Prostate Cancer: PI-RADS Version 2 Helps Preoperatively Predict Clinically Significant Cancers

Purpose To retrospectively analyze whether Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) version 2 is helpful for the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer. Materials and Methods Institutional review board approved this retrospective study. A total of 425 patients with prostate...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Radiology 2016-07, Vol.280 (1), p.108-116
Hauptverfasser: Park, Sung Yoon, Jung, Dae Chul, Oh, Young Taik, Cho, Nam Hoon, Choi, Young Deuk, Rha, Koon Ho, Hong, Sung Joon, Han, Kyunghwa
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 116
container_issue 1
container_start_page 108
container_title Radiology
container_volume 280
creator Park, Sung Yoon
Jung, Dae Chul
Oh, Young Taik
Cho, Nam Hoon
Choi, Young Deuk
Rha, Koon Ho
Hong, Sung Joon
Han, Kyunghwa
description Purpose To retrospectively analyze whether Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) version 2 is helpful for the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer. Materials and Methods Institutional review board approved this retrospective study. A total of 425 patients with prostate cancer who had undergone magnetic resonance (MR) imaging and radical prostatectomy were included. Preoperative parameters such as prostate-specific antigen, biopsy Gleason score, greatest percentage of the core, percentage of the positive core number, and score at PI-RADS version 2 with MR imaging were investigated. Two independent readers performed PI-RADS scoring. Clinically significant prostate cancer was defined as follows: (a) Gleason score of 7 or greater, (b) tumor volume of 0.5 cm(3) or greater, or a (c) positive extracapsular extension or seminal vesicle invasion. The reference standard was based on review of surgical specimen. Logistic regression was conducted to determine which parameters are associated with the presence of clinically significant cancer. Interreader agreement (ie, score ≥4 or not) was investigated by using κ statistics. Results At univariate analysis, all of the preoperative parameters were significant for clinically significant prostate cancer (P < .05). However, multivariate analysis revealed that PI-RADS score was the only significant parameter for both readers (reader 1: odds ratio = 28.170, P = .002; reader 2: odds ratio = 5.474, P = .007). The interreader agreement was excellent for PI-RADS score of 4 or greater (weighted κ = 0.801; 95% confidence interval: 0.737, 0.865). Conclusion The use of PI-RADS version 2 may help preoperatively diagnose clinically significant prostate cancer. (©) RSNA, 2016.
doi_str_mv 10.1148/radiol.16151133
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1798992554</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1798992554</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c404t-c5f95f620bc6bd08c3b1258c7f23ae600fa47e0074b45609a49fe0ccb5dc02d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kE1Lw0AQhhdRbK2evUmOXtLOfiVZb1I_WihYbPFo2GwmsrJN4m4q9N-b0tbT8A7PvDAPIbcUxpSKbOJ1aRs3pgmVlHJ-RoZUsjSmnMpzMgTgPM4EVQNyFcI3ABUySy_JgCUZT0CoIflc-iZ0usNoqmuD_iFazuP3x6dV9IE-2KaOWDRD14Zo6bFp0evO_qLb7WNpTRdNna2t0a5frexXbas-1N2xLVyTi0q7gDfHOSLrl-f1dBYv3l7n08dFbASILjayUrJKGBQmKUrIDC8ok5lJK8Y1JgCVFikCpKIQMgGlhaoQjClkaYCVfETuD7Wtb362GLp8Y4NB53SNzTbkNFWZUkxK0aOTA2r6x4PHKm-93Wi_yynke6f5wWl-ctpf3B3Lt8UGy3_-JJH_ARFbc1M</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1798992554</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Prostate Cancer: PI-RADS Version 2 Helps Preoperatively Predict Clinically Significant Cancers</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Park, Sung Yoon ; Jung, Dae Chul ; Oh, Young Taik ; Cho, Nam Hoon ; Choi, Young Deuk ; Rha, Koon Ho ; Hong, Sung Joon ; Han, Kyunghwa</creator><creatorcontrib>Park, Sung Yoon ; Jung, Dae Chul ; Oh, Young Taik ; Cho, Nam Hoon ; Choi, Young Deuk ; Rha, Koon Ho ; Hong, Sung Joon ; Han, Kyunghwa</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose To retrospectively analyze whether Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) version 2 is helpful for the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer. Materials and Methods Institutional review board approved this retrospective study. A total of 425 patients with prostate cancer who had undergone magnetic resonance (MR) imaging and radical prostatectomy were included. Preoperative parameters such as prostate-specific antigen, biopsy Gleason score, greatest percentage of the core, percentage of the positive core number, and score at PI-RADS version 2 with MR imaging were investigated. Two independent readers performed PI-RADS scoring. Clinically significant prostate cancer was defined as follows: (a) Gleason score of 7 or greater, (b) tumor volume of 0.5 cm(3) or greater, or a (c) positive extracapsular extension or seminal vesicle invasion. The reference standard was based on review of surgical specimen. Logistic regression was conducted to determine which parameters are associated with the presence of clinically significant cancer. Interreader agreement (ie, score ≥4 or not) was investigated by using κ statistics. Results At univariate analysis, all of the preoperative parameters were significant for clinically significant prostate cancer (P &lt; .05). However, multivariate analysis revealed that PI-RADS score was the only significant parameter for both readers (reader 1: odds ratio = 28.170, P = .002; reader 2: odds ratio = 5.474, P = .007). The interreader agreement was excellent for PI-RADS score of 4 or greater (weighted κ = 0.801; 95% confidence interval: 0.737, 0.865). Conclusion The use of PI-RADS version 2 may help preoperatively diagnose clinically significant prostate cancer. (©) RSNA, 2016.