International Committee for Monitoring Assisted Reproductive Technologies world report: Assisted Reproductive Technology 2008, 2009 and 2010
Abstract STUDY QUESTION What were utilization, outcomes and practices in assisted reproductive technology (ART) globally in 2008, 2009 and 2010? SUMMARY ANSWER Global utilization and effectiveness remained relatively constant despite marked variations among countries, while the rate of single and fr...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Human reproduction (Oxford) 2016-07, Vol.31 (7), p.1588-1609 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 1609 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 7 |
| container_start_page | 1588 |
| container_title | Human reproduction (Oxford) |
| container_volume | 31 |
| creator | Dyer, S. Chambers, G.M. de Mouzon, J. Nygren, K.G. Zegers-Hochschild, F. Mansour, R. Ishihara, O. Banker, M. Adamson, G.D. |
| description | Abstract
STUDY QUESTION
What were utilization, outcomes and practices in assisted reproductive technology (ART) globally in 2008, 2009 and 2010?
SUMMARY ANSWER
Global utilization and effectiveness remained relatively constant despite marked variations among countries, while the rate of single and frozen embryo transfers (FETs) increased with a concomitant slight reduction in multiple birth rates.
WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY
ART is widely practised in all regions of the world. Monitoring utilization, an approximation of availability and access, as well as effectiveness and safety is an important component of universal access to reproductive health.
STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION
This is a retrospective, cross-sectional survey on utilization, effectiveness and safety of ART procedures performed globally from 2008 to 2010.
PARTICIPANTS, SETTING, METHODS
Between 58 and 61 countries submitted data from a total of nearly 2500 ART clinics each year. Aggregate country data were processed and analyzed based on forms and methods developed by the International Committee for Monitoring Assisted Reproductive Technologies (ICMART). Results are presented at country, regional and global level.
MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE
For the years 2008, 2009 and 2010, >4 461 309 ART cycles were initiated, resulting in an estimated 1 144 858 babies born. The number of aspirations increased by 6.4% between 2008 and 2010, while FET cycles increased by 27.6%. Globally, ART utilization remained relatively constant at 436 cycles/million in 2008 and 474 cycles/million population in 2010, but with a wide country range of 8–4775 cycles/million population. ICSI remained constant at around 66% of non-donor aspiration cycles. The IVF/ICSI combined delivery rate (DR) per fresh aspiration was 19.8% in 2008; 19.7% in 2009 and 20.0% in 2010, with corresponding DRs for FET of 18.8, 19.7 and 20.7%. In fresh non-donor cycles, single embryo transfer increased from 25.7% in 2008 to 30.0% in 2010, while the average number of embryos transferred fell from 2.1 to 1.9, again with wide regional variation. The rates of twin deliveries following fresh non-donor transfers were, in 2008, 2009 and 2010, 21.8, 20.5 and 20.4%, respectively, with a corresponding triplet rate of 1.3, 1.0 and 1.1%. Fresh IVF and ICSI carried a perinatal mortality rate per 1000 births of 22.8 (2008), 19.2 (2009) and 21.0 (2010), compared with 15.1, 12.8 and 14.6/1000 births following FET in the same periods of observation. The proportion |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1093/humrep/dew082 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1795880404</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><oup_id>10.1093/humrep/dew082</oup_id><sourcerecordid>1795880404</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c431t-2402b359bd276e34390cf6bbc3217beba86d1459d61b97ac84f7ea3259f847f83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkTlPxDAQhS0EguUoaZFLCgLjI7FDh1ZcEggJQR058QSMknixHVb8B340QctR0sxM8c2bp3mE7DM4ZlCKk-exD7g4sbgEzdfIjMkCMi5yWCcz4IXOGCvYFtmO8QVgGnWxSba44qCYymfk43pIGAaTnB9MR-e-711KiLT1gd76wSUf3PBEz2J0MaGl97gI3o5Ncm9IH7B5HnznnxxGuvShs3Qy40M6_W_hnXIAffRVS2oGOw0MdslGa7qIe999hzxenD_Mr7Kbu8vr-dlN1kjBUsYl8FrkZW25KlBIUULTFnXdCM5UjbXRhWUyL23B6lKZRstWoRE8L1stVavFDjlc6U7OXkeMqepdbLDrzIB-jBVTZa41SJATmq3QJvgYA7bVIrjehPeKQfUVQLUKoFoFMPEH39Jj3aP9pX8-_nfbj4t_tD4BVPySJQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1795880404</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>International Committee for Monitoring Assisted Reproductive Technologies world report: Assisted Reproductive Technology 2008, 2009 and 2010</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Dyer, S. ; Chambers, G.M. ; de Mouzon, J. ; Nygren, K.G. ; Zegers-Hochschild, F. ; Mansour, R. ; Ishihara, O. ; Banker, M. ; Adamson, G.D.</creator><creatorcontrib>Dyer, S. ; Chambers, G.M. ; de Mouzon, J. ; Nygren, K.G. ; Zegers-Hochschild, F. ; Mansour, R. ; Ishihara, O. ; Banker, M. ; Adamson, G.D.</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract
STUDY QUESTION
What were utilization, outcomes and practices in assisted reproductive technology (ART) globally in 2008, 2009 and 2010?
