Introduction Strategies Put to the Test: Local Adaptation versus Heterosis

Plant biodiversity has declined seriously because of both habitat deterioration and habitat fragmentation. As a result, many species have been forced into small, fragmented, and isolated populations and are believed to suffer from higher extinction risks. Genetic reinforcement and the establishment...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Conservation biology 2004-06, Vol.18 (3), p.812-821
Hauptverfasser: VERGEER, PHILIPPINE, SONDEREN, ESTHER, OUBORG, N. JOOP
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 821
container_issue 3
container_start_page 812
container_title Conservation biology
container_volume 18
creator VERGEER, PHILIPPINE
SONDEREN, ESTHER
OUBORG, N. JOOP
description Plant biodiversity has declined seriously because of both habitat deterioration and habitat fragmentation. As a result, many species have been forced into small, fragmented, and isolated populations and are believed to suffer from higher extinction risks. Genetic reinforcement and the establishment of new populations are now widely used to prevent extinction. However, the genetic background of transplants may seriously affect the long-term success of these populations because increased genetic variation may reduce the risk of inbreeding or lead to better performance by restored heterozygosity levels (heterosis). Introduced transplants, however, may be poorly adapted to the new local conditions. We tested the initial success of alternative introduction strategies. We evaluated the potential for inbreeding, heterosis, and/or local adaptation after introduction of artificial populations of Succisa pratensis. We introduced individuals from local and distant artificial populations that were created from either small or large populations. We created the artificial populations with the same census population size but varying effective population sizes by adjusting the relatedness of individuals. We analyzed the demographic consequences of inbreeding, heterosis, and/or local adaptation of these artificial populations. Reduced performance after selfing was manifested by a reduction in seed production, seed weight, germination, and flowering percentage. Seed production, seed weight, flowering percentage, and number of flowerheads were negatively affected by small population size. Local adaptation increased biomass and flowering percentage for local individuals. Seed weight and seed production exhibited significant heterosis. Our results demonstrate that threatened populations can benefit from introduction and genetic reinforcement of individuals from related populations. Significant differences among the artificial populations for several measured performance components suggest that introduction or reinforcement is best achieved through material from a local population or, when unavailable, from several large populations.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2004.00562.x
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_18001887</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>3589091</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>3589091</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4812-a4c6c04677f0b918fab8101e5fb12179f7fbe750a2ef0aeef126afeeb05d338e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkE9v1DAQxS0EEkvpN-DgC9wSZuI4dpA4lBW0i1ZtUUuRuFhOdgxZ0s1iO7D99nibanvFl7H03ps_P8Y4Qo7pvV3nKAuRoRJ1XgCUOYCsinz3hM0OwlM2A611pnVdPGcvQlgDQC2xnLHPi030w2psYzds-FX0NtKPjgK_HCOPA48_iV9TiO_4cmhtz09WdhvtvfkP-TAGfkaR_BC68JI9c7YPdPxQj9jXTx-v52fZ8uJ0MT9ZZm2pschs2VYtlJVSDpoatbONRkCSrsECVe2Ua0hJsAU5sEQOi8o6ogbkSghN4oi9mfpu_fB7TLuZ2y601Pd2Q8MYDGoA1Folo56MbdoveHJm67tb6-8MgtnDM2uzZ2T2jMwenrmHZ3Yp-vphhg3pbOftpu3CY17qSgsByfd-8v3terr77_5mfvFhkX4p_2rKr0Mc_CEvpK6hxiRnk9yFSLuDbP0vUymhpPl2fmpuvs9BfcEbcyn-AXmUm5Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>18001887</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Introduction Strategies Put to the Test: Local Adaptation versus Heterosis</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Wiley Online Library - AutoHoldings Journals</source><creator>VERGEER, PHILIPPINE ; SONDEREN, ESTHER ; OUBORG, N. JOOP</creator><creatorcontrib>VERGEER, PHILIPPINE ; SONDEREN, ESTHER ; OUBORG, N. JOOP</creatorcontrib><description>Plant biodiversity has declined seriously because of both habitat deterioration and habitat fragmentation. As a result, many species have been forced into small, fragmented, and isolated populations and are believed to suffer from higher extinction risks. Genetic reinforcement and the establishment of new populations are now widely used to prevent extinction. However, the genetic