The ethical and technical aspects of urinary diversions in low‐resource settings: a commentary

Obstetric fistula as a result of obstructed labour is still a vexing problem in low-resource settings. Surgery is typically the only successful treatment. Up to 86% of women are successfully repaired on the first surgical attempt; however, a minimum of 10-15% will have either a residual fistula or r...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology 2016-07, Vol.123 (8), p.1273-1277
Hauptverfasser: Wilkinson, J, Pope, R, Kammann, TJ, Scarpato, K, Raassen, TJIP, Bishop, MC, Morgan, M, Cartmell, MT, Chipungu, E, Sion, M, Weinstein, M, Lengmang, SJ, Mabeya, H, Smith, J
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Obstetric fistula as a result of obstructed labour is still a vexing problem in low-resource settings. Surgery is typically the only successful treatment. Up to 86% of women are successfully repaired on the first surgical attempt; however, a minimum of 10-15% will have either a residual fistula or residual pelvic floor disorders, such as stress incontinence. A woman can be deemed to be 'irreparable' as a result of the primary injury or after subsequent repairs. The only option available for cure is urinary diversion. Urinary diversions involve greater levels of intra-operative and post-operative risks when compared with standard vaginal surgery. There are numerous medical, ethical and cultural issues to consider, all of which are magnified in low-resource settings.
ISSN:1470-0328
1471-0528
DOI:10.1111/1471-0528.13934