Accuracy in the digital workflow: From data acquisition to the digitally milled cast

Abstract Statement of problem The accuracy of digital impressions and the milling of implant crowns greatly influence the clinical outcome of implant restorations. Purpose The purpose of this in vitro study was to calculate the propagation of error in the process of milling an implant crown. Materia...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Journal of prosthetic dentistry 2016-06, Vol.115 (6), p.749-754
Hauptverfasser: Koch, George K, Gallucci, German O., DMD, Dr Med Dent, PhD, Lee, Sang J., DMD, MMSc
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 754
container_issue 6
container_start_page 749
container_title The Journal of prosthetic dentistry
container_volume 115
creator Koch, George K
Gallucci, German O., DMD, Dr Med Dent, PhD
Lee, Sang J., DMD, MMSc
description Abstract Statement of problem The accuracy of digital impressions and the milling of implant crowns greatly influence the clinical outcome of implant restorations. Purpose The purpose of this in vitro study was to calculate the propagation of error in the process of milling an implant crown. Material and methods Thirty digitally milled casts made directly from a reference model were prepared. The casts were scanned with a laboratory scanner, and 30 standard tesselation language (STL) datasets from each group were imported to inspection software. In each analysis, STL datasets were aligned by a repeated best fit algorithm, and 18 specified contact locations of interest were measured in mean volumetric deviations. The master reference dataset was aligned 30 times to the master reference dataset to determine the software variation. The reference datasets were aligned to the master reference dataset to determine the scanner variation. The milled cast datasets were aligned to the master reference dataset to determine the milling variation. The 18 specified contact locations of interest were pooled by cusps, occlusal ridge/fossae, interproximal contacts, facial/lingual aspect, and implant position. The pooled areas were statistically analyzed by comparing each group with the reference model to investigate the mean volumetric deviations accounting for accuracy and standard deviations for precision. Results Software and scanner variation were negligible. Variations in the milled models resulting from software and scanner error exhibited statistical significance ( P
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.12.004
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1793906606</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S002239131500685X</els_id><sourcerecordid>1793906606</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c489t-c122541715f28395c84679c24c5f89cbdc0fb5fdcc796aa4add2c5b4f1b516d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkcFu1DAQhi0EotvCK1Q-cknwOLETc0BUFaVIlTiwB26WM3bAWydu7aTVvj1ebYsQF05z-f5_NN8Qcg6sBgby_a6-SzFbNy81ZyBq4DVj7QuyAaa6SvYtvCQbxjivGgXNCTnNeccY60UHr8kJlz1roGs2ZHuBuCaDe-pnuvxy1PqffjGBPsZ0O4b4-IFepThRaxZDDd6vPvvFx8LGv_Gwp5MPwVmKJi9vyKvRhOzePs0zsr36vL28rm6-ffl6eXFTYdurpULgXLTQgRh53yiBfSs7hbxFMfYKB4tsHMRoETsljWmNtRzF0I4wCJC2OSPvjrVFxf3q8qInn9GFYGYX16yhU41iUjJZUHlEsVjLyY36LvnJpL0Gpg9C9U4_C9UHoRq4LkJL8PxpxzpMzv6JPRsswKcj4MqhD94lndG7GZ31yeGibfT_3_HxnwoMfvZowq3bu7yLa5qLRg06l4D-fnjr4asgGJO9-NH8BlproDM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1793906606</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Accuracy in the digital workflow: From data acquisition to the digitally milled cast</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Koch, George K ; Gallucci, German O., DMD, Dr Med Dent, PhD ; Lee, Sang J., DMD, MMSc</creator><creatorcontrib>Koch, George K ; Gallucci, German O., DMD, Dr Med Dent, PhD ; Lee, Sang J., DMD, MMSc</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Statement of problem The accuracy of digital impressions and the milling of implant crowns greatly influence the clinical outcome of implant restorations. Purpose The purpose of this in vitro study was to calculate the propagation of error in the process of milling an implant crown. Material and methods Thirty digitally milled casts made directly from a reference model were prepared. The casts were scanned with a laboratory scanner, and 30 standard tesselation language (STL) datasets from each group were imported to inspection software. In each analysis, STL datasets were aligned by a repeated best fit algorithm, and 18 specified contact locations of interest were measured in mean volumetric deviations. The master reference dataset was aligned 30 times to the master reference dataset to determine the software variation. The reference datasets were aligned to the master reference dataset to determine the scanner variation. The milled cast datasets were aligned to the master reference dataset to determine the milling variation. The 18 specified contact locations of interest were pooled by cusps, occlusal ridge/fossae, interproximal contacts, facial/lingual aspect, and implant position. The pooled areas were statistically analyzed by comparing each group with the reference model to investigate the mean volumetric deviations accounting for accuracy and standard deviations for precision. Results Software and scanner variation were negligible. Variations in the milled models resulting from software and scanner error exhibited statistical significance ( P &lt;.001). Software, scanner, and milling error were shown to propagate through the digital workflow to the milled model. Conclusions The pooled locations may describe the reliability of the milling process as it applies to specific anatomic locations on the tooth.