background of transplants may seriously affect the long-term success of these populations because increased genetic variation may reduce the risk of inbreeding or lead to better performance by restored heterozygosity levels (heterosis). Introduced transplants, however, may be poorly adapted to the new local conditions. We tested the initial success of alternative introduction strategies. We evaluated the potential for inbreeding, heterosis, and/or local adaptation after introduction of artificial populations of Succisa pratensis. We introduced individuals from local and distant artificial populations that were created from either small or large populations. We created the artificial populations with the same census population size but varying effective population sizes by adjusting the relatedness of individuals. We analyzed the demographic consequences of inbreeding, heterosis, and/or local adaptation of these artificial populations. Reduced performance after selfing was manifested by a reduction in seed production, seed weight, germination, and flowering percentage. Seed production, seed weight, flowering percentage, and number of flowerheads were negatively affected by small population size. Local adaptation increased biomass and flowering percentage for local individuals. Seed weight and seed production exhibited significant heterosis. Our results demonstrate that threatened populations can benefit from introduction and genetic reinforcement of individuals from related populations. Significant differences among the artificial populations for several measured performance components suggest that introduction or reinforcement is best achieved through material from a local population or, when unavailable, from several large populations.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0888-8892</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1523-1739</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2004.00562.x</identifier><identifier>CODEN: CBIOEF</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>350 Main Street , Malden , MA 02148 , USA , and 9600 Garsington Road , Oxford OX4 2DQ , UK: Blackwell Publishing Inc</publisher><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology ; Applied ecology ; Biological and medical sciences ; Conservation biology ; Conservation, protection and management of environment and wildlife ; Ecological genetics ; Evolutionary genetics ; exogamia ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Genetic variation ; Germination ; Heterosis ; Inbreeding ; introducciones multi-fuente ; introducciones uni-fuente ; multisource introductions ; outbreeding ; Parks, reserves, wildlife conservation. Endangered species: population survey and restocking ; Plants ; Population genetics ; Population size ; single-source introductions ; Succisa pratensis</subject><ispartof>Conservation biology, 2004-06, Vol.18 (3), p.812-821</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2004 Society for Conservation Biology</rights><rights>2004 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4812-a4c6c04677f0b918fab8101e5fb12179f7fbe750a2ef0aeef126afeeb05d338e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4812-a4c6c04677f0b918fab8101e5fb12179f7fbe750a2ef0aeef126afeeb05d338e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/3589091$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/3589091$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,1411,27901,27902,57992,58225</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=15868330$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>VERGEER, PHILIPPINE</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SONDEREN, ESTHER</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>OUBORG, N. JOOP</creatorcontrib><title>Introduction Strategies Put to the Test: Local Adaptation versus Heterosis</title><title>Conservation biology</title><description>Plant biodiversity has declined seriously because of both habitat deterioration and habitat fragmentation. As a result, many species have been forced into small, fragmented, and isolated populations and are believed to suffer from higher extinction risks. Genetic reinforcement and the establishment of new populations are now widely used to prevent extinction. However, the genetic background of transplants may seriously affect the long-term success of these populations because increased genetic variation may reduce the risk of inbreeding or lead to better performance by restored heterozygosity levels (heterosis). Introduced transplants, however, may be poorly adapted to the new local conditions. We tested the initial success of alternative introduction strategies. We evaluated the