Two roles for ecological surrogacy: Indicator surrogates and management surrogates
Ecological surrogacy – here defined as using a process or element (e.g., species, ecosystem, or abiotic factor) to represent another aspect of an ecological system – is a widely used concept, but many applications of the surrogate concept have been controversial. We argue that some of this controver...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Ecological indicators 2016-04, Vol.63, p.121-125 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 125 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 121 |
container_title | Ecological indicators |
container_volume | 63 |
creator | Hunter, Malcolm Westgate, Martin Barton, Philip Calhoun, Aram Pierson, Jennifer Tulloch, Ayesha Beger, Maria Branquinho, Cristina Caro, Tim Gross, John Heino, Jani Lane, Peter Longo, Catherine Martin, Kathy McDowell, William H. Mellin, Camille Salo, Hanna Lindenmayer, David |
description | Ecological surrogacy – here defined as using a process or element (e.g., species, ecosystem, or abiotic factor) to represent another aspect of an ecological system – is a widely used concept, but many applications of the surrogate concept have been controversial. We argue that some of this controversy reflects differences among users with different goals, a distinction that can be crystalized by recognizing two basic types of surrogate. First, many ecologists and natural resource managers measure “indicator surrogates” to provide information about ecological systems. Second, and often overlooked, are “management surrogates” (e.g., umbrella species) that are primarily used to facilitate achieving management goals, especially broad goals such as “maintain biodiversity” or “increase ecosystem resilience.” We propose that distinguishing these two overarching roles for surrogacy may facilitate better communication about project goals. This is critical when evaluating the usefulness of different surrogates, especially where a potential surrogate might be useful in one role but not another. Our classification for ecological surrogacy applies to species, ecosystems, ecological processes, abiotic factors, and genetics, and thus can provide coherence across a broad range of uses. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.11.049 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1793248002</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1470160X15006810</els_id><sourcerecordid>1793248002</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c446t-530fd7500ff407dd1c2106eb95ec6e3c40c2e46e41c7561c2eed9dd30e2cf5663</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkF1LwzAUhosoOKc_QeylN60nbZI23ogMPwYDQTfwLsTktGR0zUw6Zf_ejO3CO71KOO_zngNPklwSyAkQfrPMUbvO9iYvgLCckByoOEpGpK6KrIKSHsc_rSAjHN5Pk7MQlhB7QvBR8jr_dql3HYa0cT7dLXKt1apLw8Z71yq9vU2nvYmjIeaH4RBx1Zt0pXrV4gr74Vdynpw0qgt4cXjHyeLxYT55zmYvT9PJ_SzTlPIhYyU0pmIATUOhMoboggDHD8FQcyw1BV0g5UiJrhiPKaIRxpSAhW4Y5-U4ud7vXXv3ucEwyJUNGrtO9eg2QZJKlAWtAYp_oJwJUVC2Q9ke1d6F4LGRa29Xym8lAbnTLZfyoFvudEtCZNQde1f7XqOcVK23QS7eIsCj6lrUnEXibk9glPJl0cugLfYajfWoB2mc_ePGDw1Rlas</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1765992452</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Two roles for ecological surrogacy: Indicator surrogates and management surrogates</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Hunter, Malcolm ; Westgate, Martin ; Barton, Philip ; Calhoun, Aram ; Pierson, Jennifer ; Tulloch, Ayesha ; Beger, Maria ; Branquinho, Cristina ; Caro, Tim ; Gross, John ; Heino, Jani ; Lane, Peter ; Longo, Catherine ; Martin, Kathy ; McDowell, William H. ; Mellin, Camille ; Salo, Hanna ; Lindenmayer, David</creator><creatorcontrib>Hunter, Malcolm ; Westgate, Martin ; Barton, Philip ; Calhoun, Aram ; Pierson, Jennifer ; Tulloch, Ayesha ; Beger, Maria ; Branquinho, Cristina ; Caro, Tim ; Gross, John ; Heino, Jani ; Lane, Peter ; Longo, Catherine ; Martin, Kathy ; McDowell, William H. ; Mellin, Camille ; Salo, Hanna ; Lindenmayer, David</creatorcontrib><description>Ecological surrogacy – here defined as using a process or element (e.g., species, ecosystem, or abiotic factor) to represent another aspect of an ecological system – is a widely used concept, but many applications of the surrogate concept have been controversial. We argue that some of this controversy reflects differences among users with different goals, a distinction that can be crystalized by recognizing two basic types of surrogate. First, many ecologists and natural resource managers measure “indicator surrogates” to provide information about ecological systems. Second, and often overlooked, are “management surrogates” (e.g., umbrella species) that are primarily used to facilitate achieving management goals, especially broad goals such as “maintain biodiversity” or “increase ecosystem resilience.” We propose that distinguishing these two overarching roles for surrogacy may facilitate better communication about project goals. This is critical when evaluating the usefulness of different surrogates, especially where a potential surrogate might be useful in one role but not another. Our classification for ecological surrogacy applies to species, ecosystems, ecological processes, abiotic factors, and genetics, and thus can provide coherence across a broad range of uses.