Safety of Osseointegrated Implants for Transfemoral Amputees: A Two-Center Prospective Cohort Study
Osseointegrated implants are an alternative for prosthetic attachment for individuals unable to wear a socket following an amputation. The concept of an integrated metal implant communicating with the external environment raises substantial concern about the risk of ascending infection. We report on...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume 2016-06, Vol.98 (11), p.900-909 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 909 |
---|---|
container_issue | 11 |
container_start_page | 900 |
container_title | Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume |
container_volume | 98 |
creator | Al Muderis, Munjed Khemka, Aditya Lord, Sarah J. Van de Meent, Henk Frölke, Jan Paul M. |
description | Osseointegrated implants are an alternative for prosthetic attachment for individuals unable to wear a socket following an amputation. The concept of an integrated metal implant communicating with the external environment raises substantial concern about the risk of ascending infection. We report on the safety of press-fit osseointegrated implants currently used in Australia and the Netherlands.
We prospectively recorded all adverse events in all patients with transfemoral amputation who were managed with an osseointegration implant system between 2009 and 2013 at two centers. The procedure was performed in two stages. A customized porous-coated implant was placed in the first stage, and a stoma was created in the second. Adverse events were categorized according to type (infection or "other") and severity. Infections were classified according to four grades of severity based on clinical and radiographic findings: (1) low-grade soft-tissue infection, (2) high-grade soft-tissue infection, (3) bone infection, and (4) septic implant failure.
Eighty-six patients (ninety-one implants), twenty-five to eighty-one years of age, were included in the study and followed for a median of thirty-four months (range, twenty-four to seventy-one months). Thirty-one patients had an uneventful course with no complications; twenty-nine developed infection (all grade 1 or 2); and twenty-six did not develop infection but had one or more other complications requiring intervention, including stoma hypergranulation (seventeen patients), soft-tissue redundancy (fourteen), proximal femoral fracture (three), inadequate osseointegration leading to implant replacement (one), implant breakage (two), and breakage of the pin used as a fail-safe mechanism (twenty-five).
Mild infection and irritation of the soft tissue in the skin-penetration area are common in transfemoral amputees who have an osseointegrated implant. These complications were successfully managed with simple measures. Severe infections resulting in septic implant loosening are rare.
Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence. |
doi_str_mv | 10.2106/JBJS.15.00808 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1793910056</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1793910056</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2943-9c569d2e83c2932752b49d051d086e1a5a38cd06e09d4a7221555b2359b9a88f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kE1v2zAMhoWhxZq2O-466NiLUkqyZGu3NNj6gQItkPQsKDa9ZLMjV5IX5N9PWdqeCBIPX5APIV85TAUHff1w87CYcjUFqKD6RCZcScW4rPQJmQAIzoxU6oycx_gbAIoCys_kTJRCiUIWE1IvXItpT31Ln2JEv9km_BVcwobe90PntinS1ge6DG4bW-x9cB2d9cOYEON3OqPLnWdzzFuBPgcfB6zT5i_SuV_7kOgijc3-kpy2rov45a1ekJefP5bzO_b4dHs_nz2yWphCMlMrbRqBlcy9FKUSq8I0oHgDlUbulJNV3YBGME3hSiG4UmolpDIr46qqlRfk6pg7BP86Yky238Qau_wF-jFaXhppOIDSGWVHtM43x4CtHcKmd2FvOdiDV3vwarmy_71m_ttb9Ljqsfmg30VmoDgCO99lF_FPN-4w2DW6Lq1zSFavhWQCuAYNHNhhJOU_40WB9w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1793910056</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Safety of Osseointegrated Implants for Transfemoral Amputees: A Two-Center Prospective Cohort Study</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Al Muderis, Munjed ; Khemka, Aditya ; Lord, Sarah J. ; Van de Meent, Henk ; Frölke, Jan Paul M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Al Muderis, Munjed ; Khemka, Aditya ; Lord, Sarah J. ; Van de Meent, Henk ; Frölke, Jan Paul M.</creatorcontrib><description>Osseointegrated implants are an alternative for prosthetic attachment for individuals unable to wear a socket following an amputation. The concept of an integrated metal implant communicating with the external environment raises substantial concern about the risk of ascending infection. We report on the safety of press-fit osseointegrated implants currently used in Australia and the Netherlands.
We prospectively recorded all adverse events in all patients with transfemoral amputation who were managed with an osseointegration implant system between 2009 and 2013 at two centers. The procedure was performed in two stages. A customized porous-coated implant was placed in the first stage, and a stoma was created in the second. Adverse events were categorized according to type (infection or "other") and severity. Infections were classified according to four grades of severity based on clinical and radiographic findings: (1) low-grade soft-tissue infection, (2) high-grade soft-tissue infection, (3) bone infection, and (4) septic implant failure.
Eighty-six patients (ninety-one implants), twenty-five to eighty-one years of age, were included in the study and followed for a median of thirty-four months (range, twenty-four to seventy-one months). Thirty-one patients had an uneventful course with no complications; twenty-nine developed infection (all grade 1 or 2); and twenty-six did not develop infection but had one or more other complications requiring intervention, including stoma hypergranulation (seventeen patients), soft-tissue redundancy (fourteen), proximal femoral fracture (three), inadequate osseointegration leading to implant replacement (one), implant breakage (two), and breakage of the pin used as a fail-safe mechanism (twenty-five).
Mild infection and irritation of the soft tissue in the skin-penetration area are common in transfemoral amputees who have an osseointegrated implant. These complications were successfully managed with simple measures. Severe infections resulting in septic implant loosening are rare.
Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-9355</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1535-1386</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.15.00808</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27252434</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Amputees ; Artificial Limbs - adverse effects ; Female ; Femur - surgery ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Osseointegration ; Prosthesis Design ; Prosthesis Implantation - adverse effects ; Prosthesis Implantation - methods ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume, 2016-06, Vol.98 (11), p.900-909</ispartof><rights>The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2016 by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Incorporated.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2943-9c569d2e83c2932752b49d051d086e1a5a38cd06e09d4a7221555b2359b9a88f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27252434$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Al Muderis, Munjed</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khemka, Aditya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lord, Sarah J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van de Meent, Henk</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Frölke, Jan Paul M.</creatorcontrib><title>Safety of Osseointegrated Implants for Transfemoral Amputees: A Two-Center Prospective Cohort Study</title><title>Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume</title><addtitle>J Bone Joint Surg Am</addtitle><description>Osseointegrated implants are an alternative for prosthetic attachment for individuals unable to wear a socket following an amputation. The concept of an integrated metal implant communicating with the external environment raises substantial concern about the risk of ascending infection. We report on the safety of press-fit osseointegrated implants currently used in Australia and the Netherlands.
We prospectively recorded all adverse events in all patients with transfemoral amputation who were managed with an osseointegration implant system between 2009 and 2013 at two centers. The procedure was performed in two stages. A customized porous-coated implant was placed in the first stage, and a stoma was created in the second. Adverse events were categorized according to type (infection or "other") and severity. Infections were classified according to four grades of severity based on clinical and radiographic findings: (1) low-grade soft-tissue infection, (2) high-grade soft-tissue infection, (3) bone infection, and (4) septic implant failure.
Eighty-six patients (ninety-one implants), twenty-five to eighty-one years of age, were included in the study and followed for a median of thirty-four months (range, twenty-four to seventy-one months). Thirty-one patients had an uneventful course with no complications; twenty-nine developed infection (all grade 1 or 2); and twenty-six did not develop infection but had one or more other complications requiring intervention, including stoma hypergranulation (seventeen patients), soft-tissue redundancy (fourteen), proximal femoral fracture (three), inadequate osseointegration leading to implant replacement (one), implant breakage (two), and breakage of the pin used as a fail-safe mechanism (twenty-five).
Mild infection and irritation of the soft tissue in the skin-penetration area are common in transfemoral amputees who have an osseointegrated implant. These complications were successfully managed with simple measures. Severe infections resulting in septic implant loosening are rare.
Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Amputees</subject><subject>Artificial Limbs - adverse effects</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Femur - surgery</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Osseointegration</subject><subject>Prosthesis Design</subject><subject>Prosthesis Implantation - adverse effects</subject><subject>Prosthesis Implantation - methods</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>0021-9355</issn><issn>1535-1386</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNo9kE1v2zAMhoWhxZq2O-466NiLUkqyZGu3NNj6gQItkPQsKDa9ZLMjV5IX5N9PWdqeCBIPX5APIV85TAUHff1w87CYcjUFqKD6RCZcScW4rPQJmQAIzoxU6oycx_gbAIoCys_kTJRCiUIWE1IvXItpT31Ln2JEv9km_BVcwobe90PntinS1ge6DG4bW-x9cB2d9cOYEON3OqPLnWdzzFuBPgcfB6zT5i_SuV_7kOgijc3-kpy2rov45a1ekJefP5bzO_b4dHs_nz2yWphCMlMrbRqBlcy9FKUSq8I0oHgDlUbulJNV3YBGME3hSiG4UmolpDIr46qqlRfk6pg7BP86Yky238Qau_wF-jFaXhppOIDSGWVHtM43x4CtHcKmd2FvOdiDV3vwarmy_71m_ttb9Ljqsfmg30VmoDgCO99lF_FPN-4w2DW6Lq1zSFavhWQCuAYNHNhhJOU_40WB9w</recordid><startdate>20160601</startdate><enddate>20160601</enddate><creator>Al Muderis, Munjed</creator><creator>Khemka, Aditya</creator><creator>Lord, Sarah J.</creator><creator>Van de Meent, Henk</creator><creator>Frölke, Jan Paul M.</creator><general>The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160601</creationdate><title>Safety of Osseointegrated Implants for Transfemoral Amputees: A Two-Center Prospective Cohort Study</title><author>Al Muderis, Munjed ; Khemka, Aditya ; Lord, Sarah J. ; Van de Meent, Henk ; Frölke, Jan Paul M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2943-9c569d2e83c2932752b49d051d086e1a5a38cd06e09d4a7221555b2359b9a88f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Amputees</topic><topic>Artificial Limbs - adverse effects</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Femur - surgery</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Osseointegration</topic><topic>Prosthesis Design</topic><topic>Prosthesis Implantation - adverse effects</topic><topic>Prosthesis Implantation - methods</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Al Muderis, Munjed</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khemka, Aditya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lord, Sarah J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van de Meent, Henk</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Frölke, Jan Paul M.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Al Muderis, Munjed</au><au>Khemka, Aditya</au><au>Lord, Sarah J.</au><au>Van de Meent, Henk</au><au>Frölke, Jan Paul M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Safety of Osseointegrated Implants for Transfemoral Amputees: A Two-Center Prospective Cohort Study</atitle><jtitle>Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume</jtitle><addtitle>J Bone Joint Surg Am</addtitle><date>2016-06-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>98</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>900</spage><epage>909</epage><pages>900-909</pages><issn>0021-9355</issn><eissn>1535-1386</eissn><abstract>Osseointegrated implants are an alternative for prosthetic attachment for individuals unable to wear a socket following an amputation. The concept of an integrated metal implant communicating with the external environment raises substantial concern about the risk of ascending infection. We report on the safety of press-fit osseointegrated implants currently used in Australia and the Netherlands.
We prospectively recorded all adverse events in all patients with transfemoral amputation who were managed with an osseointegration implant system between 2009 and 2013 at two centers. The procedure was performed in two stages. A customized porous-coated implant was placed in the first stage, and a stoma was created in the second. Adverse events were categorized according to type (infection or "other") and severity. Infections were classified according to four grades of severity based on clinical and radiographic findings: (1) low-grade soft-tissue infection, (2) high-grade soft-tissue infection, (3) bone infection, and (4) septic implant failure.
Eighty-six patients (ninety-one implants), twenty-five to eighty-one years of age, were included in the study and followed for a median of thirty-four months (range, twenty-four to seventy-one months). Thirty-one patients had an uneventful course with no complications; twenty-nine developed infection (all grade 1 or 2); and twenty-six did not develop infection but had one or more other complications requiring intervention, including stoma hypergranulation (seventeen patients), soft-tissue redundancy (fourteen), proximal femoral fracture (three), inadequate osseointegration leading to implant replacement (one), implant breakage (two), and breakage of the pin used as a fail-safe mechanism (twenty-five).
Mild infection and irritation of the soft tissue in the skin-penetration area are common in transfemoral amputees who have an osseointegrated implant. These complications were successfully managed with simple measures. Severe infections resulting in septic implant loosening are rare.
Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc</pub><pmid>27252434</pmid><doi>10.2106/JBJS.15.00808</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0021-9355 |
ispartof | Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume, 2016-06, Vol.98 (11), p.900-909 |
issn | 0021-9355 1535-1386 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1793910056 |
source | MEDLINE; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Adult Aged Aged, 80 and over Amputees Artificial Limbs - adverse effects Female Femur - surgery Humans Male Middle Aged Osseointegration Prosthesis Design Prosthesis Implantation - adverse effects Prosthesis Implantation - methods Treatment Outcome |
title | Safety of Osseointegrated Implants for Transfemoral Amputees: A Two-Center Prospective Cohort Study |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T15%3A47%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Safety%20of%20Osseointegrated%20Implants%20for%20Transfemoral%20Amputees:%20A%20Two-Center%20Prospective%20Cohort%20Study&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20bone%20and%20joint%20surgery.%20American%20volume&rft.au=Al%20Muderis,%20Munjed&rft.date=2016-06-01&rft.volume=98&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=900&rft.epage=909&rft.pages=900-909&rft.issn=0021-9355&rft.eissn=1535-1386&rft_id=info:doi/10.2106/JBJS.15.00808&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1793910056%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1793910056&rft_id=info:pmid/27252434&rfr_iscdi=true |