Vertical Scar Breast Reduction: Does Gathering the Incision Matter?

BACKGROUNDThe vertical scar bilateral breast reduction is a highly effective technique to reduce breast volume and create long-lasting aesthetic improvements. A cited disadvantage is the inability to adequately shorten the vertical scar, leading to chest wall scars or inframammary puckers. Gathering...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Annals of plastic surgery 2016-01, Vol.77 (1), p.25-31
Hauptverfasser: Matthews, Jennifer L.K, Oddone-Paolucci, Elizabeth, Lawson, Douglas M, Hall-Findlay, Elizabeth J
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 31
container_issue 1
container_start_page 25
container_title Annals of plastic surgery
container_volume 77
creator Matthews, Jennifer L.K
Oddone-Paolucci, Elizabeth
Lawson, Douglas M
Hall-Findlay, Elizabeth J
description BACKGROUNDThe vertical scar bilateral breast reduction is a highly effective technique to reduce breast volume and create long-lasting aesthetic improvements. A cited disadvantage is the inability to adequately shorten the vertical scar, leading to chest wall scars or inframammary puckers. Gathering or cinching sutures have been described as a strategy to confront this issue. This article aims to determine if suture gathering is an effective methods to (1) reduce the incision length, (2) shorten the areola-to-inframammary fold (IMF) distance, and (3) reduce the pucker revision rate. METHODSAll patients undergoing vertical breast reduction performed by the senior author (E.H.F.) from 2001 to 2007 were included. The patient population was divided into “gather” and “no gather” groups depending on how the vertical incision was closed. RESULTSThere were 203 patients in the “no gather” group and 193 in the “gather” group. Age, body mass index, and resection weight were statistically but not clinically different. The percent reduction in vertical incision length was significantly greater in the “gather” group (34.2 ± 9.9% vs. 12.2 ± 5.9%). Both groups showed a gradual lengthening of areola-to-IMF distance postoperatively. Suture gathering had no impact on the pucker revision rate but increased healing complications. CONCLUSIONGathering sutures significantly reduce the incision length in the operating room but do not change the areola-to-IMF distance or pucker revision rate. Gathering negatively influences skin vascularity and wound healing. It is acceptable and necessary to have a longer areola-to-IMF distance in a vertical reduction to accommodate increased projection.
doi_str_mv 10.1097/SAP.0000000000000234
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1797231609</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1797231609</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2354-4aaea0d9f7cef2a9dd2157ba526c8ddcaa507eedfc18abe6b890f32c618e5e903</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE9Lw0AQxRdRbK1-A5EcvaTu3-zGi2jVWqgoVr2GyWZio2lSdxOK395Iq4gH5_IO894b5kfIIaNDRmN9Mju_H9Lfw4XcIn2mRBQKTc026VMmTaipFD2y5_0rpYwbGe2SHleUCilUn4ye0TWFhTKYWXDBhUPwTfCAWWuboq5Og8safTCGZo6uqF6CToNJZQvfLYNbaBp0Z_tkJ4fS48FGB-Tp-upxdBNO78aT0fk0tFwoGUoABJrFubaYc4izjDOlU1A8sibLLICiGjHLLTOQYpSamOaC24gZVBhTMSDH696lq99b9E2yKLzFsoQK69YnTMeaCxbRuLPKtdW62nuHebJ0xQLcR8Jo8oUv6fAlf_F1saPNhTZdYPYT-ubVGczasKrL7nX_VrYrdMkcoWzm_3d_AnEre7s</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1797231609</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Vertical Scar Breast Reduction: Does Gathering the Incision Matter?</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><creator>Matthews, Jennifer L.K ; Oddone-Paolucci, Elizabeth ; Lawson, Douglas M ; Hall-Findlay, Elizabeth J</creator><creatorcontrib>Matthews, Jennifer L.K ; Oddone-Paolucci, Elizabeth ; Lawson, Douglas M ; Hall-Findlay, Elizabeth J</creatorcontrib><description>BACKGROUNDThe vertical scar bilateral breast reduction is a highly effective technique to reduce breast volume and create long-lasting aesthetic improvements. A cited disadvantage is the inability to adequately shorten the vertical scar, leading to chest wall scars or inframammary puckers. Gathering or cinching sutures have been described as a strategy to confront this issue. This article aims to determine if suture gathering is an effective methods to (1) reduce the incision length, (2) shorten the areola-to-inframammary fold (IMF) distance, and (3) reduce the pucker revision rate. METHODSAll patients undergoing vertical breast reduction performed by the senior author (E.H.F.) from 2001 to 2007 were included. The patient population was divided into “gather” and “no gather” groups depending on how the vertical incision was closed. RESULTSThere were 203 patients in the “no gather” group and 193 in the “gather” group. Age, body mass index, and resection weight were statistically but not clinically different. The percent reduction in vertical incision length was significantly greater in the “gather” group (34.2 ± 9.9% vs. 12.2 ± 5.9%). Both groups showed a gradual lengthening of areola-to-IMF distance postoperatively. Suture gathering had no impact on the pucker revision rate but increased healing complications. CONCLUSIONGathering sutures significantly reduce the incision length in the operating room but do not change the areola-to-IMF distance or pucker revision rate. Gathering negatively influences skin vascularity and wound healing. It is acceptable and necessary to have a longer areola-to-IMF distance in a vertical reduction to accommodate increased projection.