Waikato Teledermatology: a pilot project for improving access in New Zealand
Introduction Teledermatology can improve access to specialist dermatological advice. We describe a retrospective review of the first 12 months of Waikato Teledermatology (WT), a low-cost, secure, website-based, store-and-forward teledermatology network using the Collegium Telemedicus platform. Metho...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of telemedicine and telecare 2015-10, Vol.21 (7), p.414-419 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 419 |
---|---|
container_issue | 7 |
container_start_page | 414 |
container_title | Journal of telemedicine and telecare |
container_volume | 21 |
creator | McGoey, Suzanne T Oakley, Amanda Rademaker, Marius |
description | Introduction
Teledermatology can improve access to specialist dermatological advice. We describe a retrospective review of the first 12 months of Waikato Teledermatology (WT), a low-cost, secure, website-based, store-and-forward teledermatology network using the Collegium Telemedicus platform.
Methods
We determined specialist response time, referral metrics, patient diagnosis and progress reports from the network’s database. The programme’s value was evaluated by post-pilot online surveys of referrers and specialist dermatologists.
Results
WT was used by 31 referring doctors for 309 consultations with four dermatologists between July 2013 and June 2014. Mean and median specialist response time was 2.07 hours (range: 0.13–5.64 hours). The researchers categorized the referrals as tumours (56.8%) and rashes (43.2%), including inflammatory dermatoses (51.9%), infection (18.1%), uncertain (16.5%), miscellaneous (7.5%), and of environmental origin (6%). Thirty tumours were biopsied, including nine melanomas and three basal cell carcinomas. A total of 158 progress reports and 35 survey responses were received. Reported advantages included decreased delay, improved accuracy of diagnosis and treatment compared to that made without specialist input, decreased unnecessary procedures such as biopsies of undiagnosed conditions, and increased appropriate referrals for face-to-face assessment, thus leading to cost savings for the patient and the health care system. The major disadvantages were the time burden for clinicians to complete consultations, the lack of integration with the patients’ usual electronic medical record and absence of funding.
Discussion
WT proved an effective and acceptable approach to improving patient access to dermatologic services. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/1357633X15583216 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1793293698</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_1357633X15583216</sage_id><sourcerecordid>1793293698</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c398t-feaecd73603ac0a02e35628d25c4afbe9e45dd7639c6366982c44587c204fa4b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkc1LAzEQxYMotlbvniTgxctqvjfxJsUvKHqpKF6WNDtbtu42dbOr9L83pVWhIHjKhPm9N28YhI4pOac0TS8ol6ni_IVKqTmjagf1aSp1Qikxu7GO7WTV76GDEGaEMCqk2Uc9pgjnWog-Gj3b8s22Ho-hghyaOtaVny4vscWLsvItXjR-Bq7FhW9wWcffRzmfYuschIDLOX6AT_wKtrLz_BDtFbYKcLR5B-jp5no8vEtGj7f3w6tR4rjRbVKABZenPIawjljCgEvFdM6kE7aYgAEh8zwuZpziShnNnBBSp44RUVgx4QN0tvaNad47CG1Wl8FBFTOA70JGU8OZ4VH5D5RyI6mO-ACdbqEz3zXzuEjGGCGGcaVppMiaco0PoYEiWzRlbZtlRkm2Okq2fZQoOdkYd5Ma8h_B9xUikKyBYKfwO_VPwy_4LJKF</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2200923681</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Waikato Teledermatology: a pilot project for improving access in New Zealand</title><source>SAGE Complete A-Z List</source><source>MEDLINE</source><creator>McGoey, Suzanne T ; Oakley, Amanda ; Rademaker, Marius</creator><creatorcontrib>McGoey, Suzanne T ; Oakley, Amanda ; Rademaker, Marius</creatorcontrib><description>Introduction
Teledermatology can improve access to specialist dermatological advice. We describe a retrospective review of the first 12 months of Waikato Teledermatology (WT), a low-cost, secure, website-based, store-and-forward teledermatology network using the Collegium Telemedicus platform.
Methods
We determined specialist response time, referral metrics, patient diagnosis and progress reports from the network’s database. The programme’s value was evaluated by post-pilot online surveys of referrers and specialist dermatologists.
Results
WT was used by 31 referring doctors for 309 consultations with four dermatologists between July 2013 and June 2014. Mean and median specialist response time was 2.07 hours (range: 0.13–5.64 hours). The researchers categorized the referrals as tumours (56.8%) and rashes (43.2%), including inflammatory dermatoses (51.9%), infection (18.1%), uncertain (16.5%), miscellaneous (7.5%), and of environmental origin (6%). Thirty tumours were biopsied, including nine melanomas and three basal cell carcinomas. A total of 158 progress reports and 35 survey responses were received. Reported advantages included decreased delay, improved accuracy of diagnosis and treatment compared to that made without specialist input, decreased unnecessary procedures such as biopsies of undiagnosed conditions, and increased appropriate referrals for face-to-face assessment, thus leading to cost savings for the patient and the health care system. The major disadvantages were the time burden for clinicians to complete consultations, the lack of integration with the patients’ usual electronic medical record and absence of funding.
