Multiresidue determination of fluoroquinolones in poultry muscle and kidney according to the regulation 2002/657/EC. A systematic comparison of two different approaches: Liquid chromatography coupled to high-resolution mass spectrometry or tandem mass spectrometry

•Extraction of twelve fluoroquinolones from poultry muscle and kidney by QuEChERS.•The samples were analyzed by two chromatographic methods (LC–HRMS and LC–MS/MS).•The methods were validated according to the 2002/657/EC directives.•The methods showed statistically identical performance. This work in...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of Chromatography A 2015-01, Vol.1379, p.83-91
Hauptverfasser: Rocha, Diego G., Santos, Flavio A., da Silva, Júlio César C., Augusti, Rodinei, Faria, Adriana F.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 91
container_issue
container_start_page 83
container_title Journal of Chromatography A
container_volume 1379
creator Rocha, Diego G.
Santos, Flavio A.
da Silva, Júlio César C.
Augusti, Rodinei
Faria, Adriana F.
description •Extraction of twelve fluoroquinolones from poultry muscle and kidney by QuEChERS.•The samples were analyzed by two chromatographic methods (LC–HRMS and LC–MS/MS).•The methods were validated according to the 2002/657/EC directives.•The methods showed statistically identical performance. This work involved the optimization and validation of two methods according to the Commission Decision 2002/657/EC directives for determining fluoroquinolones residues in samples of poultry muscle and kidney: ciprofloxacin, danofloxacin, difloxacin, enrofloxacin, flumequine, marbofloxacin, nalidixic acid, norfloxacin, ofloxacin, oxolinic acid, pipemidic acid and sarafloxacin. The extraction procedure was based on a QuEChERS approach, whose optimization employed a Box–Behnken 33 factorial design. A liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry method (LC–MS/MS) was developed for determining the twelve analytes using the multiple reaction monitoring mode (MRM). Accuracy, evaluated by recovery studies, varied from 88.8 to 112.2% for the selected levels with RSD values lower than 12.3%. The second validated method employed high resolution mass spectrometry (HRMS) performed in the single ion monitoring mode (SIM), determining nine among twelve analytes. The validation parameters were evaluated as satisfactory, with recoveries from 82.5 to 114.4% and RSD lower than 8.7%. Decision limits and detection capabilities for both methods were reported. The two methods were statistically compared using the Student's t test, at 95% confidence level, resulting in no significant difference.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.chroma.2014.12.058
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1800439045</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0021967314019906</els_id><sourcerecordid>1800439045</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c465t-98e468518ef2c79355d6d4c96f6c4d6ed77a6072a24eaa6419688879394cee3c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UsuO1DAQDAjEDAt_gJCPXJKxE8dOOCCtRstDGsQFzpaxOxMPiR38AM3f45CFCxInH7qqq6pdRfGC4Ipgwg6XSo3ezbKqMaEVqSvcdg-LPel4Uzacd4-KPcY1KXvGm13xNIQLxoRjXj8pdnXbcs4o3z_YfUxTNB6C0QmQhgh-NlZG4yxyAxqm5Lz7nox1k7MQkLFocZnir2hOQU2ApNXom9EWrkgq5bw29oyiQ3EE5OGcpm1Znc0cWMsPd8cK3aJwDRHmPFJIuXmR3oRNMf50SJthAA82Irks3kk1QniNTib70GhLHd3Zy2W8ZnZaJtCr4mjOY5mjuCn9lpxlCCgsoGJmwGrZeRSzX5j_nT0rHg9yCvD8_r0pvry9-3x8X54-vftwvD2VirI2ln0HlHUt6WCoFe-bttVMU9WzgSmqGWjOJctHljUFKRklPeu6LgN7qgAa1dwUr7a9y3pXCFHMJiiYJmnBpSBIhzFtekzbDKUbVHkXgodBLN7M0l8FwWLtgLiI7Rpi7YAgtcgdyLSX9wrp6wz6L-nPp2fAmw0AOecPA14EZcAq0LkIKgrtzP8VfgES18vW</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1800439045</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Multiresidue determination of fluoroquinolones in poultry muscle and kidney according to the regulation 2002/657/EC. A systematic comparison of two different approaches: Liquid chromatography coupled to high-resolution mass spectrometry or tandem mass spectrometry</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Rocha, Diego G. ; Santos, Flavio A. ; da Silva, Júlio César C. ; Augusti, Rodinei ; Faria, Adriana F.</creator><creatorcontrib>Rocha, Diego G. ; Santos, Flavio A. ; da Silva, Júlio César C. ; Augusti, Rodinei ; Faria, Adriana F.