Introduction Strategies Put to the Test: Local Adaptation versus Heterosis
Plant biodiversity has declined seriously because of both habitat deterioration and habitat fragmentation. As a result, many species have been forced into small, fragmented, and isolated populations and are believed to suffer from higher extinction risks. Genetic reinforcement and the establishment...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Conservation biology 2004-06, Vol.18 (3), p.812-821 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 821 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 812 |
container_title | Conservation biology |
container_volume | 18 |
creator | VERGEER, PHILIPPINE SONDEREN, ESTHER OUBORG, N. JOOP |
description | Plant biodiversity has declined seriously because of both habitat deterioration and habitat fragmentation. As a result, many species have been forced into small, fragmented, and isolated populations and are believed to suffer from higher extinction risks. Genetic reinforcement and the establishment of new populations are now widely used to prevent extinction. However, the genetic background of transplants may seriously affect the long-term success of these populations because increased genetic variation may reduce the risk of inbreeding or lead to better performance by restored heterozygosity levels (heterosis). Introduced transplants, however, may be poorly adapted to the new local conditions. We tested the initial success of alternative introduction strategies. We evaluated the potential for inbreeding, heterosis, and/or local adaptation after introduction of artificial populations of Succisa pratensis. We introduced individuals from local and distant artificial populations that were created from either small or large populations. We created the artificial populations with the same census population size but varying effective population sizes by adjusting the relatedness of individuals. We analyzed the demographic consequences of inbreeding, heterosis, and/or local adaptation of these artificial populations. Reduced performance after selfing was manifested by a reduction in seed production, seed weight, germination, and flowering percentage. Seed production, seed weight, flowering percentage, and number of flowerheads were negatively affected by small population size. Local adaptation increased biomass and flowering percentage for local individuals. Seed weight and seed production exhibited significant heterosis. Our results demonstrate that threatened populations can benefit from introduction and genetic reinforcement of individuals from related populations. Significant differences among the artificial populations for several measured performance components suggest that introduction or reinforcement is best achieved through material from a local population or, when unavailable, from several large populations. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2004.00562.x |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_18001887</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>3589091</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>3589091</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4812-a4c6c04677f0b918fab8101e5fb12179f7fbe750a2ef0aeef126afeeb05d338e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkE9v1DAQxS0EEkvpN-DgC9wSZuI4dpA4lBW0i1ZtUUuRuFhOdgxZ0s1iO7D99nibanvFl7H03ps_P8Y4Qo7pvV3nKAuRoRJ1XgCUOYCsinz3hM0OwlM2A611pnVdPGcvQlgDQC2xnLHPi030w2psYzds-FX0NtKPjgK_HCOPA48_iV9TiO_4cmhtz09WdhvtvfkP-TAGfkaR_BC68JI9c7YPdPxQj9jXTx-v52fZ8uJ0MT9ZZm2pschs2VYtlJVSDpoatbONRkCSrsECVe2Ua0hJsAU5sEQOi8o6ogbkSghN4oi9mfpu_fB7TLuZ2y601Pd2Q8MYDGoA1Folo56MbdoveHJm67tb6-8MgtnDM2uzZ2T2jMwenrmHZ3Yp-vphhg3pbOftpu3CY17qSgsByfd-8v3terr77_5mfvFhkX4p_2rKr0Mc_CEvpK6hxiRnk9yFSLuDbP0vUymhpPl2fmpuvs9BfcEbcyn-AXmUm5Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>18001887</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Introduction Strategies Put to the Test: Local Adaptation versus Heterosis</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Wiley Online Library - AutoHoldings Journals</source><creator>VERGEER, PHILIPPINE ; SONDEREN, ESTHER ; OUBORG, N. JOOP</creator><creatorcontrib>VERGEER, PHILIPPINE ; SONDEREN, ESTHER ; OUBORG, N. JOOP</creatorcontrib><description>Plant biodiversity has declined seriously because of both habitat deterioration and habitat fragmentation. As a result, many species have been forced into small, fragmented, and isolated populations and are believed to suffer from higher extinction risks. Genetic reinforcement and the establishment of new populations are now widely used to prevent extinction. However, the genetic background of transplants may seriously affect the long-term success of these populations because increased genetic variation may reduce the risk of inbreeding or lead to better performance by restored heterozygosity levels (heterosis). Introduced transplants, however, may be poorly adapted to the new local conditions. We tested the initial success of alternative introduction strategies. We evaluated the potential for inbreeding, heterosis, and/or local adaptation after introduction of artificial populations of Succisa pratensis. We introduced individuals from local and distant artificial populations that were created from either small or large populations. We created the artificial populations with the same census population size but varying effective population sizes by adjusting the relatedness of individuals. We analyzed the demographic consequences of inbreeding, heterosis, and/or local adaptation of these artificial populations. Reduced performance after selfing was manifested by a reduction in seed production, seed weight, germination, and flowering percentage. Seed production, seed weight, flowering percentage, and number of flowerheads were negatively affected by small population size. Local adaptation increased biomass and flowering percentage for local individuals. Seed weight and seed production exhibited significant heterosis. Our results demonstrate that threatened populations can benefit from introduction and genetic reinforcement of individuals from related populations. Significant differences among the artificial populations for several measured performance components suggest that introduction or reinforcement is best achieved through material from a local population or, when unavailable, from several large populations.