Vertical Scar Breast Reduction: Does Gathering the Incision Matter?
BACKGROUNDThe vertical scar bilateral breast reduction is a highly effective technique to reduce breast volume and create long-lasting aesthetic improvements. A cited disadvantage is the inability to adequately shorten the vertical scar, leading to chest wall scars or inframammary puckers. Gathering...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Annals of plastic surgery 2016-01, Vol.77 (1), p.25-31 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 31 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 25 |
container_title | Annals of plastic surgery |
container_volume | 77 |
creator | Matthews, Jennifer L.K Oddone-Paolucci, Elizabeth Lawson, Douglas M Hall-Findlay, Elizabeth J |
description | BACKGROUNDThe vertical scar bilateral breast reduction is a highly effective technique to reduce breast volume and create long-lasting aesthetic improvements. A cited disadvantage is the inability to adequately shorten the vertical scar, leading to chest wall scars or inframammary puckers. Gathering or cinching sutures have been described as a strategy to confront this issue. This article aims to determine if suture gathering is an effective methods to (1) reduce the incision length, (2) shorten the areola-to-inframammary fold (IMF) distance, and (3) reduce the pucker revision rate.
METHODSAll patients undergoing vertical breast reduction performed by the senior author (E.H.F.) from 2001 to 2007 were included. The patient population was divided into “gather” and “no gather” groups depending on how the vertical incision was closed.
RESULTSThere were 203 patients in the “no gather” group and 193 in the “gather” group. Age, body mass index, and resection weight were statistically but not clinically different. The percent reduction in vertical incision length was significantly greater in the “gather” group (34.2 ± 9.9% vs. 12.2 ± 5.9%). Both groups showed a gradual lengthening of areola-to-IMF distance postoperatively. Suture gathering had no impact on the pucker revision rate but increased healing complications.
CONCLUSIONGathering sutures significantly reduce the incision length in the operating room but do not change the areola-to-IMF distance or pucker revision rate. Gathering negatively influences skin vascularity and wound healing. It is acceptable and necessary to have a longer areola-to-IMF distance in a vertical reduction to accommodate increased projection. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1097/SAP.0000000000000234 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1797231609</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1797231609</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2354-4aaea0d9f7cef2a9dd2157ba526c8ddcaa507eedfc18abe6b890f32c618e5e903</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE9Lw0AQxRdRbK1-A5EcvaTu3-zGi2jVWqgoVr2GyWZio2lSdxOK395Iq4gH5_IO894b5kfIIaNDRmN9Mju_H9Lfw4XcIn2mRBQKTc026VMmTaipFD2y5_0rpYwbGe2SHleUCilUn4ye0TWFhTKYWXDBhUPwTfCAWWuboq5Og8safTCGZo6uqF6CToNJZQvfLYNbaBp0Z_tkJ4fS48FGB-Tp-upxdBNO78aT0fk0tFwoGUoABJrFubaYc4izjDOlU1A8sibLLICiGjHLLTOQYpSamOaC24gZVBhTMSDH696lq99b9E2yKLzFsoQK69YnTMeaCxbRuLPKtdW62nuHebJ0xQLcR8Jo8oUv6fAlf_F1saPNhTZdYPYT-ubVGczasKrL7nX_VrYrdMkcoWzm_3d_AnEre7s</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1797231609</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Vertical Scar Breast Reduction: Does Gathering the Incision Matter?</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><creator>Matthews, Jennifer L.K ; Oddone-Paolucci, Elizabeth ; Lawson, Douglas M ; Hall-Findlay, Elizabeth J</creator><creatorcontrib>Matthews, Jennifer L.K ; Oddone-Paolucci, Elizabeth ; Lawson, Douglas M ; Hall-Findlay, Elizabeth J</creatorcontrib><description>BACKGROUNDThe vertical scar bilateral breast reduction is a highly effective technique to reduce breast volume and create long-lasting aesthetic improvements. A cited disadvantage is the inability to adequately shorten the vertical scar, leading to chest wall scars or inframammary puckers. Gathering or cinching sutures have been described as a strategy to confront this issue. This article aims to determine if suture gathering is an effective methods to (1) reduce the incision length, (2) shorten the areola-to-inframammary fold (IMF) distance, and (3) reduce the pucker revision rate.
METHODSAll patients undergoing vertical breast reduction performed by the senior author (E.H.F.) from 2001 to 2007 were included. The patient population was divided into “gather” and “no gather” groups depending on how the vertical incision was closed.
