Development of varicella vaccine in Japan and future prospects
Abstract In Japan, Dr. Michiaki Takahashi (1928–2013) successfully developed the first live attenuated varicella vaccine in the world. The virus used for this vaccine was varicella-zoster virus isolated from the vesicular fluid of a child with typical varicella and it was named the Oka strain after...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Vaccine 2016-06, Vol.34 (29), p.3427-3433 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 3433 |
---|---|
container_issue | 29 |
container_start_page | 3427 |
container_title | Vaccine |
container_volume | 34 |
creator | Ozaki, Takao Asano, Yoshizo |
description | Abstract In Japan, Dr. Michiaki Takahashi (1928–2013) successfully developed the first live attenuated varicella vaccine in the world. The virus used for this vaccine was varicella-zoster virus isolated from the vesicular fluid of a child with typical varicella and it was named the Oka strain after the family name of the child. In 1974, a patient with nephrosis developed varicella in the Pediatric Ward, and uninfected pediatric patients received varicella vaccine immediately. As a result, there were no cases of varicella in the other children and all of the vaccinated children acquired immunity to the disease. These results were published in the Lancet, demonstrating the safety and efficacy of varicella Oka strain vaccine for the first time. When clinical studies were conducted at the start of vaccine development, most of the subjects were pediatric patients with a high risk of contracting severe varicella. Therefore, the development process was different from that for other vaccines, since clinical studies are generally performed in healthy individuals. This vaccine was approved in Japan in 1986, and voluntary single-dose vaccination for children aged 1 year or older was started in 1987. However, the vaccination coverage rate remained low and the number of patients with varicella did not decrease significantly. Due to its voluntary status, the cost of vaccination was borne by the child's family and this was considered to be a reason for the low coverage rate. Moreover, although the vaccine achieved a good antibody response, the number of cases of breakthrough varicella (BV) was relatively high and showed an increasing trend that was also a concern. In order to increase the coverage rate and reduce BV, the Japanese government changed the varicella vaccination policy from voluntary to routine vaccination in October 2014. At the same time, a two-dose schedule was introduced that involved administration of the vaccine twice at an interval of at least 3 months up to the age of 3 years. At present, cases of varicella are only monitored at the pediatric sentinel clinics in Japan. Therefore, we need to establish a system to survey all patients, in order to demonstrate the efficacy of varicella vaccine based on detailed surveillance data. We also need to investigate the optimum timing of the second dose of the vaccine and the necessity for further booster vaccination. A combined live vaccine containing varicella vaccine has not yet been approved in Japan. Because |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.vaccine.2016.04.059 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1796684382</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S0264410X16302146</els_id><sourcerecordid>1796684382</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c448t-fa0ff805f2285314bc11e4908cb4a41c17ef476f468cfdd84d0bb32f2888b6e13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU1v1DAQhi1ERZfCTwBF4sIlYcZ2HOdShMpnVakHQOJmOc5Y8pJ1Qpys1H9fL7uA1Asny9Iz78w8w9gLhAoB1ZtttbfOhUgVz98KZAV1-4htUDei5DXqx2wDXMlSIvw4Z09T2gJALbB9ws55gwpAtBt2-Z72NIzTjuJSjL7Y2zk4GgZbnOKLEItrO9lY2NgXfl3WmYppHtNEbknP2Jm3Q6Lnp_eCff_44dvV5_Lm9tOXq3c3pZNSL6W34L2G2nOu8wiyc4gkW9Cuk1aiw4a8bJSXSjvf91r20HWCe6617hShuGCvj7m586-V0mJ2If2eM9K4JoNNq5SWQvOMvnqAbsd1jnk6k900TYsCRKbqI-XyKmkmb6Y57Ox8ZxDMQbDZmpMBcxBsQJosONe9PKWv3Y76v1V_jGbg7RGgrGMfaDbJBYqO-jBnY6Yfw39bXD5IcEOIwdnhJ91R-reNSdyA-Xq48uHIqARwlErcAzxqom4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1877791303</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Development of varicella vaccine in Japan and future prospects</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><source>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</source><creator>Ozaki, Takao ; Asano, Yoshizo</creator><creatorcontrib>Ozaki, Takao ; Asano, Yoshizo</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract In Japan, Dr. Michiaki Takahashi (1928–2013) successfully developed the first live attenuated varicella vaccine in the world. The virus used for this vaccine was varicella-zoster virus isolated from the vesicular fluid of a child with typical varicella and it was named the Oka strain after the family name of the child. In 1974, a patient with nephrosis developed varicella in the Pediatric Ward, and uninfected pediatric patients received varicella vaccine immediately. As a result, there were no cases of varicella in the other children and all of the vaccinated children acquired immunity to the disease. These results were published in the Lancet, demonstrating the safety and efficacy of varicella Oka strain vaccine for the first time. When clinical studies