The ethical and technical aspects of urinary diversions in low‐resource settings: a commentary
Obstetric fistula as a result of obstructed labour is still a vexing problem in low-resource settings. Surgery is typically the only successful treatment. Up to 86% of women are successfully repaired on the first surgical attempt; however, a minimum of 10-15% will have either a residual fistula or r...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology 2016-07, Vol.123 (8), p.1273-1277 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Obstetric fistula as a result of obstructed labour is still a vexing problem in low-resource settings. Surgery is typically the only successful treatment. Up to 86% of women are successfully repaired on the first surgical attempt; however, a minimum of 10-15% will have either a residual fistula or residual pelvic floor disorders, such as stress incontinence. A woman can be deemed to be 'irreparable' as a result of the primary injury or after subsequent repairs. The only option available for cure is urinary diversion. Urinary diversions involve greater levels of intra-operative and post-operative risks when compared with standard vaginal surgery. There are numerous medical, ethical and cultural issues to consider, all of which are magnified in low-resource settings. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1470-0328 1471-0528 |
DOI: | 10.1111/1471-0528.13934 |