Moral Distress Scale for Occupational Therapists: Part 1. Instrument Development and Content Validity
We describe the development of an instrument to measure moral distress experienced by occupational therapists and show how its content validity was established. Written comments (n = 78) from a previous survey using the Moral Distress Scale-Revised-Other Health Provider Adult were used to modify tha...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The American journal of occupational therapy 2016-07, Vol.70 (4), p.7004300020-7004300020p8 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 7004300020p8 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 7004300020 |
container_title | The American journal of occupational therapy |
container_volume | 70 |
creator | Penny, Neil H Bires, Samantha J Bonn, Elizabeth A Dockery, Alisha N Pettit, Nicole L |
description | We describe the development of an instrument to measure moral distress experienced by occupational therapists and show how its content validity was established.
Written comments (n = 78) from a previous survey using the Moral Distress Scale-Revised-Other Health Provider Adult were used to modify that instrument and create the Moral Distress Scale-Revised-Occupational Therapy-Adult Settings (MDS-R-OT[A]). The MDS-R-OT[A] was distributed to a nationwide random sample of 400 occupational therapists who rated the relevance of each item to their clinical practice.
A scale content validity index of 81.8% was found (geriatric = 81.5%, physical disability = 80.8%, combination of the two = 85.7%).
The MDS-R-OT[A] possesses acceptable content validity and is appropriate for use with occupational therapists working in geriatric or physical disability settings. |
doi_str_mv | 10.5014/ajot.2015.018358 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1797229166</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A456275667</galeid><sourcerecordid>A456275667</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c340t-ac4a1231cf535e2f7700e1e65d040b1f693b03c29f106564f84f1a25ee0f9c4c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkt1rFDEUxYModq2--yQDgvgyY76z8a1sbS1UKlh9DdnMjTvLzGSaZIT-92a69aMiecjl5ncu3JOD0EuCG4EJf2f3ITcUE9FgsmZi_QitiOasVlLJx2iFqaK15hofoWcp7TGmes3oU3RU-qWt1QrBpxBtX512KUdIqfribA-VD7G6cm6ebO7CWN6vdxDtVKD0vvpsY65IU12MRTMPMObqFH5AH6a72o5ttQljXupvtu_aLt8-R0-87RO8uL-P0dezD9ebj_Xl1fnF5uSydozjXFvHLaGMOC-YAOqVwhgISNFijrfES822mDmqPcFSSO7X3BNLBQD22nHHjtHbw9wphpsZUjZDlxz0vR0hzMkQpRWlmkhZ0Nf_oPswx7LrHVX801KqP9T3YovpRh9ytG4Zak64kFSJA9X8hyqnhaFzYQTflf4DwZu_BDuwfd6l0M-L2-khiA-giyGlCN5MsRtsvDUEmyUCZomAWSJgDhEoklf3i83bAdrfgl9_zn4CEqWqIA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1796769667</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Moral Distress Scale for Occupational Therapists: Part 1. Instrument Development and Content Validity</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Penny, Neil H ; Bires, Samantha J ; Bonn, Elizabeth A ; Dockery, Alisha N ; Pettit, Nicole L</creator><creatorcontrib>Penny, Neil H ; Bires, Samantha J ; Bonn, Elizabeth A ; Dockery, Alisha N ; Pettit, Nicole L</creatorcontrib><description>We describe the development of an instrument to measure moral distress experienced by occupational therapists and show how its content validity was established.
Written comments (n = 78) from a previous survey using the Moral Distress Scale-Revised-Other Health Provider Adult were used to modify that instrument and create the Moral Distress Scale-Revised-Occupational Therapy-Adult Settings (MDS-R-OT[A]). The MDS-R-OT[A] was distributed to a nationwide random sample of 400 occupational therapists who rated the relevance of each item to their clinical practice.
A scale content validity index of 81.8% was found (geriatric = 81.5%, physical disability = 80.8%, combination of the two = 85.7%).
