Long-Term Evaluation of Biotronik Linox and Linox(smart) Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator Leads

Expert consensus holds that post-market, systematic surveillance of ICD leads is essential to ensure confirmation of adequate lead performance. GALAXY (NCT00836589) and CELESTIAL (NCT00810264) are ongoing multicenter, prospective, non-randomized registries conducted to confirm the long-term safety a...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology 2016-06, Vol.27 (6), p.735-742
Hauptverfasser: Good, Eric D, Cakulev, Ivan, Orlov, Michael V, Hirsh, David, Simeles, John, Mohr, Kelly, Moll, Phil, Bloom, Heather
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 742
container_issue 6
container_start_page 735
container_title Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology
container_volume 27
creator Good, Eric D
Cakulev, Ivan
Orlov, Michael V
Hirsh, David
Simeles, John
Mohr, Kelly
Moll, Phil
Bloom, Heather
description Expert consensus holds that post-market, systematic surveillance of ICD leads is essential to ensure confirmation of adequate lead performance. GALAXY (NCT00836589) and CELESTIAL (NCT00810264) are ongoing multicenter, prospective, non-randomized registries conducted to confirm the long-term safety and reliability of Biotronik leads. ICD and CRT-D patients are followed for Linox and Linox(smart) ICD lead performance and safety for 5 years post-implant. All procedural and system-related adverse events (AEs) were assessed at each follow-up, along with lead electrical parameters. An independent CEC of EPs adjudicated AEs to determine AE category and lead relatedness. The analysis used categories of lead observations per ISO 5841-2 (Third edition). A total of 3,933 leads were implanted in 3,840 patients (73.0% male, mean age 67.0 ± 12.2 years) at 146 US centers. The estimated cumulative survival probability was 96.3% at 5 years after implant for Linox leads and 96.6% at 4 years after implant for Linox(smart) leads. A comparison of the Linox and Linox(smart) survival functions did not find evidence of a difference (P = 0.2155). The most common AEs were oversensing (23, 0.58%), conductor fracture (14, 0.36%), failure to capture (13, 0.33%), lead dislodgement (12, 0.31%), insulation breach (10, 0.25%), and abnormal pacing impedance (8, 0.20%). Linox and Linox(smart) ICD leads are safe, reliable and infrequently associated with lead-related AEs. Additionally, estimated cumulative survival probability is clinically acceptable and well within industry standards. Ongoing data collection will confirm the longer-term safety and performance of the Linox family of ICD leads.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/jce.12971
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1793906601</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1793906601</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p211t-a7258a0fe73c33a29aaa0f7d98118ecd232bc52b0e9e6e617bc1c083d72319fd3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo1ULFOwzAUtJAQLYWBH0Aey5DiZ5M4HqEUqBSJpcyRE78glyQOtlPB3xOp5Za7k06n946QG2ArmHC_r3EFXEk4I3NIH1iSQyZn5DKEPWMgMpZekBnPlGIppHOChes_kx36jm4Ouh11tK6nrqFP1kXvevtFC9u7H6p7c1TL0Gkf7-i2G1rdR121SNfaG-sO6CN6-oyNrbxtWx2dpwVqE67IeaPbgNcnXpCPl81u_ZYU76_b9WORDBwgJlryNNesQSlqITRXWk9OGpUD5FgbLnhVp7xiqDDDDGRVQ81yYSQXoBojFmR57B28-x4xxLKzocbplB7dGEqQSiiWZdMQC3J7io5Vh6YcvJ3--i3_pxF_RVFjvQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1793906601</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Long-Term Evaluation of Biotronik Linox and Linox(smart) Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator Leads</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Good, Eric D ; Cakulev, Ivan ; Orlov, Michael V ; Hirsh, David ; Simeles, John ; Mohr, Kelly ; Moll, Phil ; Bloom, Heather</creator><creatorcontrib>Good, Eric D ; Cakulev, Ivan ; Orlov, Michael V ; Hirsh, David ; Simeles, John ; Mohr, Kelly ; Moll, Phil ; Bloom, Heather</creatorcontrib><description>Expert consensus holds that post-market, systematic surveillance of ICD leads is essential to ensure confirmation of adequate lead performance. GALAXY (NCT00836589) and CELESTIAL (NCT00810264) are ongoing multicenter, prospective, non-randomized registries conducted to confirm the long-term safety and reliability of Biotronik leads. ICD and CRT-D patients are followed for Linox and Linox(smart) ICD lead performance and safety for 5 years post-implant. All procedural and system-related adverse events (AEs) were assessed at each follow-up, along with lead electrical parameters. An independent CEC of EPs adjudicated AEs to determine AE category and lead relatedness. The analysis used categories of lead observations per ISO 5841-2 (Third edition). A total of 3,933 leads were implanted in 3,840 patients (73.0% male, mean age 67.0 ± 12.2 years) at 146 US centers. The estimated cumulative survival probability was 96.3% at 5 years after implant for Linox leads and 96.6% at 4 years after implant for Linox(smart) leads. A comparison of the Linox and Linox(smart) survival functions did not find evidence of a difference (P = 0.2155). The most common AEs were oversensing (23, 0.58%), conductor fracture (14, 0.36%), failure to capture (13, 0.33%), lead dislodgement (12, 0.31%), insulation breach (10, 0.25%), and abnormal pacing impedance (8, 0.20%). Linox and Linox(smart) ICD leads are safe, reliable and infrequently associated with lead-related AEs. Additionally, estimated cumulative survival probability is clinically acceptable and well within industry standards. Ongoing data collection will confirm the longer-term safety and performance of the Linox family of ICD leads.