Validation of Revised FIGO Staging Classification for Cancer of the Ovary, Fallopian Tube, and Peritoneum Based on a Single Histological Type
OBJECTIVEThis study aimed to evaluate the prognostic significance of revised International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO2013) staging classification for cancer of the ovary, fallopian tube, and peritoneum in patients exhibiting high-grade serous histology. METHODSClinical records of...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | International journal of gynecological cancer 2016-07, Vol.26 (6), p.1012-1019 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1019 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 1012 |
container_title | International journal of gynecological cancer |
container_volume | 26 |
creator | Toptas, Tayfun Pestereli, Elif Erol, Onur Bozkurt, Selen Erdogan, Gulgun Simsek, Tayup |
description | OBJECTIVEThis study aimed to evaluate the prognostic significance of revised International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO2013) staging classification for cancer of the ovary, fallopian tube, and peritoneum in patients exhibiting high-grade serous histology.
METHODSClinical records of patients with high-grade serous carcinoma who underwent primary surgery between 2007 and 2012 were reviewed retrospectively. Patients were reclassified according to the FIGO2013 criteria. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were calculated for each stage using Kaplan-Meier estimates and compared with the log-rank test.
RESULTSIn total, 125 patients were included in the analysis. The distribution of the study cohort according to the revised classification was as follows; stage I, 6 patients; stage II, 9 patients; stage III, 85 patients; and stage IV, 25 patients. Median follow-up time was 36 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 3–110). The median PFS and OS were 14 months (95% CI, 12.4–15.6) and 60 months (95% CI, 47.0–72.9), respectively. Both PFS and OS were significantly different among stages I, II, III, and IV (P < 0.01). Subgroup analyses for stage III disease also revealed significant differences in survival. The median PFS for stages IIIA1, IIIB, and IIIC was 56, 46, and 16 months, respectively (P < 0.01), and the median OS was 104, 95, and 60 months, respectively (P = 0.03). The outcomes of patients with stage IV disease differed slightly but nonsignificantly according to new substages. The median PFS for stages IVA and IVB was 12 and 6 months, respectively (hazard ratio, 1.16; 95% CI, 0.48–2.79; P = 0.72), and the median OS was 41 and 24 months, respectively (hazard ratio, 1.62; 95% CI, 0.58–4.55; P = 0.35). The study sample was insufficient in size for subgroup analyses in stages I and II.
CONCLUSIONSThe revised FIGO2013 staging system is highly prognostic for discriminating outcomes of patients with high-grade serous carcinoma across stages I to IV, in subgroups of stage III, but not in subgroups of stage IV. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1097/IGC.0000000000000736 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1799208524</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2579088319</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3846-16d9a6f9032dfd1a9219ba0893507283181569c22df17fc337ecc9ac8ed783823</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc1uEzEURkcIREvhDRCyxIZFp_hnZmwvYUTSSJWCaEDsrBvPncTFGQd7plUfgnfGUQpCXeCNLfl8x9b9iuI1oxeMavl-MW8v6L9LiuZJccpqXpesEuppPtNKlUqz7yfFi5RuMqM51c-LEy45bbiqTotf38C7DkYXBhJ68gVvXcKOzBbzJbkeYeOGDWk9pOR6Z49YHyJpYbAYD4lxi2R5C_H-nMzA-7B3MJDVtMZzAkNHPmN0Yxhw2pGPcDBnAZDrrPVILl0agw-bbPZkdb_Hl8WzHnzCVw_7WfF19mnVXpZXy_mi_XBVWqGqpmRNp6HpNRW86zsGmjO9Bqq0qKnkSjDF6kZbnm-Z7K0QEq3VYBV2UgnFxVnx7ujdx_BzwjSanUsWvYcBw5QMkzpPStW8yujbR-hNmOKQf2d4LTVV-TmdqepI2RhSitibfXS7PBXDqDnUZXJd5nFdOfbmQT6td9j9Df3pJwPqCNwFP2JMP_x0h9FsEfy4_b_7N010n8c</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2579088319</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Validation of Revised FIGO Staging Classification for Cancer of the Ovary, Fallopian Tube, and Peritoneum Based on a Single Histological Type</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><creator>Toptas, Tayfun ; Pestereli, Elif ; Erol, Onur ; Bozkurt, Selen ; Erdogan, Gulgun ; Simsek, Tayup</creator><creatorcontrib>Toptas, Tayfun ; Pestereli, Elif ; Erol, Onur ; Bozkurt, Selen ; Erdogan, Gulgun ; Simsek, Tayup</creatorcontrib><description>OBJECTIVEThis study aimed to evaluate the prognostic significance of revised International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO2013) staging classification for cancer of the ovary, fallopian tube, and peritoneum in patients exhibiting high-grade serous histology.