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-3913</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-6841</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.12.004</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26803173</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Algorithms ; Computer-Aided Design ; Crowns ; Dental Casting Technique ; Dental Implants ; Dental Impression Technique ; Dental Prosthesis Design - methods ; Dentistry ; Humans ; Reproducibility of Results ; Software</subject><ispartof>The Journal of prosthetic dentistry, 2016-06, Vol.115 (6), p.749-754</ispartof><rights>Editorial Council for the Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry</rights><rights>2016 Editorial Council for the Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry</rights><rights>Copyright © 2016 Editorial Council for the Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c489t-c122541715f28395c84679c24c5f89cbdc0fb5fdcc796aa4add2c5b4f1b516d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c489t-c122541715f28395c84679c24c5f89cbdc0fb5fdcc796aa4add2c5b4f1b516d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S002239131500685X$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26803173$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Koch, George K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gallucci, German O., DMD, Dr Med Dent, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Sang J., DMD, MMSc</creatorcontrib><title>Accuracy in the digital workflow: From data acquisition to the digitally milled cast</title><title>The Journal of prosthetic dentistry</title><addtitle>J Prosthet Dent</addtitle><description>Abstract Statement of problem The accuracy of digital impressions and the milling of implant crowns greatly influence the clinical outcome of implant restorations. Purpose The purpose of this in vitro study was to calculate the propagation of error in the process of milling an implant crown. Material and methods Thirty digitally milled casts made directly from a reference model were prepared. The casts were scanned with a laboratory scanner, and 30 standard tesselation language (STL) datasets from each group were imported to inspection software. In each analysis, STL datasets were aligned by a repeated best fit algorithm, and 18 specified contact locations of interest were measured in mean volumetric deviations. The master reference dataset was aligned 30 times to the master reference dataset to determine the software variation. The reference datasets were aligned to the master reference dataset to determine the scanner variation. The milled cast datasets were aligned to the master reference dataset to determine the milling variation. The 18 specified contact locations of interest were pooled by cusps, occlusal ridge/fossae, interproximal contacts, facial/lingual aspect, and implant position. The pooled areas were statistically analyzed by comparing each group with the reference model to investigate the mean volumetric deviations accounting for accuracy and standard deviations for precision. Results Software and scanner variation were negligible. Variations in the milled models resulting from software and scanner error exhibited statistical significance ( P &lt;.001). Software, scanner, and milling error were shown to propagate through the digital workflow to the milled model. Conclusions The pooled locations may describe the reliability of the milling process as it applies to specific anatomic locations on the tooth.</description><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Computer-Aided Design</subject><subject>Crowns</subject><subject>Dental Casting Technique</subject><subject>Dental Implants</subject><subject>Dental Impression Technique</subject><subject>Dental Prosthesis Design - methods</subject><subject>Dentistry</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Software</subject><issn>0022-3913</issn><issn>1097-6841</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkcFu1DAQhi0EotvCK1Q-cknwOLETc0BUFaVIlTiwB26WM3bAWydu7aTVvj1ebYsQF05z-f5_NN8Qcg6sBgby_a6-SzFbNy81ZyBq4DVj7QuyAaa6SvYtvCQbxjivGgXNCTnNeccY60UHr8kJlz1roGs2ZHuBuCaDe-pnuvxy1PqffjGBPsZ0O4b4-IFepThRaxZDDd6vPvvFx8LGv_Gwp5MPwVmKJi9vyKvRhOzePs0zsr36vL28rm6-ffl6eXFTYdurpULgXLTQgRh53yiBfSs7hbxFMfYKB4tsHMRoETsljWmNtRzF0I4wCJC2OSPvjrVFxf3q8qInn9GFYGYX16yhU41iUjJZUHlEsVjLyY36LvnJpL0Gpg9C9U4_C9UHoRq4LkJL8PxpxzpMzv6JPRsswKcj4MqhD94lndG7GZ31yeGibfT_3_HxnwoMfvZowq3bu7yLa5qLRg06l4D-fnjr4asgGJO9-NH8BlproDM</recordid><startdate>20160601</startdate><enddate>20160601</enddate><creator>Koch, George