Comparing polysaccharide decomposition between the type strains Gramella echinicola KMM 6050(T) (DSM 19838(T)) and Gramella portivictoriae UST040801-001(T) (DSM 23547(T)), and emended description of Gramella echinicola Nedashkovskaya et al. 2005 emend. Shahina et al. 2014 and Gramella portivictoriae Lau et al. 2005
Strains of the genus Gramella (family Flavobacteriacae, phylum Bacteroidetes) were isolated from marine habitats such as tidal flat sediments, coastal surface seawater and sea urchins. Flavobacteriaceae have been shown to be involved in the decomposition of plant and algal polysaccharides. However,...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Standards in genomic sciences 2016, Vol.11, p.37-37 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Report |
Sprache: | eng |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 37 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 37 |
container_title | Standards in genomic sciences |
container_volume | 11 |
creator | Panschin, Irina Huang, Sixing Meier-Kolthoff, Jan P Tindall, Brian J Rohde, Manfred Verbarg, Susanne Lapidus, Alla Han, James Trong, Stephan Haynes, Matthew Reddy, T B K Huntemann, Marcel Pati, Amrita Ivanova, Natalia N Mavromatis, Konstantinos Markowitz, Victor Woyke, Tanja Göker, Markus Klenk, Hans-Peter Kyrpides, Nikos C Hahnke, Richard L |
description | Strains of the genus Gramella (family Flavobacteriacae, phylum Bacteroidetes) were isolated from marine habitats such as tidal flat sediments, coastal surface seawater and sea urchins. Flavobacteriaceae have been shown to be involved in the decomposition of plant and algal polysaccharides. However, the potential to decompose polysaccharides may differ tremendously even between species of the same genus. Gramella echinicola KMM 6050(T) (DSM 19838(T)) and Gramella portivictoriae UST040801-001(T) (DSM 23547(T)) have genomes of similar lengths, similar numbers of protein coding genes and RNA genes. Both genomes encode for a greater number of peptidases compared to 'G. forsetii'. In contrast to the genome of 'G. forsetii', both genomes comprised a smaller set of CAZymes. Seven polysaccharide utilization loci were identified in the genomes of DSM 19838(T) and DSM 23547(T). Both Gramella strains hydrolyzed starch, galactomannan, arabinoxylan and hydroxyethyl-cellulose, but not pectin, chitosan and cellulose (Avicel). Galactan and xylan were hydrolyzed by strain DSM 19838(T), whereas strain DSM 23547(T) hydrolyzed pachyman and carboxy-methyl cellulose. Conclusively, both Gramella type strains exhibit characteristic physiological, morphological and genomic differences that might be linked to their habitat. Furthermore, the identified enzymes mediating polysaccharide decomposition, are of biotechnological interest. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1186/s40793-016-0163-9 |
format | Report |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1795877658</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1795877658</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_miscellaneous_17958776583</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVTsFKAzEUXEXBov0Ab-_YgluTbnazAW-1Kmi9tJ5LzL66sbvJukkr_XvTKtqDCD54vBnmzTBRdE7JgNI8u3SMcJHEhGbbTWJxGHWoYCxOhpwf7eGTqOvcKwmTCC6Y6BxcjWzdyFabF2hstXFSqTLQAqFAFSTrtNfWwDP6d0QDvkTwmwbB-VZq4-C2lTVWlQRUpTZa2QDvJxPISEp6sz70rqcToCJP8sD6IE3xY2ls6_VaK29bLRGepjPCSE5oTAj99g6TlPGt92JnxhpNgUWo51Srm105u_i1xiMW0pVLu3ZLuQmKB1kNYEhI-pkygGkpw_eeRNmfDR_kaj_mLDpeyMph9-ueRr2b8Wx0FzetfVuh8_NaO7UNMmhXbk65SHPOszRP_vH6AdxIlVo</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>report</recordtype><pqid>1795877658</pqid></control><display><type>report</type><title>Comparing polysaccharide decomposition between the type strains Gramella echinicola KMM 6050(T) (DSM 19838(T)) and Gramella portivictoriae UST040801-001(T) (DSM 23547(T)), and emended description of Gramella echinicola Nedashkovskaya et al. 2005 emend. Shahina et al. 2014 and Gramella portivictoriae Lau et al. 2005</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Panschin, Irina ; Huang, Sixing ; Meier-Kolthoff, Jan P ; Tindall, Brian J ; Rohde, Manfred ; Verbarg, Susanne ; Lapidus, Alla ; Han, James ; Trong, Stephan ; Haynes, Matthew ; Reddy, T B K ; Huntemann, Marcel ; Pati, Amrita ; Ivanova, Natalia N ; Mavromatis, Konstantinos ; Markowitz, Victor ; Woyke, Tanja ; Göker, Markus ; Klenk, Hans-Peter ; Kyrpides, Nikos C ; Hahnke, Richard L</creator><creatorcontrib>Panschin, Irina ; Huang, Sixing ; Meier-Kolthoff, Jan P ; Tindall, Brian