potential for inbreeding, heterosis, and/or local adaptation after introduction of artificial populations of Succisa pratensis. We introduced individuals from local and distant artificial populations that were created from either small or large populations. We created the artificial populations with the same census population size but varying effective population sizes by adjusting the relatedness of individuals. We analyzed the demographic consequences of inbreeding, heterosis, and/or local adaptation of these artificial populations. Reduced performance after selfing was manifested by a reduction in seed production, seed weight, germination, and flowering percentage. Seed production, seed weight, flowering percentage, and number of flowerheads were negatively affected by small population size. Local adaptation increased biomass and flowering percentage for local individuals. Seed weight and seed production exhibited significant heterosis. Our results demonstrate that threatened populations can benefit from introduction and genetic reinforcement of individuals from related populations. Significant differences among the artificial populations for several measured performance components suggest that introduction or reinforcement is best achieved through material from a local population or, when unavailable, from several large populations.</description><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</subject><subject>Applied ecology</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Conservation biology</subject><subject>Conservation, protection and management of environment and wildlife</subject><subject>Ecological genetics</subject><subject>Evolutionary genetics</subject><subject>exogamia</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Genetic variation</subject><subject>Germination</subject><subject>Heterosis</subject><subject>Inbreeding</subject><subject>introducciones multi-fuente</subject><subject>introducciones uni-fuente</subject><subject>multisource introductions</subject><subject>outbreeding</subject><subject>Parks, reserves, wildlife conservation. Endangered species: population survey and restocking</subject><subject>Plants</subject><subject>Population genetics</subject><subject>Population size</subject><subject>single-source introductions</subject><subject>Succisa pratensis</subject><issn>0888-8892</issn><issn>1523-1739</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkE9v1DAQxS0EEkvpN-DgC9wSZuI4dpA4lBW0i1ZtUUuRuFhOdgxZ0s1iO7D99nibanvFl7H03ps_P8Y4Qo7pvV3nKAuRoRJ1XgCUOYCsinz3hM0OwlM2A611pnVdPGcvQlgDQC2xnLHPi030w2psYzds-FX0NtKPjgK_HCOPA48_iV9TiO_4cmhtz09WdhvtvfkP-TAGfkaR_BC68JI9c7YPdPxQj9jXTx-v52fZ8uJ0MT9ZZm2pschs2VYtlJVSDpoatbONRkCSrsECVe2Ua0hJsAU5sEQOi8o6ogbkSghN4oi9mfpu_fB7TLuZ2y601Pd2Q8MYDGoA1Folo56MbdoveHJm67tb6-8MgtnDM2uzZ2T2jMwenrmHZ3Yp-vphhg3pbOftpu3CY17qSgsByfd-8v3terr77_5mfvFhkX4p_2rKr0Mc_CEvpK6hxiRnk9yFSLuDbP0vUymhpPl2fmpuvs9BfcEbcyn-AXmUm5Q</recordid><startdate>200406</startdate><enddate>200406</enddate><creator>VERGEER, PHILIPPINE</creator><creator>SONDEREN, ESTHER</creator><creator>OUBORG, N. JOOP</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Inc</general><general>Blackwell Science</general><general>Blackwell</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>C1K</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200406</creationdate><title>Introduction Strategies Put to the Test: Local Adaptation versus Heterosis</title><author>VERGEER, PHILIPPINE ; SONDEREN, ESTHER ; OUBORG, N. JOOP</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4812-a4c6c04677f0b918fab8101e5fb12179f7fbe750a2ef0aeef126afeeb05d338e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</topic><topic>Applied ecology</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Conservation biology</topic><topic>Conservation, protection and management of environment and wildlife</topic><topic>Ecological genetics</topic><topic>Evolutionary genetics</topic><topic>exogamia</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Genetic variation</topic><topic>Germination</topic><topic>Heterosis</topic><topic>Inbreeding</topic><topic>introducciones multi-fuente</topic><topic>introducciones uni-fuente</topic><topic>multisource introductions</topic><topic>outbreeding</topic><topic>Parks, reserves, wildlife conservation. Endangered species: population survey and restocking</topic><topic>Plants</topic><topic>Population genetics</topic><topic>Population size</topic><topic>single-source introductions</topic><topic>Succisa pratensis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>VERGEER, PHILIPPINE</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SONDEREN, ESTHER</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>OUBORG, N. JOOP</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><jtitle>Conservation