Waikato Teledermatology: a pilot project for improving access in New Zealand

Introduction Teledermatology can improve access to specialist dermatological advice. We describe a retrospective review of the first 12 months of Waikato Teledermatology (WT), a low-cost, secure, website-based, store-and-forward teledermatology network using the Collegium Telemedicus platform. Metho...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of telemedicine and telecare 2015-10, Vol.21 (7), p.414-419
Hauptverfasser: McGoey, Suzanne T, Oakley, Amanda, Rademaker, Marius
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 419
container_issue 7
container_start_page 414
container_title Journal of telemedicine and telecare
container_volume 21
creator McGoey, Suzanne T
Oakley, Amanda
Rademaker, Marius
description Introduction Teledermatology can improve access to specialist dermatological advice. We describe a retrospective review of the first 12 months of Waikato Teledermatology (WT), a low-cost, secure, website-based, store-and-forward teledermatology network using the Collegium Telemedicus platform. Methods We determined specialist response time, referral metrics, patient diagnosis and progress reports from the network’s database. The programme’s value was evaluated by post-pilot online surveys of referrers and specialist dermatologists. Results WT was used by 31 referring doctors for 309 consultations with four dermatologists between July 2013 and June 2014. Mean and median specialist response time was 2.07 hours (range: 0.13–5.64 hours). The researchers categorized the referrals as tumours (56.8%) and rashes (43.2%), including inflammatory dermatoses (51.9%), infection (18.1%), uncertain (16.5%), miscellaneous (7.5%), and of environmental origin (6%). Thirty tumours were biopsied, including nine melanomas and three basal cell carcinomas. A total of 158 progress reports and 35 survey responses were received. Reported advantages included decreased delay, improved accuracy of diagnosis and treatment compared to that made without specialist input, decreased unnecessary procedures such as biopsies of undiagnosed conditions, and increased appropriate referrals for face-to-face assessment, thus leading to cost savings for the patient and the health care system. The major disadvantages were the time burden for clinicians to complete consultations, the lack of integration with the patients’ usual electronic medical record and absence of funding. Discussion WT proved an effective and acceptable approach to improving patient access to dermatologic services.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/1357633X15583216
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1793293698</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_1357633X15583216</sage_id><sourcerecordid>1793293698</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c398t-feaecd73603ac0a02e35628d25c4afbe9e45dd7639c6366982c44587c204fa4b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkc1LAzEQxYMotlbvniTgxctqvjfxJsUvKHqpKF6WNDtbtu42dbOr9L83pVWhIHjKhPm9N28YhI4pOac0TS8ol6ni_IVKqTmjagf1aSp1Qikxu7GO7WTV76GDEGaEMCqk2Uc9pgjnWog-Gj3b8s22Ho-hghyaOtaVny4vscWLsvItXjR-Bq7FhW9wWcffRzmfYuschIDLOX6AT_wKtrLz_BDtFbYKcLR5B-jp5no8vEtGj7f3w6tR4rjRbVKABZenPIawjljCgEvFdM6kE7aYgAEh8zwuZpziShnNnBBSp44RUVgx4QN0tvaNad47CG1Wl8FBFTOA70JGU8OZ4VH5D5RyI6mO-ACdbqEz3zXzuEjGGCGGcaVppMiaco0PoYEiWzRlbZtlRkm2Okq2fZQoOdkYd5Ma8h_B9xUikKyBYKfwO_VPwy_4LJKF</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2200923681</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Waikato Teledermatology: a pilot project for improving access in New Zealand</title><source>SAGE Complete A-Z List</source><source>MEDLINE</source><creator>McGoey, Suzanne T ; Oakley, Amanda ; Rademaker, Marius</creator><creatorcontrib>McGoey, Suzanne T ; Oakley, Amanda ; Rademaker, Marius</creatorcontrib><description>Introduction Teledermatology can improve access to specialist dermatological advice. We describe a retrospective review of the first 12 months of Waikato Teledermatology (WT), a low-cost, secure, website-based, store-and-forward teledermatology network using the Collegium Telemedicus platform. Methods We determined specialist response time, referral metrics, patient diagnosis and progress reports from the network’s database. The programme’s value was evaluated by post-pilot online surveys of referrers and specialist dermatologists. Results WT was used by 31 referring doctors for 309 consultations with four dermatologists between July 2013 and June 2014. Mean and median specialist response time was 2.07 hours (range: 0.13–5.64 hours). The researchers categorized the referrals as tumours (56.8%) and rashes (43.2%), including inflammatory dermatoses (51.9%), infection (18.1%), uncertain (16.5%), miscellaneous (7.5%), and of environmental origin (6%). Thirty tumours were biopsied, including nine melanomas and three basal cell carcinomas. A total of 158 progress reports and 35 survey responses were received. Reported advantages included decreased delay, improved accuracy of diagnosis and treatment compared to that made without specialist input, decreased unnecessary procedures such as biopsies of undiagnosed conditions, and increased appropriate referrals for face-to-face assessment, thus leading to cost savings for the patient and the health care system. The major disadvantages were the time burden for clinicians to complete consultations, the lack of integration with the patients’ usual electronic medical record and absence of funding. Discussion WT proved an effective and acceptable approach to improving patient access to dermatologic services.