METHODSClinical records of patients with high-grade serous carcinoma who underwent primary surgery between 2007 and 2012 were reviewed retrospectively. Patients were reclassified according to the FIGO2013 criteria. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were calculated for each stage using Kaplan-Meier estimates and compared with the log-rank test.
RESULTSIn total, 125 patients were included in the analysis. The distribution of the study cohort according to the revised classification was as follows; stage I, 6 patients; stage II, 9 patients; stage III, 85 patients; and stage IV, 25 patients. Median follow-up time was 36 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 3–110). The median PFS and OS were 14 months (95% CI, 12.4–15.6) and 60 months (95% CI, 47.0–72.9), respectively. Both PFS and OS were significantly different among stages I, II, III, and IV (P < 0.01). Subgroup analyses for stage III disease also revealed significant differences in survival. The median PFS for stages IIIA1, IIIB, and IIIC was 56, 46, and 16 months, respectively (P < 0.01), and the median OS was 104, 95, and 60 months, respectively (P = 0.03). The outcomes of patients with stage IV disease differed slightly but nonsignificantly according to new substages. The median PFS for stages IVA and IVB was 12 and 6 months, respectively (hazard ratio, 1.16; 95% CI, 0.48–2.79; P = 0.72), and the median OS was 41 and 24 months, respectively (hazard ratio, 1.62; 95% CI, 0.58–4.55; P = 0.35). The study sample was insufficient in size for subgroup analyses in stages I and II.
CONCLUSIONSThe revised FIGO2013 staging system is highly prognostic for discriminating outcomes of patients with high-grade serous carcinoma across stages I to IV, in subgroups of stage III, but not in subgroups of stage IV.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1048-891X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1525-1438</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/IGC.0000000000000736</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27206284</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: by the International Gynecologic Cancer Society and the European Society of Gynaecological Oncology</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial ; Cystadenocarcinoma, Serous - classification ; Cystadenocarcinoma, Serous - pathology ; Cystadenocarcinoma, Serous - surgery ; Fallopian Tube Neoplasms - classification ; Fallopian Tube Neoplasms - pathology ; Fallopian Tube Neoplasms - surgery ; Fallopian tubes ; Female ; Humans ; Middle Aged ; Neoplasm Grading ; Neoplasm Staging ; Neoplasms, Glandular and Epithelial - classification ; Neoplasms, Glandular and Epithelial - pathology ; Neoplasms, Glandular and Epithelial - surgery ; Ovarian cancer ; Ovarian Neoplasms - classification ; Ovarian Neoplasms - pathology ; Ovarian Neoplasms - surgery ; Ovaries ; Peritoneal Neoplasms - classification ; Peritoneal Neoplasms - pathology ; Peritoneal Neoplasms - surgery ; Reproducibility of Results</subject><ispartof>International journal of gynecological cancer, 2016-07, Vol.26 (6), p.1012-1019</ispartof><rights>2016 by the International Gynecologic Cancer Society and the European Society of Gynaecological Oncology.</rights><rights>2016 2016 by the International Gynecologic Cancer Society and the European Society of Gynaecological Oncology.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3846-16d9a6f9032dfd1a9219ba0893507283181569c22df17fc337ecc9ac8ed783823</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3846-16d9a6f9032dfd1a9219ba0893507283181569c22df17fc337ecc9ac8ed783823</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,27929,27930</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27206284$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Toptas, Tayfun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pestereli, Elif</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Erol, Onur</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bozkurt, Selen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Erdogan, Gulgun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Simsek, Tayup</creatorcontrib><title>Validation of Revised FIGO Staging Classification for Cancer of the Ovary, Fallopian Tube, and Peritoneum Based on a Single Histological Type</title><title>International journal of gynecological cancer</title><addtitle>Int J Gynecol Cancer</addtitle><description>OBJECTIVEThis study aimed to evaluate the prognostic significance of revised International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO2013) staging classification for cancer of the ovary, fallopian tube, and peritoneum in patients exhibiting high-grade serous histology.