</creatorcontrib><description>•Extraction of twelve fluoroquinolones from poultry muscle and kidney by QuEChERS.•The samples were analyzed by two chromatographic methods (LC–HRMS and LC–MS/MS).•The methods were validated according to the 2002/657/EC directives.•The methods showed statistically identical performance. This work involved the optimization and validation of two methods according to the Commission Decision 2002/657/EC directives for determining fluoroquinolones residues in samples of poultry muscle and kidney: ciprofloxacin, danofloxacin, difloxacin, enrofloxacin, flumequine, marbofloxacin, nalidixic acid, norfloxacin, ofloxacin, oxolinic acid, pipemidic acid and sarafloxacin. The extraction procedure was based on a QuEChERS approach, whose optimization employed a Box–Behnken 33 factorial design. A liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry method (LC–MS/MS) was developed for determining the twelve analytes using the multiple reaction monitoring mode (MRM). Accuracy, evaluated by recovery studies, varied from 88.8 to 112.2% for the selected levels with RSD values lower than 12.3%. The second validated method employed high resolution mass spectrometry (HRMS) performed in the single ion monitoring mode (SIM), determining nine among twelve analytes. The validation parameters were evaluated as satisfactory, with recoveries from 82.5 to 114.4% and RSD lower than 8.7%. Decision limits and detection capabilities for both methods were reported. The two methods were statistically compared using the Student's t test, at 95% confidence level, resulting in no significant difference.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-9673</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-3778</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2014.12.058</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25577647</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Analytical chemistry ; Animals ; Anti-Bacterial Agents - analysis ; Chromatography ; Chromatography, Liquid ; Confidence intervals ; Fluoroquinolones ; Fluoroquinolones - analysis ; Food Technology - methods ; Kidney - chemistry ; Kidneys ; Liquid chromatography ; Mass spectrometry ; Meat - analysis ; Monitoring ; Muscles - chemistry ; Poultry ; QuEChERS ; Recovery ; Tandem Mass Spectrometry</subject><ispartof>Journal of Chromatography A, 2015-01, Vol.1379, p.83-91</ispartof><rights>2015</rights><rights>Copyright © 2015. Published by Elsevier B.V.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c465t-98e468518ef2c79355d6d4c96f6c4d6ed77a6072a24eaa6419688879394cee3c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c465t-98e468518ef2c79355d6d4c96f6c4d6ed77a6072a24eaa6419688879394cee3c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0021967314019906$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3536,27903,27904,65309</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25577647$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rocha, Diego G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Santos, Flavio A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>da Silva, Júlio César C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Augusti, Rodinei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Faria, Adriana F.</creatorcontrib><title>Multiresidue determination of fluoroquinolones in poultry muscle and kidney according to the regulation 2002/657/EC. A systematic comparison of two different approaches: Liquid chromatography coupled to high-resolution mass spectrometry or tandem mass spectrometry</title><title>Journal of Chromatography A</title><addtitle>J Chromatogr A</addtitle><description>•Extraction of twelve fluoroquinolones from poultry muscle and kidney by QuEChERS.•The samples were analyzed by two chromatographic methods (LC–HRMS and LC–MS/MS).•The methods were validated according to the 2002/657/EC directives.