J ; Rohde, Manfred ; Verbarg, Susanne ; Lapidus, Alla ; Han, James ; Trong, Stephan ; Haynes, Matthew ; Reddy, T B K ; Huntemann, Marcel ; Pati, Amrita ; Ivanova, Natalia N ; Mavromatis, Konstantinos ; Markowitz, Victor ; Woyke, Tanja ; Göker, Markus ; Klenk, Hans-Peter ; Kyrpides, Nikos C ; Hahnke, Richard L</creatorcontrib><description>Strains of the genus Gramella (family Flavobacteriacae, phylum Bacteroidetes) were isolated from marine habitats such as tidal flat sediments, coastal surface seawater and sea urchins. Flavobacteriaceae have been shown to be involved in the decomposition of plant and algal polysaccharides. However, the potential to decompose polysaccharides may differ tremendously even between species of the same genus. Gramella echinicola KMM 6050(T) (DSM 19838(T)) and Gramella portivictoriae UST040801-001(T) (DSM 23547(T)) have genomes of similar lengths, similar numbers of protein coding genes and RNA genes. Both genomes encode for a greater number of peptidases compared to 'G. forsetii'. In contrast to the genome of 'G. forsetii', both genomes comprised a smaller set of CAZymes. Seven polysaccharide utilization loci were identified in the genomes of DSM 19838(T) and DSM 23547(T). Both Gramella strains hydrolyzed starch, galactomannan, arabinoxylan and hydroxyethyl-cellulose, but not pectin, chitosan and cellulose (Avicel). Galactan and xylan were hydrolyzed by strain DSM 19838(T), whereas strain DSM 23547(T) hydrolyzed pachyman and carboxy-methyl cellulose. Conclusively, both Gramella type strains exhibit characteristic physiological, morphological and genomic differences that might be linked to their habitat. Furthermore, the identified enzymes mediating polysaccharide decomposition, are of biotechnological interest.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1944-3277</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1944-3277</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1186/s40793-016-0163-9</identifier><language>eng</language><ispartof>Standards in genomic sciences, 2016, Vol.11, p.37-37</ispartof><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>780,784,864,4490,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Panschin, Irina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huang, Sixing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meier-Kolthoff, Jan P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tindall, Brian J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rohde, Manfred</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Verbarg, Susanne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lapidus, Alla</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Han, James</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Trong, Stephan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haynes, Matthew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reddy, T B K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huntemann, Marcel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pati, Amrita</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ivanova, Natalia N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mavromatis, Konstantinos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Markowitz, Victor</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Woyke, Tanja</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Göker, Markus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Klenk, Hans-Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kyrpides, Nikos C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hahnke, Richard L</creatorcontrib><title>Comparing polysaccharide decomposition between the type strains Gramella echinicola KMM 6050(T) (DSM 19838(T)) and Gramella portivictoriae UST040801-001(T) (DSM 23547(T)), and emended description of Gramella echinicola Nedashkovskaya et al. 2005 emend. Shahina et al. 2014 and Gramella portivictoriae Lau et al. 2005</title><title>Standards in genomic sciences</title><description>Strains of the genus Gramella (family Flavobacteriacae, phylum Bacteroidetes) were isolated from marine habitats such as tidal flat sediments, coastal surface seawater and sea urchins. Flavobacteriaceae have been shown to be involved in the decomposition of plant and algal polysaccharides. However, the potential to decompose polysaccharides may differ tremendously even between species of the same genus. Gramella echinicola KMM 6050(T) (DSM 19838(T)) and Gramella portivictoriae UST040801-001(T) (DSM 23547(T)) have genomes of similar