A template for broad consent in biobank research. Results and explanation of an evidence and consensus-based development process
Abstract Background Biobanks increasingly presume long-term storage of biomaterials and data that shall be used for future research projects which are today unspecified. Appropriate consent documents for sample donors must therefore explain the breadth of consent and other elements of the biobank go...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | European journal of medical genetics 2016-06, Vol.59 (6-7), p.295-309 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 309 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6-7 |
container_start_page | 295 |
container_title | European journal of medical genetics |
container_volume | 59 |
creator | Strech, D Bein, S Brumhard, M Eisenmenger, W Glinicke, C Herbst, T Jahns, R von Kielmansegg, S Schmidt, G Taupitz, J Tröger, H.D |
description | Abstract Background Biobanks increasingly presume long-term storage of biomaterials and data that shall be used for future research projects which are today unspecified. Appropriate consent documents for sample donors must therefore explain the breadth of consent and other elements of the biobank governance framework. Recent reviews demonstrated high variability in what issues these documents mention or not and how the issues are explained. This might undermine the protection of sample donors, complicate networked biobank research, create research waste and impact on public trust. Methods A systematic analysis of international research guidelines and existing broad consent templates was performed. Based on this information an interdisciplinary expert group from the AKMEK (Permanent Working Party of German RECs) developed a draft template and organized a comprehensive stakeholder consultation. After revision the final template was consented by all 53 German RECs. Results This paper briefly explores the spectrum of potentially relevant issues for broad consent forms. It then elaborates the template and how it was designed to be applicable in different types of biobanks. Discussion To further improve the validity and applicability of broad consent forms in biobank and other big data research, practice evaluations are needed. We hope that in this regard the presented template supports the development of new consent forms as well as the evaluation and revision of existing ones. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.ejmg.2016.04.002 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1794470233</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S176972121630060X</els_id><sourcerecordid>1794470233</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-ec72d0bb8252cdd1cce4d868e9160a80ca24cfaa975860abb89d628fb65d49e03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU2L1TAUhosozof-AReSpZvWkzS3TUGEYRhHYUDwA9yFNDnVdNrkmtNenJ0_3dQ7unDhKoeT931P8pyieMah4sCbl2OF4_y1ErmuQFYA4kFxylWrSlCye5jrtunKVnBxUpwRjQC14qJ7XJyIltcghTotfl6wBef9ZBZkQ0ysT9E4ZmMgDAvzgfU-9ibcsoSEJtlvFfuAtE4LMRMcwx_ZGsziY2BxyC2GB-8wWPx9fcyhlcreEDrm8IBT3M9b9j5Fi0RPikeDmQif3p_nxec3V58u35Y376_fXV7clFZyvpRoW-Gg75XYCesctxalU43CjjdgFFgjpB2M6dqdyo0s7Fwj1NA3Oyc7hPq8eHHMzXO_r0iLnj1ZnPLzMa6kedtJ2YKo6ywVR6lNkSjhoPfJzybdaQ56I69HvZHXG3kNUmfy2fT8Pn_tZ3R_LX9QZ8GrowDzLw8ekybrN1LOJ7SLdtH_P__1P3Y7-eCtmW7xDmmMawqZn-aahAb9cdv9tnre1AANfKl_ASpYrBE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1794470233</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A template for broad consent in biobank research. Results and explanation of an evidence and consensus-based development process</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Strech, D ; Bein, S ; Brumhard, M ; Eisenmenger, W ; Glinicke, C ; Herbst, T ; Jahns, R ; von Kielmansegg, S ; Schmidt, G ; Taupitz, J ; Tröger, H.D</creator><creatorcontrib>Strech, D ; Bein, S ; Brumhard, M ; Eisenmenger, W ; Glinicke, C ; Herbst, T ; Jahns, R ; von Kielmansegg, S ; Schmidt, G ; Taupitz, J ; Tröger, H.D</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Background Biobanks increasingly presume long-term storage of biomaterials and data that shall be used for future research projects which are today unspecified. Appropriate consent documents for sample donors must therefore explain the breadth of consent and other elements of the biobank governance framework. Recent reviews demonstrated high variability in what issues these documents mention or not and how the issues are explained. This might undermine the protection of sample donors, complicate networked biobank research, create research waste and impact on public trust. Methods A systematic analysis of international research guidelines and existing broad consent templates was performed. Based on this information an interdisciplinary expert group from the AKMEK (Permanent Working Party of German RECs) developed a draft template and organized a comprehensive stakeholder consultation. After revision the final template was consented by all 53 German RECs. Results This paper briefly explores the spectrum of potentially relevant issues for broad consent forms. It then elaborates the template and how it was designed to be applicable in different types of biobanks. Discussion To further improve the validity and applicability of broad consent forms in biobank and other big data research, practice evaluations are needed. We hope that in this regard the presented template supports the development of new consent forms as well as the evaluation and revision of existing ones.