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1357-633X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1758-1109</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/1357633X15583216</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26033844</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Assessments ; Attitude of Health Personnel ; Child ; Child, Preschool ; Consultancy services ; Dermatology ; Dermatology - organization &amp; administration ; Diagnosis ; Feasibility Studies ; Female ; Health Services Accessibility - organization &amp; administration ; Humans ; Infant ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Networks ; New Zealand ; Patients ; Pilot Projects ; Progress reports ; Referral and Consultation - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Retrospective Studies ; Skin cancer ; Skin Diseases - diagnosis ; Skin Diseases - therapy ; Telecare ; Telemedicine ; Telemedicine - methods ; Tumors ; Tumours ; Waiting Lists ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Journal of telemedicine and telecare, 2015-10, Vol.21 (7), p.414-419</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2015</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2015.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c398t-feaecd73603ac0a02e35628d25c4afbe9e45dd7639c6366982c44587c204fa4b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c398t-feaecd73603ac0a02e35628d25c4afbe9e45dd7639c6366982c44587c204fa4b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/1357633X15583216$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1357633X15583216$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,21798,27901,27902,43597,43598</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26033844$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>McGoey, Suzanne T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oakley, Amanda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rademaker, Marius</creatorcontrib><title>Waikato Teledermatology: a pilot project for improving access in New Zealand</title><title>Journal of telemedicine and telecare</title><addtitle>J Telemed Telecare</addtitle><description>Introduction Teledermatology can improve access to specialist dermatological advice. We describe a retrospective review of the first 12 months of Waikato Teledermatology (WT), a low-cost, secure, website-based, store-and-forward teledermatology network using the Collegium Telemedicus platform. Methods We determined specialist response time, referral metrics, patient diagnosis and progress reports from the network’s database. The programme’s value was evaluated by post-pilot online surveys of referrers and specialist dermatologists. Results WT was used by 31 referring doctors for 309 consultations with four dermatologists between July 2013 and June 2014. Mean and median specialist response time was 2.07 hours (range: 0.13–5.64 hours). The researchers categorized the referrals as tumours (56.8%) and rashes (43.2%), including inflammatory dermatoses (51.9%), infection (18.1%), uncertain (16.5%), miscellaneous (7.5%), and of environmental origin (6%). Thirty tumours were biopsied, including nine melanomas and three basal cell carcinomas. A total of 158 progress reports and 35 survey responses were received. Reported advantages included decreased delay, improved accuracy of diagnosis and treatment compared to that made without specialist input, decreased unnecessary procedures such as biopsies of undiagnosed conditions, and increased appropriate referrals for face-to-face assessment, thus leading to cost savings for the patient and the health care system. The major disadvantages were the time burden for clinicians to complete consultations, the lack of integration with the patients’ usual electronic medical record and absence of funding. Discussion WT proved an effective and acceptable approach to improving patient access to dermatologic services.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Assessments</subject><subject>Attitude of Health Personnel</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Child, Preschool</subject><subject>Consultancy services</subject><subject>Dermatology</subject><subject>Dermatology - organization &amp; administration</subject><subject>Diagnosis</subject><subject>Feasibility Studies</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Health Services Accessibility - organization &amp; administration</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infant</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Networks</subject><subject>New Zealand</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Pilot Projects</subject><subject>Progress reports</subject><subject>Referral and Consultation - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Skin cancer</subject><subject>Skin Diseases - diagnosis</subject><subject>Skin Diseases - therapy</subject><subject>Telecare</subject><subject>Telemedicine</subject><subject>Telemedicine - methods</subject><subject>Tumors</subject><subject>Tumours</subject><subject>Waiting Lists</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>1357-633X</issn><issn>1758-1109</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkc1LAzEQxYMotlbvniTgxctqvjfxJsUvKHqpKF6WNDtbtu42dbOr9L83pVWhIHjKhPm9N28YhI4pOac0TS8ol6ni_IVKqTmjagf1aSp1Qikxu7GO7WTV76GDEGaEMCqk2Uc9pgjnWog-Gj3b8s22Ho-hghyaOtaVny4vscWLsvItXjR-Bq7FhW9wWcffRzmfYuschIDLOX6AT_wKtrLz_BDtFbYKcLR5B-jp5no8vEtGj7f3w6tR4rjRbVKABZenPIawjljCgEvFdM6kE7aYgAEh8zwuZpziShnNnBBSp44RUVgx4QN0tvaNad47CG1Wl8FBFTOA70JGU8OZ4VH5D5RyI6mO-ACdbqEz3zXzuEjGGCGGcaVppMiaco0PoYEiWzRlbZtlRkm2Okq2fZQoOdkYd5Ma8h_B9xUikKyBYKfwO_VPwy_4LJKF</recordid><startdate>20151001</startdate><enddate>20151001</enddate><creator>McGoey, Suzanne T</creator><creator>Oakley, Amanda</creator><creator>Rademaker, Marius</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Sage Publications Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>L7M</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20151001</creationdate><title>Waikato Teledermatology: a pilot project for