SUMMARY ANSWER
Global utilization and effectiveness remained relatively constant despite marked variations among countries, while the rate of single and frozen embryo transfers (FETs) increased with a concomitant slight reduction in multiple birth rates.
WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY
ART is widely practised in all regions of the world. Monitoring utilization, an approximation of availability and access, as well as effectiveness and safety is an important component of universal access to reproductive health.
STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION
This is a retrospective, cross-sectional survey on utilization, effectiveness and safety of ART procedures performed globally from 2008 to 2010.
PARTICIPANTS, SETTING, METHODS
Between 58 and 61 countries submitted data from a total of nearly 2500 ART clinics each year. Aggregate country data were processed and analyzed based on forms and methods developed by the International Committee for Monitoring Assisted Reproductive Technologies (ICMART). Results are presented at country, regional and global level.
MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE
For the years 2008, 2009 and 2010, >4 461 309 ART cycles were initiated, resulting in an estimated 1 144 858 babies born. The number of aspirations increased by 6.4% between 2008 and 2010, while FET cycles increased by 27.6%. Globally, ART utilization remained relatively constant at 436 cycles/million in 2008 and 474 cycles/million population in 2010, but with a wide country range of 8–4775 cycles/million population. ICSI remained constant at around 66% of non-donor aspiration cycles. The IVF/ICSI combined delivery rate (DR) per fresh aspiration was 19.8% in 2008; 19.7% in 2009 and 20.0% in 2010, with corresponding DRs for FET of 18.8, 19.7 and 20.7%. In fresh non-donor cycles, single embryo transfer increased from 25.7% in 2008 to 30.0% in 2010, while the average number of embryos transferred fell from 2.1 to 1.9, again with wide regional variation. The rates of twin deliveries following fresh non-donor transfers were, in 2008, 2009 and 2010, 21.8, 20.5 and 20.4%, respectively, with a corresponding triplet rate of 1.3, 1.0 and 1.1%. Fresh IVF and ICSI carried a perinatal mortality rate per 1000 births of 22.8 (2008), 19.2 (2009) and 21.0 (2010), compared with 15.1, 12.8 and 14.6/1000 births following FET in the same periods of observation. The proportion of women aged 40 years or older undergoing non-donor ART increased from 20.8 to 23.2% from 2008 to 2010.
LIMITATIONS, REASON FOR CAUTION
The data presented are reliant on the quality and completeness of data submitted by individual countries. This report covers approximately two-thirds of the world ART activity.
WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF FINDINGS
The ICMART World Reports provide the most comprehensive global statistical census and review of ART utilization, effectiveness, safety and quality. While ART treatment continues to increase globally, the wide disparities in access to treatment and embryo transfer practices warrant attention by clinicians and policy makers.
STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S)
The authors declare no conflict of interest and no specific support from any organizations in relation to this manuscript. ICMART acknowledges financial support from the following organizations: American Society for Reproductive Medicine; European Society for Human Reproduction and Embryology; Fertility Society of Australia; Japan Society for Reproductive Medicine; Japan Society of Fertilization and Implantation; Red Latinoamericana de Reproduccion Asistida; Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology; Government of Canada (Research grant), Ferring Pharmaceuticals (Grant unrelated to World Reports).