lengths, similar numbers of protein coding genes and RNA genes. Both genomes encode for a greater number of peptidases compared to 'G. forsetii'. In contrast to the genome of 'G. forsetii', both genomes comprised a smaller set of CAZymes. Seven polysaccharide utilization loci were identified in the genomes of DSM 19838(T) and DSM 23547(T). Both Gramella strains hydrolyzed starch, galactomannan, arabinoxylan and hydroxyethyl-cellulose, but not pectin, chitosan and cellulose (Avicel). Galactan and xylan were hydrolyzed by strain DSM 19838(T), whereas strain DSM 23547(T) hydrolyzed pachyman and carboxy-methyl cellulose. Conclusively, both Gramella type strains exhibit characteristic physiological, morphological and genomic differences that might be linked to their habitat. Furthermore, the identified enzymes mediating polysaccharide decomposition, are of biotechnological interest.</description><issn>1944-3277</issn><issn>1944-3277</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>report</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>report</recordtype><recordid>eNqVTsFKAzEUXEXBov0Ab-_YgluTbnazAW-1Kmi9tJ5LzL66sbvJukkr_XvTKtqDCD54vBnmzTBRdE7JgNI8u3SMcJHEhGbbTWJxGHWoYCxOhpwf7eGTqOvcKwmTCC6Y6BxcjWzdyFabF2hstXFSqTLQAqFAFSTrtNfWwDP6d0QDvkTwmwbB-VZq4-C2lTVWlQRUpTZa2QDvJxPISEp6sz70rqcToCJP8sD6IE3xY2ls6_VaK29bLRGepjPCSE5oTAj99g6TlPGt92JnxhpNgUWo51Srm105u_i1xiMW0pVLu3ZLuQmKB1kNYEhI-pkygGkpw_eeRNmfDR_kaj_mLDpeyMph9-ueRr2b8Wx0FzetfVuh8_NaO7UNMmhXbk65SHPOszRP_vH6AdxIlVo</recordid><startdate>20160101</startdate><enddate>20160101</enddate><creator>Panschin, Irina</creator><creator>Huang, Sixing</creator><creator>Meier-Kolthoff, Jan P</creator><creator>Tindall, Brian J</creator><creator>Rohde, Manfred</creator><creator>Verbarg, Susanne</creator><creator>Lapidus, Alla</creator><creator>Han, James</creator><creator>Trong, Stephan</creator><creator>Haynes, Matthew</creator><creator>Reddy, T B K</creator><creator>Huntemann, Marcel</creator><creator>Pati, Amrita</creator><creator>Ivanova, Natalia N</creator><creator>Mavromatis, Konstantinos</creator><creator>Markowitz, Victor</creator><creator>Woyke, Tanja</creator><creator>Göker, Markus</creator><creator>Klenk, Hans-Peter</creator><creator>Kyrpides, Nikos C</creator><creator>Hahnke, Richard L</creator><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160101</creationdate><title>Comparing polysaccharide decomposition between the type strains Gramella echinicola KMM 6050(T) (DSM 19838(T)) and Gramella portivictoriae UST040801-001(T) (DSM 23547(T)), and emended description of Gramella echinicola Nedashkovskaya et al. 2005 emend. Shahina et al. 2014 and Gramella portivictoriae Lau et al. 2005</title><author>Panschin, Irina ; Huang, Sixing ; Meier-Kolthoff, Jan P ; Tindall, Brian J ; Rohde, Manfred ; Verbarg, Susanne ; Lapidus, Alla ; Han, James ; Trong, Stephan ; Haynes, Matthew ; Reddy, T B K ; Huntemann, Marcel ; Pati, Amrita ; Ivanova, Natalia N ; Mavromatis, Konstantinos ; Markowitz, Victor ; Woyke, Tanja ; Göker, Markus ; Klenk, Hans-Peter ; Kyrpides, Nikos C ; Hahnke, Richard L</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_miscellaneous_17958776583</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>reports</rsrctype><prefilter>reports</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Panschin, Irina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huang, Sixing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meier-Kolthoff, Jan P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tindall, Brian J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rohde, Manfred</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Verbarg, Susanne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lapidus, Alla</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Han, James</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Trong, Stephan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haynes, Matthew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reddy, T B K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huntemann, Marcel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pati, Amrita</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ivanova, Natalia N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mavromatis, Konstantinos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Markowitz, Victor</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Woyke, Tanja</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Göker, Markus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Klenk, Hans-Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kyrpides, Nikos