A template for broad consent in biobank research. Results and explanation of an evidence and consensus-based development process

Abstract Background Biobanks increasingly presume long-term storage of biomaterials and data that shall be used for future research projects which are today unspecified. Appropriate consent documents for sample donors must therefore explain the breadth of consent and other elements of the biobank go...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:European journal of medical genetics 2016-06, Vol.59 (6-7), p.295-309
Hauptverfasser: Strech, D, Bein, S, Brumhard, M, Eisenmenger, W, Glinicke, C, Herbst, T, Jahns, R, von Kielmansegg, S, Schmidt, G, Taupitz, J, Tröger, H.D
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 309
container_issue 6-7
container_start_page 295
container_title European journal of medical genetics
container_volume 59
creator Strech, D
Bein, S
Brumhard, M
Eisenmenger, W
Glinicke, C
Herbst, T
Jahns, R
von Kielmansegg, S
Schmidt, G
Taupitz, J
Tröger, H.D
description Abstract Background Biobanks increasingly presume long-term storage of biomaterials and data that shall be used for future research projects which are today unspecified. Appropriate consent documents for sample donors must therefore explain the breadth of consent and other elements of the biobank governance framework. Recent reviews demonstrated high variability in what issues these documents mention or not and how the issues are explained. This might undermine the protection of sample donors, complicate networked biobank research, create research waste and impact on public trust. Methods A systematic analysis of international research guidelines and existing broad consent templates was performed. Based on this information an interdisciplinary expert group from the AKMEK (Permanent Working Party of German RECs) developed a draft template and organized a comprehensive stakeholder consultation. After revision the final template was consented by all 53 German RECs. Results This paper briefly explores the spectrum of potentially relevant issues for broad consent forms. It then elaborates the template and how it was designed to be applicable in different types of biobanks. Discussion To further improve the validity and applicability of broad consent forms in biobank and other big data research, practice evaluations are needed. We hope that in this regard the presented template supports the development of new consent forms as well as the evaluation and revision of existing ones.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.ejmg.2016.04.002
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1794470233</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S176972121630060X</els_id><sourcerecordid>1794470233</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-ec72d0bb8252cdd1cce4d868e9160a80ca24cfaa975860abb89d628fb65d49e03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU2L1TAUhosozof-AReSpZvWkzS3TUGEYRhHYUDwA9yFNDnVdNrkmtNenJ0_3dQ7unDhKoeT931P8pyieMah4sCbl2OF4_y1ErmuQFYA4kFxylWrSlCye5jrtunKVnBxUpwRjQC14qJ7XJyIltcghTotfl6wBef9ZBZkQ0ysT9E4ZmMgDAvzgfU-9ibcsoSEJtlvFfuAtE4LMRMcwx_ZGsziY2BxyC2GB-8wWPx9fcyhlcreEDrm8IBT3M9b9j5Fi0RPikeDmQif3p_nxec3V58u35Y376_fXV7clFZyvpRoW-Gg75XYCesctxalU43CjjdgFFgjpB2M6dqdyo0s7Fwj1NA3Oyc7hPq8eHHMzXO_r0iLnj1ZnPLzMa6kedtJ2YKo6ywVR6lNkSjhoPfJzybdaQ56I69HvZHXG3kNUmfy2fT8Pn_tZ3R_LX9QZ8GrowDzLw8ekybrN1LOJ7SLdtH_P__1P3Y7-eCtmW7xDmmMawqZn-aahAb9cdv9tnre1AANfKl_ASpYrBE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1794470233</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A template for broad consent in biobank research. Results and explanation of an evidence and consensus-based development process</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Strech, D ; Bein, S ; Brumhard, M ; Eisenmenger, W ; Glinicke, C ; Herbst, T ; Jahns, R ; von Kielmansegg, S ; Schmidt, G ; Taupitz, J ; Tröger, H.D</creator><creatorcontrib>Strech, D ; Bein, S ; Brumhard, M ; Eisenmenger, W ; Glinicke, C ; Herbst, T ; Jahns, R ; von Kielmansegg, S ; Schmidt, G ; Taupitz, J ; Tröger, H.D</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Background Biobanks increasingly presume long-term storage of biomaterials and data that shall be used for future research projects which are today unspecified. Appropriate consent documents for sample donors must therefore explain the breadth of consent and other elements of the biobank governance framework. Recent reviews demonstrated high variability in what issues these documents mention or not and how the issues are explained. This might undermine the protection of sample donors, complicate networked biobank research, create research waste and impact on public trust. Methods A systematic analysis of international research guidelines and existing broad consent templates was performed. Based on this information an interdisciplinary expert group from the AKMEK (Permanent Working Party of German RECs) developed a draft template and organized a comprehensive stakeholder consultation. After revision the final template was consented by all 53 German RECs. Results This paper briefly explores the spectrum of potentially relevant issues for broad consent forms. It then elaborates the template and how it was designed to be applicable in different types of biobanks. Discussion To further improve the validity and applicability of broad consent forms in biobank and other big data research, practice evaluations are needed. We hope that in this regard the presented template supports the development of new consent forms as well as the evaluation and revision of existing ones.