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0148-7043</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1536-3708</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000000234</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25003435</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Copyright Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved</publisher><subject>Adult ; Cicatrix - etiology ; Cicatrix - prevention &amp; control ; Cicatrix - surgery ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Humans ; Mammaplasty - methods ; Middle Aged ; Postoperative Complications - prevention &amp; control ; Reoperation - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Retrospective Studies ; Suture Techniques ; Treatment Outcome ; Wound Healing</subject><ispartof>Annals of plastic surgery, 2016-01, Vol.77 (1), p.25-31</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2016 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2354-4aaea0d9f7cef2a9dd2157ba526c8ddcaa507eedfc18abe6b890f32c618e5e903</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25003435$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Matthews, Jennifer L.K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oddone-Paolucci, Elizabeth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lawson, Douglas M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hall-Findlay, Elizabeth J</creatorcontrib><title>Vertical Scar Breast Reduction: Does Gathering the Incision Matter?</title><title>Annals of plastic surgery</title><addtitle>Ann Plast Surg</addtitle><description>BACKGROUNDThe vertical scar bilateral breast reduction is a highly effective technique to reduce breast volume and create long-lasting aesthetic improvements. A cited disadvantage is the inability to adequately shorten the vertical scar, leading to chest wall scars or inframammary puckers. Gathering or cinching sutures have been described as a strategy to confront this issue. This article aims to determine if suture gathering is an effective methods to (1) reduce the incision length, (2) shorten the areola-to-inframammary fold (IMF) distance, and (3) reduce the pucker revision rate. METHODSAll patients undergoing vertical breast reduction performed by the senior author (E.H.F.) from 2001 to 2007 were included. The patient population was divided into “gather” and “no gather” groups depending on how the vertical incision was closed. RESULTSThere were 203 patients in the “no gather” group and 193 in the “gather” group. Age, body mass index, and resection weight were statistically but not clinically different. The percent reduction in vertical incision length was significantly greater in the “gather” group (34.2 ± 9.9% vs. 12.2 ± 5.9%). Both groups showed a gradual lengthening of areola-to-IMF distance postoperatively. Suture gathering had no impact on the pucker revision rate but increased healing complications. CONCLUSIONGathering sutures significantly reduce the incision length in the operating room but do not change the areola-to-IMF distance or pucker revision rate. Gathering negatively influences skin vascularity and wound healing. It is acceptable and necessary to have a longer areola-to-IMF distance in a vertical reduction to accommodate increased projection.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Cicatrix - etiology</subject><subject>Cicatrix - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Cicatrix - surgery</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Mammaplasty - methods</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Reoperation - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Suture Techniques</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>Wound Healing</subject><issn>0148-7043</issn><issn>1536-3708</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE9Lw0AQxRdRbK1-A5EcvaTu3-zGi2jVWqgoVr2GyWZio2lSdxOK395Iq4gH5_IO894b5kfIIaNDRmN9Mju_H9Lfw4XcIn2mRBQKTc026VMmTaipFD2y5_0rpYwbGe2SHleUCilUn4ye0TWFhTKYWXDBhUPwTfCAWWuboq5Og8safTCGZo6uqF6CToNJZQvfLYNbaBp0Z_tkJ4fS48FGB-Tp-upxdBNO78aT0fk0tFwoGUoABJrFubaYc4izjDOlU1A8sibLLICiGjHLLTOQYpSamOaC24gZVBhTMSDH696lq99b9E2yKLzFsoQK69YnTMeaCxbRuLPKtdW62nuHebJ0xQLcR8Jo8oUv6fAlf_F1saPNhTZdYPYT-ubVGczasKrL7nX_VrYrdMkcoWzm_3d_AnEre7s</recordid><startdate>201601</startdate><enddate>201601</enddate><creator>Matthews, Jennifer L.K</creator><creator>Oddone-Paolucci, Elizabeth</creator><creator>Lawson, Douglas M</creator><creator>Hall-Findlay, Elizabeth J</creator><general>Copyright Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201601</creationdate><title>Vertical Scar Breast Reduction: Does Gathering the Incision Matter?