Clinical evaluation of different desensitizing agents in home-bleaching gels

Abstract Statement of problem The influence of different compositions of desensitizing agents in whitening gels should be evaluated. Purpose The purpose of this clinical trial was to compare the effectiveness of 4 carbamide peroxide (CP)-based bleaching gels containing desensitizing agents regarding...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Journal of prosthetic dentistry 2016-06, Vol.115 (6), p.692-696
Hauptverfasser: Bernardon, Jussara Karina, DDS, MSD, PhD, Vieira Martins, Marceli, DDS, MSD, Branco Rauber, Gabrielle, DDS, MSD, Monteiro Junior, Sylvio, DDS, MSD, PhD, Baratieri, Luiz Narciso, DDS, MSD, PhD
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 696
container_issue 6
container_start_page 692
container_title The Journal of prosthetic dentistry
container_volume 115
creator Bernardon, Jussara Karina, DDS, MSD, PhD
Vieira Martins, Marceli, DDS, MSD
Branco Rauber, Gabrielle, DDS, MSD
Monteiro Junior, Sylvio, DDS, MSD, PhD
Baratieri, Luiz Narciso, DDS, MSD, PhD
description Abstract Statement of problem The influence of different compositions of desensitizing agents in whitening gels should be evaluated. Purpose The purpose of this clinical trial was to compare the effectiveness of 4 carbamide peroxide (CP)-based bleaching gels containing desensitizing agents regarding the degree of bleaching, tooth sensitivity, degree of participant satisfaction, and gingival irritation. Material and methods The maxillary arch of the 50 participants was bleached using a split mouth, home-bleaching technique. The participants were divided into 2 groups: G1, 10% CP (Opalescence PF; Ultradent Products, Inc) (right) and 10% CP (Power Bleaching 10%; BM4) (left); and G2, 15% CP (Opalescence PF) (right) and 16% CP (Power Bleaching 16%) (left). Each gel was used in a 2-hour daily regimen for 45 days. The shade of the 6 maxillary anterior teeth was recorded with a shade guide and spectrophotometer at baseline, and after 15, 30, 45, and 180 days of treatment. Statistical differences were analyzed with ANOVA for repeated measures followed by the Bonferroni and Student t tests (α=.05). Tooth sensitivity was evaluated with a visual analog scale (rated on a 0 to 10 scale). Participant satisfaction was evaluated by using participant reports of their personal satisfaction or dissatisfaction with the shade. Gingival irritation was evaluated using the Löe index scores. Results Color change was found to be statistically significant for all treatment periods evaluated, both by the objective and the subjective analyses, regardless of the composition and the concentration of the bleaching agent ( P
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.10.020
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1793904247</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S0022391315006289</els_id><sourcerecordid>1793904247</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c423t-3c40c9fe5fd6e1fcdaba21527cd7e2501605276f50da5f25fbae0173c39f46653</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkTFv2zAQhYmiRe04-QuGxi5yjqRIWkvQwmibAAYytJ0JmjzadGTKFaUAya8vBdsdsmQi-O7dHe57hMwpLChQebtfHLs2OYz9ggEVWVwAgw9kSqFWpVxW9COZAjBW8pryCblKaQ8AS6HoZzJhUtWVgmpK1qsmxGBNU-CzaQbThzYWrS9c8B67PL5wmDCm0IfXELeF2WYtFSEWu_aA5aZBY3djYYtNuiafvGkS3pzfGfnz4_vv1X25fvz5sPq2Lm3FeF9yW4GtPQrvJFJvndkYRgVT1ilkIp8H-SO9AGeEZ8JvDAJV3PLaV1IKPiNfTnMzg78Dpl4fQrLYNCZiOyRNVc1rqFilslWerDbjSh16fezCwXQvmoIeSeq9vpDUI8lRzyRz4_y8Y9gc0P1vu6DLhq8nQz4cnwN2OtmA0aILHdpeuza8v-PuzQh7TuMJXzDt26GLmaOmOjEN-teY5xgnFQCSLWv-DzChncs</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1793904247</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Clinical evaluation of different desensitizing agents in home-bleaching gels</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Bernardon, Jussara Karina, DDS, MSD, PhD ; Vieira Martins, Marceli, DDS, MSD ; Branco Rauber, Gabrielle, DDS, MSD ; Monteiro Junior, Sylvio, DDS, MSD, PhD ; Baratieri, Luiz Narciso, DDS, MSD, PhD</creator><creatorcontrib>Bernardon, Jussara Karina, DDS, MSD, PhD ; Vieira Martins, Marceli, DDS, MSD ; Branco Rauber, Gabrielle, DDS, MSD ; Monteiro Junior, Sylvio, DDS, MSD, PhD ; Baratieri, Luiz Narciso, DDS, MSD, PhD</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Statement of problem The influence of different compositions of desensitizing agents in whitening gels should be evaluated. Purpose The purpose of this clinical trial was to compare the effectiveness of 4 carbamide peroxide (CP)-based bleaching gels containing desensitizing agents regarding the degree of bleaching, tooth sensitivity, degree of participant satisfaction, and gingival irritation. Material and methods The maxillary arch of the 50 participants was bleached using a split mouth, home-bleaching technique. The