RESULTSThere were 203 patients in the “no gather” group and 193 in the “gather” group. Age, body mass index, and resection weight were statistically but not clinically different. The percent reduction in vertical incision length was significantly greater in the “gather” group (34.2 ± 9.9% vs. 12.2 ± 5.9%). Both groups showed a gradual lengthening of areola-to-IMF distance postoperatively. Suture gathering had no impact on the pucker revision rate but increased healing complications.
CONCLUSIONGathering sutures significantly reduce the incision length in the operating room but do not change the areola-to-IMF distance or pucker revision rate. Gathering negatively influences skin vascularity and wound healing. It is acceptable and necessary to have a longer areola-to-IMF distance in a vertical reduction to accommodate increased projection.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0148-7043</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1536-3708</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000000234</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25003435</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Copyright Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved</publisher><subject>Adult ; Cicatrix - etiology ; Cicatrix - prevention & control ; Cicatrix - surgery ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Humans ; Mammaplasty - methods ; Middle Aged ; Postoperative Complications - prevention & control ; Reoperation - statistics & numerical data ; Retrospective Studies ; Suture Techniques ; Treatment Outcome ; Wound Healing</subject><ispartof>Annals of plastic surgery, 2016-01, Vol.77 (1), p.25-31</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2016 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2354-4aaea0d9f7cef2a9dd2157ba526c8ddcaa507eedfc18abe6b890f32c618e5e903</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25003435$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Matthews, Jennifer L.K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oddone-Paolucci, Elizabeth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lawson, Douglas M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hall-Findlay, Elizabeth J</creatorcontrib><title>Vertical Scar Breast Reduction: Does Gathering the Incision Matter?</title><title>Annals of plastic surgery</title><addtitle>Ann Plast Surg</addtitle><description>BACKGROUNDThe vertical scar bilateral breast reduction is a highly effective technique to reduce breast volume and create long-lasting aesthetic improvements. A cited disadvantage is the inability to adequately shorten the vertical scar, leading to chest wall scars or inframammary puckers. Gathering or cinching sutures have been described as a strategy to confront this issue. This article aims to determine if suture gathering is an effective methods to (1) reduce the incision length, (2) shorten the areola-to-inframammary fold (IMF) distance, and (3) reduce the pucker revision rate.
METHODSAll patients undergoing vertical breast reduction performed by the senior author (E.H.F.) from 2001 to 2007 were included. The patient population was divided into “gather” and “no gather” groups depending on how the vertical incision was closed.
RESULTSThere were 203 patients in the “no gather” group and 193 in the “gather” group. Age, body mass index, and resection weight were statistically but not clinically different. The percent reduction in vertical incision length was significantly greater in the “gather” group (34.2 ± 9.9% vs. 12.2 ± 5.9%). Both groups showed a gradual lengthening of areola-to-IMF distance postoperatively. Suture gathering had no impact on the pucker revision rate but increased healing complications.
CONCLUSIONGathering sutures significantly reduce the incision length in the operating room but do not change the areola-to-IMF distance or pucker revision rate. Gathering negatively influences skin vascularity and wound healing. It is acceptable and necessary to have a longer areola-to-IMF distance in a vertical reduction to accommodate increased projection.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Cicatrix - etiology</subject><subject>Cicatrix - prevention & control</subject><subject>Cicatrix - surgery</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Mammaplasty - methods</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications - prevention & control</subject><subject>Reoperation - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Suture Techniques</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>Wound Healing</subject><issn>0148-7043</issn><issn>1536-3708</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE9Lw0AQxRdRbK1-A5EcvaTu3-zGi2jVWqgoVr2GyWZio2lSdxOK395Iq4gH5_IO894b5kfIIaNDRmN9Mju_H9Lfw4XcIn2mRBQKTc026VMmTaipFD2y5_0rpYwbGe2SHleUCilUn4ye0TWFhTKYWXDBhUPwTfCAWWuboq5Og8safTCGZo6uqF6CToNJZQvfLYNbaBp0Z_tkJ4fS48FGB-Tp-upxdBNO78aT0fk0tFwoGUoABJrFubaYc4izjDOlU1A8sibLLICiGjHLLTOQYpSamOaC24gZVBhTMSDH696lq99b9E2yKLzFsoQK69YnTMeaCxbRuLPKtdW62nuHebJ0xQLcR8Jo8oUv6fAlf_F1saPNhTZdYPYT-ubVGczasKrL7nX_VrYrdMkcoWzm_3d_AnEre7s</recordid><startdate>201601</startdate><enddate>201601</enddate><creator>Matthews, Jennifer L.K</creator><creator>Oddone-Paolucci, Elizabeth</creator><creator>Lawson, Douglas M</creator><creator>Hall-Findlay, Elizabeth J</creator><general>Copyright Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201601</creationdate><title>Vertical Scar Breast Reduction: Does Gathering the Incision Matter?