•The methods showed statistically identical performance. This work involved the optimization and validation of two methods according to the Commission Decision 2002/657/EC directives for determining fluoroquinolones residues in samples of poultry muscle and kidney: ciprofloxacin, danofloxacin, difloxacin, enrofloxacin, flumequine, marbofloxacin, nalidixic acid, norfloxacin, ofloxacin, oxolinic acid, pipemidic acid and sarafloxacin. The extraction procedure was based on a QuEChERS approach, whose optimization employed a Box–Behnken 33 factorial design. A liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry method (LC–MS/MS) was developed for determining the twelve analytes using the multiple reaction monitoring mode (MRM). Accuracy, evaluated by recovery studies, varied from 88.8 to 112.2% for the selected levels with RSD values lower than 12.3%. The second validated method employed high resolution mass spectrometry (HRMS) performed in the single ion monitoring mode (SIM), determining nine among twelve analytes. The validation parameters were evaluated as satisfactory, with recoveries from 82.5 to 114.4% and RSD lower than 8.7%. Decision limits and detection capabilities for both methods were reported. The two methods were statistically compared using the Student's t test, at 95% confidence level, resulting in no significant difference.</description><subject>Analytical chemistry</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Anti-Bacterial Agents - analysis</subject><subject>Chromatography</subject><subject>Chromatography, Liquid</subject><subject>Confidence intervals</subject><subject>Fluoroquinolones</subject><subject>Fluoroquinolones - analysis</subject><subject>Food Technology - methods</subject><subject>Kidney - chemistry</subject><subject>Kidneys</subject><subject>Liquid chromatography</subject><subject>Mass spectrometry</subject><subject>Meat - analysis</subject><subject>Monitoring</subject><subject>Muscles - chemistry</subject><subject>Poultry</subject><subject>QuEChERS</subject><subject>Recovery</subject><subject>Tandem Mass Spectrometry</subject><issn>0021-9673</issn><issn>1873-3778</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9UsuO1DAQDAjEDAt_gJCPXJKxE8dOOCCtRstDGsQFzpaxOxMPiR38AM3f45CFCxInH7qqq6pdRfGC4Ipgwg6XSo3ezbKqMaEVqSvcdg-LPel4Uzacd4-KPcY1KXvGm13xNIQLxoRjXj8pdnXbcs4o3z_YfUxTNB6C0QmQhgh-NlZG4yxyAxqm5Lz7nox1k7MQkLFocZnir2hOQU2ApNXom9EWrkgq5bw29oyiQ3EE5OGcpm1Znc0cWMsPd8cK3aJwDRHmPFJIuXmR3oRNMf50SJthAA82Irks3kk1QniNTib70GhLHd3Zy2W8ZnZaJtCr4mjOY5mjuCn9lpxlCCgsoGJmwGrZeRSzX5j_nT0rHg9yCvD8_r0pvry9-3x8X54-vftwvD2VirI2ln0HlHUt6WCoFe-bttVMU9WzgSmqGWjOJctHljUFKRklPeu6LgN7qgAa1dwUr7a9y3pXCFHMJiiYJmnBpSBIhzFtekzbDKUbVHkXgodBLN7M0l8FwWLtgLiI7Rpi7YAgtcgdyLSX9wrp6wz6L-nPp2fAmw0AOecPA14EZcAq0LkIKgrtzP8VfgES18vW</recordid><startdate>20150130</startdate><enddate>20150130</enddate><creator>Rocha, Diego G.</creator><creator>Santos, Flavio A.</creator><creator>da Silva, Júlio César C.</creator><creator>Augusti, Rodinei</creator><creator>Faria, Adriana F.</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>L7M</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150130</creationdate><title>Multiresidue determination of fluoroquinolones in poultry muscle and kidney according to the regulation 2002/657/EC. A systematic comparison of two different approaches: Liquid chromatography coupled to high-resolution mass spectrometry or tandem mass spectrometry</title><author>Rocha, Diego G. ; Santos, Flavio A. ; da Silva, Júlio César C. ; Augusti, Rodinei ; Faria, Adriana F.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c465t-98e468518ef2c79355d6d4c96f6c4d6ed77a6072a24eaa6419688879394cee3c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Analytical chemistry</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Anti-Bacterial Agents - analysis</topic><topic>Chromatography</topic><topic>Chromatography, Liquid</topic><topic>Confidence intervals</topic><topic>Fluoroquinolones</topic><topic>Fluoroquinolones - analysis</topic><topic>Food Technology - methods</topic><topic>Kidney - chemistry</topic><topic>Kidneys</topic><topic>Liquid chromatography</topic><topic>Mass spectrometry</topic><topic>Meat - analysis</topic><topic>Monitoring</topic><topic>Muscles - chemistry</topic><topic>Poultry</topic><topic>QuEChERS</topic><topic>Recovery</topic><topic>Tandem Mass Spectrometry</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rocha, Diego G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Santos, Flavio A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>da Silva, Júlio César C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Augusti, Rodinei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Faria, Adriana F.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>Journal of Chromatography A</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rocha, Diego G.