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1470-160X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-7034</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.11.049</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>biodiversity ; Classification ; Coarse-filter ; Ecological monitoring ; ecological resilience ; ecologists ; Ecology ; Ecosystems ; Environmental management ; Environmental proxy ; Flagship species ; Focal species ; Genetics ; Indicators ; Management ; managers ; Monitoring ; Natural resources ; Surrogates ; Terminology ; Umbrella species</subject><ispartof>Ecological indicators, 2016-04, Vol.63, p.121-125</ispartof><rights>2015 Elsevier Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c446t-530fd7500ff407dd1c2106eb95ec6e3c40c2e46e41c7561c2eed9dd30e2cf5663</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c446t-530fd7500ff407dd1c2106eb95ec6e3c40c2e46e41c7561c2eed9dd30e2cf5663</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.11.049$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3548,27923,27924,45994</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hunter, Malcolm</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Westgate, Martin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barton, Philip</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Calhoun, Aram</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pierson, Jennifer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tulloch, Ayesha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beger, Maria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Branquinho, Cristina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Caro, Tim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gross, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heino, Jani</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lane, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Longo, Catherine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martin, Kathy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McDowell, William H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mellin, Camille</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Salo, Hanna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lindenmayer, David</creatorcontrib><title>Two roles for ecological surrogacy: Indicator surrogates and management surrogates</title><title>Ecological indicators</title><description>Ecological surrogacy – here defined as using a process or element (e.g., species, ecosystem, or abiotic factor) to represent another aspect of an ecological system – is a widely used concept, but many applications of the surrogate concept have been controversial. We argue that some of this controversy reflects differences among users with different goals, a distinction that can be crystalized by recognizing two basic types of surrogate. First, many ecologists and natural resource managers measure “indicator surrogates” to provide information about ecological systems. Second, and often overlooked, are “management surrogates” (e.g., umbrella species) that are primarily used to facilitate achieving management goals, especially broad goals such as “maintain biodiversity” or “increase ecosystem resilience.” We propose that distinguishing these two overarching roles for surrogacy may facilitate better communication about project goals. This is critical when evaluating the usefulness of different surrogates, especially where a potential surrogate might be useful in one role but not another. Our classification for ecological surrogacy applies to species, ecosystems, ecological processes, abiotic factors, and genetics, and thus can provide coherence across a broad range of uses.</description><subject>biodiversity</subject><subject>Classification</subject><subject>Coarse-filter</subject><subject>Ecological monitoring</subject><subject>ecological resilience</subject><subject>ecologists</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Ecosystems</subject><subject>Environmental management</subject><subject>Environmental proxy</subject><subject>Flagship species</subject><subject>Focal species</subject><subject>Genetics</subject><subject>Indicators</subject><subject>Management</subject><subject>managers</subject><subject>Monitoring</subject><subject>Natural resources</subject><subject>Surrogates</subject><subject>Terminology</subject><subject>Umbrella species</subject><issn>1470-160X</issn><issn>1872-7034</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkF1LwzAUhosoOKc_QeylN60nbZI23ogMPwYDQTfwLsTktGR0zUw6Zf_ejO3CO71KOO_zngNPklwSyAkQfrPMUbvO9iYvgLCckByoOEpGpK6KrIKSHsc_rSAjHN5Pk7MQlhB7QvBR8jr_dql3HYa0cT7dLXKt1apLw8Z71yq9vU2nvYmjIeaH4RBx1Zt0pXrV4gr74Vdynpw0qgt4cXjHyeLxYT55zmYvT9PJ_SzTlPIhYyU0pmIATUOhMoboggDHD8FQcyw1BV0g5UiJrhiPKaIRxpSAhW4Y5-U4ud7vXXv3ucEwyJUNGrtO9eg2QZJKlAWtAYp_oJwJUVC2Q9ke1d6F4LGRa29Xym8lAbnTLZfyoFvudEtCZNQde1f7XqOcVK23QS7eIsCj6lrUnEXibk9glPJl0cugLfYajfWoB2mc_ePGDw1Rlas</recordid><startdate>20160401</startdate><enddate>20160401</enddate><creator>Hunter, Malcolm</creator><creator>Westgate, Martin</creator><creator>Barton, Philip</creator><creator>Calhoun, Aram</creator><creator>Pierson, Jennifer</creator><creator>Tulloch, Ayesha</creator><creator>Beger, Maria</creator><creator>Branquinho, Cristina</creator><creator>Caro, Tim</creator><creator>Gross, John</creator><creator>Heino, Jani</creator><creator>Lane, Peter</creator><creator>Longo, Catherine</creator><creator>Martin, Kathy</creator><creator>McDowell, William H.