Where should a laminoplasty start? The effect of the proximal level on post-laminoplasty loss of lordosis

Abstract Background Context Open-door laminoplasty is a useful operation in the surgical management of cervical myelopathy with favorable outcomes and relatively low complications. One potential undesirable outcome is a decrease in cervical lordosis postoperatively. It is unknown whether the most pr...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The spine journal 2016-06, Vol.16 (6), p.737-741
Hauptverfasser: Michael, Keith W., M.D, Neustein, Thomas M., B.A, Rhee, John M., M.D
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 741
container_issue 6
container_start_page 737
container_title The spine journal
container_volume 16
creator Michael, Keith W., M.D
Neustein, Thomas M., B.A
Rhee, John M., M.D
description Abstract Background Context Open-door laminoplasty is a useful operation in the surgical management of cervical myelopathy with favorable outcomes and relatively low complications. One potential undesirable outcome is a decrease in cervical lordosis postoperatively. It is unknown whether the most proximal level undergoing laminoplasty affects the magnitude of loss of lordosis. Purpose To compare the loss of cervical lordosis postoperatively in patients for whom the most proximal level undergoing laminoplasty is C3 versus C4. Study Design/Setting Retrospective radiographic review at an academic center. Patient Sample 65 patients at a single institution who underwent plated open door laminoplasty for cervical myelopathy by multiple surgeons over a five-year period were included. Outcome Measures The primary outcome was change in cervical lordosis, which was the difference in C2-T1 Cobb Angle between the postoperative and preoperative films. Methods Patients were divided into two groups based on the most proximal vertebral level undergoing laminoplasty. Forty-nine patients underwent laminoplasty beginning at C3, while sixteen patients underwent laminoplasty beginning at C4. The C2-T1 Cobb angle was measured on the preoperative film and on the final postoperative follow-up film. The difference between these values was calculated for each patient, and the mean of the differences for the C3 group was compared to that of the C4 group. Results When C3 was the proximal plated laminoplasty level, loss of lordosis averaged 9°. In contrast, when C4 was the proximal plated level, loss of lordosis was significantly less and averaged only 3° (p=0.047). In the group as a whole, mean preoperative lordosis was 18° compared with 11° postoperatively, for an overall 7° loss of lordosis. Conclusions Starting the laminoplasty at C4 led to significantly less loss of lordosis than starting at C3. When the pattern of spinal cord compression does not require laminoplasty at C3, consideration should be given to making C4 the most cephalad laminoplasty level rather than C3 in order to better preserve lordosis.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.spinee.2016.01.188
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1799556085</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S1529943016003016</els_id><sourcerecordid>1799556085</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c417t-d53ef57e9b3b1aef504abbca02e5c56e1962607f4092ffd7e44379fd614a66c43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU1v1DAQhi0EoqXwDxDykUvCjJM4yQWEKr6kShzaqkfLccZaL9442EnF_vs62oIEFy72jPS-8_EMY68RSgSU7_Zlmt1EVIqclYAldt0Tdo5d2xUoK_E0x43oi76u4Iy9SGkPAF2L4jk7E7ITHSCeM3e3o0g87cLqR6651wc3hdnrtBx5WnRcPvCbHXGylszCg-VLzuYYfrmD9tzTPXkeJj6HtBR_mX1IadP7EMeQXHrJnlntE716_C_Y7edPN5dfi6vvX75dfrwqTI3tUoxNRbZpqR-qAXUOodbDYDQIakwjCXspJLS2hl5YO7ZU11Xb21FiraU0dXXB3p7q5iF_rpQWdXDJkPd6orAmhW3fN42ErsnS-iQ1MQ8byao55rXiUSGoDbLaqxNktUFWgCpDzrY3jx3W4UDjH9Nvqlnw_iSgvOe9o6iScTQZGl3MFNUY3P86_FvAeDc5o_0POlLahzVOmaFClYQCdb0derszSoDtrR4Anc6l9w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1799556085</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Where should a laminoplasty start? The effect of the proximal level on post-laminoplasty loss of lordosis</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Michael, Keith W., M.D ; Neustein, Thomas M., B.A ; Rhee, John M., M.D</creator><creatorcontrib>Michael, Keith W., M.D ; Neustein, Thomas M., B.A ; Rhee, John M., M.D</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Background Context Open-door laminoplasty is a useful operation in the surgical management of