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1769-7212</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1878-0849</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmg.2016.04.002</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27130428</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier Masson SAS</publisher><subject>Biobank ; Biological Specimen Banks - trends ; Biomedical Research - trends ; Biospecimen ; Broad consent ; Consent form ; Ethics ; Genetic research ; Humans ; Medical Education</subject><ispartof>European journal of medical genetics, 2016-06, Vol.59 (6-7), p.295-309</ispartof><rights>2016 Elsevier Masson SAS</rights><rights>Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-ec72d0bb8252cdd1cce4d868e9160a80ca24cfaa975860abb89d628fb65d49e03</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-ec72d0bb8252cdd1cce4d868e9160a80ca24cfaa975860abb89d628fb65d49e03</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-9153-079X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmg.2016.04.002$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,3551,27929,27930,46000</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27130428$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Strech, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bein, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brumhard, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eisenmenger, W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Glinicke, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Herbst, T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jahns, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>von Kielmansegg, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schmidt, G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Taupitz, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tröger, H.D</creatorcontrib><title>A template for broad consent in biobank research. Results and explanation of an evidence and consensus-based development process</title><title>European journal of medical genetics</title><addtitle>Eur J Med Genet</addtitle><description>Abstract Background Biobanks increasingly presume long-term storage of biomaterials and data that shall be used for future research projects which are today unspecified. Appropriate consent documents for sample donors must therefore explain the breadth of consent and other elements of the biobank governance framework. Recent reviews demonstrated high variability in what issues these documents mention or not and how the issues are explained. This might undermine the protection of sample donors, complicate networked biobank research, create research waste and impact on public trust. Methods A systematic analysis of international research guidelines and existing broad consent templates was performed. Based on this information an interdisciplinary expert group from the AKMEK (Permanent Working Party of German RECs) developed a draft template and organized a comprehensive stakeholder consultation. After revision the final template was consented by all 53 German RECs. Results This paper briefly explores the spectrum of potentially relevant issues for broad consent forms. It then elaborates the template and how it was designed to be applicable in different types of biobanks. Discussion To further improve the validity and applicability of broad consent forms in biobank and other big data research, practice evaluations are needed. We hope that in this regard the presented template supports the development of new consent forms as well as the evaluation and revision of existing ones.</description><subject>Biobank</subject><subject>Biological Specimen Banks - trends</subject><subject>Biomedical Research - trends</subject><subject>Biospecimen</subject><subject>Broad consent</subject><subject>Consent form</subject><subject>Ethics</subject><subject>Genetic research</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Medical Education</subject><issn>1769-7212</issn><issn>1878-0849</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kU2L1TAUhosozof-AReSpZvWkzS3TUGEYRhHYUDwA9yFNDnVdNrkmtNenJ0_3dQ7unDhKoeT931P8pyieMah4sCbl2OF4_y1ErmuQFYA4kFxylWrSlCye5jrtunKVnBxUpwRjQC14qJ7XJyIltcghTotfl6wBef9ZBZkQ0ysT9E4ZmMgDAvzgfU-9ibcsoSEJtlvFfuAtE4LMRMcwx_ZGsziY2BxyC2GB-8wWPx9fcyhlcreEDrm8IBT3M9b9j5Fi0RPikeDmQif3p_nxec3V58u35Y376_fXV7clFZyvpRoW-Gg75XYCesctxalU43CjjdgFFgjpB2M6dqdyo0s7Fwj1NA3Oyc7hPq8eHHMzXO_r0iLnj1ZnPLzMa6kedtJ2YKo6ywVR6lNkSjhoPfJzybdaQ56I69HvZHXG3kNUmfy2fT8Pn_tZ3R_LX9QZ8GrowDzLw8ekybrN1LOJ7SLdtH_P__1P3Y7-eCtmW7xDmmMawqZn-aahAb9cdv9tnre1AANfKl_ASpYrBE</recordid><startdate>20160601</startdate><enddate>20160601</enddate><creator>Strech, D</creator><creator>Bein, S</creator><creator>Brumhard, M</creator><creator>Eisenmenger, W</creator><creator>Glinicke, C</creator><creator>Herbst, T</creator><creator>Jahns, R</creator><creator>von Kielmansegg, S</creator><creator>Schmidt, G</creator><creator>Taupitz, J</creator><creator>Tröger, H.D</creator><general>Elsevier Masson SAS</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9153-079X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20160601</creationdate><title>A template for broad consent in biobank research. Results and