</au><au>Santos, Flavio A.</au><au>da Silva, Júlio César C.</au><au>Augusti, Rodinei</au><au>Faria, Adriana F.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Multiresidue determination of fluoroquinolones in poultry muscle and kidney according to the regulation 2002/657/EC. A systematic comparison of two different approaches: Liquid chromatography coupled to high-resolution mass spectrometry or tandem mass spectrometry</atitle><jtitle>Journal of Chromatography A</jtitle><addtitle>J Chromatogr A</addtitle><date>2015-01-30</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>1379</volume><spage>83</spage><epage>91</epage><pages>83-91</pages><issn>0021-9673</issn><eissn>1873-3778</eissn><abstract>•Extraction of twelve fluoroquinolones from poultry muscle and kidney by QuEChERS.•The samples were analyzed by two chromatographic methods (LC–HRMS and LC–MS/MS).•The methods were validated according to the 2002/657/EC directives.•The methods showed statistically identical performance. This work involved the optimization and validation of two methods according to the Commission Decision 2002/657/EC directives for determining fluoroquinolones residues in samples of poultry muscle and kidney: ciprofloxacin, danofloxacin, difloxacin, enrofloxacin, flumequine, marbofloxacin, nalidixic acid, norfloxacin, ofloxacin, oxolinic acid, pipemidic acid and sarafloxacin. The extraction procedure was based on a QuEChERS approach, whose optimization employed a Box–Behnken 33 factorial design. A liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry method (LC–MS/MS) was developed for determining the twelve analytes using the multiple reaction monitoring mode (MRM). Accuracy, evaluated by recovery studies, varied from 88.8 to 112.2% for the selected levels with RSD values lower than 12.3%. The second validated method employed high resolution mass spectrometry (HRMS) performed in the single ion monitoring mode (SIM), determining nine among twelve analytes. The validation parameters were evaluated as satisfactory, with recoveries from 82.5 to 114.4% and RSD lower than 8.7%. Decision limits and detection capabilities for both methods were reported. The two methods were statistically compared using the Student's t test, at 95% confidence level, resulting in no significant difference.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>25577647</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.chroma.2014.12.058</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0021-9673
ispartof Journal of Chromatography A, 2015-01, Vol.1379, p.83-91
issn 0021-9673
1873-3778
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1800439045
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Analytical chemistry
Animals
Anti-Bacterial Agents - analysis
Chromatography
Chromatography, Liquid
Confidence intervals
Fluoroquinolones
Fluoroquinolones - analysis
Food Technology - methods
Kidney - chemistry
Kidneys
Liquid chromatography
Mass spectrometry
Meat - analysis
Monitoring
Muscles - chemistry
Poultry
QuEChERS
Recovery
Tandem Mass Spectrometry
title Multiresidue determination of fluoroquinolones in poultry muscle and kidney according to the regulation 2002/657/EC. A systematic comparison of two different approaches: Liquid chromatography coupled to high-resolution mass spectrometry or tandem mass spectrometry
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-25T13%3A14%3A08IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Multiresidue%20determination%20of%20fluoroquinolones%20in%20poultry%20muscle%20and%20kidney%20according%20to%20the%20regulation%202002/657/EC.%20A%20systematic%20comparison%20of%20two%20different%20approaches:%20Liquid%20chromatography%20coupled%20to%20high-resolution%20mass%20spectrometry%20or%20tandem%20mass%20spectrometry&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20Chromatography%20A&rft.au=Rocha,%20Diego%20G.&rft.date=2015-01-30&rft.volume=1379&rft.spage=83&rft.epage=91&rft.pages=83-91&rft.issn=0021-9673&rft.eissn=1873-3778&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.chroma.2014.12.058&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1800439045%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1800439045&rft_id=info:pmid/25577647&rft_els_id=S0021967314019906&rfr_iscdi=true