CHANGING FACE OF MEDICARE’S NATIONAL COVERAGE DETERMINATIONS FOR TECHNOLOGY

Objectives: The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) issues National Coverage Determinations (NCDs) for medical interventions expected to have a significant impact on Medicare, the health insurance program for US citizens aged 65 years and older and certain people with disabilities under...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International journal of technology assessment in health care 2015-01, Vol.31 (5), p.347-354
Hauptverfasser: Chambers, James D., Chenoweth, Matthew D., Pyo, Junhee, Cangelosi, Michael J., Neumann, Peter J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 354
container_issue 5
container_start_page 347
container_title International journal of technology assessment in health care
container_volume 31
creator Chambers, James D.
Chenoweth, Matthew D.
Pyo, Junhee
Cangelosi, Michael J.
Neumann, Peter J.
description Objectives: The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) issues National Coverage Determinations (NCDs) for medical interventions expected to have a significant impact on Medicare, the health insurance program for US citizens aged 65 years and older and certain people with disabilities under the age of 65 years. The objective of this study was to evaluate NCDs issued from 1999 to 2013 to identify key trends, and to discuss implications for future CMS policy. Methods: We used the Tufts Medical Center Medicare National Coverage Determination Database to examine characteristics of NCDs from 1999 through 2013. We examined various characteristics of NCDs, including: whether the intervention under review is used for prevention or treatment of disease, the type of intervention considered, evidence limitations cited by CMS, and coverage determination outcome. We evaluated longitudinal trends in categorical and continuous variables in the database, using Cochran-Armitage trend tests and linear regression, respectively. Results: We found that NCDs increasingly focus on preventive care (p = 0.072), pertain to diagnostic imaging (p = 0.033), and evaluate health education/behavioral therapy interventions (p = 0.051). CMS increasingly cites the lack of relevant outcomes (p = 0.019) and the lack of applicability of study results to the Medicare population (p < 0.001) as evidence limitations. CMS less often restricts coverage to certain population subgroups in NCDs (p < 0.001), but increasingly applies coverage with evidence development policies (p < 0.001). Conclusions: Identified trends reflect broader changes in Medicare as CMS shifts its focus from treatment to prevention of disease, addresses potentially overutilized technologies, and attempts to issue flexible coverage policies.
doi_str_mv 10.1017/S0266462315000525
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1800452805</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_S0266462315000525</cupid><sourcerecordid>3941039421</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c579t-8a387a590bdc26f9a547f690fdf25d60d0ed8aa64e831448eb3a89fae43945aa3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkc1OwkAURidGI4g-gBvTxI2b6p3O_7IpQyGBNgE0cdUMdGogFLCFhTtfw9fzSWwFjdEYXd3Fd-65ufkQOsdwjQGLmxF4nFPuEcwAgHnsADUxFdjlhMpD1Kxjt84b6KQs5wCYgIJj1PC4YMCYbKJB0PWjsBeFTscPtBN3nIFu9wJ_qF-fX0ZO5I97ceT3nSC-00M_1E5bj_Vw0NsFI6cTD52xDrpR3I_D-1N0lJlFac_2s4VuO3ocdN0qrKR9d8qE2rjSECkMUzBJpx7PlGFUZFxBlmYeSzmkYFNpDKdWEkyptBNipMqMpURRZgxpoaudd12sHre23CT5rJzaxcIs7WpbJlgCUOZJYH-jQhBJuMDkHyj3FMeCQIVefkPnq22xrH5-p7DAUtUU3lHTYlWWhc2SdTHLTfGUYEjqBpMfDVY7F3vzdpLb9HPjo7IKIHupySfFLH2wX27_qn0DWN2caw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1762171890</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>CHANGING FACE OF MEDICARE’S NATIONAL COVERAGE DETERMINATIONS FOR TECHNOLOGY</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Cambridge University Press Journals Complete</source><creator>Chambers, James D. ; Chenoweth, Matthew D. ; Pyo, Junhee ; Cangelosi, Michael J. ; Neumann, Peter J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Chambers, James D. ; Chenoweth, Matthew D. ; Pyo, Junhee ; Cangelosi, Michael J. ; Neumann, Peter J.