METHODSClinical records of patients with high-grade serous carcinoma who underwent primary surgery between 2007 and 2012 were reviewed retrospectively. Patients were reclassified according to the FIGO2013 criteria. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were calculated for each stage using Kaplan-Meier estimates and compared with the log-rank test.
RESULTSIn total, 125 patients were included in the analysis. The distribution of the study cohort according to the revised classification was as follows; stage I, 6 patients; stage II, 9 patients; stage III, 85 patients; and stage IV, 25 patients. Median follow-up time was 36 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 3–110). The median PFS and OS were 14 months (95% CI, 12.4–15.6) and 60 months (95% CI, 47.0–72.9), respectively. Both PFS and OS were significantly different among stages I, II, III, and IV (P < 0.01). Subgroup analyses for stage III disease also revealed significant differences in survival. The median PFS for stages IIIA1, IIIB, and IIIC was 56, 46, and 16 months, respectively (P < 0.01), and the median OS was 104, 95, and 60 months, respectively (P = 0.03). The outcomes of patients with stage IV disease differed slightly but nonsignificantly according to new substages. The median PFS for stages IVA and IVB was 12 and 6 months, respectively (hazard ratio, 1.16; 95% CI, 0.48–2.79; P = 0.72), and the median OS was 41 and 24 months, respectively (hazard ratio, 1.62; 95% CI, 0.58–4.55; P = 0.35). The study sample was insufficient in size for subgroup analyses in stages I and II.
CONCLUSIONSThe revised FIGO2013 staging system is highly prognostic for discriminating outcomes of patients with high-grade serous carcinoma across stages I to IV, in subgroups of stage III, but not in subgroups of stage IV.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial</subject><subject>Cystadenocarcinoma, Serous - classification</subject><subject>Cystadenocarcinoma, Serous - pathology</subject><subject>Cystadenocarcinoma, Serous - surgery</subject><subject>Fallopian Tube Neoplasms - classification</subject><subject>Fallopian Tube Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Fallopian Tube Neoplasms - surgery</subject><subject>Fallopian tubes</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Neoplasm Grading</subject><subject>Neoplasm Staging</subject><subject>Neoplasms, Glandular and Epithelial - classification</subject><subject>Neoplasms, Glandular and Epithelial - pathology</subject><subject>Neoplasms, Glandular and Epithelial - surgery</subject><subject>Ovarian cancer</subject><subject>Ovarian Neoplasms - classification</subject><subject>Ovarian Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Ovarian Neoplasms - surgery</subject><subject>Ovaries</subject><subject>Peritoneal Neoplasms - classification</subject><subject>Peritoneal Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Peritoneal Neoplasms - surgery</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><issn>1048-891X</issn><issn>1525-1438</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kc1uEzEURkcIREvhDRCyxIZFp_hnZmwvYUTSSJWCaEDsrBvPncTFGQd7plUfgnfGUQpCXeCNLfl8x9b9iuI1oxeMavl-MW8v6L9LiuZJccpqXpesEuppPtNKlUqz7yfFi5RuMqM51c-LEy45bbiqTotf38C7DkYXBhJ68gVvXcKOzBbzJbkeYeOGDWk9pOR6Z49YHyJpYbAYD4lxi2R5C_H-nMzA-7B3MJDVtMZzAkNHPmN0Yxhw2pGPcDBnAZDrrPVILl0agw-bbPZkdb_Hl8WzHnzCVw_7WfF19mnVXpZXy_mi_XBVWqGqpmRNp6HpNRW86zsGmjO9Bqq0qKnkSjDF6kZbnm-Z7K0QEq3VYBV2UgnFxVnx7ujdx_BzwjSanUsWvYcBw5QMkzpPStW8yujbR-hNmOKQf2d4LTVV-TmdqepI2RhSitibfXS7PBXDqDnUZXJd5nFdOfbmQT6td9j9Df3pJwPqCNwFP2JMP_x0h9FsEfy4_b_7N010n8c</recordid><startdate>201607</startdate><enddate>201607</enddate><creator>Toptas, Tayfun</creator><creator>Pestereli, Elif</creator><creator>Erol, Onur</creator><creator>Bozkurt, Selen</creator><creator>Erdogan, Gulgun</creator><creator>Simsek, Tayup</creator><general>by