were conducted at the start of vaccine development, most of the subjects were pediatric patients with a high risk of contracting severe varicella. Therefore, the development process was different from that for other vaccines, since clinical studies are generally performed in healthy individuals. This vaccine was approved in Japan in 1986, and voluntary single-dose vaccination for children aged 1 year or older was started in 1987. However, the vaccination coverage rate remained low and the number of patients with varicella did not decrease significantly. Due to its voluntary status, the cost of vaccination was borne by the child's family and this was considered to be a reason for the low coverage rate. Moreover, although the vaccine achieved a good antibody response, the number of cases of breakthrough varicella (BV) was relatively high and showed an increasing trend that was also a concern. In order to increase the coverage rate and reduce BV, the Japanese government changed the varicella vaccination policy from voluntary to routine vaccination in October 2014. At the same time, a two-dose schedule was introduced that involved administration of the vaccine twice at an interval of at least 3 months up to the age of 3 years. At present, cases of varicella are only monitored at the pediatric sentinel clinics in Japan. Therefore, we need to establish a system to survey all patients, in order to demonstrate the efficacy of varicella vaccine based on detailed surveillance data. We also need to investigate the optimum timing of the second dose of the vaccine and the necessity for further booster vaccination. A combined live vaccine containing varicella vaccine has not yet been approved in Japan. Because of the greater convenience of combined vaccines, development and introduction of such a vaccine in the future would be desirable. Routine varicella vaccination is also expected to eventually reduce the occurrence of herpes zoster, although there are no supporting epidemiological data. The prevalence of herpes zoster has attracted attention, but it is necessary to develop a surveillance system for this disease. In March 2016, use of varicella vaccine to prevent herpes zoster in adults aged 50 years or older was approved in Japan, and the results of this policy change need to be assessed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0264-410X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-2518</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2016.04.059</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27160039</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Allergy and Immunology ; Antibody Formation ; Breakthrough varicella ; Chicken pox ; Chickenpox - prevention & control ; Chickenpox Vaccine - history ; Chickenpox Vaccine - therapeutic use ; Disease ; Dr. Michiaki Takahashi ; Health Policy ; Herpes Zoster - prevention & control ; History, 20th Century ; History, 21st Century ; Immunization Programs ; Immunization, Secondary ; Infections ; Japan ; Leukemia ; Measles ; Mumps ; Oka strain ; Pediatrics ; Poliomyelitis ; Routine two-dose vaccination ; Rubella ; Skin ; Vaccination ; Vaccines ; Vaccines, Combined ; Varicella vaccine</subject><ispartof>Vaccine, 2016-06, Vol.34 (29), p.3427-3433</ispartof><rights>Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>2016 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Limited Jun 17, 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c448t-fa0ff805f2285314bc11e4908cb4a41c17ef476f468cfdd84d0bb32f2888b6e13</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c448t-fa0ff805f2285314bc11e4908cb4a41c17ef476f468cfdd84d0bb32f2888b6e13</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1877791303?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995,64385,64387,64389,72469</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27160039$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ozaki, Takao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Asano, Yoshizo</creatorcontrib><title>Development of varicella vaccine in Japan and future prospects</title><title>Vaccine</title><addtitle>Vaccine</addtitle><description>Abstract In Japan, Dr. Michiaki Takahashi (1928–2013) successfully developed the first live attenuated varicella vaccine in the world. The virus used for this vaccine was varicella-zoster virus isolated from the vesicular fluid of a child with typical varicella and it was named the Oka strain after the family name of the child. In 1974, a patient with nephrosis developed varicella in the Pediatric Ward, and uninfected pediatric patients received varicella vaccine immediately. As a result, there were no cases of varicella in the other children and all of the vaccinated children acquired immunity to the disease. These results were published in the Lancet, demonstrating the safety and efficacy of varicella Oka strain vaccine for the first time. When clinical studies were conducted at the start of vaccine development, most of the subjects were pediatric patients with a high risk of contracting severe varicella. Therefore, the development process was different from that for other vaccines, since clinical studies are generally performed in healthy individuals. This vaccine was approved in Japan in 1986, and voluntary single-dose vaccination for children aged 1 year or older was started in 1987. However, the vaccination coverage rate remained low and the number of patients with varicella did not decrease significantly. Due to its voluntary status, the cost of vaccination was borne by the child's family and this was considered to be a reason for the low coverage rate. Moreover, although the vaccine achieved a good antibody response, the number of cases of breakthrough varicella (BV) was relatively high and showed an increasing trend that was also a concern. In order to increase the coverage rate and reduce BV, the Japanese government changed the varicella vaccination policy from voluntary to routine vaccination in October 2014. At the same time, a two-dose schedule was introduced that involved administration of the vaccine twice at an interval of at least 3 months up to the age of 3 years. At present, cases of varicella are only monitored at the pediatric sentinel clinics in Japan. Therefore, we need to establish a system to survey all patients, in order to demonstrate the efficacy of varicella vaccine based on detailed surveillance data. We also need to investigate the optimum timing of the second dose of the vaccine and the necessity for further booster vaccination. A combined live vaccine containing varicella vaccine has not yet been approved in Japan. Because of the greater convenience of combined vaccines, development and introduction of such a vaccine in the future would be desirable. Routine varicella vaccination is also expected to eventually reduce the occurrence of herpes zoster, although there are no supporting epidemiological data. The prevalence of herpes zoster has attracted attention, but it is necessary to develop a surveillance system for this disease. In March 2016, use of varicella vaccine to prevent herpes zoster in adults aged 50 years or older was approved in Japan, and the results of this policy change need to be assessed.</description><subject>Allergy and Immunology</subject><subject>Antibody Formation</subject><subject>Breakthrough varicella</subject><subject>Chicken pox</subject><subject>Chickenpox - prevention & control</subject><subject>Chickenpox Vaccine - history</subject><subject>Chickenpox Vaccine - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Disease</subject><subject>Dr. Michiaki Takahashi</subject><subject>Health Policy</subject><subject>Herpes Zoster - prevention & control</subject><subject>History, 20th Century</subject><subject>History, 21st Century</subject><subject>Immunization Programs</subject><subject>Immunization, Secondary</subject><subject>Infections</subject><subject>Japan</subject><subject>Leukemia</subject><subject>Measles</subject><subject>Mumps</subject><subject>Oka strain</subject><subject>Pediatrics</subject><subject>Poliomyelitis</subject><subject>Routine two-dose vaccination</subject><subject>Rubella</subject><subject>Skin</subject><subject>Vaccination</subject><subject>Vaccines</subject><subject>Vaccines, Combined</subject><subject>Varicella vaccine</subject><issn>0264-410X</issn><issn>1873-2518</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkU1v1DAQhi1ERZfCTwBF4sIlYcZ2HOdShMpnVakHQOJmOc5Y8pJ1Qpys1H9fL7uA1Asny9Iz78w8w9gLhAoB1ZtttbfOhUgVz98KZAV1-4htUDei5DXqx2wDXMlSIvw4Z09T2gJALbB9ws55gwpAtBt2-Z72NIzTjuJSjL7Y2zk4GgZbnOKLEItrO9lY2NgXfl3WmYppHtNEbknP2Jm3Q6Lnp_eCff_44dvV5_Lm9tOXq3c3pZNSL6W34L2G2nOu8wiyc4gkW9Cuk1aiw4a8bJSXSjvf91r20HWCe6617hShuGCvj7m586-V0mJ2If2eM9K4JoNNq5SWQvOMvnqAbsd1jnk6k900TYsCRKbqI-XyKmkmb6Y57Ox8ZxDMQbDZmpMBcxBsQJosONe9PKWv3Y76v1V_jGbg7RGgrGMfaDbJBYqO-jBnY6Yfw39bXD5IcEOIwdnhJ91R-reNSdyA-Xq48uHIqARwlErcAzxqom4</recordid><startdate>20160617</startdate><enddate>20160617</enddate><creator>Ozaki, Takao</creator><creator>Asano, Yoshizo</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0R</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160617</creationdate><title>Development of varicella vaccine in Japan and future prospects</title><author>Ozaki, Takao ; Asano, Yoshizo</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c448t-fa0ff805f2285314bc11e4908cb4a41c17ef476f468cfdd84d0bb32f2888b6e13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Allergy and Immunology</topic><topic>Antibody Formation</topic><topic>Breakthrough varicella</topic><topic>Chicken pox</topic><topic>Chickenpox - prevention & control</topic><topic>Chickenpox Vaccine - history</topic><topic>Chickenpox Vaccine - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Disease</topic><topic>Dr. Michiaki Takahashi</topic><topic>Health Policy</topic><topic>Herpes Zoster - prevention & control</topic><topic>History, 20th Century</topic><topic>History, 21st Century</topic><topic>Immunization Programs</topic><topic>Immunization, Secondary</topic><topic>Infections</topic><topic>Japan</topic><topic>Leukemia</topic><topic>Measles</topic><topic>Mumps</topic><topic>Oka strain</topic><topic>Pediatrics</topic><topic>Poliomyelitis</topic><topic>Routine two-dose vaccination</topic><topic>Rubella</topic><topic>Skin</topic><topic>Vaccination</topic><topic>Vaccines</topic><topic>Vaccines, Combined</topic><topic>Varicella vaccine</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ozaki, Takao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Asano, Yoshizo</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Vaccine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ozaki, Takao</au><au>Asano, Yoshizo</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Development