K</creator><creator>Gallucci, German O., DMD, Dr Med Dent, PhD</creator><creator>Lee, Sang J., DMD, MMSc</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160601</creationdate><title>Accuracy in the digital workflow: From data acquisition to the digitally milled cast</title><author>Koch, George K ; Gallucci, German O., DMD, Dr Med Dent, PhD ; Lee, Sang J., DMD, MMSc</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c489t-c122541715f28395c84679c24c5f89cbdc0fb5fdcc796aa4add2c5b4f1b516d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Computer-Aided Design</topic><topic>Crowns</topic><topic>Dental Casting Technique</topic><topic>Dental Implants</topic><topic>Dental Impression Technique</topic><topic>Dental Prosthesis Design - methods</topic><topic>Dentistry</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Software</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Koch, George K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gallucci, German O., DMD, Dr Med Dent, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Sang J., DMD, MMSc</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The Journal of prosthetic dentistry</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Koch, George K</au><au>Gallucci, German O., DMD, Dr Med Dent, PhD</au><au>Lee, Sang J., DMD, MMSc</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Accuracy in the digital workflow: From data acquisition to the digitally milled cast</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of prosthetic dentistry</jtitle><addtitle>J Prosthet Dent</addtitle><date>2016-06-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>115</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>749</spage><epage>754</epage><pages>749-754</pages><issn>0022-3913</issn><eissn>1097-6841</eissn><abstract>Abstract Statement of problem The accuracy of digital impressions and the milling of implant crowns greatly influence the clinical outcome of implant restorations. Purpose The purpose of this in vitro study was to calculate the propagation of error in the process of milling an implant crown. Material and methods Thirty digitally milled casts made directly from a reference model were prepared. The casts were scanned with a laboratory scanner, and 30 standard tesselation language (STL) datasets from each group were imported to inspection software. In each analysis, STL datasets were aligned by a repeated best fit algorithm, and 18 specified contact locations of interest were measured in mean volumetric deviations. The master reference dataset was aligned 30 times to the master reference dataset to determine the software variation. The reference datasets were aligned to the master reference dataset to determine the scanner variation. The milled cast datasets were aligned to the master reference dataset to determine the milling variation. The 18 specified contact locations of interest were pooled by cusps, occlusal ridge/fossae, interproximal contacts, facial/lingual aspect, and implant position. The pooled areas were statistically analyzed by comparing each group with the reference model to investigate the mean volumetric deviations accounting for accuracy and standard deviations for precision. Results Software and scanner variation were negligible. Variations in the milled models resulting from software and scanner error exhibited statistical significance ( P &lt;.001). Software, scanner, and milling error were shown to propagate through the digital workflow to the milled model. Conclusions The pooled locations may describe the reliability of the milling process as it applies to specific anatomic locations on the tooth.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>26803173</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.12.004</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-3913
ispartof The Journal of prosthetic dentistry, 2016-06, Vol.115 (6), p.749-754
issn 0022-3913
1097-6841
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1793906606
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Algorithms
Computer-Aided Design
Crowns
Dental Casting Technique
Dental Implants
Dental Impression Technique
Dental Prosthesis Design - methods
Dentistry
Humans
Reproducibility of Results
Software
title Accuracy in the digital workflow: From data acquisition to the digitally milled cast
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-03T18%3A13%3A11IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Accuracy%20in%20the%20digital%20workflow:%20From%20data%20acquisition%20to%20the%20digitally%20milled%20cast&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20prosthetic%20dentistry&rft.au=Koch,%20George%20K&rft.date=2016-06-01&rft.volume=115&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=749&rft.epage=754&rft.pages=749-754&rft.issn=0022-3913&rft.eissn=1097-6841&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.12.004&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1793906606%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1793906606&rft_id=info:pmid/26803173&rft_els_id=S002239131500685X&rfr_iscdi=true