C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hahnke, Richard L</creatorcontrib><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Panschin, Irina</au><au>Huang, Sixing</au><au>Meier-Kolthoff, Jan P</au><au>Tindall, Brian J</au><au>Rohde, Manfred</au><au>Verbarg, Susanne</au><au>Lapidus, Alla</au><au>Han, James</au><au>Trong, Stephan</au><au>Haynes, Matthew</au><au>Reddy, T B K</au><au>Huntemann, Marcel</au><au>Pati, Amrita</au><au>Ivanova, Natalia N</au><au>Mavromatis, Konstantinos</au><au>Markowitz, Victor</au><au>Woyke, Tanja</au><au>Göker, Markus</au><au>Klenk, Hans-Peter</au><au>Kyrpides, Nikos C</au><au>Hahnke, Richard L</au><format>book</format><genre>unknown</genre><ristype>RPRT</ristype><atitle>Comparing polysaccharide decomposition between the type strains Gramella echinicola KMM 6050(T) (DSM 19838(T)) and Gramella portivictoriae UST040801-001(T) (DSM 23547(T)), and emended description of Gramella echinicola Nedashkovskaya et al. 2005 emend. Shahina et al. 2014 and Gramella portivictoriae Lau et al. 2005</atitle><jtitle>Standards in genomic sciences</jtitle><date>2016-01-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>11</volume><spage>37</spage><epage>37</epage><pages>37-37</pages><issn>1944-3277</issn><eissn>1944-3277</eissn><abstract>Strains of the genus Gramella (family Flavobacteriacae, phylum Bacteroidetes) were isolated from marine habitats such as tidal flat sediments, coastal surface seawater and sea urchins. Flavobacteriaceae have been shown to be involved in the decomposition of plant and algal polysaccharides. However, the potential to decompose polysaccharides may differ tremendously even between species of the same genus. Gramella echinicola KMM 6050(T) (DSM 19838(T)) and Gramella portivictoriae UST040801-001(T) (DSM 23547(T)) have genomes of similar lengths, similar numbers of protein coding genes and RNA genes. Both genomes encode for a greater number of peptidases compared to 'G. forsetii'. In contrast to the genome of 'G. forsetii', both genomes comprised a smaller set of CAZymes. Seven polysaccharide utilization loci were identified in the genomes of DSM 19838(T) and DSM 23547(T). Both Gramella strains hydrolyzed starch, galactomannan, arabinoxylan and hydroxyethyl-cellulose, but not pectin, chitosan and cellulose (Avicel). Galactan and xylan were hydrolyzed by strain DSM 19838(T), whereas strain DSM 23547(T) hydrolyzed pachyman and carboxy-methyl cellulose. Conclusively, both Gramella type strains exhibit characteristic physiological, morphological and genomic differences that might be linked to their habitat. Furthermore, the identified enzymes mediating polysaccharide decomposition, are of biotechnological interest.</abstract><doi>10.1186/s40793-016-0163-9</doi></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1944-3277 |
ispartof | Standards in genomic sciences, 2016, Vol.11, p.37-37 |
issn | 1944-3277 1944-3277 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1795877658 |
source | DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; PubMed Central Open Access; PubMed Central; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
title | Comparing polysaccharide decomposition between the type strains Gramella echinicola KMM 6050(T) (DSM 19838(T)) and Gramella portivictoriae UST040801-001(T) (DSM 23547(T)), and emended description of Gramella echinicola Nedashkovskaya et al. 2005 emend. Shahina et al. 2014 and Gramella portivictoriae Lau et al. 2005 |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T09%3A00%3A40IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=unknown&rft.atitle=Comparing%20polysaccharide%20decomposition%20between%20the%20type%20strains%20Gramella%20echinicola%20KMM%206050(T)%20(DSM%2019838(T))%20and%20Gramella%20portivictoriae%20UST040801-001(T)%20(DSM%2023547(T)),%20and%20emended%20description%20of%20Gramella%20echinicola%20Nedashkovskaya%20et%20al.%202005%20emend.%20Shahina%20et%20al.%202014%20and%20Gramella%20portivictoriae%20Lau%20et%20al.%202005&rft.jtitle=Standards%20in%20genomic%20sciences&rft.au=Panschin,%20Irina&rft.date=2016-01-01&rft.volume=11&rft.spage=37&rft.epage=37&rft.pages=37-37&rft.issn=1944-3277&rft.eissn=1944-3277&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186/s40793-016-0163-9&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E1795877658%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1795877658&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |