Safety of Osseointegrated Implants for Transfemoral Amputees: A Two-Center Prospective Cohort Study

Osseointegrated implants are an alternative for prosthetic attachment for individuals unable to wear a socket following an amputation. The concept of an integrated metal implant communicating with the external environment raises substantial concern about the risk of ascending infection. We report on...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume 2016-06, Vol.98 (11), p.900-909
Hauptverfasser: Al Muderis, Munjed, Khemka, Aditya, Lord, Sarah J., Van de Meent, Henk, Frölke, Jan Paul M.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 909
container_issue 11
container_start_page 900
container_title Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume
container_volume 98
creator Al Muderis, Munjed
Khemka, Aditya
Lord, Sarah J.
Van de Meent, Henk
Frölke, Jan Paul M.
description Osseointegrated implants are an alternative for prosthetic attachment for individuals unable to wear a socket following an amputation. The concept of an integrated metal implant communicating with the external environment raises substantial concern about the risk of ascending infection. We report on the safety of press-fit osseointegrated implants currently used in Australia and the Netherlands. We prospectively recorded all adverse events in all patients with transfemoral amputation who were managed with an osseointegration implant system between 2009 and 2013 at two centers. The procedure was performed in two stages. A customized porous-coated implant was placed in the first stage, and a stoma was created in the second. Adverse events were categorized according to type (infection or "other") and severity. Infections were classified according to four grades of severity based on clinical and radiographic findings: (1) low-grade soft-tissue infection, (2) high-grade soft-tissue infection, (3) bone infection, and (4) septic implant failure. Eighty-six patients (ninety-one implants), twenty-five to eighty-one years of age, were included in the study and followed for a median of thirty-four months (range, twenty-four to seventy-one months). Thirty-one patients had an uneventful course with no complications; twenty-nine developed infection (all grade 1 or 2); and twenty-six did not develop infection but had one or more other complications requiring intervention, including stoma hypergranulation (seventeen patients), soft-tissue redundancy (fourteen), proximal femoral fracture (three), inadequate osseointegration leading to implant replacement (one), implant breakage (two), and breakage of the pin used as a fail-safe mechanism (twenty-five). Mild infection and irritation of the soft tissue in the skin-penetration area are common in transfemoral amputees who have an osseointegrated implant. These complications were successfully managed with simple measures. Severe infections resulting in septic implant loosening are rare. Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
doi_str_mv 10.2106/JBJS.15.00808
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1793910056</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1793910056</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2943-9c569d2e83c2932752b49d051d086e1a5a38cd06e09d4a7221555b2359b9a88f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kE1v2zAMhoWhxZq2O-466NiLUkqyZGu3NNj6gQItkPQsKDa9ZLMjV5IX5N9PWdqeCBIPX5APIV85TAUHff1w87CYcjUFqKD6RCZcScW4rPQJmQAIzoxU6oycx_gbAIoCys_kTJRCiUIWE1IvXItpT31Ln2JEv9km_BVcwobe90PntinS1ge6DG4bW-x9cB2d9cOYEON3OqPLnWdzzFuBPgcfB6zT5i_SuV_7kOgijc3-kpy2rov45a1ekJefP5bzO_b4dHs_nz2yWphCMlMrbRqBlcy9FKUSq8I0oHgDlUbulJNV3YBGME3hSiG4UmolpDIr46qqlRfk6pg7BP86Yky238Qau_wF-jFaXhppOIDSGWVHtM43x4CtHcKmd2FvOdiDV3vwarmy_71m_ttb9Ljqsfmg30VmoDgCO99lF_FPN-4w2DW6Lq1zSFavhWQCuAYNHNhhJOU_40WB9w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1793910056</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Safety of Osseointegrated Implants for Transfemoral Amputees: A Two-Center Prospective Cohort Study</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Al Muderis, Munjed ; Khemka, Aditya ; Lord, Sarah J. ; Van de Meent, Henk ; Frölke, Jan Paul M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Al Muderis, Munjed ; Khemka, Aditya ; Lord, Sarah J. ; Van de Meent, Henk ; Frölke, Jan Paul M.</creatorcontrib><description>Osseointegrated implants are an alternative for prosthetic attachment for individuals unable to wear a socket following an amputation. The concept of an integrated metal implant communicating with the external environment raises substantial concern about the risk of ascending infection. We report on the safety of press-fit osseointegrated implants currently used in Australia and the Netherlands. We prospectively recorded all adverse events in all patients with transfemoral amputation who were managed with an osseointegration implant system between 2009 and 2013 at two centers. The procedure was performed in two stages. A customized porous-coated implant was placed in the first stage, and a stoma was created in the second. Adverse events were categorized according to type (infection or "other") and severity. Infections were classified according to four grades of severity based on clinical and radiographic findings: (1) low-grade soft-tissue infection, (2) high-grade soft-tissue infection, (3) bone infection, and (4) septic implant failure. Eighty-six patients (ninety-one implants), twenty-five to eighty-one years of age, were included in the study and followed for a median of thirty-four months (range, twenty-four to seventy-one months). Thirty-one patients had an uneventful course with no complications; twenty-nine developed infection (all grade 1 or 2); and twenty-six did not develop infection but had one or more other complications requiring intervention, including stoma hypergranulation (seventeen patients), soft-tissue redundancy (fourteen), proximal femoral fracture (three), inadequate osseointegration leading to implant replacement (one), implant breakage (two), and breakage of the pin used as a fail-safe mechanism (twenty-five). Mild infection and irritation of the soft tissue in the skin-penetration area are common in transfemoral amputees who have an osseointegrated implant. These complications were successfully managed with simple measures. Severe infections resulting in septic implant loosening are rare. Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-9355</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1535-1386</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.15.00808</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27252434</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Amputees ; Artificial Limbs - adverse effects ; Female ; Femur - surgery ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Osseointegration ; Prosthesis Design ; Prosthesis Implantation - adverse effects ; Prosthesis Implantation - methods ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume, 2016-06, Vol.98 (11), p.900-909</ispartof><rights>The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2016 by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Incorporated.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2943-9c569d2e83c2932752b49d051d086e1a5a38cd06e09d4a7221555b2359b9a88f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27252434$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Al Muderis, Munjed</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khemka, Aditya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lord, Sarah J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van de Meent, Henk</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Frölke, Jan Paul M.</creatorcontrib><title>Safety of Osseointegrated Implants for Transfemoral Amputees: A Two-Center Prospective Cohort Study</title><title>Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume</title><addtitle>J Bone Joint Surg Am</addtitle><description>Osseointegrated implants are an alternative for prosthetic attachment for individuals unable to wear a socket following an amputation. The concept of an integrated metal implant communicating with the external environment raises substantial concern about the risk of ascending infection. We report on the safety of press-fit osseointegrated implants currently used in Australia and the Netherlands. We prospectively recorded all adverse events in all patients with transfemoral amputation who were managed with an osseointegration implant system between 2009 and 2013 at two centers. The procedure was performed in two stages. A customized porous-coated implant was placed in the first stage, and a stoma was created in the second. Adverse events were categorized according to type (infection or "other") and severity. Infections were classified according to four grades of severity based on clinical and radiographic findings: (1) low-grade soft-tissue infection, (2) high-grade soft-tissue infection, (3) bone infection, and (4) septic implant failure. Eighty-six patients (ninety-one implants), twenty-five to eighty-one years of age, were included in the study and followed for a median of thirty-four months (range, twenty-four to seventy-one months). Thirty-one patients had an uneventful course with no complications; twenty-nine developed infection (all grade 1 or 2); and twenty-six did not develop infection but had one or more other complications requiring intervention, including stoma hypergranulation (seventeen patients), soft-tissue redundancy (fourteen), proximal femoral fracture (three), inadequate osseointegration leading to implant replacement (one), implant breakage (two), and breakage of the pin used as a fail-safe mechanism (twenty-five). Mild infection and irritation of the soft tissue in the skin-penetration area are common in transfemoral amputees who have an osseointegrated implant. These complications were successfully managed with simple measures. Severe infections resulting in septic implant loosening are rare. Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Amputees</subject><subject>Artificial Limbs - adverse effects</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Femur - surgery</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Osseointegration</subject><subject>Prosthesis Design</subject><subject>Prosthesis Implantation - adverse effects</subject><subject>Prosthesis Implantation - methods</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>0021-9355</issn><issn>1535-1386</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNo9kE1v2zAMhoWhxZq2O-466NiLUkqyZGu3NNj6gQItkPQsKDa9ZLMjV5IX5N9PWdqeCBIPX5APIV85TAUHff1w87CYcjUFqKD6RCZcScW4rPQJmQAIzoxU6oycx_gbAIoCys_kTJRCiUIWE1IvXItpT31Ln2JEv9km_BVcwobe90PntinS1ge6DG4bW-x9cB2d9cOYEON3OqPLnWdzzFuBPgcfB6zT5i_SuV_7kOgijc3-kpy2rov45a1ekJefP5bzO_b4dHs_nz2yWphCMlMrbRqBlcy9FKUSq8I0oHgDlUbulJNV3YBGME3hSiG4UmolpDIr46qqlRfk6pg7BP86Yky238Qau_wF-jFaXhppOIDSGWVHtM43x4CtHcKmd2FvOdiDV3vwarmy_71m_ttb9Ljqsfmg30VmoDgCO99lF_FPN-4w2DW6Lq1zSFavhWQCuAYNHNhhJOU_40WB9w</recordid><startdate>20160601</startdate><enddate>20160601</enddate><creator>Al Muderis, Munjed</creator><creator>Khemka, Aditya</creator><creator>Lord, Sarah J.