explanation of an evidence and consensus-based development process</title><author>Strech, D ; Bein, S ; Brumhard, M ; Eisenmenger, W ; Glinicke, C ; Herbst, T ; Jahns, R ; von Kielmansegg, S ; Schmidt, G ; Taupitz, J ; Tröger, H.D</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-ec72d0bb8252cdd1cce4d868e9160a80ca24cfaa975860abb89d628fb65d49e03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Biobank</topic><topic>Biological Specimen Banks - trends</topic><topic>Biomedical Research - trends</topic><topic>Biospecimen</topic><topic>Broad consent</topic><topic>Consent form</topic><topic>Ethics</topic><topic>Genetic research</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Medical Education</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Strech, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bein, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brumhard, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eisenmenger, W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Glinicke, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Herbst, T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jahns, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>von Kielmansegg, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schmidt, G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Taupitz, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tröger, H.D</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>European journal of medical genetics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Strech, D</au><au>Bein, S</au><au>Brumhard, M</au><au>Eisenmenger, W</au><au>Glinicke, C</au><au>Herbst, T</au><au>Jahns, R</au><au>von Kielmansegg, S</au><au>Schmidt, G</au><au>Taupitz, J</au><au>Tröger, H.D</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A template for broad consent in biobank research. Results and explanation of an evidence and consensus-based development process</atitle><jtitle>European journal of medical genetics</jtitle><addtitle>Eur J Med Genet</addtitle><date>2016-06-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>59</volume><issue>6-7</issue><spage>295</spage><epage>309</epage><pages>295-309</pages><issn>1769-7212</issn><eissn>1878-0849</eissn><abstract>Abstract Background Biobanks increasingly presume long-term storage of biomaterials and data that shall be used for future research projects which are today unspecified. Appropriate consent documents for sample donors must therefore explain the breadth of consent and other elements of the biobank governance framework. Recent reviews demonstrated high variability in what issues these documents mention or not and how the issues are explained. This might undermine the protection of sample donors, complicate networked biobank research, create research waste and impact on public trust. Methods A systematic analysis of international research guidelines and existing broad consent templates was performed. Based on this information an interdisciplinary expert group from the AKMEK (Permanent Working Party of German RECs) developed a draft template and organized a comprehensive stakeholder consultation. After revision the final template was consented by all 53 German RECs. Results This paper briefly explores the spectrum of potentially relevant issues for broad consent forms. It then elaborates the template and how it was designed to be applicable in different types of biobanks. Discussion To further improve the validity and applicability of broad consent forms in biobank and other big data research, practice evaluations are needed. We hope that in this regard the presented template supports the development of new consent forms as well as the evaluation and revision of existing ones.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier Masson SAS</pub><pmid>27130428</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.ejmg.2016.04.002</doi><tpages>15</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9153-079X</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1769-7212 |
ispartof | European journal of medical genetics, 2016-06, Vol.59 (6-7), p.295-309 |
issn | 1769-7212 1878-0849 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1794470233 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete |
subjects | Biobank Biological Specimen Banks - trends Biomedical Research - trends Biospecimen Broad consent Consent form Ethics Genetic research Humans Medical Education |
title | A template for broad consent in biobank research. Results and explanation of an evidence and consensus-based development process |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-12T00%3A47%3A11IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20template%20for%20broad%20consent%20in%20biobank%20research.%20Results%20and%20explanation%20of%20an%20evidence%20and%20consensus-based%20development%20process&rft.jtitle=European%20journal%20of%20medical%20genetics&rft.au=Strech,%20D&rft.date=2016-06-01&rft.volume=59&rft.issue=6-7&rft.spage=295&rft.epage=309&rft.pages=295-309&rft.issn=1769-7212&rft.eissn=1878-0849&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ejmg.2016.04.002&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1794470233%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1794470233&rft_id=info:pmid/27130428&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S176972121630060X&rfr_iscdi=true |