the International Gynecologic Cancer Society and the European Society of Gynaecological Oncology</general><general>BMJ Publishing Group LTD</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201607</creationdate><title>Validation of Revised FIGO Staging Classification for Cancer of the Ovary, Fallopian Tube, and Peritoneum Based on a Single Histological Type</title><author>Toptas, Tayfun ; Pestereli, Elif ; Erol, Onur ; Bozkurt, Selen ; Erdogan, Gulgun ; Simsek, Tayup</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3846-16d9a6f9032dfd1a9219ba0893507283181569c22df17fc337ecc9ac8ed783823</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial</topic><topic>Cystadenocarcinoma, Serous - classification</topic><topic>Cystadenocarcinoma, Serous - pathology</topic><topic>Cystadenocarcinoma, Serous - surgery</topic><topic>Fallopian Tube Neoplasms - classification</topic><topic>Fallopian Tube Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Fallopian Tube Neoplasms - surgery</topic><topic>Fallopian tubes</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Neoplasm Grading</topic><topic>Neoplasm Staging</topic><topic>Neoplasms, Glandular and Epithelial - classification</topic><topic>Neoplasms, Glandular and Epithelial - pathology</topic><topic>Neoplasms, Glandular and Epithelial - surgery</topic><topic>Ovarian cancer</topic><topic>Ovarian Neoplasms - classification</topic><topic>Ovarian Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Ovarian Neoplasms - surgery</topic><topic>Ovaries</topic><topic>Peritoneal Neoplasms - classification</topic><topic>Peritoneal Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Peritoneal Neoplasms - surgery</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Toptas, Tayfun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pestereli, Elif</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Erol, Onur</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bozkurt, Selen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Erdogan, Gulgun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Simsek, Tayup</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>International journal of gynecological cancer</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Toptas, Tayfun</au><au>Pestereli, Elif</au><au>Erol, Onur</au><au>Bozkurt, Selen</au><au>Erdogan, Gulgun</au><au>Simsek, Tayup</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Validation of Revised FIGO Staging Classification for Cancer of the Ovary, Fallopian Tube, and Peritoneum Based on a Single Histological Type</atitle><jtitle>International journal of gynecological cancer</jtitle><addtitle>Int J Gynecol Cancer</addtitle><date>2016-07</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>26</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1012</spage><epage>1019</epage><pages>1012-1019</pages><issn>1048-891X</issn><eissn>1525-1438</eissn><abstract>OBJECTIVEThis study aimed to evaluate the prognostic significance of revised International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO2013) staging classification for cancer of the ovary, fallopian tube, and peritoneum in patients exhibiting high-grade serous histology.