</creatorcontrib><description>Objectives: The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) issues National Coverage Determinations (NCDs) for medical interventions expected to have a significant impact on Medicare, the health insurance program for US citizens aged 65 years and older and certain people with disabilities under the age of 65 years. The objective of this study was to evaluate NCDs issued from 1999 to 2013 to identify key trends, and to discuss implications for future CMS policy. Methods: We used the Tufts Medical Center Medicare National Coverage Determination Database to examine characteristics of NCDs from 1999 through 2013. We examined various characteristics of NCDs, including: whether the intervention under review is used for prevention or treatment of disease, the type of intervention considered, evidence limitations cited by CMS, and coverage determination outcome. We evaluated longitudinal trends in categorical and continuous variables in the database, using Cochran-Armitage trend tests and linear regression, respectively. Results: We found that NCDs increasingly focus on preventive care (p = 0.072), pertain to diagnostic imaging (p = 0.033), and evaluate health education/behavioral therapy interventions (p = 0.051). CMS increasingly cites the lack of relevant outcomes (p = 0.019) and the lack of applicability of study results to the Medicare population (p &lt; 0.001) as evidence limitations. CMS less often restricts coverage to certain population subgroups in NCDs (p &lt; 0.001), but increasingly applies coverage with evidence development policies (p &lt; 0.001). Conclusions: Identified trends reflect broader changes in Medicare as CMS shifts its focus from treatment to prevention of disease, addresses potentially overutilized technologies, and attempts to issue flexible coverage policies.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0266-4623</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1471-6348</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S0266462315000525</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26750558</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, USA: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Behavior modification ; Behavior Therapy - trends ; Beneficiaries ; Cardiovascular disease ; Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (U.S.) - trends ; Decision making ; Diagnostic Imaging - trends ; Disease prevention ; FDA approval ; Health ; Health Education - trends ; Humans ; Imaging ; Insurance Coverage - trends ; Intervention ; Medical ; Medical equipment ; Medical services ; Medicare ; Medicare - trends ; Patients ; Policies ; Preventive Medicine - trends ; Regression ; Technology Assessment, Biomedical - trends ; Time Factors ; Trends ; United States ; Variables</subject><ispartof>International journal of technology assessment in health care, 2015-01, Vol.31 (5), p.347-354</ispartof><rights>Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c579t-8a387a590bdc26f9a547f690fdf25d60d0ed8aa64e831448eb3a89fae43945aa3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c579t-8a387a590bdc26f9a547f690fdf25d60d0ed8aa64e831448eb3a89fae43945aa3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0266462315000525/type/journal_article$$EHTML$$P50$$Gcambridge$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>164,314,780,784,27924,27925,55628</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26750558$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Chambers, James D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chenoweth, Matthew D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pyo, Junhee</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cangelosi, Michael J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Neumann, Peter J.</creatorcontrib><title>CHANGING FACE OF MEDICARE’S NATIONAL COVERAGE DETERMINATIONS FOR TECHNOLOGY</title><title>International journal of technology assessment in health care</title><addtitle>Int J Technol Assess Health Care</addtitle><description>Objectives: The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) issues National Coverage Determinations (NCDs) for medical interventions expected to have a significant impact on Medicare, the health insurance program for US citizens aged 65 years and older and certain people with disabilities under the age of 65 years. The objective of this study was to evaluate NCDs issued from 1999 to 2013 to identify key trends, and to discuss implications for future CMS policy. Methods: We used the Tufts Medical Center Medicare National Coverage Determination Database to examine characteristics of NCDs from 1999 through 2013. We examined various characteristics of NCDs, including: whether the intervention under review is used for prevention or treatment of disease, the type of intervention considered, evidence limitations cited by CMS, and coverage determination outcome. We evaluated longitudinal trends in categorical and continuous variables in the database, using Cochran-Armitage