Discussion
WT proved an effective and acceptable approach to improving patient access to dermatologic services.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1357-633X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1758-1109</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/1357633X15583216</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26033844</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Assessments ; Attitude of Health Personnel ; Child ; Child, Preschool ; Consultancy services ; Dermatology ; Dermatology - organization & administration ; Diagnosis ; Feasibility Studies ; Female ; Health Services Accessibility - organization & administration ; Humans ; Infant ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Networks ; New Zealand ; Patients ; Pilot Projects ; Progress reports ; Referral and Consultation - statistics & numerical data ; Retrospective Studies ; Skin cancer ; Skin Diseases - diagnosis ; Skin Diseases - therapy ; Telecare ; Telemedicine ; Telemedicine - methods ; Tumors ; Tumours ; Waiting Lists ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Journal of telemedicine and telecare, 2015-10, Vol.21 (7), p.414-419</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2015</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2015.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c398t-feaecd73603ac0a02e35628d25c4afbe9e45dd7639c6366982c44587c204fa4b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c398t-feaecd73603ac0a02e35628d25c4afbe9e45dd7639c6366982c44587c204fa4b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/1357633X15583216$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1357633X15583216$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,21798,27901,27902,43597,43598</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26033844$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>McGoey, Suzanne T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oakley, Amanda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rademaker, Marius</creatorcontrib><title>Waikato Teledermatology: a pilot project for improving access in New Zealand</title><title>Journal of telemedicine and telecare</title><addtitle>J Telemed Telecare</addtitle><description>Introduction
Teledermatology can improve access to specialist dermatological advice. We describe a retrospective review of the first 12 months of Waikato Teledermatology (WT), a low-cost, secure, website-based, store-and-forward teledermatology network using the Collegium Telemedicus platform.
Methods
We determined specialist response time, referral metrics, patient diagnosis and progress reports from the network’s database. The programme’s value was evaluated by post-pilot online surveys of referrers and specialist dermatologists.
Results
WT was used by 31 referring doctors for 309 consultations with four dermatologists between July 2013 and June 2014. Mean and median specialist response time was 2.07 hours (range: 0.13–5.64 hours). The researchers categorized the referrals as tumours (56.8%) and rashes (43.2%), including inflammatory dermatoses (51.9%), infection (18.1%), uncertain (16.5%), miscellaneous (7.5%), and of environmental origin (6%). Thirty tumours were biopsied, including nine melanomas and three basal cell carcinomas. A total of 158 progress reports and 35 survey responses were received. Reported advantages included decreased delay, improved accuracy of diagnosis and treatment compared to that made without specialist input, decreased unnecessary procedures such as biopsies of undiagnosed conditions, and increased appropriate referrals for face-to-face assessment, thus leading to cost savings for the patient and the health care system. The major disadvantages were the time burden for clinicians to complete consultations, the lack of integration with the patients’ usual electronic medical record and absence of funding.
Discussion
WT proved an effective and acceptable approach to improving patient access to dermatologic services.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Assessments</subject><subject>Attitude of Health Personnel</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Child, Preschool</subject><subject>Consultancy services</subject><subject>Dermatology</subject><subject>Dermatology - organization & administration</subject><subject>Diagnosis</subject><subject>Feasibility Studies</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Health Services Accessibility - organization & administration</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infant</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Networks</subject><subject>New Zealand</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Pilot Projects</subject><subject>Progress reports</subject><subject>Referral and Consultation - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Skin cancer</subject><subject>Skin Diseases - diagnosis</subject><subject>Skin Diseases - therapy</subject><subject>Telecare</subject><subject>Telemedicine</subject><subject>Telemedicine - methods</subject><subject>Tumors</subject><subject>Tumours</subject><subject>Waiting Lists</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>1357-633X</issn><issn>1758-1109</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkc1LAzEQxYMotlbvniTgxctqvjfxJsUvKHqpKF6WNDtbtu42dbOr9L83pVWhIHjKhPm9N28YhI4pOac0TS8ol6ni_IVKqTmjagf1aSp1Qikxu7GO7WTV76GDEGaEMCqk2Uc9pgjnWog-Gj3b8s22Ho-hghyaOtaVny4vscWLsvItXjR-Bq7FhW9wWcffRzmfYuschIDLOX6AT_wKtrLz_BDtFbYKcLR5B-jp5no8vEtGj7f3w6tR4rjRbVKABZenPIawjljCgEvFdM6kE7aYgAEh8zwuZpziShnNnBBSp44RUVgx4QN0tvaNad47CG1Wl8FBFTOA70JGU8OZ4VH5D5RyI6mO-ACdbqEz3zXzuEjGGCGGcaVppMiaco0PoYEiWzRlbZtlRkm2Okq2fZQoOdkYd5Ma8h_B9xUikKyBYKfwO_VPwy_4LJKF</recordid><startdate>20151001</startdate><enddate>20151001</enddate><creator>McGoey, Suzanne T</creator><creator>Oakley, Amanda</creator><creator>Rademaker, Marius</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Sage