participants were divided into 2 groups: G1, 10% CP (Opalescence PF; Ultradent Products, Inc) (right) and 10% CP (Power Bleaching 10%; BM4) (left); and G2, 15% CP (Opalescence PF) (right) and 16% CP (Power Bleaching 16%) (left). Each gel was used in a 2-hour daily regimen for 45 days. The shade of the 6 maxillary anterior teeth was recorded with a shade guide and spectrophotometer at baseline, and after 15, 30, 45, and 180 days of treatment. Statistical differences were analyzed with ANOVA for repeated measures followed by the Bonferroni and Student t tests (α=.05). Tooth sensitivity was evaluated with a visual analog scale (rated on a 0 to 10 scale). Participant satisfaction was evaluated by using participant reports of their personal satisfaction or dissatisfaction with the shade. Gingival irritation was evaluated using the Löe index scores. Results Color change was found to be statistically significant for all treatment periods evaluated, both by the objective and the subjective analyses, regardless of the composition and the concentration of the bleaching agent ( P &lt;.001). After 45 days, all participants were satisfied with the shade obtained. No clinically diagnosed gingival irritation was noted. Neither of the 10% CP products caused sensitivity during treatment, and 16% CP containing 3% potassium oxalate showed lower sensitivity than 15% CP containing potassium nitrate. Conclusion The association of 3% potassium oxalate with fluoride was effective in reducing tooth sensitivity during and after bleaching, particularly with the 16% CP product, and did not compromise the effectiveness of treatment.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-3913</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-6841</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.10.020</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26794704</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Dentin Sensitivity - prevention &amp; control ; Dentistry ; Drug Combinations ; Gingiva - drug effects ; Humans ; Patient Satisfaction ; Peroxides - adverse effects ; Peroxides - therapeutic use ; Polyvinyls - adverse effects ; Polyvinyls - therapeutic use ; Self Care - methods ; Tooth Bleaching - adverse effects ; Tooth Bleaching - methods ; Tooth Bleaching Agents - adverse effects ; Tooth Bleaching Agents - therapeutic use ; Urea - adverse effects ; Urea - analogs &amp; derivatives ; Urea - therapeutic use ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>The Journal of prosthetic dentistry, 2016-06, Vol.115 (6), p.692-696</ispartof><rights>Editorial Council for the Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry</rights><rights>2016 Editorial Council for the Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry</rights><rights>Copyright © 2016 Editorial Council for the Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c423t-3c40c9fe5fd6e1fcdaba21527cd7e2501605276f50da5f25fbae0173c39f46653</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c423t-3c40c9fe5fd6e1fcdaba21527cd7e2501605276f50da5f25fbae0173c39f46653</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.10.020$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,3537,27905,27906,45976</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26794704$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bernardon, Jussara Karina, DDS, MSD, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vieira Martins, Marceli, DDS, MSD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Branco Rauber, Gabrielle, DDS, MSD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Monteiro Junior, Sylvio, DDS, MSD, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baratieri, Luiz Narciso, DDS, MSD, PhD</creatorcontrib><title>Clinical evaluation of different desensitizing agents in home-bleaching gels</title><title>The Journal of prosthetic dentistry</title><addtitle>J Prosthet Dent</addtitle><description>Abstract Statement of problem The influence of different compositions of desensitizing agents in whitening gels should be evaluated. Purpose The purpose of this clinical trial was to compare the effectiveness of 4 carbamide peroxide (CP)-based bleaching gels containing desensitizing agents regarding the degree of bleaching, tooth sensitivity, degree of participant satisfaction, and gingival irritation. Material and methods The maxillary arch of the 50 participants was bleached using a split mouth, home-bleaching technique. The participants were divided into 2 groups: G1, 10% CP (Opalescence PF; Ultradent Products, Inc) (right) and 10% CP (Power Bleaching 10%; BM4) (left); and G2, 15% CP (Opalescence PF) (right) and 16% CP (Power Bleaching 16%) (left). Each gel was used in a 2-hour daily regimen for 45 days. The shade of the 6 maxillary anterior teeth was recorded with a shade guide and spectrophotometer at