TRIAL REGISTRATION
not applicable.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0268-1161</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1460-2350</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/humrep/dew082</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27207175</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Cross-Sectional Studies ; Female ; Health Services Accessibility ; Humans ; Pregnancy ; Pregnancy Outcome ; Reproductive Techniques, Assisted - adverse effects ; Reproductive Techniques, Assisted - trends ; Reproductive Techniques, Assisted - utilization ; Research Report ; Retrospective Studies</subject><ispartof>Human reproduction (Oxford), 2016-07, Vol.31 (7), p.1588-1609</ispartof><rights>The Author 2016. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com 2016</rights><rights>The Author 2016. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c431t-2402b359bd276e34390cf6bbc3217beba86d1459d61b97ac84f7ea3259f847f83</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c431t-2402b359bd276e34390cf6bbc3217beba86d1459d61b97ac84f7ea3259f847f83</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,1581,27911,27912</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27207175$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Dyer, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chambers, G.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Mouzon, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nygren, K.G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zegers-Hochschild, F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mansour, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ishihara, O.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Banker, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Adamson, G.D.</creatorcontrib><title>International Committee for Monitoring Assisted Reproductive Technologies world report: Assisted Reproductive Technology 2008, 2009 and 2010</title><title>Human reproduction (Oxford)</title><addtitle>Hum Reprod</addtitle><description>Abstract
STUDY QUESTION
What were utilization, outcomes and practices in assisted reproductive technology (ART) globally in 2008, 2009 and 2010?
SUMMARY ANSWER
Global utilization and effectiveness remained relatively constant despite marked variations among countries, while the rate of single and frozen embryo transfers (FETs) increased with a concomitant slight reduction in multiple birth rates.
WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY
ART is widely practised in all regions of the world. Monitoring utilization, an approximation of availability and access, as well as effectiveness and safety is an important component of universal access to reproductive health.
STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION
This is a retrospective, cross-sectional survey on utilization, effectiveness and safety of ART procedures performed globally from 2008 to 2010.
PARTICIPANTS, SETTING, METHODS
Between 58 and 61 countries submitted data from a total of nearly 2500 ART clinics each year. Aggregate country data were processed and analyzed based on forms and methods developed by the International Committee for Monitoring Assisted Reproductive Technologies (ICMART). Results are presented at country, regional and global level.
MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE
For the years 2008, 2009 and 2010, >4 461 309 ART cycles were initiated, resulting in an estimated 1 144 858 babies born. The number of aspirations increased by 6.4% between 2008 and 2010, while FET cycles increased by 27.6%. Globally, ART utilization remained relatively constant at 436 cycles/million in 2008 and 474 cycles/million population in 2010, but with a wide country range of 8–4775 cycles/million population. ICSI remained constant at around 66% of non-donor aspiration cycles. The IVF/ICSI combined delivery rate (DR) per fresh aspiration was 19.8% in 2008; 19.7% in 2009 and 20.0% in 2010, with corresponding DRs for FET of 18.8, 19.7 and 20.7%. In fresh non-donor cycles, single embryo transfer increased from 25.7% in 2008 to 30.0% in 2010, while the average number of embryos transferred fell from 2.1 to 1.9, again with wide regional variation. The rates of twin deliveries following fresh non-donor transfers were, in 2008, 2009 and 2010, 21.8, 20.5 and 20.4%, respectively, with a corresponding triplet rate of 1.3, 1.0 and 1.1%. Fresh IVF and ICSI carried a perinatal mortality rate per 1000 births of 22.8 (2008), 19.2 (2009) and 21.0 (2010), compared with 15.1, 12.8 and 14.6/1000 births following FET in the same periods of observation. The proportion of women aged 40 years or older undergoing non-donor ART increased from 20.8 to 23.2% from 2008 to 2010.
LIMITATIONS, REASON FOR CAUTION
The data presented are reliant on the quality and completeness of data submitted by individual countries. This report covers approximately two-thirds of the world ART activity.
WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF FINDINGS
The ICMART World Reports provide the most comprehensive global statistical census and review of ART utilization, effectiveness, safety and quality. While ART treatment continues to increase globally, the wide disparities in access to treatment and embryo transfer practices warrant attention by clinicians and policy makers.
STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S)
The authors declare no conflict of interest and no specific support from any organizations in relation to this manuscript. ICMART acknowledges financial support from the following organizations: American Society for Reproductive Medicine; European Society for Human Reproduction and Embryology; Fertility Society of Australia; Japan Society for Reproductive Medicine; Japan Society of Fertilization and Implantation; Red Latinoamericana de Reproduccion Asistida; Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology; Government of Canada (Research grant), Ferring Pharmaceuticals (Grant unrelated to World Reports).
