Eye contact affects attention more than arousal as revealed by prospective time estimation
Eye contact can both increase arousal and engage attention. Because these two changes impact time estimation differently, we were able to use a prospective time estimation task to assess the relative changes in arousal and attention during eye contact. Pairs of participants made a 1-minute prospecti...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Attention, perception & psychophysics perception & psychophysics, 2016-07, Vol.78 (5), p.1302-1307 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 1307 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 5 |
| container_start_page | 1302 |
| container_title | Attention, perception & psychophysics |
| container_volume | 78 |
| creator | Jarick, Michelle Laidlaw, Kaitlin E. W. Nasiopoulos, Eleni Kingstone, Alan |
| description | Eye contact can both increase arousal and engage attention. Because these two changes impact time estimation differently, we were able to use a prospective time estimation task to assess the relative changes in arousal and attention during eye contact. Pairs of participants made a 1-minute prospective time estimate while sitting side-by-side and performing three different gaze trials: looking at the wall away from their partner (
baseline/away trials
), looking at their partner’s profile (
profile trials
), or making eye contact with their partner (
eye contact trials
). We found that participants produced significantly longer estimates when they were engaged in eye contact, more so than when they looked at another person’s profile or baseline. As research has shown that people produce shorter estimates during arousing events and longer estimates when attention is captured, we attribute this difference to the attention-demanding process of interacting with another person, via mutual eye contact, over and above any changes in arousal. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.3758/s13414-016-1085-8 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1798994275</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>4101088841</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c415t-bc07742750770221e78d0b33baed3a2cd52b2e06b24818492a46f4fc659379603</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE1LAzEQhoMoWqs_wIsEvHhZzedmcxSpH1DwoiBeQjY7q5Xtbk22hf57Z2ktInjJBOZ55515CTnj7EoaXVwnLhVXGeN5xlmhs2KPjLhVMpNWvu7v_oIfkeOUPhnLZW7YITkShjFhtR2Rt8kaaOja3oee-rqG0Cfq-x7afta1dN5FoP2Hb6mP3TL5hvpEI6zAN1DRck0XsUsLFM1WyM3mQCFh8YP4hBzUvklwuq1j8nI3eb59yKZP94-3N9MsKK77rAzMGCWMxsKE4GCKipVSlh4q6UWotCgFsLwUquCFssKrvFZ1yLWVxuZMjsnlZi7u8rVEfzefpQBN41vAnR03trB2cED04g_62S1ji9sNlNVK44sU31ABj0sRareIeFNcO87cELzbBO8weDcE7wrUnG8nL8s5VDvFT9IIiA2QsNW-Q_xl_e_Ub0-4jVA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1799545799</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Eye contact affects attention more than arousal as revealed by prospective time estimation</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Jarick, Michelle ; Laidlaw, Kaitlin E. W. ; Nasiopoulos, Eleni ; Kingstone, Alan</creator><creatorcontrib>Jarick, Michelle ; Laidlaw, Kaitlin E. W. ; Nasiopoulos, Eleni ; Kingstone, Alan</creatorcontrib><description>Eye contact can both increase arousal and engage attention. Because these two changes impact time estimation differently, we were able to use a prospective time estimation task to assess the relative changes in arousal and attention during eye contact. Pairs of participants made a 1-minute prospective time estimate while sitting side-by-side and performing three different gaze trials: looking at the wall away from their partner (
baseline/away trials
), looking at their partner’s profile (
profile trials
), or making eye contact with their partner (
eye contact trials
). We found that participants produced significantly longer estimates when they were engaged in eye contact, more so than when they looked at another person’s profile or baseline. As research has shown that people produce shorter estimates during arousing events and longer estimates when attention is captured, we attribute this difference to the attention-demanding process of interacting with another person, via mutual eye contact, over and above any changes in arousal.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1943-3921</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1943-393X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3758/s13414-016-1085-8</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27002959</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>Adult ; Anatomy ; Attention - physiology ; Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder ; Behavior Change ; Behavioral Science and Psychology ; Cognitive Psychology ; Eye contact ; Facial Recognition - physiology ; Female ; Fixation, Ocular - physiology ; Humans ; Influence ; Male ; Nervous system ; Perceptions ; Psychology ; Social Cognition ; Social Perception ; Test Results ; Time Management ; Time Perception - physiology ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Attention, perception & psychophysics, 2016-07, Vol.78 (5), p.1302-1307</ispartof><rights>The Psychonomic Society, Inc. 2016</rights><rights>Copyright Springer Science & Business Media Jun 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c415t-bc07742750770221e78d0b33baed3a2cd52b2e06b24818492a46f4fc659379603</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c415t-bc07742750770221e78d0b33baed3a2cd52b2e06b24818492a46f4fc659379603</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.3758/s13414-016-1085-8$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.3758/s13414-016-1085-8$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27922,27923,41486,42555,51317</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27002959$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Jarick, Michelle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Laidlaw, Kaitlin E. W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nasiopoulos, Eleni</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kingstone, Alan</creatorcontrib><title>Eye contact affects attention more than arousal as revealed by prospective time estimation</title><title>Attention, perception & psychophysics</title><addtitle>Atten Percept Psychophys</addtitle><addtitle>Atten Percept Psychophys</addtitle><description>Eye contact can both increase arousal and engage attention. Because these two changes impact time estimation differently, we were able to use a prospective time estimation task to assess the relative changes in arousal and attention during eye contact. Pairs of participants made a 1-minute prospective time estimate while sitting side-by-side and performing three different gaze trials: looking at the wall away from their partner (
baseline/away trials
), looking at their partner’s profile (
profile trials
), or making eye contact with their partner (
eye contact trials
). We found that participants produced significantly longer estimates when they were engaged in eye contact, more so than when they looked at another person’s profile or baseline. As research has shown that people produce shorter estimates during arousing events and longer estimates when attention is captured, we attribute this difference to the attention-demanding process of interacting with another person, via mutual eye contact, over and above any changes in arousal.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Anatomy</subject><subject>Attention - physiology</subject><subject>Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder</subject><subject>Behavior Change</subject><subject>Behavioral Science and Psychology</subject><subject>Cognitive Psychology</subject><subject>Eye contact</subject><subject>Facial Recognition - physiology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fixation, Ocular - physiology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Influence</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Nervous system</subject><subject>Perceptions</subject><subject>Psychology</subject><subject>Social Cognition</subject><subject>Social Perception</subject><subject>Test Results</subject><subject>Time Management</subject><subject>Time Perception - physiology</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>1943-3921</issn><issn>1943-393X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kE1LAzEQhoMoWqs_wIsEvHhZzedmcxSpH1DwoiBeQjY7q5Xtbk22hf57Z2ktInjJBOZ55515CTnj7EoaXVwnLhVXGeN5xlmhs2KPjLhVMpNWvu7v_oIfkeOUPhnLZW7YITkShjFhtR2Rt8kaaOja3oee-rqG0Cfq-x7afta1dN5FoP2Hb6mP3TL5hvpEI6zAN1DRck0XsUsLFM1WyM3mQCFh8YP4hBzUvklwuq1j8nI3eb59yKZP94-3N9MsKK77rAzMGCWMxsKE4GCKipVSlh4q6UWotCgFsLwUquCFssKrvFZ1yLWVxuZMjsnlZi7u8rVEfzefpQBN41vAnR03trB2cED04g_62S1ji9sNlNVK44sU31ABj0sRareIeFNcO87cELzbBO8weDcE7wrUnG8nL8s5VDvFT9IIiA2QsNW-Q_xl_e_Ub0-4jVA</recordid><startdate>20160701</startdate><enddate>20160701</enddate><creator>Jarick, Michelle</creator><creator>Laidlaw, Kaitlin E. W.