baseline, and after 15, 30, 45, and 180 days of treatment. Statistical differences were analyzed with ANOVA for repeated measures followed by the Bonferroni and Student t tests (α=.05). Tooth sensitivity was evaluated with a visual analog scale (rated on a 0 to 10 scale). Participant satisfaction was evaluated by using participant reports of their personal satisfaction or dissatisfaction with the shade. Gingival irritation was evaluated using the Löe index scores. Results Color change was found to be statistically significant for all treatment periods evaluated, both by the objective and the subjective analyses, regardless of the composition and the concentration of the bleaching agent ( P &lt;.001). After 45 days, all participants were satisfied with the shade obtained. No clinically diagnosed gingival irritation was noted. Neither of the 10% CP products caused sensitivity during treatment, and 16% CP containing 3% potassium oxalate showed lower sensitivity than 15% CP containing potassium nitrate. Conclusion The association of 3% potassium oxalate with fluoride was effective in reducing tooth sensitivity during and after bleaching, particularly with the 16% CP product, and did not compromise the effectiveness of treatment.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Dentin Sensitivity - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Dentistry</subject><subject>Drug Combinations</subject><subject>Gingiva - drug effects</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Patient Satisfaction</subject><subject>Peroxides - adverse effects</subject><subject>Peroxides - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Polyvinyls - adverse effects</subject><subject>Polyvinyls - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Self Care - methods</subject><subject>Tooth Bleaching - adverse effects</subject><subject>Tooth Bleaching - methods</subject><subject>Tooth Bleaching Agents - adverse effects</subject><subject>Tooth Bleaching Agents - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Urea - adverse effects</subject><subject>Urea - analogs &amp; derivatives</subject><subject>Urea - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0022-3913</issn><issn>1097-6841</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkTFv2zAQhYmiRe04-QuGxi5yjqRIWkvQwmibAAYytJ0JmjzadGTKFaUAya8vBdsdsmQi-O7dHe57hMwpLChQebtfHLs2OYz9ggEVWVwAgw9kSqFWpVxW9COZAjBW8pryCblKaQ8AS6HoZzJhUtWVgmpK1qsmxGBNU-CzaQbThzYWrS9c8B67PL5wmDCm0IfXELeF2WYtFSEWu_aA5aZBY3djYYtNuiafvGkS3pzfGfnz4_vv1X25fvz5sPq2Lm3FeF9yW4GtPQrvJFJvndkYRgVT1ilkIp8H-SO9AGeEZ8JvDAJV3PLaV1IKPiNfTnMzg78Dpl4fQrLYNCZiOyRNVc1rqFilslWerDbjSh16fezCwXQvmoIeSeq9vpDUI8lRzyRz4_y8Y9gc0P1vu6DLhq8nQz4cnwN2OtmA0aILHdpeuza8v-PuzQh7TuMJXzDt26GLmaOmOjEN-teY5xgnFQCSLWv-DzChncs</recordid><startdate>20160601</startdate><enddate>20160601</enddate><creator>Bernardon, Jussara Karina, DDS, MSD, PhD</creator><creator>Vieira Martins, Marceli, DDS, MSD</creator><creator>Branco Rauber, Gabrielle, DDS, MSD</creator><creator>Monteiro Junior, Sylvio, DDS, MSD, PhD</creator><creator>Baratieri, Luiz Narciso, DDS, MSD, PhD</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160601</creationdate><title>Clinical evaluation of different desensitizing agents in home-bleaching gels</title><author>Bernardon, Jussara Karina, DDS, MSD, PhD ; Vieira Martins, Marceli, DDS, MSD ; Branco Rauber, Gabrielle, DDS, MSD ; Monteiro Junior, Sylvio, DDS, MSD, PhD ; Baratieri, Luiz Narciso, DDS, MSD, PhD</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c423t-3c40c9fe5fd6e1fcdaba21527cd7e2501605276f50da5f25fbae0173c39f46653</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Dentin Sensitivity - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Dentistry</topic><topic>Drug Combinations</topic><topic>Gingiva - drug effects</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Patient Satisfaction</topic><topic>Peroxides - adverse effects</topic><topic>Peroxides - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Polyvinyls - adverse effects</topic><topic>Polyvinyls - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Self Care - methods</topic><topic>Tooth Bleaching - adverse effects</topic><topic>Tooth Bleaching - methods</topic><topic>Tooth Bleaching Agents - adverse effects</topic><topic>Tooth Bleaching Agents - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Urea - adverse effects</topic><topic>Urea - analogs &amp; derivatives</topic><topic>Urea - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bernardon, Jussara Karina, DDS, MSD, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vieira Martins, Marceli, DDS, MSD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Branco Rauber, Gabrielle, DDS, MSD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Monteiro Junior, Sylvio, DDS, MSD, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baratieri, Luiz