The MDS-R-OT[A] possesses acceptable content validity and is appropriate for use with occupational therapists working in geriatric or physical disability settings.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0272-9490</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1943-7676</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.5014/ajot.2015.018358</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27294997</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Occupational Therapy Association</publisher><subject>Assertiveness ; Burnout ; Content Validity ; Ethics ; Geriatrics ; Interrater Reliability ; Likert Scales ; Multidimensional Scaling ; Nursing ; Occupational therapists ; Occupational therapy ; Physical Disabilities ; Practice ; Psychological aspects ; Researchers ; Resistance (Psychology) ; Validity</subject><ispartof>The American journal of occupational therapy, 2016-07, Vol.70 (4), p.7004300020-7004300020p8</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2016 by the American Occupational Therapy Association, Inc.</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2016 American Occupational Therapy Association</rights><rights>Copyright American Occupational Therapy Association, Inc. Jul/Aug 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c340t-ac4a1231cf535e2f7700e1e65d040b1f693b03c29f106564f84f1a25ee0f9c4c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c340t-ac4a1231cf535e2f7700e1e65d040b1f693b03c29f106564f84f1a25ee0f9c4c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,12826,27903,27904,30978</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27294997$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Penny, Neil H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bires, Samantha J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bonn, Elizabeth A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dockery, Alisha N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pettit, Nicole L</creatorcontrib><title>Moral Distress Scale for Occupational Therapists: Part 1. Instrument Development and Content Validity</title><title>The American journal of occupational therapy</title><addtitle>Am J Occup Ther</addtitle><description>We describe the development of an instrument to measure moral distress experienced by occupational therapists and show how its content validity was established.
Written comments (n = 78) from a previous survey using the Moral Distress Scale-Revised-Other Health Provider Adult were used to modify that instrument and create the Moral Distress Scale-Revised-Occupational Therapy-Adult Settings (MDS-R-OT[A]). The MDS-R-OT[A] was distributed to a nationwide random sample of 400 occupational therapists who rated the relevance of each item to their clinical practice.
A scale content validity index of 81.8% was found (geriatric = 81.5%, physical disability = 80.8%, combination of the two = 85.7%).
The MDS-R-OT[A] possesses acceptable content validity and is appropriate for use with occupational therapists working in geriatric or physical disability settings.</description><subject>Assertiveness</subject><subject>Burnout</subject><subject>Content Validity</subject><subject>Ethics</subject><subject>Geriatrics</subject><subject>Interrater Reliability</subject><subject>Likert Scales</subject><subject>Multidimensional Scaling</subject><subject>Nursing</subject><subject>Occupational therapists</subject><subject>Occupational therapy</subject><subject>Physical Disabilities</subject><subject>Practice</subject><subject>Psychological aspects</subject><subject>Researchers</subject><subject>Resistance (Psychology)</subject><subject>Validity</subject><issn>0272-9490</issn><issn>1943-7676</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNptkt1rFDEUxYModq2--yQDgvgyY76z8a1sbS1UKlh9DdnMjTvLzGSaZIT-92a69aMiecjl5ncu3JOD0EuCG4EJf2f3ITcUE9FgsmZi_QitiOasVlLJx2iFqaK15hofoWcp7TGmes3oU3RU-qWt1QrBpxBtX512KUdIqfribA-VD7G6cm6ebO7CWN6vdxDtVKD0vvpsY65IU12MRTMPMObqFH5AH6a72o5ttQljXupvtu_aLt8-R0-87RO8uL-P0dezD9ebj_Xl1fnF5uSydozjXFvHLaGMOC-YAOqVwhgISNFijrfES822mDmqPcFSSO7X3BNLBQD22nHHjtHbw9wphpsZUjZDlxz0vR0hzMkQpRWlmkhZ0Nf_oPswx7LrHVX801KqP9T3YovpRh9ytG4Zak64kFSJA9X8hyqnhaFzYQTflf4DwZu_BDuwfd6l0M-L2-khiA-giyGlCN5MsRtsvDUEmyUCZomAWSJgDhEoklf3i83bAdrfgl9_zn4CEqWqIA</recordid><startdate>201607</startdate><enddate>201607</enddate><creator>Penny, Neil H</creator><creator>Bires, Samantha J</creator><creator>Bonn, Elizabeth A</creator><creator>Dockery, Alisha N</creator><creator>Pettit, Nicole L</creator><general>American Occupational Therapy Association</general><general>American Occupational Therapy Association, Inc</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>ASE</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HEHIP</scope><scope>K6X</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>M2S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201607</creationdate><title>Moral