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1769-7212</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1878-0849</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmg.2016.04.002</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27130428</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier Masson SAS</publisher><subject>Biobank ; Biological Specimen Banks - trends ; Biomedical Research - trends ; Biospecimen ; Broad consent ; Consent form ; Ethics ; Genetic research ; Humans ; Medical Education</subject><ispartof>European journal of medical genetics, 2016-06, Vol.59 (6-7), p.295-309</ispartof><rights>2016 Elsevier Masson SAS</rights><rights>Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-ec72d0bb8252cdd1cce4d868e9160a80ca24cfaa975860abb89d628fb65d49e03</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-ec72d0bb8252cdd1cce4d868e9160a80ca24cfaa975860abb89d628fb65d49e03</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-9153-079X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmg.2016.04.002$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,3551,27929,27930,46000</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27130428$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Strech, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bein, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brumhard, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eisenmenger, W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Glinicke, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Herbst, T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jahns, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>von Kielmansegg, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schmidt, G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Taupitz, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tröger, H.D</creatorcontrib><title>A template for broad consent in biobank research. Results and explanation of an evidence and consensus-based development process</title><title>European journal of medical genetics</title><addtitle>Eur J Med Genet</addtitle><description>Abstract Background Biobanks increasingly presume long-term storage of biomaterials and data that shall be used for future research projects which are today unspecified. Appropriate consent documents for sample donors must therefore explain the breadth of consent and other elements of the biobank governance framework. Recent reviews demonstrated high variability in what issues these documents mention or not and how the issues are explained. This might undermine the protection of sample donors, complicate networked biobank research, create research waste and impact on public trust. Methods A systematic analysis of international research guidelines and existing broad consent templates was performed. Based on this information an interdisciplinary expert group from the AKMEK (Permanent Working Party of German RECs) developed a draft template and organized a comprehensive stakeholder consultation. After revision the final template was consented by all 53 German RECs. Results This paper briefly explores the spectrum of potentially relevant issues for broad consent forms. It then elaborates the template and how it was designed to be applicable in different types of biobanks. Discussion To further improve the validity and applicability of broad consent forms in biobank and other big data research, practice evaluations are needed. We hope that in this regard the presented template supports the development of new consent forms as well as the evaluation and revision of existing ones.</description><subject>Biobank</subject><subject>Biological Specimen Banks - trends</subject><subject>Biomedical Research - trends</subject><subject>Biospecimen</subject><subject>Broad consent</subject><subject>Consent form</subject><subject>Ethics</subject><subject>Genetic research</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Medical Education</subject><issn>1769-7212</issn><issn>1878-0849</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kU2L1TAUhosozof-AReSpZvWkzS3TUGEYRhHYUDwA9yFNDnVdNrkmtNenJ0_3dQ7unDhKoeT931P8pyieMah4sCbl2OF4_y1ErmuQFYA4kFxylWrSlCye5jrtunKVnBxUpwRjQC14qJ7XJyIltcghTotfl6wBef9ZBZkQ0ysT9E4ZmMgDAvzgfU-9ibcsoSEJtlvFfuAtE4LMRMcwx_ZGsziY2BxyC2GB-8wWPx9fcyhlcreEDrm8IBT3M9b9j5Fi0RPikeDmQif3p_nxec3V58u35Y376_fXV7clFZyvpRoW-Gg75XYCesctxalU43CjjdgFFgjpB2M6dqdyo0s7Fwj1NA3Oyc7hPq8eHHMzXO_r0iLnj1ZnPLzMa6kedtJ2YKo6ywVR6lNkSjhoPfJzybdaQ56I69HvZHXG3kNUmfy2fT8Pn_tZ3R_LX9QZ8GrowDzLw8ekybrN1LOJ7SLdtH_P__1P3Y7-eCtmW7xDmmMawqZn-aahAb9cdv9tnre1AANfKl_ASpYrBE</recordid><startdate>20160601</startdate><enddate>20160601</enddate><creator>Strech, D</creator><creator>Bein, S</creator><creator>Brumhard, M</creator><creator>Eisenmenger, W</creator><creator>Glinicke, C</creator><creator>Herbst, T</creator><creator>Jahns, R</creator><creator>von Kielmansegg, S</creator><creator>Schmidt, G</creator><creator>Taupitz, J</creator><creator>Tröger, H.D</creator><general>Elsevier Masson SAS</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9153-079X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20160601</creationdate><title>A template for