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0033-8419</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1527-1315</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1148/radiol.16151133</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26836049</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><subject>Aged ; Humans ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Predictive Value of Tests ; Preoperative Care - methods ; Prostate - diagnostic imaging ; Prostate - pathology ; Prostate - surgery ; Prostatic Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging ; Prostatic Neoplasms - pathology ; Prostatic Neoplasms - surgery ; Radiology Information Systems - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Retrospective Studies ; Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><ispartof>Radiology, 2016-07, Vol.280 (1), p.108-116</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c404t-c5f95f620bc6bd08c3b1258c7f23ae600fa47e0074b45609a49fe0ccb5dc02d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c404t-c5f95f620bc6bd08c3b1258c7f23ae600fa47e0074b45609a49fe0ccb5dc02d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,27929,27930</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26836049$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Park, Sung Yoon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jung, Dae Chul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oh, Young Taik</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cho, Nam Hoon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Choi, Young Deuk</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rha, Koon Ho</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hong, Sung Joon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Han, Kyunghwa</creatorcontrib><title>Prostate Cancer: PI-RADS Version 2 Helps Preoperatively Predict Clinically Significant Cancers</title><title>Radiology</title><addtitle>Radiology</addtitle><description>Purpose To retrospectively analyze whether Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) version 2 is helpful for the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer. Materials and Methods Institutional review board approved this retrospective study. A total of 425 patients with prostate cancer who had undergone magnetic resonance (MR) imaging and radical prostatectomy were included. Preoperative parameters such as prostate-specific antigen, biopsy Gleason score, greatest percentage of the core, percentage of the positive core number, and score at PI-RADS version 2 with MR imaging were investigated. Two independent readers performed PI-RADS scoring. Clinically significant prostate cancer was defined as follows: (a) Gleason score of 7 or greater, (b) tumor volume of 0.5 cm(3) or greater, or a (c) positive extracapsular extension or seminal vesicle invasion. The reference standard was based on review of surgical specimen. Logistic regression was conducted to determine which parameters are associated with the presence of clinically significant cancer. Interreader agreement (ie, score ≥4 or not) was investigated by using κ statistics. Results At univariate analysis, all of the preoperative parameters were significant for clinically significant prostate cancer (P &lt; .05). However, multivariate analysis revealed that PI-RADS score was the only significant parameter for both readers (reader 1: odds ratio = 28.170, P = .002; reader 2: odds ratio = 5.474, P = .007). The interreader agreement was excellent for PI-RADS score of 4 or greater (weighted κ = 0.801; 95% confidence interval: 0.737, 0.865). Conclusion The use of PI-RADS version 2 may help preoperatively diagnose clinically significant prostate cancer. (©) RSNA, 2016.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Predictive Value of Tests</subject><subject>Preoperative Care - methods</subject><subject>Prostate - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Prostate - pathology</subject><subject>Prostate - surgery</subject><subject>Prostatic Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Prostatic Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Prostatic Neoplasms - surgery</subject><subject>Radiology Information Systems - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><issn>0033-8419</issn><issn>1527-1315</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNo9kE1Lw0AQhhdRbK2evUmOXtLOfiVZb1I_WihYbPFo2GwmsrJN4m4q9N-b0tbT8A7PvDAPIbcUxpSKbOJ1aRs3pgmVlHJ-RoZUsjSmnMpzMgTgPM4EVQNyFcI3ABUySy_JgCUZT0CoIflc-iZ0usNoqmuD_iFazuP3x6dV9IE-2KaOWDRD14Zo6bFp0evO_qLb7WNpTRdNna2t0a5frexXbas-1N2xLVyTi0q7gDfHOSLrl-f1dBYv3l7n08dFbASILjayUrJKGBQmKUrIDC8ok5lJK8Y1JgCVFikCpKIQMgGlhaoQjClkaYCVfETuD7Wtb362GLp8Y4NB53SNzTbkNFWZUkxK0aOTA2r6x4PHKm-93Wi_yynke6f5wWl-ctpf3B3Lt8UGy3_-JJH_ARFbc1M</recordid><startdate>201607</startdate><enddate>201607</enddate><creator>Park, Sung Yoon</creator><creator>Jung, Dae Chul</creator><creator>Oh, Young Taik</creator><creator>Cho, Nam Hoon</creator><creator>Choi, Young Deuk</creator><creator>Rha, Koon Ho</creator><creator>Hong, Sung Joon</creator><creator>Han, Kyunghwa</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201607</creationdate><title>Prostate