TRIAL REGISTRATION
not applicable.</description><subject>Cross-Sectional Studies</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Health Services Accessibility</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Pregnancy Outcome</subject><subject>Reproductive Techniques, Assisted - adverse effects</subject><subject>Reproductive Techniques, Assisted - trends</subject><subject>Reproductive Techniques, Assisted - utilization</subject><subject>Research Report</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><issn>0268-1161</issn><issn>1460-2350</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkTlPxDAQhS0EguUoaZFLCgLjI7FDh1ZcEggJQR058QSMknixHVb8B340QctR0sxM8c2bp3mE7DM4ZlCKk-exD7g4sbgEzdfIjMkCMi5yWCcz4IXOGCvYFtmO8QVgGnWxSba44qCYymfk43pIGAaTnB9MR-e-711KiLT1gd76wSUf3PBEz2J0MaGl97gI3o5Ncm9IH7B5HnznnxxGuvShs3Qy40M6_W_hnXIAffRVS2oGOw0MdslGa7qIe999hzxenD_Mr7Kbu8vr-dlN1kjBUsYl8FrkZW25KlBIUULTFnXdCM5UjbXRhWUyL23B6lKZRstWoRE8L1stVavFDjlc6U7OXkeMqepdbLDrzIB-jBVTZa41SJATmq3QJvgYA7bVIrjehPeKQfUVQLUKoFoFMPEH39Jj3aP9pX8-_nfbj4t_tD4BVPySJQ</recordid><startdate>20160701</startdate><enddate>20160701</enddate><creator>Dyer, S.</creator><creator>Chambers, G.M.</creator><creator>de Mouzon, J.</creator><creator>Nygren, K.G.</creator><creator>Zegers-Hochschild, F.</creator><creator>Mansour, R.</creator><creator>Ishihara, O.</creator><creator>Banker, M.</creator><creator>Adamson, G.D.</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160701</creationdate><title>International Committee for Monitoring Assisted Reproductive Technologies world report: Assisted Reproductive Technology 2008, 2009 and 2010</title><author>Dyer, S. ; Chambers, G.M. ; de Mouzon, J. ; Nygren, K.G. ; Zegers-Hochschild, F. ; Mansour, R. ; Ishihara, O. ; Banker, M. ; Adamson, G.D.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c431t-2402b359bd276e34390cf6bbc3217beba86d1459d61b97ac84f7ea3259f847f83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Cross-Sectional Studies</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Health Services Accessibility</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Pregnancy Outcome</topic><topic>Reproductive Techniques, Assisted - adverse effects</topic><topic>Reproductive Techniques, Assisted - trends</topic><topic>Reproductive Techniques, Assisted - utilization</topic><topic>Research Report</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Dyer, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chambers, G.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Mouzon, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nygren, K.G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zegers-Hochschild, F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mansour, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ishihara, O.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Banker, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Adamson, G.D.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Human reproduction (Oxford)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Dyer, S.</au><au>Chambers, G.M.</au><au>de Mouzon, J.</au><au>Nygren, K.G.</au><au>Zegers-Hochschild, F.</au><au>Mansour, R.</au><au>Ishihara, O.</au><au>Banker, M.</au><au>Adamson, G.D.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>International Committee for Monitoring Assisted Reproductive Technologies world report: Assisted Reproductive Technology 2008, 2009 and 2010</atitle><jtitle>Human reproduction (Oxford)</jtitle><addtitle>Hum Reprod</addtitle><date>2016-07-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>31</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>1588</spage><epage>1609</epage><pages>1588-1609</pages><issn>0268-1161</issn><eissn>1460-2350</eissn><abstract>Abstract
STUDY QUESTION
What were utilization, outcomes and practices in assisted reproductive technology (ART) globally in 2008, 2009 and 2010?
SUMMARY ANSWER
Global utilization and effectiveness remained relatively constant despite marked variations among countries, while the rate of single and frozen embryo transfers (FETs) increased with a concomitant slight reduction in multiple birth rates.
WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY
ART is widely practised in all regions of the world. Monitoring utilization, an approximation of availability and access, as well as effectiveness and safety is an important component of universal access to reproductive health.
STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION
This is a retrospective, cross-sectional survey on utilization, effectiveness and safety of ART procedures performed globally from 2008 to 2010.
PARTICIPANTS, SETTING, METHODS
Between 58 and 61 countries submitted data from a total of nearly 2500 ART clinics each year. Aggregate country data were processed and analyzed based on forms and methods developed by the International Committee for Monitoring Assisted Reproductive Technologies (ICMART). Results are presented at country, regional and global level.
MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE
For the years 2008, 2009 and 2010, >4 461 309 ART cycles were initiated, resulting in an estimated 1 144 858 babies born. The number of aspirations increased by 6.4% between 2008 and 2010, while FET cycles increased by 27.6%. Globally, ART utilization remained relatively constant at 436 cycles/million in 2008 and 474 cycles/million population in 2010, but with a wide country range of 8–4775 cycles/million population. ICSI remained constant at around 66% of non-donor aspiration cycles. The IVF/ICSI combined delivery rate (DR) per fresh aspiration was 19.8% in 2008; 19.7% in 2009 and 20.0% in 2010, with corresponding DRs for FET of 18.8, 19.7 and 20.7%. In fresh non-donor cycles, single embryo transfer increased from 25.7% in 2008 to 30.0% in 2010, while the average number of embryos transferred fell from 2.1 to 1.9, again with wide regional variation. The rates of twin deliveries following fresh non-donor transfers were, in 2008, 2009 and 2010, 21.8, 20.5 and 20.4%, respectively, with a corresponding triplet rate of 1.3, 1.0 and 1.1%. Fresh IVF and ICSI carried a perinatal mortality rate per 1000 births of 22.8 (2008), 19.2 (2009) and 21.0 (2010), compared with 15.1, 12.8 and 14.6/1000 births following FET in the same periods of observation. The proportion of women aged 40 years or older undergoing non-donor ART increased from 20.8 to 23.2% from 2008 to 2010.
LIMITATIONS, REASON FOR CAUTION
The data presented are reliant on the quality and completeness of data submitted by individual countries. This report covers approximately two-thirds of the world ART activity.
WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF FINDINGS
The ICMART World Reports provide the most comprehensive global statistical census and review of ART utilization, effectiveness, safety and quality. While ART treatment continues to increase globally, the wide disparities in access to treatment and embryo transfer practices warrant attention by clinicians and policy makers.
STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S)
The authors declare no conflict of interest and no specific support from any organizations in relation to this manuscript. ICMART acknowledges financial support from the following organizations: American Society for Reproductive Medicine; European Society for Human Reproduction and Embryology; Fertility Society of Australia; Japan Society for Reproductive Medicine; Japan Society of Fertilization and Implantation; Red Latinoamericana de Reproduccion Asistida; Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology; Government of Canada (Research grant), Ferring Pharmaceuticals (Grant unrelated to World Reports).
TRIAL REGISTRATION
not applicable.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><pmid>27207175</pmid><doi>10.1093/humrep/dew082</doi><tpages>22</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0268-1161 |
| ispartof | Human reproduction (Oxford), 2016-07, Vol.31 (7), p.1588-1609 |
| issn | 0268-1161 1460-2350 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1795880404 |
| source | MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); Alma/SFX Local Collection |
| subjects | Cross-Sectional Studies Female Health Services Accessibility Humans Pregnancy Pregnancy Outcome Reproductive Techniques, Assisted - adverse effects Reproductive Techniques, Assisted - trends Reproductive Techniques, Assisted - utilization Research Report Retrospective Studies |
| title | International Committee for Monitoring Assisted Reproductive Technologies world report: Assisted Reproductive Technology 2008, 2009 and 2010 |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-16T04%3A03%3A02IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=International%20Committee%20for%20Monitoring%20Assisted%20Reproductive%20Technologies%20world%20report:%20Assisted%20Reproductive%20Technology%202008,%202009%20and%202010&rft.jtitle=Human%20reproduction%20(Oxford)&rft.au=Dyer,%20S.&rft.date=2016-07-01&rft.volume=31&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=1588&rft.epage=1609&rft.pages=1588-1609&rft.issn=0268-1161&rft.eissn=1460-2350&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/humrep/dew082&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1795880404%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1795880404&rft_id=info:pmid/27207175&rft_oup_id=10.1093/humrep/dew082&rfr_iscdi=true |