Prostate Cancer: PI-RADS Version 2 Helps Preoperatively Predict Clinically Significant Cancers
Purpose To retrospectively analyze whether Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) version 2 is helpful for the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer. Materials and Methods Institutional review board approved this retrospective study. A total of 425 patients with prostate...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Radiology 2016-07, Vol.280 (1), p.108-116 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 116 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 108 |
container_title | Radiology |
container_volume | 280 |
creator | Park, Sung Yoon Jung, Dae Chul Oh, Young Taik Cho, Nam Hoon Choi, Young Deuk Rha, Koon Ho Hong, Sung Joon Han, Kyunghwa |
description | Purpose To retrospectively analyze whether Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) version 2 is helpful for the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer. Materials and Methods Institutional review board approved this retrospective study. A total of 425 patients with prostate cancer who had undergone magnetic resonance (MR) imaging and radical prostatectomy were included. Preoperative parameters such as prostate-specific antigen, biopsy Gleason score, greatest percentage of the core, percentage of the positive core number, and score at PI-RADS version 2 with MR imaging were investigated. Two independent readers performed PI-RADS scoring. Clinically significant prostate cancer was defined as follows: (a) Gleason score of 7 or greater, (b) tumor volume of 0.5 cm(3) or greater, or a (c) positive extracapsular extension or seminal vesicle invasion. The reference standard was based on review of surgical specimen. Logistic regression was conducted to determine which parameters are associated with the presence of clinically significant cancer. Interreader agreement (ie, score ≥4 or not) was investigated by using κ statistics. Results At univariate analysis, all of the preoperative parameters were significant for clinically significant prostate cancer (P < .05). However, multivariate analysis revealed that PI-RADS score was the only significant parameter for both readers (reader 1: odds ratio = 28.170, P = .002; reader 2: odds ratio = 5.474, P = .007). The interreader agreement was excellent for PI-RADS score of 4 or greater (weighted κ = 0.801; 95% confidence interval: 0.737, 0.865). Conclusion The use of PI-RADS version 2 may help preoperatively diagnose clinically significant prostate cancer. (©) RSNA, 2016. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1148/radiol.16151133 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1798992554</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1798992554</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c404t-c5f95f620bc6bd08c3b1258c7f23ae600fa47e0074b45609a49fe0ccb5dc02d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kE1Lw0AQhhdRbK2evUmOXtLOfiVZb1I_WihYbPFo2GwmsrJN4m4q9N-b0tbT8A7PvDAPIbcUxpSKbOJ1aRs3pgmVlHJ-RoZUsjSmnMpzMgTgPM4EVQNyFcI3ABUySy_JgCUZT0CoIflc-iZ0usNoqmuD_iFazuP3x6dV9IE-2KaOWDRD14Zo6bFp0evO_qLb7WNpTRdNna2t0a5frexXbas-1N2xLVyTi0q7gDfHOSLrl-f1dBYv3l7n08dFbASILjayUrJKGBQmKUrIDC8ok5lJK8Y1JgCVFikCpKIQMgGlhaoQjClkaYCVfETuD7Wtb362GLp8Y4NB53SNzTbkNFWZUkxK0aOTA2r6x4PHKm-93Wi_yynke6f5wWl-ctpf3B3Lt8UGy3_-JJH_ARFbc1M</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1798992554</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Prostate Cancer: PI-RADS Version 2 Helps Preoperatively Predict Clinically Significant Cancers</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Park, Sung Yoon ; Jung, Dae Chul ; Oh, Young Taik ; Cho, Nam Hoon ; Choi, Young Deuk ; Rha, Koon Ho ; Hong, Sung Joon ; Han, Kyunghwa</creator><creatorcontrib>Park, Sung Yoon ; Jung, Dae Chul ; Oh, Young Taik ; Cho, Nam Hoon ; Choi, Young Deuk ; Rha, Koon Ho ; Hong, Sung Joon ; Han, Kyunghwa</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose To retrospectively analyze whether Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) version 2 is helpful for the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer. Materials and Methods Institutional review board approved this retrospective study. A total of 425 patients with prostate cancer who had undergone magnetic resonance (MR) imaging and radical prostatectomy were included. Preoperative parameters such as prostate-specific antigen, biopsy Gleason score, greatest percentage of the core, percentage of the positive core number, and score at PI-RADS version 2 with MR imaging were investigated. Two independent readers performed PI-RADS scoring. Clinically significant prostate cancer was defined as follows: (a) Gleason score of 7 or greater, (b) tumor volume of 0.5 cm(3) or greater, or a (c) positive extracapsular extension or seminal vesicle invasion. The reference standard was based on review of surgical specimen. Logistic regression was conducted to determine which parameters are associated with the presence of clinically significant cancer. Interreader agreement (ie, score ≥4 or not) was investigated by using κ statistics. Results At univariate analysis, all of the preoperative parameters were significant for clinically significant prostate cancer (P < .05). However, multivariate analysis revealed that PI-RADS score was the only significant parameter for both readers (reader 1: odds ratio = 28.170, P = .002; reader 2: odds ratio = 5.474, P = .007). The interreader agreement was excellent for PI-RADS score of 4 or greater (weighted κ = 0.801; 95% confidence interval: 0.737, 0.865). Conclusion The use of PI-RADS version 2 may help preoperatively diagnose clinically significant prostate cancer. (©) RSNA, 2016.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0033-8419</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1527-1315</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1148/radiol.16151133</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26836049</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><subject>Aged ; Humans ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Predictive Value of Tests ; Preoperative Care - methods ; Prostate - diagnostic imaging ; Prostate - pathology ; Prostate - surgery ; Prostatic Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging ; Prostatic Neoplasms - pathology ; Prostatic Neoplasms - surgery ; Radiology Information Systems - statistics & numerical data ; Retrospective Studies ; Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><ispartof>Radiology, 2016-07, Vol.280 (1), p.108-116</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c404t-c5f95f620bc6bd08c3b1258c7f23ae600fa47e0074b45609a49fe0ccb5dc02d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c404t-c5f95f620bc6bd08c3b1258c7f23ae600fa47e0074b45609a49fe0ccb5dc02d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,27929,27930</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26836049$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Park, Sung Yoon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jung, Dae Chul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oh, Young Taik</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cho, Nam Hoon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Choi, Young Deuk</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rha, Koon Ho</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hong, Sung Joon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Han, Kyunghwa</creatorcontrib><title>Prostate Cancer: PI-RADS Version 2 Helps Preoperatively Predict Clinically Significant Cancers</title><title>Radiology</title><addtitle>Radiology</addtitle><description>Purpose To retrospectively analyze whether Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) version 2 is helpful for the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer. Materials and Methods Institutional review board approved this retrospective study. A total of 425 patients with prostate cancer who had undergone magnetic resonance (MR) imaging and radical prostatectomy were included. Preoperative parameters such as prostate-specific antigen, biopsy Gleason score, greatest percentage of the core, percentage of the positive core number, and score at PI-RADS version 2 with MR imaging were investigated. Two independent readers performed PI-RADS scoring. Clinically significant prostate cancer was defined as follows: (a) Gleason score of 7 or greater, (b) tumor volume of 0.5 cm(3) or greater, or a (c) positive extracapsular extension or seminal vesicle invasion. The reference standard was based on review of surgical specimen. Logistic regression was conducted to determine which parameters are associated with the presence of clinically significant cancer. Interreader agreement (ie, score ≥4 or not) was investigated by using κ statistics. Results At univariate analysis, all of the preoperative parameters were significant for clinically significant prostate cancer (P < .05). However, multivariate analysis revealed that PI-RADS score was the only significant parameter for both readers (reader 1: odds ratio = 28.170, P = .002; reader 2: odds ratio = 5.474, P = .007). The interreader agreement was excellent for PI-RADS score of 4 or greater (weighted κ = 0.801; 95% confidence interval: 0.737, 0.865). Conclusion The use of PI-RADS version 2 may help preoperatively diagnose clinically significant prostate cancer. (©) RSNA, 2016.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Predictive Value of Tests</subject><subject>Preoperative Care - methods</subject><subject>Prostate - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Prostate - pathology</subject><subject>Prostate - surgery</subject><subject>Prostatic Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Prostatic Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Prostatic Neoplasms - surgery</subject><subject>Radiology Information Systems - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><issn>0033-8419</issn><issn>1527-1315</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNo9kE1Lw0AQhhdRbK2evUmOXtLOfiVZb1I_WihYbPFo2GwmsrJN4m4q9N-b0tbT8A7PvDAPIbcUxpSKbOJ1aRs3pgmVlHJ-RoZUsjSmnMpzMgTgPM4EVQNyFcI3ABUySy_JgCUZT0CoIflc-iZ0usNoqmuD_iFazuP3x6dV9IE-2KaOWDRD14Zo6bFp0evO_qLb7WNpTRdNna2t0a5frexXbas-1N2xLVyTi0q7gDfHOSLrl-f1dBYv3l7n08dFbASILjayUrJKGBQmKUrIDC8ok5lJK8Y1JgCVFikCpKIQMgGlhaoQjClkaYCVfETuD7Wtb362GLp8Y4NB53SNzTbkNFWZUkxK0aOTA2r6x4PHKm-93Wi_yynke6f5wWl-ctpf3B3Lt8UGy3_-JJH_ARFbc1M</recordid><startdate>201607</startdate><enddate>201607</enddate><creator>Park, Sung Yoon</creator><creator>Jung, Dae Chul</creator><creator>Oh, Young Taik</creator><creator>Cho, Nam Hoon</creator><creator>Choi, Young Deuk</creator><creator>Rha, Koon Ho</creator><creator>Hong, Sung Joon</creator><creator>Han, Kyunghwa</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201607</creationdate><title>Prostate Cancer: PI-RADS Version 2 Helps Preoperatively Predict Clinically Significant Cancers</title><author>Park, Sung Yoon ; Jung, Dae Chul ; Oh, Young Taik ; Cho, Nam Hoon ; Choi, Young Deuk ; Rha, Koon Ho ; Hong, Sung Joon ; Han, Kyunghwa</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c404t-c5f95f620bc6bd08c3b1258c7f23ae600fa47e0074b45609a49fe0ccb5dc02d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Predictive Value of Tests</topic><topic>Preoperative Care - methods</topic><topic>Prostate - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Prostate - pathology</topic><topic>Prostate - surgery</topic><topic>Prostatic Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Prostatic Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Prostatic Neoplasms - surgery</topic><topic>Radiology Information Systems - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Park, Sung Yoon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jung, Dae Chul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oh, Young Taik</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cho, Nam Hoon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Choi, Young Deuk</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rha, Koon Ho</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hong, Sung Joon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Han, Kyunghwa</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Radiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Park, Sung Yoon</au><au>Jung, Dae Chul</au><au>Oh, Young Taik</au><au>Cho, Nam Hoon</au><au>Choi, Young Deuk</au><au>Rha, Koon Ho</au><au>Hong, Sung Joon</au><au>Han, Kyunghwa</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Prostate Cancer: PI-RADS Version 2 Helps Preoperatively Predict Clinically Significant Cancers</atitle><jtitle>Radiology</jtitle><addtitle>Radiology</addtitle><date>2016-07</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>280</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>108</spage><epage>116</epage><pages>108-116</pages><issn>0033-8419</issn><eissn>1527-1315</eissn><abstract>Purpose To retrospectively analyze whether Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) version 2 is helpful for the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer. Materials and Methods Institutional review board approved this retrospective study. A total of 425 patients with prostate cancer who had undergone magnetic resonance (MR) imaging and radical prostatectomy were included. Preoperative parameters such as prostate-specific antigen, biopsy Gleason score, greatest percentage of the core, percentage of the positive core number, and score at PI-RADS version 2 with MR imaging were investigated. Two independent readers performed PI-RADS scoring. Clinically significant prostate cancer was defined as follows: (a) Gleason score of 7 or greater, (b) tumor volume of 0.5 cm(3) or greater, or a (c) positive extracapsular extension or seminal vesicle invasion. The reference standard was based on review of surgical specimen. Logistic regression was conducted to determine which parameters are associated with the presence of clinically significant cancer. Interreader agreement (ie, score ≥4 or not) was investigated by using κ statistics. Results At univariate analysis, all of the preoperative parameters were significant for clinically significant prostate cancer (P < .05). However, multivariate analysis revealed that PI-RADS score was the only significant parameter for both readers (reader 1: odds ratio = 28.170, P = .002; reader 2: odds ratio = 5.474, P = .007). The interreader agreement was excellent for PI-RADS score of 4 or greater (weighted κ = 0.801; 95% confidence interval: 0.737, 0.865). Conclusion The use of PI-RADS version 2 may help preoperatively diagnose clinically significant prostate cancer. (©) RSNA, 2016.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pmid>26836049</pmid><doi>10.1148/radiol.16151133</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0033-8419 |
ispartof | Radiology, 2016-07, Vol.280 (1), p.108-116 |
issn | 0033-8419 1527-1315 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1798992554 |
source | MEDLINE; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals |
subjects | Aged Humans Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods Male Middle Aged Predictive Value of Tests Preoperative Care - methods Prostate - diagnostic imaging Prostate - pathology Prostate - surgery Prostatic Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging Prostatic Neoplasms - pathology Prostatic Neoplasms - surgery Radiology Information Systems - statistics & numerical data Retrospective Studies Sensitivity and Specificity |
title | Prostate Cancer: PI-RADS Version 2 Helps Preoperatively Predict Clinically Significant Cancers |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-11T15%3A03%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Prostate%20Cancer:%20PI-RADS%20Version%202%20Helps%20Preoperatively%20Predict%20Clinically%20Significant%20Cancers&rft.jtitle=Radiology&rft.au=Park,%20Sung%20Yoon&rft.date=2016-07&rft.volume=280&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=108&rft.epage=116&rft.pages=108-116&rft.issn=0033-8419&rft.eissn=1527-1315&rft_id=info:doi/10.1148/radiol.16151133&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1798992554%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1798992554&rft_id=info:pmid/26836049&rfr_iscdi=true |