improving access in New Zealand</title><author>McGoey, Suzanne T ; Oakley, Amanda ; Rademaker, Marius</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c398t-feaecd73603ac0a02e35628d25c4afbe9e45dd7639c6366982c44587c204fa4b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Assessments</topic><topic>Attitude of Health Personnel</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Child, Preschool</topic><topic>Consultancy services</topic><topic>Dermatology</topic><topic>Dermatology - organization &amp; administration</topic><topic>Diagnosis</topic><topic>Feasibility Studies</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Health Services Accessibility - organization &amp; administration</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infant</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Networks</topic><topic>New Zealand</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Pilot Projects</topic><topic>Progress reports</topic><topic>Referral and Consultation - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Skin cancer</topic><topic>Skin Diseases - diagnosis</topic><topic>Skin Diseases - therapy</topic><topic>Telecare</topic><topic>Telemedicine</topic><topic>Telemedicine - methods</topic><topic>Tumors</topic><topic>Tumours</topic><topic>Waiting Lists</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>McGoey, Suzanne T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oakley, Amanda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rademaker, Marius</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology &amp; Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>Journal of telemedicine and telecare</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>McGoey, Suzanne T</au><au>Oakley, Amanda</au><au>Rademaker, Marius</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Waikato Teledermatology: a pilot project for improving access in New Zealand</atitle><jtitle>Journal of telemedicine and telecare</jtitle><addtitle>J Telemed Telecare</addtitle><date>2015-10-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>21</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>414</spage><epage>419</epage><pages>414-419</pages><issn>1357-633X</issn><eissn>1758-1109</eissn><abstract>Introduction Teledermatology can improve access to specialist dermatological advice. We describe a retrospective review of the first 12 months of Waikato Teledermatology (WT), a low-cost, secure, website-based, store-and-forward teledermatology network using the Collegium Telemedicus platform. Methods We determined specialist response time, referral metrics, patient diagnosis and progress reports from the network’s database. The programme’s value was evaluated by post-pilot online surveys of referrers and specialist dermatologists. Results WT was used by 31 referring doctors for 309 consultations with four dermatologists between July 2013 and June 2014. Mean and median specialist response time was 2.07 hours (range: 0.13–5.64 hours). The researchers categorized the referrals as tumours (56.8%) and rashes (43.2%), including inflammatory dermatoses (51.9%), infection (18.1%), uncertain (16.5%), miscellaneous (7.5%), and of environmental origin (6%). Thirty tumours were biopsied, including nine melanomas and three basal cell carcinomas. A total of 158 progress reports and 35 survey responses were received. Reported advantages included decreased delay, improved accuracy of diagnosis and treatment compared to that made without specialist input, decreased unnecessary procedures such as biopsies of undiagnosed conditions, and increased appropriate referrals for face-to-face assessment, thus leading to cost savings for the patient and the health care system. The major disadvantages were the time burden for clinicians to complete consultations, the lack of integration with the patients’ usual electronic medical record and absence of funding. Discussion WT proved an effective and acceptable approach to improving patient access to dermatologic services.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>26033844</pmid><doi>10.1177/1357633X15583216</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1357-633X
ispartof Journal of telemedicine and telecare, 2015-10, Vol.21 (7), p.414-419
issn 1357-633X
1758-1109
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1793293698
source SAGE Complete A-Z List; MEDLINE
subjects Adolescent
Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Assessments
Attitude of Health Personnel
Child
Child, Preschool
Consultancy services
Dermatology
Dermatology - organization & administration
Diagnosis
Feasibility Studies
Female
Health Services Accessibility - organization & administration
Humans
Infant
Male
Middle Aged
Networks
New Zealand
Patients
Pilot Projects
Progress reports
Referral and Consultation - statistics & numerical data
Retrospective Studies
Skin cancer
Skin Diseases - diagnosis
Skin Diseases - therapy
Telecare
Telemedicine
Telemedicine - methods
Tumors
Tumours
Waiting Lists
Young Adult
title Waikato Teledermatology: a pilot project for improving access in New Zealand
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-28T18%3A25%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Waikato%20Teledermatology:%20a%20pilot%20project%20for%20improving%20access%20in%20New%20Zealand&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20telemedicine%20and%20telecare&rft.au=McGoey,%20Suzanne%20T&rft.date=2015-10-01&rft.volume=21&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=414&rft.epage=419&rft.pages=414-419&rft.issn=1357-633X&rft.eissn=1758-1109&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/1357633X15583216&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1793293698%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2200923681&rft_id=info:pmid/26033844&rft_sage_id=10.1177_1357633X15583216&rfr_iscdi=true