trend tests and linear regression, respectively. Results: We found that NCDs increasingly focus on preventive care (p = 0.072), pertain to diagnostic imaging (p = 0.033), and evaluate health education/behavioral therapy interventions (p = 0.051). CMS increasingly cites the lack of relevant outcomes (p = 0.019) and the lack of applicability of study results to the Medicare population (p &lt; 0.001) as evidence limitations. CMS less often restricts coverage to certain population subgroups in NCDs (p &lt; 0.001), but increasingly applies coverage with evidence development policies (p &lt; 0.001). Conclusions: Identified trends reflect broader changes in Medicare as CMS shifts its focus from treatment to prevention of disease, addresses potentially overutilized technologies, and attempts to issue flexible coverage policies.</description><subject>Behavior modification</subject><subject>Behavior Therapy - trends</subject><subject>Beneficiaries</subject><subject>Cardiovascular disease</subject><subject>Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (U.S.) - trends</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Diagnostic Imaging - trends</subject><subject>Disease prevention</subject><subject>FDA approval</subject><subject>Health</subject><subject>Health Education - trends</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Imaging</subject><subject>Insurance Coverage - trends</subject><subject>Intervention</subject><subject>Medical</subject><subject>Medical equipment</subject><subject>Medical services</subject><subject>Medicare</subject><subject>Medicare - trends</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Policies</subject><subject>Preventive Medicine - trends</subject><subject>Regression</subject><subject>Technology Assessment, Biomedical - trends</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Trends</subject><subject>United States</subject><subject>Variables</subject><issn>0266-4623</issn><issn>1471-6348</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkc1OwkAURidGI4g-gBvTxI2b6p3O_7IpQyGBNgE0cdUMdGogFLCFhTtfw9fzSWwFjdEYXd3Fd-65ufkQOsdwjQGLmxF4nFPuEcwAgHnsADUxFdjlhMpD1Kxjt84b6KQs5wCYgIJj1PC4YMCYbKJB0PWjsBeFTscPtBN3nIFu9wJ_qF-fX0ZO5I97ceT3nSC-00M_1E5bj_Vw0NsFI6cTD52xDrpR3I_D-1N0lJlFac_2s4VuO3ocdN0qrKR9d8qE2rjSECkMUzBJpx7PlGFUZFxBlmYeSzmkYFNpDKdWEkyptBNipMqMpURRZgxpoaudd12sHre23CT5rJzaxcIs7WpbJlgCUOZJYH-jQhBJuMDkHyj3FMeCQIVefkPnq22xrH5-p7DAUtUU3lHTYlWWhc2SdTHLTfGUYEjqBpMfDVY7F3vzdpLb9HPjo7IKIHupySfFLH2wX27_qn0DWN2caw</recordid><startdate>20150101</startdate><enddate>20150101</enddate><creator>Chambers, James D.</creator><creator>Chenoweth, Matthew D.</creator><creator>Pyo, Junhee</creator><creator>Cangelosi, Michael J.</creator><creator>Neumann, Peter J.</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7U2</scope><scope>C1K</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150101</creationdate><title>CHANGING FACE OF MEDICARE’S NATIONAL COVERAGE DETERMINATIONS FOR TECHNOLOGY</title><author>Chambers, James D. ; Chenoweth, Matthew D. ; Pyo, Junhee ; Cangelosi, Michael J. ; Neumann, Peter J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c579t-8a387a590bdc26f9a547f690fdf25d60d0ed8aa64e831448eb3a89fae43945aa3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Behavior modification</topic><topic>Behavior Therapy - trends</topic><topic>Beneficiaries</topic><topic>Cardiovascular disease</topic><topic>Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (U.S.) - trends</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Diagnostic Imaging - trends</topic><topic>Disease prevention</topic><topic>FDA approval</topic><topic>Health</topic><topic>Health Education - trends</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Imaging</topic><topic>Insurance Coverage - trends</topic><topic>Intervention</topic><topic>Medical</topic><topic>Medical equipment</topic><topic>Medical services</topic><topic>Medicare</topic><topic>Medicare - trends</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Policies</topic><topic>Preventive Medicine - trends</topic><topic>Regression</topic><topic>Technology Assessment, Biomedical - trends</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Trends</topic><topic>United States</topic><topic>Variables</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Chambers, James D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chenoweth, Matthew D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pyo, Junhee</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cangelosi, Michael J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Neumann, Peter J.