Cancer: PI-RADS Version 2 Helps Preoperatively Predict Clinically Significant Cancers</title><author>Park, Sung Yoon ; Jung, Dae Chul ; Oh, Young Taik ; Cho, Nam Hoon ; Choi, Young Deuk ; Rha, Koon Ho ; Hong, Sung Joon ; Han, Kyunghwa</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c404t-c5f95f620bc6bd08c3b1258c7f23ae600fa47e0074b45609a49fe0ccb5dc02d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Predictive Value of Tests</topic><topic>Preoperative Care - methods</topic><topic>Prostate - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Prostate - pathology</topic><topic>Prostate - surgery</topic><topic>Prostatic Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Prostatic Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Prostatic Neoplasms - surgery</topic><topic>Radiology Information Systems - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Park, Sung Yoon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jung, Dae Chul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oh, Young Taik</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cho, Nam Hoon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Choi, Young Deuk</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rha, Koon Ho</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hong, Sung Joon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Han, Kyunghwa</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Radiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Park, Sung Yoon</au><au>Jung, Dae Chul</au><au>Oh, Young Taik</au><au>Cho, Nam Hoon</au><au>Choi, Young Deuk</au><au>Rha, Koon Ho</au><au>Hong, Sung Joon</au><au>Han, Kyunghwa</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Prostate Cancer: PI-RADS Version 2 Helps Preoperatively Predict Clinically Significant Cancers</atitle><jtitle>Radiology</jtitle><addtitle>Radiology</addtitle><date>2016-07</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>280</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>108</spage><epage>116</epage><pages>108-116</pages><issn>0033-8419</issn><eissn>1527-1315</eissn><abstract>Purpose To retrospectively analyze whether Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) version 2 is helpful for the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer. Materials and Methods Institutional review board approved this retrospective study. A total of 425 patients with prostate cancer who had undergone magnetic resonance (MR) imaging and radical prostatectomy were included. Preoperative parameters such as prostate-specific antigen, biopsy Gleason score, greatest percentage of the core, percentage of the positive core number, and score at PI-RADS version 2 with MR imaging were investigated. Two independent readers performed PI-RADS scoring. Clinically significant prostate cancer was defined as follows: (a) Gleason score of 7 or greater, (b) tumor volume of 0.5 cm(3) or greater, or a (c) positive extracapsular extension or seminal vesicle invasion. The reference standard was based on review of surgical specimen. Logistic regression was conducted to determine which parameters are associated with the presence of clinically significant cancer. Interreader agreement (ie, score ≥4 or not) was investigated by using κ statistics. Results At univariate analysis, all of the preoperative parameters were significant for clinically significant prostate cancer (P &lt; .05). However, multivariate analysis revealed that PI-RADS score was the only significant parameter for both readers (reader 1: odds ratio = 28.170, P = .002; reader 2: odds ratio = 5.474, P = .007). The interreader agreement was excellent for PI-RADS score of 4 or greater (weighted κ = 0.801; 95% confidence interval: 0.737, 0.865). Conclusion The use of PI-RADS version 2 may help preoperatively diagnose clinically significant prostate cancer. (©) RSNA, 2016.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pmid>26836049</pmid><doi>10.1148/radiol.16151133</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0033-8419
ispartof Radiology, 2016-07, Vol.280 (1), p.108-116
issn 0033-8419
1527-1315
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1798992554
source MEDLINE; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
subjects Aged
Humans
Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods
Male
Middle Aged
Predictive Value of Tests
Preoperative Care - methods
Prostate - diagnostic imaging
Prostate - pathology
Prostate - surgery
Prostatic Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging
Prostatic Neoplasms - pathology
Prostatic Neoplasms - surgery
Radiology Information Systems - statistics & numerical data
Retrospective Studies
Sensitivity and Specificity
title Prostate Cancer: PI-RADS Version 2 Helps Preoperatively Predict Clinically Significant Cancers
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-11T15%3A03%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Prostate%20Cancer:%20PI-RADS%20Version%202%20Helps%20Preoperatively%20Predict%20Clinically%20Significant%20Cancers&rft.jtitle=Radiology&rft.au=Park,%20Sung%20Yoon&rft.date=2016-07&rft.volume=280&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=108&rft.epage=116&rft.pages=108-116&rft.issn=0033-8419&rft.eissn=1527-1315&rft_id=info:doi/10.1148/radiol.16151133&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1798992554%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1798992554&rft_id=info:pmid/26836049&rfr_iscdi=true