Publications Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>L7M</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20151001</creationdate><title>Waikato Teledermatology: a pilot project for improving access in New Zealand</title><author>McGoey, Suzanne T ; Oakley, Amanda ; Rademaker, Marius</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c398t-feaecd73603ac0a02e35628d25c4afbe9e45dd7639c6366982c44587c204fa4b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Assessments</topic><topic>Attitude of Health Personnel</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Child, Preschool</topic><topic>Consultancy services</topic><topic>Dermatology</topic><topic>Dermatology - organization & administration</topic><topic>Diagnosis</topic><topic>Feasibility Studies</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Health Services Accessibility - organization & administration</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infant</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Networks</topic><topic>New Zealand</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Pilot Projects</topic><topic>Progress reports</topic><topic>Referral and Consultation - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Skin cancer</topic><topic>Skin Diseases - diagnosis</topic><topic>Skin Diseases - therapy</topic><topic>Telecare</topic><topic>Telemedicine</topic><topic>Telemedicine - methods</topic><topic>Tumors</topic><topic>Tumours</topic><topic>Waiting Lists</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>McGoey, Suzanne T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oakley, Amanda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rademaker, Marius</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology & Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>Journal of telemedicine and telecare</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>McGoey, Suzanne T</au><au>Oakley, Amanda</au><au>Rademaker, Marius</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Waikato Teledermatology: a pilot project for improving access in New Zealand</atitle><jtitle>Journal of telemedicine and telecare</jtitle><addtitle>J Telemed Telecare</addtitle><date>2015-10-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>21</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>414</spage><epage>419</epage><pages>414-419</pages><issn>1357-633X</issn><eissn>1758-1109</eissn><abstract>Introduction
Teledermatology can improve access to specialist dermatological advice. We describe a retrospective review of the first 12 months of Waikato Teledermatology (WT), a low-cost, secure, website-based, store-and-forward teledermatology network using the Collegium Telemedicus platform.
Methods
We determined specialist response time, referral metrics, patient diagnosis and progress reports from the network’s database. The programme’s value was evaluated by post-pilot online surveys of referrers and specialist dermatologists.
Results
WT was used by 31 referring doctors for 309 consultations with four dermatologists between July 2013 and June 2014. Mean and median specialist response time was 2.07 hours (range: 0.13–5.64 hours). The researchers categorized the referrals as tumours (56.8%) and rashes (43.2%), including inflammatory dermatoses (51.9%), infection (18.1%), uncertain (16.5%), miscellaneous (7.5%), and of environmental origin (6%). Thirty tumours were biopsied, including nine melanomas and three basal cell carcinomas. A total of 158 progress reports and 35 survey responses were received. Reported advantages included decreased delay, improved accuracy of diagnosis and treatment compared to that made without specialist input, decreased unnecessary procedures such as biopsies of undiagnosed conditions, and increased appropriate referrals for face-to-face assessment, thus leading to cost savings for the patient and the health care system. The major disadvantages were the time burden for clinicians to complete consultations, the lack of integration with the patients’ usual electronic medical record and absence of funding.
Discussion
WT proved an effective and acceptable approach to improving patient access to dermatologic services.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>26033844</pmid><doi>10.1177/1357633X15583216</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1357-633X |
ispartof | Journal of telemedicine and telecare, 2015-10, Vol.21 (7), p.414-419 |
issn | 1357-633X 1758-1109 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1793293698 |
source | SAGE Complete A-Z List; MEDLINE |
subjects | Adolescent Adult Aged Aged, 80 and over Assessments Attitude of Health Personnel Child Child, Preschool Consultancy services Dermatology Dermatology - organization & administration Diagnosis Feasibility Studies Female Health Services Accessibility - organization & administration Humans Infant Male Middle Aged Networks New Zealand Patients Pilot Projects Progress reports Referral and Consultation - statistics & numerical data Retrospective Studies Skin cancer Skin Diseases - diagnosis Skin Diseases - therapy Telecare Telemedicine Telemedicine - methods Tumors Tumours Waiting Lists Young Adult |
title | Waikato Teledermatology: a pilot project for improving access in New Zealand |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-28T18%3A25%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Waikato%20Teledermatology:%20a%20pilot%20project%20for%20improving%20access%20in%20New%20Zealand&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20telemedicine%20and%20telecare&rft.au=McGoey,%20Suzanne%20T&rft.date=2015-10-01&rft.volume=21&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=414&rft.epage=419&rft.pages=414-419&rft.issn=1357-633X&rft.eissn=1758-1109&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/1357633X15583216&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1793293698%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2200923681&rft_id=info:pmid/26033844&rft_sage_id=10.1177_1357633X15583216&rfr_iscdi=true |