Distress Scale for Occupational Therapists: Part 1. Instrument Development and Content Validity</title><author>Penny, Neil H ; Bires, Samantha J ; Bonn, Elizabeth A ; Dockery, Alisha N ; Pettit, Nicole L</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c340t-ac4a1231cf535e2f7700e1e65d040b1f693b03c29f106564f84f1a25ee0f9c4c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Assertiveness</topic><topic>Burnout</topic><topic>Content Validity</topic><topic>Ethics</topic><topic>Geriatrics</topic><topic>Interrater Reliability</topic><topic>Likert Scales</topic><topic>Multidimensional Scaling</topic><topic>Nursing</topic><topic>Occupational therapists</topic><topic>Occupational therapy</topic><topic>Physical Disabilities</topic><topic>Practice</topic><topic>Psychological aspects</topic><topic>Researchers</topic><topic>Resistance (Psychology)</topic><topic>Validity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Penny, Neil H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bires, Samantha J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bonn, Elizabeth A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dockery, Alisha N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pettit, Nicole L</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Sociology Collection</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Education Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Sociology Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The American journal of occupational therapy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Penny, Neil H</au><au>Bires, Samantha J</au><au>Bonn, Elizabeth A</au><au>Dockery, Alisha N</au><au>Pettit, Nicole L</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Moral Distress Scale for Occupational Therapists: Part 1. Instrument Development and Content Validity</atitle><jtitle>The American journal of occupational therapy</jtitle><addtitle>Am J Occup Ther</addtitle><date>2016-07</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>70</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>7004300020</spage><epage>7004300020p8</epage><pages>7004300020-7004300020p8</pages><issn>0272-9490</issn><eissn>1943-7676</eissn><abstract>We describe the development of an instrument to measure moral distress experienced by occupational therapists and show how its content validity was established.
Written comments (n = 78) from a previous survey using the Moral Distress Scale-Revised-Other Health Provider Adult were used to modify that instrument and create the Moral Distress Scale-Revised-Occupational Therapy-Adult Settings (MDS-R-OT[A]). The MDS-R-OT[A] was distributed to a nationwide random sample of 400 occupational therapists who rated the relevance of each item to their clinical practice.
A scale content validity index of 81.8% was found (geriatric = 81.5%, physical disability = 80.8%, combination of the two = 85.7%).
The MDS-R-OT[A] possesses acceptable content validity and is appropriate for use with occupational therapists working in geriatric or physical disability settings.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Occupational Therapy Association</pub><pmid>27294997</pmid><doi>10.5014/ajot.2015.018358</doi></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0272-9490 |
ispartof | The American journal of occupational therapy, 2016-07, Vol.70 (4), p.7004300020-7004300020p8 |
issn | 0272-9490 1943-7676 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1797229166 |
source | Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Assertiveness Burnout Content Validity Ethics Geriatrics Interrater Reliability Likert Scales Multidimensional Scaling Nursing Occupational therapists Occupational therapy Physical Disabilities Practice Psychological aspects Researchers Resistance (Psychology) Validity |
title | Moral Distress Scale for Occupational Therapists: Part 1. Instrument Development and Content Validity |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-26T04%3A08%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Moral%20Distress%20Scale%20for%20Occupational%20Therapists:%20Part%201.%20Instrument%20Development%20and%20Content%20Validity&rft.jtitle=The%20American%20journal%20of%20occupational%20therapy&rft.au=Penny,%20Neil%20H&rft.date=2016-07&rft.volume=70&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=7004300020&rft.epage=7004300020p8&rft.pages=7004300020-7004300020p8&rft.issn=0272-9490&rft.eissn=1943-7676&rft_id=info:doi/10.5014/ajot.2015.018358&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA456275667%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1796769667&rft_id=info:pmid/27294997&rft_galeid=A456275667&rfr_iscdi=true |