cervical myelopathy with favorable outcomes and relatively low complications. One potential undesirable outcome is a decrease in cervical lordosis postoperatively. It is unknown whether the most proximal level undergoing laminoplasty affects the magnitude of loss of lordosis. Purpose To compare the loss of cervical lordosis postoperatively in patients for whom the most proximal level undergoing laminoplasty is C3 versus C4. Study Design/Setting Retrospective radiographic review at an academic center. Patient Sample 65 patients at a single institution who underwent plated open door laminoplasty for cervical myelopathy by multiple surgeons over a five-year period were included. Outcome Measures The primary outcome was change in cervical lordosis, which was the difference in C2-T1 Cobb Angle between the postoperative and preoperative films. Methods Patients were divided into two groups based on the most proximal vertebral level undergoing laminoplasty. Forty-nine patients underwent laminoplasty beginning at C3, while sixteen patients underwent laminoplasty beginning at C4. The C2-T1 Cobb angle was measured on the preoperative film and on the final postoperative follow-up film. The difference between these values was calculated for each patient, and the mean of the differences for the C3 group was compared to that of the C4 group. Results When C3 was the proximal plated laminoplasty level, loss of lordosis averaged 9°. In contrast, when C4 was the proximal plated level, loss of lordosis was significantly less and averaged only 3° (p=0.047). In the group as a whole, mean preoperative lordosis was 18° compared with 11° postoperatively, for an overall 7° loss of lordosis. Conclusions Starting the laminoplasty at C4 led to significantly less loss of lordosis than starting at C3. When the pattern of spinal cord compression does not require laminoplasty at C3, consideration should be given to making C4 the most cephalad laminoplasty level rather than C3 in order to better preserve lordosis.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1529-9430</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1878-1632</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2016.01.188</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26828011</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Bone Plates - adverse effects ; Cervical myelopathy ; Cervical spine ; Cervical spine surgery ; Cervical Vertebrae - surgery ; Complications ; Female ; Humans ; Kyphosis ; Laminoplasty ; Laminoplasty - adverse effects ; Laminoplasty - instrumentation ; Laminoplasty - methods ; Lordosis ; Lordosis - surgery ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Orthopedics ; Postoperative Complications ; Retrospective Studies ; Sagittal alignment ; Sagittal balance ; Spinal Cord Compression - surgery</subject><ispartof>The spine journal, 2016-06, Vol.16 (6), p.737-741</ispartof><rights>2016 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c417t-d53ef57e9b3b1aef504abbca02e5c56e1962607f4092ffd7e44379fd614a66c43</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c417t-d53ef57e9b3b1aef504abbca02e5c56e1962607f4092ffd7e44379fd614a66c43</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2016.01.188$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3548,27922,27923,45993</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26828011$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Michael, Keith W., M.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Neustein, Thomas M., B.A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rhee, John M., M.D</creatorcontrib><title>Where should a laminoplasty start? The effect of the proximal level on post-laminoplasty loss of lordosis</title><title>The spine journal</title><addtitle>Spine J</addtitle><description>Abstract Background Context Open-door laminoplasty is a useful operation in the surgical management of cervical myelopathy with favorable outcomes and relatively low complications. One potential undesirable outcome is a decrease in cervical lordosis postoperatively. It is unknown whether the most proximal level undergoing laminoplasty affects the magnitude of loss of lordosis. Purpose To compare the loss of cervical lordosis postoperatively in patients for whom the most proximal level undergoing laminoplasty is C3 versus C4. Study Design/Setting Retrospective radiographic review at an academic center. Patient Sample 65 patients at a single institution who underwent