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0888-8892</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1523-1739</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2004.00562.x</identifier><identifier>CODEN: CBIOEF</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>350 Main Street , Malden , MA 02148 , USA , and 9600 Garsington Road , Oxford OX4 2DQ , UK: Blackwell Publishing Inc</publisher><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology ; Applied ecology ; Biological and medical sciences ; Conservation biology ; Conservation, protection and management of environment and wildlife ; Ecological genetics ; Evolutionary genetics ; exogamia ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Genetic variation ; Germination ; Heterosis ; Inbreeding ; introducciones multi-fuente ; introducciones uni-fuente ; multisource introductions ; outbreeding ; Parks, reserves, wildlife conservation. Endangered species: population survey and restocking ; Plants ; Population genetics ; Population size ; single-source introductions ; Succisa pratensis</subject><ispartof>Conservation biology, 2004-06, Vol.18 (3), p.812-821</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2004 Society for Conservation Biology</rights><rights>2004 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4812-a4c6c04677f0b918fab8101e5fb12179f7fbe750a2ef0aeef126afeeb05d338e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4812-a4c6c04677f0b918fab8101e5fb12179f7fbe750a2ef0aeef126afeeb05d338e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/3589091$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/3589091$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,1411,27901,27902,57992,58225</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=15868330$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>VERGEER, PHILIPPINE</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SONDEREN, ESTHER</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>OUBORG, N. JOOP</creatorcontrib><title>Introduction Strategies Put to the Test: Local Adaptation versus Heterosis</title><title>Conservation biology</title><description>Plant biodiversity has declined seriously because of both habitat deterioration and habitat fragmentation. As a result, many species have been forced into small, fragmented, and isolated populations and are believed to suffer from higher extinction risks. Genetic reinforcement and the establishment of new populations are now widely used to prevent extinction. However, the genetic background of transplants may seriously affect the long-term success of these populations because increased genetic variation may reduce the risk of inbreeding or lead to better performance by restored heterozygosity levels (heterosis). Introduced transplants, however, may be poorly adapted to the new local conditions. We tested the initial success of alternative introduction strategies. We evaluated the potential for inbreeding, heterosis, and/or local adaptation after introduction of artificial populations of Succisa pratensis. We introduced individuals from local and distant artificial populations that were created from either small or large populations. We created the artificial populations with the same census population size but varying effective population sizes by adjusting the relatedness of individuals. We analyzed the demographic consequences of inbreeding, heterosis, and/or local adaptation of these artificial populations. Reduced performance after selfing was manifested by a reduction in seed production, seed weight, germination, and flowering percentage. Seed production, seed weight, flowering percentage, and number of flowerheads were negatively affected by small population size. Local adaptation increased biomass and flowering percentage for local individuals. Seed weight and seed production exhibited significant heterosis. Our results demonstrate that threatened populations can benefit from introduction and genetic reinforcement of individuals from related populations. Significant differences among the artificial populations for several measured performance components suggest that introduction or reinforcement is best achieved through material from a local population or, when unavailable, from several large populations.</description><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</subject><subject>Applied ecology</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Conservation biology</subject><subject>Conservation, protection and management of environment and wildlife</subject><subject>Ecological genetics</subject><subject>Evolutionary genetics</subject><subject>exogamia</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Genetic variation</subject><subject>Germination</subject><subject>Heterosis</subject><subject>Inbreeding</subject><subject>introducciones multi-fuente</subject><subject>introducciones uni-fuente</subject><subject>multisource introductions</subject><subject>outbreeding</subject><subject>Parks, reserves, wildlife conservation. Endangered species: population survey and restocking</subject><subject>Plants</subject><subject>Population genetics</subject><subject>Population size</subject><subject>single-source introductions</subject><subject>Succisa pratensis</subject><issn>0888-8892</issn><issn>1523-1739</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkE9v1DAQxS0EEkvpN-DgC9wSZuI4dpA4lBW0i1ZtUUuRuFhOdgxZ0s1iO7D99nibanvFl7H03ps_P8Y4Qo7pvV3nKAuRoRJ1XgCUOYCsinz3hM0OwlM2A611pnVdPGcvQlgDQC2xnLHPi030w2psYzds-FX0NtKPjgK_HCOPA48_iV9TiO_4cmhtz09WdhvtvfkP-TAGfkaR_BC68JI9c7YPdPxQj9jXTx-v52fZ8uJ0MT9ZZm2pschs2VYtlJVSDpoatbONRkCSrsECVe2Ua0hJsAU5sEQOi8o6ogbkSghN4oi9mfpu_fB7TLuZ2y601Pd2Q8MYDGoA1Folo56MbdoveHJm67tb6-8MgtnDM2uzZ2T2jMwenrmHZ3Yp-vphhg3pbOftpu3CY17qSgsByfd-8v3terr77_5mfvFhkX4p_2rKr0Mc_CEvpK6hxiRnk9yFSLuDbP0vUymhpPl2fmpuvs9BfcEbcyn-AXmUm5Q</recordid><startdate>200406</startdate><enddate>200406</enddate><creator>VERGEER, PHILIPPINE</creator><creator>SONDEREN, ESTHER</creator><creator>OUBORG, N. JOOP</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Inc</general><general>Blackwell