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>Access via ABI/INFORM (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Safety Science and Risk</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><jtitle>International journal of technology assessment in health care</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Chambers, James D.</au><au>Chenoweth, Matthew D.</au><au>Pyo, Junhee</au><au>Cangelosi, Michael J.</au><au>Neumann, Peter J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>CHANGING FACE OF MEDICARE’S NATIONAL COVERAGE DETERMINATIONS FOR TECHNOLOGY</atitle><jtitle>International journal of technology assessment in health care</jtitle><addtitle>Int J Technol Assess Health Care</addtitle><date>2015-01-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>31</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>347</spage><epage>354</epage><pages>347-354</pages><issn>0266-4623</issn><eissn>1471-6348</eissn><abstract>Objectives: The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) issues National Coverage Determinations (NCDs) for medical interventions expected to have a significant impact on Medicare, the health insurance program for US citizens aged 65 years and older and certain people with disabilities under the age of 65 years. The objective of this study was to evaluate NCDs issued from 1999 to 2013 to identify key trends, and to discuss implications for future CMS policy. Methods: We used the Tufts Medical Center Medicare National Coverage Determination Database to examine characteristics of NCDs from 1999 through 2013. We examined various characteristics of NCDs, including: whether the intervention under review is used for prevention or treatment of disease, the type of intervention considered, evidence limitations cited by CMS, and coverage determination outcome. We evaluated longitudinal trends in categorical and continuous variables in the database, using Cochran-Armitage trend tests and linear regression, respectively. Results: We found that NCDs increasingly focus on preventive care (p = 0.072), pertain to diagnostic imaging (p = 0.033), and evaluate health education/behavioral therapy interventions (p = 0.051). CMS increasingly cites the lack of relevant outcomes (p = 0.019) and the lack of applicability of study results to the Medicare population (p &lt; 0.001) as evidence limitations. CMS less often restricts coverage to certain population subgroups in NCDs (p &lt; 0.001), but increasingly applies coverage with evidence development policies (p &lt; 0.001). Conclusions: Identified trends reflect broader changes in Medicare as CMS shifts its focus from treatment to prevention of disease, addresses potentially overutilized technologies, and attempts to issue flexible coverage policies.</abstract><cop>New York, USA</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><pmid>26750558</pmid><doi>10.1017/S0266462315000525</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0266-4623
ispartof International journal of technology assessment in health care, 2015-01, Vol.31 (5), p.347-354
issn 0266-4623
1471-6348
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1800452805
source MEDLINE; Cambridge University Press Journals Complete
subjects Behavior modification
Behavior Therapy - trends
Beneficiaries
Cardiovascular disease
Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (U.S.) - trends
Decision making
Diagnostic Imaging - trends
Disease prevention
FDA approval
Health
Health Education - trends
Humans
Imaging
Insurance Coverage - trends
Intervention
Medical
Medical equipment
Medical services
Medicare
Medicare - trends
Patients
Policies
Preventive Medicine - trends
Regression
Technology Assessment, Biomedical - trends
Time Factors
Trends
United States
Variables
title CHANGING FACE OF MEDICARE’S NATIONAL COVERAGE DETERMINATIONS FOR TECHNOLOGY
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-22T21%3A22%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=CHANGING%20FACE%20OF%20MEDICARE%E2%80%99S%20NATIONAL%20COVERAGE%20DETERMINATIONS%20FOR%20TECHNOLOGY&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20technology%20assessment%20in%20health%20care&rft.au=Chambers,%20James%20D.&rft.date=2015-01-01&rft.volume=31&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=347&rft.epage=354&rft.pages=347-354&rft.issn=0266-4623&rft.eissn=1471-6348&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S0266462315000525&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3941039421%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1762171890&rft_id=info:pmid/26750558&rft_cupid=10_1017_S0266462315000525&rfr_iscdi=true