Narciso, DDS, MSD, PhD</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The Journal of prosthetic dentistry</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bernardon, Jussara Karina, DDS, MSD, PhD</au><au>Vieira Martins, Marceli, DDS, MSD</au><au>Branco Rauber, Gabrielle, DDS, MSD</au><au>Monteiro Junior, Sylvio, DDS, MSD, PhD</au><au>Baratieri, Luiz Narciso, DDS, MSD, PhD</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Clinical evaluation of different desensitizing agents in home-bleaching gels</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of prosthetic dentistry</jtitle><addtitle>J Prosthet Dent</addtitle><date>2016-06-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>115</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>692</spage><epage>696</epage><pages>692-696</pages><issn>0022-3913</issn><eissn>1097-6841</eissn><abstract>Abstract Statement of problem The influence of different compositions of desensitizing agents in whitening gels should be evaluated. Purpose The purpose of this clinical trial was to compare the effectiveness of 4 carbamide peroxide (CP)-based bleaching gels containing desensitizing agents regarding the degree of bleaching, tooth sensitivity, degree of participant satisfaction, and gingival irritation. Material and methods The maxillary arch of the 50 participants was bleached using a split mouth, home-bleaching technique. The participants were divided into 2 groups: G1, 10% CP (Opalescence PF; Ultradent Products, Inc) (right) and 10% CP (Power Bleaching 10%; BM4) (left); and G2, 15% CP (Opalescence PF) (right) and 16% CP (Power Bleaching 16%) (left). Each gel was used in a 2-hour daily regimen for 45 days. The shade of the 6 maxillary anterior teeth was recorded with a shade guide and spectrophotometer at baseline, and after 15, 30, 45, and 180 days of treatment. Statistical differences were analyzed with ANOVA for repeated measures followed by the Bonferroni and Student t tests (α=.05). Tooth sensitivity was evaluated with a visual analog scale (rated on a 0 to 10 scale). Participant satisfaction was evaluated by using participant reports of their personal satisfaction or dissatisfaction with the shade. Gingival irritation was evaluated using the Löe index scores. Results Color change was found to be statistically significant for all treatment periods evaluated, both by the objective and the subjective analyses, regardless of the composition and the concentration of the bleaching agent ( P &lt;.001). After 45 days, all participants were satisfied with the shade obtained. No clinically diagnosed gingival irritation was noted. Neither of the 10% CP products caused sensitivity during treatment, and 16% CP containing 3% potassium oxalate showed lower sensitivity than 15% CP containing potassium nitrate. Conclusion The association of 3% potassium oxalate with fluoride was effective in reducing tooth sensitivity during and after bleaching, particularly with the 16% CP product, and did not compromise the effectiveness of treatment.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>26794704</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.10.020</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-3913
ispartof The Journal of prosthetic dentistry, 2016-06, Vol.115 (6), p.692-696
issn 0022-3913
1097-6841
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1793904247
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Adult
Dentin Sensitivity - prevention & control
Dentistry
Drug Combinations
Gingiva - drug effects
Humans
Patient Satisfaction
Peroxides - adverse effects
Peroxides - therapeutic use
Polyvinyls - adverse effects
Polyvinyls - therapeutic use
Self Care - methods
Tooth Bleaching - adverse effects
Tooth Bleaching - methods
Tooth Bleaching Agents - adverse effects
Tooth Bleaching Agents - therapeutic use
Urea - adverse effects
Urea - analogs & derivatives
Urea - therapeutic use
Young Adult
title Clinical evaluation of different desensitizing agents in home-bleaching gels
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-17T16%3A15%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Clinical%20evaluation%20of%20different%20desensitizing%20agents%20in%20home-bleaching%20gels&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20prosthetic%20dentistry&rft.au=Bernardon,%20Jussara%20Karina,%20DDS,%20MSD,%20PhD&rft.date=2016-06-01&rft.volume=115&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=692&rft.epage=696&rft.pages=692-696&rft.issn=0022-3913&rft.eissn=1097-6841&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.10.020&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1793904247%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1793904247&rft_id=info:pmid/26794704&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S0022391315006289&rfr_iscdi=true