</description><identifier>EISSN: 1540-8167</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/jce.12971</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26990515</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><subject>Aged ; Arrhythmias, Cardiac - diagnosis ; Arrhythmias, Cardiac - physiopathology ; Arrhythmias, Cardiac - therapy ; Defibrillators, Implantable ; Electric Countershock - adverse effects ; Electric Countershock - instrumentation ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Prospective Studies ; Prosthesis Design ; Prosthesis Failure ; Registries ; Stroke Volume ; Time Factors ; Treatment Outcome ; United States ; Ventricular Function, Left</subject><ispartof>Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology, 2016-06, Vol.27 (6), p.735-742</ispartof><rights>2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26990515$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Good, Eric D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cakulev, Ivan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Orlov, Michael V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hirsh, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Simeles, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mohr, Kelly</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moll, Phil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bloom, Heather</creatorcontrib><title>Long-Term Evaluation of Biotronik Linox and Linox(smart) Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator Leads</title><title>Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology</title><addtitle>J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol</addtitle><description>Expert consensus holds that post-market, systematic surveillance of ICD leads is essential to ensure confirmation of adequate lead performance. GALAXY (NCT00836589) and CELESTIAL (NCT00810264) are ongoing multicenter, prospective, non-randomized registries conducted to confirm the long-term safety and reliability of Biotronik leads. ICD and CRT-D patients are followed for Linox and Linox(smart) ICD lead performance and safety for 5 years post-implant. All procedural and system-related adverse events (AEs) were assessed at each follow-up, along with lead electrical parameters. An independent CEC of EPs adjudicated AEs to determine AE category and lead relatedness. The analysis used categories of lead observations per ISO 5841-2 (Third edition). A total of 3,933 leads were implanted in 3,840 patients (73.0% male, mean age 67.0 ± 12.2 years) at 146 US centers. The estimated cumulative survival probability was 96.3% at 5 years after implant for Linox leads and 96.6% at 4 years after implant for Linox(smart) leads. A comparison of the Linox and Linox(smart) survival functions did not find evidence of a difference (P = 0.2155). The most common AEs were oversensing (23, 0.58%), conductor fracture (14, 0.36%), failure to capture (13, 0.33%), lead dislodgement (12, 0.31%), insulation breach (10, 0.25%), and abnormal pacing impedance (8, 0.20%). Linox and Linox(smart) ICD leads are safe, reliable and infrequently associated with lead-related AEs. Additionally, estimated cumulative survival probability is clinically acceptable and well within industry standards. Ongoing data collection will confirm the longer-term safety and performance of the Linox family of ICD leads.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Arrhythmias, Cardiac - diagnosis</subject><subject>Arrhythmias, Cardiac - physiopathology</subject><subject>Arrhythmias, Cardiac - therapy</subject><subject>Defibrillators, Implantable</subject><subject>Electric Countershock - adverse effects</subject><subject>Electric Countershock - instrumentation</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Prosthesis Design</subject><subject>Prosthesis Failure</subject><subject>Registries</subject><subject>Stroke Volume</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>United States</subject><subject>Ventricular Function, Left</subject><issn>1540-8167</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNo1ULFOwzAUtJAQLYWBH0Aey5DiZ5M4HqEUqBSJpcyRE78glyQOtlPB3xOp5Za7k06n946QG2ArmHC_r3EFXEk4I3NIH1iSQyZn5DKEPWMgMpZekBnPlGIppHOChes_kx36jm4Ouh11tK6nrqFP1kXvevtFC9u7H6p7c1TL0Gkf7-i2G1rdR121SNfaG-sO6CN6-oyNrbxtWx2dpwVqE67IeaPbgNcnXpCPl81u_ZYU76_b9WORDBwgJlryNNesQSlqITRXWk9OGpUD5FgbLnhVp7xiqDDDDGRVQ81yYSQXoBojFmR57B28-x4xxLKzocbplB7dGEqQSiiWZdMQC3J7io5Vh6YcvJ3--i3_pxF_RVFjvQ</recordid><startdate>201606</startdate><enddate>201606</enddate><creator>Good, Eric D</creator><creator>Cakulev, Ivan</creator><creator>Orlov, Michael V</creator><creator>Hirsh, David</creator><creator>Simeles, John</creator><creator>Mohr, Kelly</creator><creator>Moll, Phil</creator><creator>Bloom, Heather</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201606</creationdate><title>Long-Term Evaluation of Biotronik Linox and Linox(smart) Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator Leads</title><author>Good, Eric D ; Cakulev, Ivan ; Orlov, Michael V ; Hirsh, David ; Simeles, John ; Mohr, Kelly ; Moll, Phil ; Bloom, Heather</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p211t-a7258a0fe73c33a29aaa0f7d98118ecd232bc52b0e9e6e617bc1c083d72319fd3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Arrhythmias, Cardiac - diagnosis</topic><topic>Arrhythmias, Cardiac - physiopathology</topic><topic>Arrhythmias, Cardiac - therapy</topic><topic>Defibrillators, Implantable</topic><topic>Electric Countershock - adverse effects</topic><topic>Electric Countershock - instrumentation</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Prosthesis Design</topic><topic>Prosthesis Failure</topic><topic>Registries</topic><topic>Stroke Volume</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>United States</topic><topic>Ventricular Function, Left</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Good, Eric D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cakulev, Ivan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Orlov, Michael V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hirsh, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Simeles, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mohr, Kelly</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moll, Phil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bloom, Heather</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Good, Eric D</au><au>Cakulev, Ivan</au><au>Orlov, Michael V</au><au>Hirsh, David</au><au>Simeles, John</au><au>Mohr, Kelly</au><au>Moll, Phil</au><au>Bloom, Heather</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Long-Term Evaluation of Biotronik Linox and Linox(smart) Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator Leads</atitle><jtitle>Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology</jtitle><addtitle>J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol</addtitle><date>2016-06</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>27</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>735</spage><epage>742</epage><pages>735-742</pages><eissn>1540-8167</eissn><abstract>Expert consensus holds that post-market, systematic surveillance of ICD leads is essential to ensure confirmation of adequate lead performance. GALAXY (NCT00836589) and CELESTIAL (NCT00810264) are ongoing multicenter, prospective, non-randomized registries conducted to confirm the long-term safety and reliability of Biotronik leads. ICD and CRT-D patients are followed for Linox and Linox(smart) ICD lead performance and safety for 5 years post-implant. All procedural and system-related adverse events (AEs) were assessed at each follow-up, along with lead electrical parameters. An independent CEC of EPs adjudicated AEs to determine AE category and lead relatedness. The analysis used categories of lead observations per ISO 5841-2 (Third edition). A total of 3,933 leads were implanted in 3,840 patients (73.0% male, mean age 67.0 ± 12.2 years) at 146 US centers. The estimated cumulative survival probability was 96.3% at 5 years after implant for Linox leads and 96.6% at 4 years after implant for Linox(smart) leads. A comparison of the Linox and Linox(smart) survival functions did not find evidence of a difference (P = 0.2155). The most common AEs were oversensing (23, 0.58%), conductor fracture (14, 0.36%), failure to capture (13, 0.33%), lead dislodgement (12, 0.31%), insulation breach (10, 0.25%), and abnormal pacing impedance (8, 0.20%). Linox and Linox(smart) ICD leads are safe, reliable and infrequently associated with lead-related AEs. Additionally, estimated cumulative survival probability is clinically acceptable and well within industry standards. Ongoing data collection will confirm the longer-term safety and performance of the Linox family of ICD leads.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pmid>26990515</pmid><doi>10.1111/jce.12971</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier EISSN: 1540-8167
ispartof Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology, 2016-06, Vol.27 (6), p.735-742
issn 1540-8167
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1793906601
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Aged
Arrhythmias, Cardiac - diagnosis
Arrhythmias, Cardiac - physiopathology
Arrhythmias, Cardiac - therapy
Defibrillators, Implantable
Electric Countershock - adverse effects
Electric Countershock - instrumentation
Female
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Prospective Studies
Prosthesis Design
Prosthesis Failure
Registries
Stroke Volume
Time Factors
Treatment Outcome
United States
Ventricular Function, Left
title Long-Term Evaluation of Biotronik Linox and Linox(smart) Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator Leads
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T09%3A53%3A28IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Long-Term%20Evaluation%20of%20Biotronik%20Linox%20and%20Linox(smart)%20Implantable%20Cardioverter%20Defibrillator%20Leads&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20cardiovascular%20electrophysiology&rft.au=Good,%20Eric%20D&rft.date=2016-06&rft.volume=27&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=735&rft.epage=742&rft.pages=735-742&rft.eissn=1540-8167&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/jce.12971&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1793906601%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1793906601&rft_id=info:pmid/26990515&rfr_iscdi=true