</title><author>Matthews, Jennifer L.K ; Oddone-Paolucci, Elizabeth ; Lawson, Douglas M ; Hall-Findlay, Elizabeth J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2354-4aaea0d9f7cef2a9dd2157ba526c8ddcaa507eedfc18abe6b890f32c618e5e903</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Cicatrix - etiology</topic><topic>Cicatrix - prevention & control</topic><topic>Cicatrix - surgery</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Mammaplasty - methods</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications - prevention & control</topic><topic>Reoperation - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Suture Techniques</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>Wound Healing</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Matthews, Jennifer L.K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oddone-Paolucci, Elizabeth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lawson, Douglas M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hall-Findlay, Elizabeth J</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Annals of plastic surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Matthews, Jennifer L.K</au><au>Oddone-Paolucci, Elizabeth</au><au>Lawson, Douglas M</au><au>Hall-Findlay, Elizabeth J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Vertical Scar Breast Reduction: Does Gathering the Incision Matter?</atitle><jtitle>Annals of plastic surgery</jtitle><addtitle>Ann Plast Surg</addtitle><date>2016-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>77</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>25</spage><epage>31</epage><pages>25-31</pages><issn>0148-7043</issn><eissn>1536-3708</eissn><abstract>BACKGROUNDThe vertical scar bilateral breast reduction is a highly effective technique to reduce breast volume and create long-lasting aesthetic improvements. A cited disadvantage is the inability to adequately shorten the vertical scar, leading to chest wall scars or inframammary puckers. Gathering or cinching sutures have been described as a strategy to confront this issue. This article aims to determine if suture gathering is an effective methods to (1) reduce the incision length, (2) shorten the areola-to-inframammary fold (IMF) distance, and (3) reduce the pucker revision rate.
METHODSAll patients undergoing vertical breast reduction performed by the senior author (E.H.F.) from 2001 to 2007 were included. The patient population was divided into “gather” and “no gather” groups depending on how the vertical incision was closed.
RESULTSThere were 203 patients in the “no gather” group and 193 in the “gather” group. Age, body mass index, and resection weight were statistically but not clinically different. The percent reduction in vertical incision length was significantly greater in the “gather” group (34.2 ± 9.9% vs. 12.2 ± 5.9%). Both groups showed a gradual lengthening of areola-to-IMF distance postoperatively. Suture gathering had no impact on the pucker revision rate but increased healing complications.
CONCLUSIONGathering sutures significantly reduce the incision length in the operating room but do not change the areola-to-IMF distance or pucker revision rate. Gathering negatively influences skin vascularity and wound healing. It is acceptable and necessary to have a longer areola-to-IMF distance in a vertical reduction to accommodate increased projection.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Copyright Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved</pub><pmid>25003435</pmid><doi>10.1097/SAP.0000000000000234</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0148-7043 |
ispartof | Annals of plastic surgery, 2016-01, Vol.77 (1), p.25-31 |
issn | 0148-7043 1536-3708 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1797231609 |
source | MEDLINE; Journals@Ovid Complete |
subjects | Adult Cicatrix - etiology Cicatrix - prevention & control Cicatrix - surgery Female Follow-Up Studies Humans Mammaplasty - methods Middle Aged Postoperative Complications - prevention & control Reoperation - statistics & numerical data Retrospective Studies Suture Techniques Treatment Outcome Wound Healing |
title | Vertical Scar Breast Reduction: Does Gathering the Incision Matter? |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-11T10%3A22%3A28IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Vertical%20Scar%20Breast%20Reduction:%20Does%20Gathering%20the%20Incision%20Matter?&rft.jtitle=Annals%20of%20plastic%20surgery&rft.au=Matthews,%20Jennifer%20L.K&rft.date=2016-01&rft.volume=77&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=25&rft.epage=31&rft.pages=25-31&rft.issn=0148-7043&rft.eissn=1536-3708&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/SAP.0000000000000234&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1797231609%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1797231609&rft_id=info:pmid/25003435&rfr_iscdi=true |