METHODSClinical records of patients with high-grade serous carcinoma who underwent primary surgery between 2007 and 2012 were reviewed retrospectively. Patients were reclassified according to the FIGO2013 criteria. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were calculated for each stage using Kaplan-Meier estimates and compared with the log-rank test.
RESULTSIn total, 125 patients were included in the analysis. The distribution of the study cohort according to the revised classification was as follows; stage I, 6 patients; stage II, 9 patients; stage III, 85 patients; and stage IV, 25 patients. Median follow-up time was 36 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 3–110). The median PFS and OS were 14 months (95% CI, 12.4–15.6) and 60 months (95% CI, 47.0–72.9), respectively. Both PFS and OS were significantly different among stages I, II, III, and IV (P < 0.01). Subgroup analyses for stage III disease also revealed significant differences in survival. The median PFS for stages IIIA1, IIIB, and IIIC was 56, 46, and 16 months, respectively (P < 0.01), and the median OS was 104, 95, and 60 months, respectively (P = 0.03). The outcomes of patients with stage IV disease differed slightly but nonsignificantly according to new substages. The median PFS for stages IVA and IVB was 12 and 6 months, respectively (hazard ratio, 1.16; 95% CI, 0.48–2.79; P = 0.72), and the median OS was 41 and 24 months, respectively (hazard ratio, 1.62; 95% CI, 0.58–4.55; P = 0.35). The study sample was insufficient in size for subgroup analyses in stages I and II.
CONCLUSIONSThe revised FIGO2013 staging system is highly prognostic for discriminating outcomes of patients with high-grade serous carcinoma across stages I to IV, in subgroups of stage III, but not in subgroups of stage IV.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>by the International Gynecologic Cancer Society and the European Society of Gynaecological Oncology</pub><pmid>27206284</pmid><doi>10.1097/IGC.0000000000000736</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1048-891X |
ispartof | International journal of gynecological cancer, 2016-07, Vol.26 (6), p.1012-1019 |
issn | 1048-891X 1525-1438 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1799208524 |
source | MEDLINE; Journals@Ovid Complete |
subjects | Adult Aged Aged, 80 and over Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial Cystadenocarcinoma, Serous - classification Cystadenocarcinoma, Serous - pathology Cystadenocarcinoma, Serous - surgery Fallopian Tube Neoplasms - classification Fallopian Tube Neoplasms - pathology Fallopian Tube Neoplasms - surgery Fallopian tubes Female Humans Middle Aged Neoplasm Grading Neoplasm Staging Neoplasms, Glandular and Epithelial - classification Neoplasms, Glandular and Epithelial - pathology Neoplasms, Glandular and Epithelial - surgery Ovarian cancer Ovarian Neoplasms - classification Ovarian Neoplasms - pathology Ovarian Neoplasms - surgery Ovaries Peritoneal Neoplasms - classification Peritoneal Neoplasms - pathology Peritoneal Neoplasms - surgery Reproducibility of Results |
title | Validation of Revised FIGO Staging Classification for Cancer of the Ovary, Fallopian Tube, and Peritoneum Based on a Single Histological Type |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-13T08%3A46%3A13IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Validation%20of%20Revised%20FIGO%20Staging%20Classification%20for%20Cancer%20of%20the%20Ovary,%20Fallopian%20Tube,%20and%20Peritoneum%20Based%20on%20a%20Single%20Histological%20Type&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20gynecological%20cancer&rft.au=Toptas,%20Tayfun&rft.date=2016-07&rft.volume=26&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1012&rft.epage=1019&rft.pages=1012-1019&rft.issn=1048-891X&rft.eissn=1525-1438&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/IGC.0000000000000736&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2579088319%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2579088319&rft_id=info:pmid/27206284&rfr_iscdi=true |