</title><author>Matthews, Jennifer L.K ; Oddone-Paolucci, Elizabeth ; Lawson, Douglas M ; Hall-Findlay, Elizabeth J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2354-4aaea0d9f7cef2a9dd2157ba526c8ddcaa507eedfc18abe6b890f32c618e5e903</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Cicatrix - etiology</topic><topic>Cicatrix - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Cicatrix - surgery</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Mammaplasty - methods</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Reoperation - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Suture Techniques</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>Wound Healing</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Matthews, Jennifer L.K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oddone-Paolucci, Elizabeth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lawson, Douglas M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hall-Findlay, Elizabeth J</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Annals of plastic surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Matthews, Jennifer L.K</au><au>Oddone-Paolucci, Elizabeth</au><au>Lawson, Douglas M</au><au>Hall-Findlay, Elizabeth J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Vertical Scar Breast Reduction: Does Gathering the Incision Matter?</atitle><jtitle>Annals of plastic surgery</jtitle><addtitle>Ann Plast Surg</addtitle><date>2016-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>77</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>25</spage><epage>31</epage><pages>25-31</pages><issn>0148-7043</issn><eissn>1536-3708</eissn><abstract>BACKGROUNDThe vertical scar bilateral breast reduction is a highly effective technique to reduce breast volume and create long-lasting aesthetic improvements. A cited disadvantage is the inability to adequately shorten the vertical scar, leading to chest wall scars or inframammary puckers. Gathering or cinching sutures have been described as a strategy to confront this issue. This article aims to determine if suture gathering is an effective methods to (1) reduce the incision length, (2) shorten the areola-to-inframammary fold (IMF) distance, and (3) reduce the pucker revision rate. METHODSAll patients undergoing vertical breast reduction performed by the senior author (E.H.F.) from 2001 to 2007 were included. The patient population was divided into “gather” and “no gather” groups depending on how the vertical incision was closed. RESULTSThere were 203 patients in the “no gather” group and 193 in the “gather” group. Age, body mass index, and resection weight were statistically but not clinically different. The percent reduction in vertical incision length was significantly greater in the “gather” group (34.2 ± 9.9% vs. 12.2 ± 5.9%). Both groups showed a gradual lengthening of areola-to-IMF distance postoperatively. Suture gathering had no impact on the pucker revision rate but increased healing complications. CONCLUSIONGathering sutures significantly reduce the incision length in the operating room but do not change the areola-to-IMF distance or pucker revision rate. Gathering negatively influences skin vascularity and wound healing. It is acceptable and necessary to have a longer areola-to-IMF distance in a vertical reduction to accommodate increased projection.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Copyright Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved</pub><pmid>25003435</pmid><doi>10.1097/SAP.0000000000000234</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0148-7043
ispartof Annals of plastic surgery, 2016-01, Vol.77 (1), p.25-31
issn 0148-7043
1536-3708
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1797231609
source MEDLINE; Journals@Ovid Complete
subjects Adult
Cicatrix - etiology
Cicatrix - prevention & control
Cicatrix - surgery
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Humans
Mammaplasty - methods
Middle Aged
Postoperative Complications - prevention & control
Reoperation - statistics & numerical data
Retrospective Studies
Suture Techniques
Treatment Outcome
Wound Healing
title Vertical Scar Breast Reduction: Does Gathering the Incision Matter?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-11T10%3A22%3A28IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Vertical%20Scar%20Breast%20Reduction:%20Does%20Gathering%20the%20Incision%20Matter?&rft.jtitle=Annals%20of%20plastic%20surgery&rft.au=Matthews,%20Jennifer%20L.K&rft.date=2016-01&rft.volume=77&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=25&rft.epage=31&rft.pages=25-31&rft.issn=0148-7043&rft.eissn=1536-3708&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/SAP.0000000000000234&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1797231609%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1797231609&rft_id=info:pmid/25003435&rfr_iscdi=true