Science</general><general>Blackwell</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>C1K</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200406</creationdate><title>Introduction Strategies Put to the Test: Local Adaptation versus Heterosis</title><author>VERGEER, PHILIPPINE ; SONDEREN, ESTHER ; OUBORG, N. JOOP</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4812-a4c6c04677f0b918fab8101e5fb12179f7fbe750a2ef0aeef126afeeb05d338e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</topic><topic>Applied ecology</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Conservation biology</topic><topic>Conservation, protection and management of environment and wildlife</topic><topic>Ecological genetics</topic><topic>Evolutionary genetics</topic><topic>exogamia</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Genetic variation</topic><topic>Germination</topic><topic>Heterosis</topic><topic>Inbreeding</topic><topic>introducciones multi-fuente</topic><topic>introducciones uni-fuente</topic><topic>multisource introductions</topic><topic>outbreeding</topic><topic>Parks, reserves, wildlife conservation. Endangered species: population survey and restocking</topic><topic>Plants</topic><topic>Population genetics</topic><topic>Population size</topic><topic>single-source introductions</topic><topic>Succisa pratensis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>VERGEER, PHILIPPINE</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SONDEREN, ESTHER</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>OUBORG, N. JOOP</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><jtitle>Conservation biology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>VERGEER, PHILIPPINE</au><au>SONDEREN, ESTHER</au><au>OUBORG, N. JOOP</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Introduction Strategies Put to the Test: Local Adaptation versus Heterosis</atitle><jtitle>Conservation biology</jtitle><date>2004-06</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>18</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>812</spage><epage>821</epage><pages>812-821</pages><issn>0888-8892</issn><eissn>1523-1739</eissn><coden>CBIOEF</coden><abstract>Plant biodiversity has declined seriously because of both habitat deterioration and habitat fragmentation. As a result, many species have been forced into small, fragmented, and isolated populations and are believed to suffer from higher extinction risks. Genetic reinforcement and the establishment of new populations are now widely used to prevent extinction. However, the genetic background of transplants may seriously affect the long-term success of these populations because increased genetic variation may reduce the risk of inbreeding or lead to better performance by restored heterozygosity levels (heterosis). Introduced transplants, however, may be poorly adapted to the new local conditions. We tested the initial success of alternative introduction strategies. We evaluated the potential for inbreeding, heterosis, and/or local adaptation after introduction of artificial populations of Succisa pratensis. We introduced individuals from local and distant artificial populations that were created from either small or large populations. We created the artificial populations with the same census population size but varying effective population sizes by adjusting the relatedness of individuals. We analyzed the demographic consequences of inbreeding, heterosis, and/or local adaptation of these artificial populations. Reduced performance after selfing was manifested by a reduction in seed production, seed weight, germination, and flowering percentage. Seed production, seed weight, flowering percentage, and number of flowerheads were negatively affected by small population size. Local adaptation increased biomass and flowering percentage for local individuals. Seed weight and seed production exhibited significant heterosis. Our results demonstrate that threatened populations can benefit from introduction and genetic reinforcement of individuals from related populations. Significant differences among the artificial populations for several measured performance components suggest that introduction or reinforcement is best achieved through material from a local population or, when unavailable, from several large populations.</abstract><cop>350 Main Street , Malden , MA 02148 , USA , and 9600 Garsington Road , Oxford OX4 2DQ , UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Inc</pub><doi>10.1111/j.1523-1739.2004.00562.x</doi><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0888-8892 |
ispartof | Conservation biology, 2004-06, Vol.18 (3), p.812-821 |
issn | 0888-8892 1523-1739 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_18001887 |
source | Jstor Complete Legacy; Wiley Online Library - AutoHoldings Journals |
subjects | Animal, plant and microbial ecology Applied ecology Biological and medical sciences Conservation biology Conservation, protection and management of environment and wildlife Ecological genetics Evolutionary genetics exogamia Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Genetic variation Germination Heterosis Inbreeding introducciones multi-fuente introducciones uni-fuente multisource introductions outbreeding Parks, reserves, wildlife conservation. Endangered species: population survey and restocking Plants Population genetics Population size single-source introductions Succisa pratensis |
title | Introduction Strategies Put to the Test: Local Adaptation versus Heterosis |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-31T22%3A24%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Introduction%20Strategies%20Put%20to%20the%20Test:%20Local%20Adaptation%20versus%20Heterosis&rft.jtitle=Conservation%20biology&rft.au=VERGEER,%20PHILIPPINE&rft.date=2004-06&rft.volume=18&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=812&rft.epage=821&rft.pages=812-821&rft.issn=0888-8892&rft.eissn=1523-1739&rft.coden=CBIOEF&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2004.00562.x&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E3589091%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=18001887&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=3589091&rfr_iscdi=true |