=2016-01-01&rft.volume=121&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=56&rft.epage=76&rft.pages=56-76&rft.issn=2169-9380&rft.eissn=2169-9402&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/2015JA021051&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E3957381081%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1766301246&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true