broad consent in biobank research. Results and explanation of an evidence and consensus-based development process</title><author>Strech, D ; Bein, S ; Brumhard, M ; Eisenmenger, W ; Glinicke, C ; Herbst, T ; Jahns, R ; von Kielmansegg, S ; Schmidt, G ; Taupitz, J ; Tröger, H.D</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-ec72d0bb8252cdd1cce4d868e9160a80ca24cfaa975860abb89d628fb65d49e03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Biobank</topic><topic>Biological Specimen Banks - trends</topic><topic>Biomedical Research - trends</topic><topic>Biospecimen</topic><topic>Broad consent</topic><topic>Consent form</topic><topic>Ethics</topic><topic>Genetic research</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Medical Education</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Strech, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bein, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brumhard, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eisenmenger, W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Glinicke, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Herbst, T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jahns, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>von Kielmansegg, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schmidt, G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Taupitz, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tröger, H.D</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>European journal of medical genetics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Strech, D</au><au>Bein, S</au><au>Brumhard, M</au><au>Eisenmenger, W</au><au>Glinicke, C</au><au>Herbst, T</au><au>Jahns, R</au><au>von Kielmansegg, S</au><au>Schmidt, G</au><au>Taupitz, J</au><au>Tröger, H.D</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A template for broad consent in biobank research. Results and explanation of an evidence and consensus-based development process</atitle><jtitle>European journal of medical genetics</jtitle><addtitle>Eur J Med Genet</addtitle><date>2016-06-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>59</volume><issue>6-7</issue><spage>295</spage><epage>309</epage><pages>295-309</pages><issn>1769-7212</issn><eissn>1878-0849</eissn><abstract>Abstract Background Biobanks increasingly presume long-term storage of biomaterials and data that shall be used for future research projects which are today unspecified. Appropriate consent documents for sample donors must therefore explain the breadth of consent and other elements of the biobank governance framework. Recent reviews demonstrated high variability in what issues these documents mention or not and how the issues are explained. This might undermine the protection of sample donors, complicate networked biobank research, create research waste and impact on public trust. Methods A systematic analysis of international research guidelines and existing broad consent templates was performed. Based on this information an interdisciplinary expert group from the AKMEK (Permanent Working Party of German RECs) developed a draft template and organized a comprehensive stakeholder consultation. After revision the final template was consented by all 53 German RECs. Results This paper briefly explores the spectrum of potentially relevant issues for broad consent forms. It then elaborates the template and how it was designed to be applicable in different types of biobanks. Discussion To further improve the validity and applicability of broad consent forms in biobank and other big data research, practice evaluations are needed. We hope that in this regard the presented template supports the development of new consent forms as well as the evaluation and revision of existing ones.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier Masson SAS</pub><pmid>27130428</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.ejmg.2016.04.002</doi><tpages>15</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9153-079X</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1769-7212
ispartof European journal of medical genetics, 2016-06, Vol.59 (6-7), p.295-309
issn 1769-7212
1878-0849
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1794470233
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete
subjects Biobank
Biological Specimen Banks - trends
Biomedical Research - trends
Biospecimen
Broad consent
Consent form
Ethics
Genetic research
Humans
Medical Education
title A template for broad consent in biobank research. Results and explanation of an evidence and consensus-based development process
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-12T00%3A47%3A11IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20template%20for%20broad%20consent%20in%20biobank%20research.%20Results%20and%20explanation%20of%20an%20evidence%20and%20consensus-based%20development%20process&rft.jtitle=European%20journal%20of%20medical%20genetics&rft.au=Strech,%20D&rft.date=2016-06-01&rft.volume=59&rft.issue=6-7&rft.spage=295&rft.epage=309&rft.pages=295-309&rft.issn=1769-7212&rft.eissn=1878-0849&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ejmg.2016.04.002&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1794470233%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1794470233&rft_id=info:pmid/27130428&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S176972121630060X&rfr_iscdi=true