biology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>VERGEER, PHILIPPINE</au><au>SONDEREN, ESTHER</au><au>OUBORG, N. JOOP</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Introduction Strategies Put to the Test: Local Adaptation versus Heterosis</atitle><jtitle>Conservation biology</jtitle><date>2004-06</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>18</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>812</spage><epage>821</epage><pages>812-821</pages><issn>0888-8892</issn><eissn>1523-1739</eissn><coden>CBIOEF</coden><abstract>Plant biodiversity has declined seriously because of both habitat deterioration and habitat fragmentation. As a result, many species have been forced into small, fragmented, and isolated populations and are believed to suffer from higher extinction risks. Genetic reinforcement and the establishment of new populations are now widely used to prevent extinction. However, the genetic background of transplants may seriously affect the long-term success of these populations because increased genetic variation may reduce the risk of inbreeding or lead to better performance by restored heterozygosity levels (heterosis). Introduced transplants, however, may be poorly adapted to the new local conditions. We tested the initial success of alternative introduction strategies. We evaluated the potential for inbreeding, heterosis, and/or local adaptation after introduction of artificial populations of Succisa pratensis. We introduced individuals from local and distant artificial populations that were created from either small or large populations. We created the artificial populations with the same census population size but varying effective population sizes by adjusting the relatedness of individuals. We analyzed the demographic consequences of inbreeding, heterosis, and/or local adaptation of these artificial populations. Reduced performance after selfing was manifested by a reduction in seed production, seed weight, germination, and flowering percentage. Seed production, seed weight, flowering percentage, and number of flowerheads were negatively affected by small population size. Local adaptation increased biomass and flowering percentage for local individuals. Seed weight and seed production exhibited significant heterosis. Our results demonstrate that threatened populations can benefit from introduction and genetic reinforcement of individuals from related populations. Significant differences among the artificial populations for several measured performance components suggest that introduction or reinforcement is best achieved through material from a local population or, when unavailable, from several large populations.</abstract><cop>350 Main Street , Malden , MA 02148 , USA , and 9600 Garsington Road , Oxford OX4 2DQ , UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Inc</pub><doi>10.1111/j.1523-1739.2004.00562.x</doi><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0888-8892
ispartof Conservation biology, 2004-06, Vol.18 (3), p.812-821
issn 0888-8892
1523-1739
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_18001887
source Jstor Complete Legacy; Wiley Online Library - AutoHoldings Journals
subjects Animal, plant and microbial ecology
Applied ecology
Biological and medical sciences
Conservation biology
Conservation, protection and management of environment and wildlife
Ecological genetics
Evolutionary genetics
exogamia
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Genetic variation
Germination
Heterosis
Inbreeding
introducciones multi-fuente
introducciones uni-fuente
multisource introductions
outbreeding
Parks, reserves, wildlife conservation. Endangered species: population survey and restocking
Plants
Population genetics
Population size
single-source introductions
Succisa pratensis
title Introduction Strategies Put to the Test: Local Adaptation versus Heterosis
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-31T22%3A24%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Introduction%20Strategies%20Put%20to%20the%20Test:%20Local%20Adaptation%20versus%20Heterosis&rft.jtitle=Conservation%20biology&rft.au=VERGEER,%20PHILIPPINE&rft.date=2004-06&rft.volume=18&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=812&rft.epage=821&rft.pages=812-821&rft.issn=0888-8892&rft.eissn=1523-1739&rft.coden=CBIOEF&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2004.00562.x&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E3589091%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=18001887&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=3589091&rfr_iscdi=true