</creator><creator>Van de Meent, Henk</creator><creator>Frölke, Jan Paul M.</creator><general>The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160601</creationdate><title>Safety of Osseointegrated Implants for Transfemoral Amputees: A Two-Center Prospective Cohort Study</title><author>Al Muderis, Munjed ; Khemka, Aditya ; Lord, Sarah J. ; Van de Meent, Henk ; Frölke, Jan Paul M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2943-9c569d2e83c2932752b49d051d086e1a5a38cd06e09d4a7221555b2359b9a88f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Amputees</topic><topic>Artificial Limbs - adverse effects</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Femur - surgery</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Osseointegration</topic><topic>Prosthesis Design</topic><topic>Prosthesis Implantation - adverse effects</topic><topic>Prosthesis Implantation - methods</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Al Muderis, Munjed</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khemka, Aditya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lord, Sarah J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van de Meent, Henk</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Frölke, Jan Paul M.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Al Muderis, Munjed</au><au>Khemka, Aditya</au><au>Lord, Sarah J.</au><au>Van de Meent, Henk</au><au>Frölke, Jan Paul M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Safety of Osseointegrated Implants for Transfemoral Amputees: A Two-Center Prospective Cohort Study</atitle><jtitle>Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume</jtitle><addtitle>J Bone Joint Surg Am</addtitle><date>2016-06-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>98</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>900</spage><epage>909</epage><pages>900-909</pages><issn>0021-9355</issn><eissn>1535-1386</eissn><abstract>Osseointegrated implants are an alternative for prosthetic attachment for individuals unable to wear a socket following an amputation. The concept of an integrated metal implant communicating with the external environment raises substantial concern about the risk of ascending infection. We report on the safety of press-fit osseointegrated implants currently used in Australia and the Netherlands. We prospectively recorded all adverse events in all patients with transfemoral amputation who were managed with an osseointegration implant system between 2009 and 2013 at two centers. The procedure was performed in two stages. A customized porous-coated implant was placed in the first stage, and a stoma was created in the second. Adverse events were categorized according to type (infection or "other") and severity. Infections were classified according to four grades of severity based on clinical and radiographic findings: (1) low-grade soft-tissue infection, (2) high-grade soft-tissue infection, (3) bone infection, and (4) septic implant failure. Eighty-six patients (ninety-one implants), twenty-five to eighty-one years of age, were included in the study and followed for a median of thirty-four months (range, twenty-four to seventy-one months). Thirty-one patients had an uneventful course with no complications; twenty-nine developed infection (all grade 1 or 2); and twenty-six did not develop infection but had one or more other complications requiring intervention, including stoma hypergranulation (seventeen patients), soft-tissue redundancy (fourteen), proximal femoral fracture (three), inadequate osseointegration leading to implant replacement (one), implant breakage (two), and breakage of the pin used as a fail-safe mechanism (twenty-five). Mild infection and irritation of the soft tissue in the skin-penetration area are common in transfemoral amputees who have an osseointegrated implant. These complications were successfully managed with simple measures. Severe infections resulting in septic implant loosening are rare. Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc</pub><pmid>27252434</pmid><doi>10.2106/JBJS.15.00808</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0021-9355
ispartof Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume, 2016-06, Vol.98 (11), p.900-909
issn 0021-9355
1535-1386
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1793910056
source MEDLINE; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Amputees
Artificial Limbs - adverse effects
Female
Femur - surgery
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Osseointegration
Prosthesis Design
Prosthesis Implantation - adverse effects
Prosthesis Implantation - methods
Treatment Outcome
title Safety of Osseointegrated Implants for Transfemoral Amputees: A Two-Center Prospective Cohort Study
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T15%3A47%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Safety%20of%20Osseointegrated%20Implants%20for%20Transfemoral%20Amputees:%20A%20Two-Center%20Prospective%20Cohort%20Study&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20bone%20and%20joint%20surgery.%20American%20volume&rft.au=Al%20Muderis,%20Munjed&rft.date=2016-06-01&rft.volume=98&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=900&rft.epage=909&rft.pages=900-909&rft.issn=0021-9355&rft.eissn=1535-1386&rft_id=info:doi/10.2106/JBJS.15.00808&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1793910056%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1793910056&rft_id=info:pmid/27252434&rfr_iscdi=true