</creator><creator>Nasiopoulos, Eleni</creator><creator>Kingstone, Alan</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AN0</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160701</creationdate><title>Eye contact affects attention more than arousal as revealed by prospective time estimation</title><author>Jarick, Michelle ; Laidlaw, Kaitlin E. W. ; Nasiopoulos, Eleni ; Kingstone, Alan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c415t-bc07742750770221e78d0b33baed3a2cd52b2e06b24818492a46f4fc659379603</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Anatomy</topic><topic>Attention - physiology</topic><topic>Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder</topic><topic>Behavior Change</topic><topic>Behavioral Science and Psychology</topic><topic>Cognitive Psychology</topic><topic>Eye contact</topic><topic>Facial Recognition - physiology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fixation, Ocular - physiology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Influence</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Nervous system</topic><topic>Perceptions</topic><topic>Psychology</topic><topic>Social Cognition</topic><topic>Social Perception</topic><topic>Test Results</topic><topic>Time Management</topic><topic>Time Perception - physiology</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Jarick, Michelle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Laidlaw, Kaitlin E. W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nasiopoulos, Eleni</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kingstone, Alan</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>British Nursing Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Education Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Attention, perception & psychophysics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Jarick, Michelle</au><au>Laidlaw, Kaitlin E. W.</au><au>Nasiopoulos, Eleni</au><au>Kingstone, Alan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Eye contact affects attention more than arousal as revealed by prospective time estimation</atitle><jtitle>Attention, perception & psychophysics</jtitle><stitle>Atten Percept Psychophys</stitle><addtitle>Atten Percept Psychophys</addtitle><date>2016-07-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>78</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>1302</spage><epage>1307</epage><pages>1302-1307</pages><issn>1943-3921</issn><eissn>1943-393X</eissn><abstract>Eye contact can both increase arousal and engage attention. Because these two changes impact time estimation differently, we were able to use a prospective time estimation task to assess the relative changes in arousal and attention during eye contact. Pairs of participants made a 1-minute prospective time estimate while sitting side-by-side and performing three different gaze trials: looking at the wall away from their partner (
baseline/away trials
), looking at their partner’s profile (
profile trials
), or making eye contact with their partner (
eye contact trials
). We found that participants produced significantly longer estimates when they were engaged in eye contact, more so than when they looked at another person’s profile or baseline. As research has shown that people produce shorter estimates during arousing events and longer estimates when attention is captured, we attribute this difference to the attention-demanding process of interacting with another person, via mutual eye contact, over and above any changes in arousal.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><pmid>27002959</pmid><doi>10.3758/s13414-016-1085-8</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1943-3921 |
| ispartof | Attention, perception & psychophysics, 2016-07, Vol.78 (5), p.1302-1307 |
| issn | 1943-3921 1943-393X |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1798994275 |
| source | MEDLINE; Alma/SFX Local Collection; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
| subjects | Adult Anatomy Attention - physiology Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder Behavior Change Behavioral Science and Psychology Cognitive Psychology Eye contact Facial Recognition - physiology Female Fixation, Ocular - physiology Humans Influence Male Nervous system Perceptions Psychology Social Cognition Social Perception Test Results Time Management Time Perception - physiology Young Adult |
| title | Eye contact affects attention more than arousal as revealed by prospective time estimation |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T00%3A12%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Eye%20contact%20affects%20attention%20more%20than%20arousal%20as%20revealed%20by%20prospective%20time%20estimation&rft.jtitle=Attention,%20perception%20&%20psychophysics&rft.au=Jarick,%20Michelle&rft.date=2016-07-01&rft.volume=78&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=1302&rft.epage=1307&rft.pages=1302-1307&rft.issn=1943-3921&rft.eissn=1943-393X&rft_id=info:doi/10.3758/s13414-016-1085-8&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E4101088841%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1799545799&rft_id=info:pmid/27002959&rfr_iscdi=true |