of varicella vaccine in Japan and future prospects</atitle><jtitle>Vaccine</jtitle><addtitle>Vaccine</addtitle><date>2016-06-17</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>34</volume><issue>29</issue><spage>3427</spage><epage>3433</epage><pages>3427-3433</pages><issn>0264-410X</issn><eissn>1873-2518</eissn><abstract>Abstract In Japan, Dr. Michiaki Takahashi (1928–2013) successfully developed the first live attenuated varicella vaccine in the world. The virus used for this vaccine was varicella-zoster virus isolated from the vesicular fluid of a child with typical varicella and it was named the Oka strain after the family name of the child. In 1974, a patient with nephrosis developed varicella in the Pediatric Ward, and uninfected pediatric patients received varicella vaccine immediately. As a result, there were no cases of varicella in the other children and all of the vaccinated children acquired immunity to the disease. These results were published in the Lancet, demonstrating the safety and efficacy of varicella Oka strain vaccine for the first time. When clinical studies were conducted at the start of vaccine development, most of the subjects were pediatric patients with a high risk of contracting severe varicella. Therefore, the development process was different from that for other vaccines, since clinical studies are generally performed in healthy individuals. This vaccine was approved in Japan in 1986, and voluntary single-dose vaccination for children aged 1 year or older was started in 1987. However, the vaccination coverage rate remained low and the number of patients with varicella did not decrease significantly. Due to its voluntary status, the cost of vaccination was borne by the child's family and this was considered to be a reason for the low coverage rate. Moreover, although the vaccine achieved a good antibody response, the number of cases of breakthrough varicella (BV) was relatively high and showed an increasing trend that was also a concern. In order to increase the coverage rate and reduce BV, the Japanese government changed the varicella vaccination policy from voluntary to routine vaccination in October 2014. At the same time, a two-dose schedule was introduced that involved administration of the vaccine twice at an interval of at least 3 months up to the age of 3 years. At present, cases of varicella are only monitored at the pediatric sentinel clinics in Japan. Therefore, we need to establish a system to survey all patients, in order to demonstrate the efficacy of varicella vaccine based on detailed surveillance data. We also need to investigate the optimum timing of the second dose of the vaccine and the necessity for further booster vaccination. A combined live vaccine containing varicella vaccine has not yet been approved in Japan. Because of the greater convenience of combined vaccines, development and introduction of such a vaccine in the future would be desirable. Routine varicella vaccination is also expected to eventually reduce the occurrence of herpes zoster, although there are no supporting epidemiological data. The prevalence of herpes zoster has attracted attention, but it is necessary to develop a surveillance system for this disease. In March 2016, use of varicella vaccine to prevent herpes zoster in adults aged 50 years or older was approved in Japan, and the results of this policy change need to be assessed.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>27160039</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.vaccine.2016.04.059</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0264-410X |
ispartof | Vaccine, 2016-06, Vol.34 (29), p.3427-3433 |
issn | 0264-410X 1873-2518 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1796684382 |
source | MEDLINE; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier); ProQuest Central UK/Ireland |
subjects | Allergy and Immunology Antibody Formation Breakthrough varicella Chicken pox Chickenpox - prevention & control Chickenpox Vaccine - history Chickenpox Vaccine - therapeutic use Disease Dr. Michiaki Takahashi Health Policy Herpes Zoster - prevention & control History, 20th Century History, 21st Century Immunization Programs Immunization, Secondary Infections Japan Leukemia Measles Mumps Oka strain Pediatrics Poliomyelitis Routine two-dose vaccination Rubella Skin Vaccination Vaccines Vaccines, Combined Varicella vaccine |
title | Development of varicella vaccine in Japan and future prospects |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-24T21%3A49%3A03IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Development%20of%20varicella%20vaccine%20in%20Japan%20and%20future%20prospects&rft.jtitle=Vaccine&rft.au=Ozaki,%20Takao&rft.date=2016-06-17&rft.volume=34&rft.issue=29&rft.spage=3427&rft.epage=3433&rft.pages=3427-3433&rft.issn=0264-410X&rft.eissn=1873-2518&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.vaccine.2016.04.059&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1796684382%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1877791303&rft_id=info:pmid/27160039&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S0264410X16302146&rfr_iscdi=true |