plated open door laminoplasty for cervical myelopathy by multiple surgeons over a five-year period were included. Outcome Measures The primary outcome was change in cervical lordosis, which was the difference in C2-T1 Cobb Angle between the postoperative and preoperative films. Methods Patients were divided into two groups based on the most proximal vertebral level undergoing laminoplasty. Forty-nine patients underwent laminoplasty beginning at C3, while sixteen patients underwent laminoplasty beginning at C4. The C2-T1 Cobb angle was measured on the preoperative film and on the final postoperative follow-up film. The difference between these values was calculated for each patient, and the mean of the differences for the C3 group was compared to that of the C4 group. Results When C3 was the proximal plated laminoplasty level, loss of lordosis averaged 9°. In contrast, when C4 was the proximal plated level, loss of lordosis was significantly less and averaged only 3° (p=0.047). In the group as a whole, mean preoperative lordosis was 18° compared with 11° postoperatively, for an overall 7° loss of lordosis. Conclusions Starting the laminoplasty at C4 led to significantly less loss of lordosis than starting at C3. When the pattern of spinal cord compression does not require laminoplasty at C3, consideration should be given to making C4 the most cephalad laminoplasty level rather than C3 in order to better preserve lordosis.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Bone Plates - adverse effects</subject><subject>Cervical myelopathy</subject><subject>Cervical spine</subject><subject>Cervical spine surgery</subject><subject>Cervical Vertebrae - surgery</subject><subject>Complications</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Kyphosis</subject><subject>Laminoplasty</subject><subject>Laminoplasty - adverse effects</subject><subject>Laminoplasty - instrumentation</subject><subject>Laminoplasty - methods</subject><subject>Lordosis</subject><subject>Lordosis - surgery</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Orthopedics</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Sagittal alignment</subject><subject>Sagittal balance</subject><subject>Spinal Cord Compression - surgery</subject><issn>1529-9430</issn><issn>1878-1632</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkU1v1DAQhi0EoqXwDxDykUvCjJM4yQWEKr6kShzaqkfLccZaL9442EnF_vs62oIEFy72jPS-8_EMY68RSgSU7_Zlmt1EVIqclYAldt0Tdo5d2xUoK_E0x43oi76u4Iy9SGkPAF2L4jk7E7ITHSCeM3e3o0g87cLqR6651wc3hdnrtBx5WnRcPvCbHXGylszCg-VLzuYYfrmD9tzTPXkeJj6HtBR_mX1IadP7EMeQXHrJnlntE716_C_Y7edPN5dfi6vvX75dfrwqTI3tUoxNRbZpqR-qAXUOodbDYDQIakwjCXspJLS2hl5YO7ZU11Xb21FiraU0dXXB3p7q5iF_rpQWdXDJkPd6orAmhW3fN42ErsnS-iQ1MQ8byao55rXiUSGoDbLaqxNktUFWgCpDzrY3jx3W4UDjH9Nvqlnw_iSgvOe9o6iScTQZGl3MFNUY3P86_FvAeDc5o_0POlLahzVOmaFClYQCdb0derszSoDtrR4Anc6l9w</recordid><startdate>20160601</startdate><enddate>20160601</enddate><creator>Michael, Keith W., M.D</creator><creator>Neustein, Thomas M., B.A</creator><creator>Rhee, John M., M.D</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160601</creationdate><title>Where should a laminoplasty start? The effect of the proximal level on post-laminoplasty loss of lordosis</title><author>Michael, Keith W., M.D ; Neustein, Thomas M., B.A ; Rhee, John M., M.D</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c417t-d53ef57e9b3b1aef504abbca02e5c56e1962607f4092ffd7e44379fd614a66c43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Bone Plates - adverse effects</topic><topic>Cervical myelopathy</topic><topic>Cervical spine</topic><topic>Cervical spine surgery</topic><topic>Cervical Vertebrae - surgery</topic><topic>Complications</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Kyphosis</topic><topic>Laminoplasty</topic><topic>Laminoplasty - adverse effects</topic><topic>Laminoplasty - instrumentation</topic><topic>Laminoplasty - methods</topic><topic>Lordosis</topic><topic>Lordosis - surgery</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Orthopedics</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Sagittal alignment</topic><topic>Sagittal balance</topic><topic>Spinal Cord Compression - surgery</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Michael, Keith W., M.