</creator><creator>Mellin, Camille</creator><creator>Salo, Hanna</creator><creator>Lindenmayer, David</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160401</creationdate><title>Two roles for ecological surrogacy: Indicator surrogates and management surrogates</title><author>Hunter, Malcolm ; Westgate, Martin ; Barton, Philip ; Calhoun, Aram ; Pierson, Jennifer ; Tulloch, Ayesha ; Beger, Maria ; Branquinho, Cristina ; Caro, Tim ; Gross, John ; Heino, Jani ; Lane, Peter ; Longo, Catherine ; Martin, Kathy ; McDowell, William H. ; Mellin, Camille ; Salo, Hanna ; Lindenmayer, David</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c446t-530fd7500ff407dd1c2106eb95ec6e3c40c2e46e41c7561c2eed9dd30e2cf5663</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>biodiversity</topic><topic>Classification</topic><topic>Coarse-filter</topic><topic>Ecological monitoring</topic><topic>ecological resilience</topic><topic>ecologists</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Ecosystems</topic><topic>Environmental management</topic><topic>Environmental proxy</topic><topic>Flagship species</topic><topic>Focal species</topic><topic>Genetics</topic><topic>Indicators</topic><topic>Management</topic><topic>managers</topic><topic>Monitoring</topic><topic>Natural resources</topic><topic>Surrogates</topic><topic>Terminology</topic><topic>Umbrella species</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hunter, Malcolm</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Westgate, Martin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barton, Philip</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Calhoun, Aram</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pierson, Jennifer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tulloch, Ayesha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beger, Maria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Branquinho, Cristina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Caro, Tim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gross, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heino, Jani</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lane, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Longo, Catherine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martin, Kathy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McDowell, William H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mellin, Camille</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Salo, Hanna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lindenmayer, David</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Ecological indicators</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hunter, Malcolm</au><au>Westgate, Martin</au><au>Barton, Philip</au><au>Calhoun, Aram</au><au>Pierson, Jennifer</au><au>Tulloch, Ayesha</au><au>Beger, Maria</au><au>Branquinho, Cristina</au><au>Caro, Tim</au><au>Gross, John</au><au>Heino, Jani</au><au>Lane, Peter</au><au>Longo, Catherine</au><au>Martin, Kathy</au><au>McDowell, William H.</au><au>Mellin, Camille</au><au>Salo, Hanna</au><au>Lindenmayer, David</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Two roles for ecological surrogacy: Indicator surrogates and management surrogates</atitle><jtitle>Ecological indicators</jtitle><date>2016-04-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>63</volume><spage>121</spage><epage>125</epage><pages>121-125</pages><issn>1470-160X</issn><eissn>1872-7034</eissn><abstract>Ecological surrogacy – here defined as using a process or element (e.g., species, ecosystem, or abiotic factor) to represent another aspect of an ecological system – is a widely used concept, but many applications of the surrogate concept have been controversial. We argue that some of this controversy reflects differences among users with different goals, a distinction that can be crystalized by recognizing two basic types of surrogate. First, many ecologists and natural resource managers measure “indicator surrogates” to provide information about ecological systems. Second, and often overlooked, are “management surrogates” (e.g., umbrella species) that are primarily used to facilitate achieving management goals, especially broad goals such as “maintain biodiversity” or “increase ecosystem resilience.” We propose that distinguishing these two overarching roles for surrogacy may facilitate better communication about project goals. This is critical when evaluating the usefulness of different surrogates, especially where a potential surrogate might be useful in one role but not another. Our classification for ecological surrogacy applies to species, ecosystems, ecological processes, abiotic factors, and genetics, and thus can provide coherence across a broad range of uses.</abstract><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.11.049</doi><tpages>5</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1470-160X |
ispartof | Ecological indicators, 2016-04, Vol.63, p.121-125 |
issn | 1470-160X 1872-7034 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1793248002 |
source | Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete - AutoHoldings |
subjects | biodiversity Classification Coarse-filter Ecological monitoring ecological resilience ecologists Ecology Ecosystems Environmental management Environmental proxy Flagship species Focal species Genetics Indicators Management managers Monitoring Natural resources Surrogates Terminology Umbrella species |
title | Two roles for ecological surrogacy: Indicator surrogates and management surrogates |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-13T10%3A37%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Two%20roles%20for%20ecological%20surrogacy:%20Indicator%20surrogates%20and%20management%20surrogates&rft.jtitle=Ecological%20indicators&rft.au=Hunter,%20Malcolm&rft.date=2016-04-01&rft.volume=63&rft.spage=121&rft.epage=125&rft.pages=121-125&rft.issn=1470-160X&rft.eissn=1872-7034&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.11.049&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1793248002%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1765992452&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S1470160X15006810&rfr_iscdi=true |