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Neustein, Thomas M., B.A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rhee, John M., M.D</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The spine journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Michael, Keith W., M.D</au><au>Neustein, Thomas M., B.A</au><au>Rhee, John M., M.D</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Where should a laminoplasty start? The effect of the proximal level on post-laminoplasty loss of lordosis</atitle><jtitle>The spine journal</jtitle><addtitle>Spine J</addtitle><date>2016-06-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>16</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>737</spage><epage>741</epage><pages>737-741</pages><issn>1529-9430</issn><eissn>1878-1632</eissn><abstract>Abstract Background Context Open-door laminoplasty is a useful operation in the surgical management of cervical myelopathy with favorable outcomes and relatively low complications. One potential undesirable outcome is a decrease in cervical lordosis postoperatively. It is unknown whether the most proximal level undergoing laminoplasty affects the magnitude of loss of lordosis. Purpose To compare the loss of cervical lordosis postoperatively in patients for whom the most proximal level undergoing laminoplasty is C3 versus C4. Study Design/Setting Retrospective radiographic review at an academic center. Patient Sample 65 patients at a single institution who underwent plated open door laminoplasty for cervical myelopathy by multiple surgeons over a five-year period were included. Outcome Measures The primary outcome was change in cervical lordosis, which was the difference in C2-T1 Cobb Angle between the postoperative and preoperative films. Methods Patients were divided into two groups based on the most proximal vertebral level undergoing laminoplasty. Forty-nine patients underwent laminoplasty beginning at C3, while sixteen patients underwent laminoplasty beginning at C4. The C2-T1 Cobb angle was measured on the preoperative film and on the final postoperative follow-up film. The difference between these values was calculated for each patient, and the mean of the differences for the C3 group was compared to that of the C4 group. Results When C3 was the proximal plated laminoplasty level, loss of lordosis averaged 9°. In contrast, when C4 was the proximal plated level, loss of lordosis was significantly less and averaged only 3° (p=0.047). In the group as a whole, mean preoperative lordosis was 18° compared with 11° postoperatively, for an overall 7° loss of lordosis. Conclusions Starting the laminoplasty at C4 led to significantly less loss of lordosis than starting at C3. When the pattern of spinal cord compression does not require laminoplasty at C3, consideration should be given to making C4 the most cephalad laminoplasty level rather than C3 in order to better preserve lordosis.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>26828011</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.spinee.2016.01.188</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1529-9430
ispartof The spine journal, 2016-06, Vol.16 (6), p.737-741
issn 1529-9430
1878-1632
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1799556085
source MEDLINE; ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)
subjects Adult
Aged
Bone Plates - adverse effects
Cervical myelopathy
Cervical spine
Cervical spine surgery
Cervical Vertebrae - surgery
Complications
Female
Humans
Kyphosis
Laminoplasty
Laminoplasty - adverse effects
Laminoplasty - instrumentation
Laminoplasty - methods
Lordosis
Lordosis - surgery
Male
Middle Aged
Orthopedics
Postoperative Complications
Retrospective Studies
Sagittal alignment
Sagittal balance
Spinal Cord Compression - surgery
title Where should a laminoplasty start? The effect of the proximal level on post-laminoplasty loss of lordosis
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-09T23%3A29%3A07IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Where%20should%20a%20laminoplasty%20start?%20The%20effect%20of%20the%20proximal%20level%20on%20post-laminoplasty%20loss%20of%20lordosis&rft.jtitle=The%20spine%20journal&rft.au=Michael,%20Keith%20W.,%20M.D&rft.date=2016-06-01&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=737&rft.epage=741&rft.pages=737-741&rft.issn=1529-9430&rft.eissn=1878-1632&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.spinee.2016.01.188&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1799556085%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1799556085&rft_id=info:pmid/26828011&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S1529943016003016&rfr_iscdi=true