Microclimatic edge effects in a recently harvested forest: Do remnant forest patches create the same impact as large forest areas?

•Distance to mature forest (forest influence) drives microclimate in harvested areas.•The depth and magnitude of forest influence change with time (daily and monthly).•Forest influence made conditions near edges ⩽16% more humid and ⩽4°C cooler.•Retained aggregates were efficient in generating microc...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Forest ecology and management 2016-04, Vol.365, p.128-136
Hauptverfasser: Baker, Thomas P., Jordan, Gregory J., Baker, Susan C.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 136
container_issue
container_start_page 128
container_title Forest ecology and management
container_volume 365
creator Baker, Thomas P.
Jordan, Gregory J.
Baker, Susan C.
description •Distance to mature forest (forest influence) drives microclimate in harvested areas.•The depth and magnitude of forest influence change with time (daily and monthly).•Forest influence made conditions near edges ⩽16% more humid and ⩽4°C cooler.•Retained aggregates were efficient in generating microclimatic forest influence.•Shade was a significant driver of microclimatic forest influence. Microclimatic forest influence (edge effects into open or regenerating areas) occurs within harvested forest, but the depth and magnitude may change depending on the design of the harvested area. This is an important consideration for managers, because gradients in microclimate can significant affect the ability of species to recolonise following disturbance. One harvesting method that can increase the amount of forest influence is aggregated retention. This technique involves leaving groups of trees (aggregates) within the harvested area, thus increasing the amount of regenerating forest that is near to an edge and therefore under forest influence. However, differences in the scale of forest influence generated from aggregates compared to unlogged forests surrounding harvested areas have not been tested. Understanding the ability of retained aggregates to generate forest influence is important in designing and implementing aggregated retention harvesting practices. This study tested whether retained aggregates generated similar levels of forest influence as mature forest surrounding harvested areas. Microclimatic forest influence was examined by monitoring spatial changes in air temperature and relative humidity along transects running from within standing mature forest into harvested forest. Intact forest and aggregate transects were located in the direction of maximum expected forest influence (south-facing edges). Results showed that forest influence was mostly similar in both depth and magnitude regardless of the type of forest from which it was generated. Temporal examination of forest influence showed that it changed throughout the day and across the year, with peaks in magnitude occurring during the middle of the day, and in months close to the equinoxes. Shade derived from standing trees was a potential driver of temporal patterns in microclimatic forest influence. At its peak magnitude, the microclimatic forest influence observed will likely have significant impacts on habitat suitability and thus, presumably, species recolonisation after disturbance. Results in
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.foreco.2016.01.022
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1793244053</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0378112716000232</els_id><sourcerecordid>1793244053</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-b20929f214278988b3426413cf6be7bc64a95b4c3a967342d3b65651584a45383</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkbtuGzEQRYkgBizL-QMXLNPsmm9yUzgInPgByHDj1ASXOxtR2IdM0gLU-stNQaqNVAPOnLkXnIvQFSU1JVRdb-p-juDnmpVXTWhNGPuCFtRoVmki2Fe0IFybilKmz9FFShtCiJTCLND7U_Bx9kMYXQ4eQ_cPMPQ9-JxwmLDDRRemPOzx2sUdpAwdPpil_AP_nst0nNyUTy28ddmvIWEfwWXAeQ04uRFwGLfOZ-wSHlwsDifcFSz9vERnvRsSfDvVJfp79-fl9qFaPd8_3v5aVZ5rlquWkYY1PaOCadMY03LBlKDc96oF3XolXCNb4blrlC6zjrdKKkmlEU5IbvgSfT_qbuP8-lb87RiSh2FwE8xvyVLdcCYEkfw_UGWkFkKrgoojWs6YUoTebmM5ZtxbSuwhHbuxx3TsIR1LqC3plLWb4xqUH-8CRJt8gMlDFwqbbTeHzwU-AMelmiY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1768574476</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Microclimatic edge effects in a recently harvested forest: Do remnant forest patches create the same impact as large forest areas?</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Baker, Thomas P. ; Jordan, Gregory J. ; Baker, Susan C.</creator><creatorcontrib>Baker, Thomas P. ; Jordan, Gregory J. ; Baker, Susan C.</creatorcontrib><description>•Distance to mature forest (forest influence) drives microclimate in harvested areas.•The depth and magnitude of forest influence change with time (daily and monthly).•Forest influence made conditions near edges ⩽16% more humid and ⩽4°C cooler.•Retained aggregates were efficient in generating microclimatic forest influence.•Shade was a significant driver of microclimatic forest influence. Microclimatic forest influence (edge effects into open or regenerating areas) occurs within harvested forest, but the depth and magnitude may change depending on the design of the harvested area. This is an important consideration for managers, because gradients in microclimate can significant affect the ability of species to recolonise following disturbance. One harvesting method that can increase the amount of forest influence is aggregated retention. This technique involves leaving groups of trees (aggregates) within the harvested area, thus increasing the amount of regenerating forest that is near to an edge and therefore under forest influence. However, differences in the scale of forest influence generated from aggregates compared to unlogged forests surrounding harvested areas have not been tested. Understanding the ability of retained aggregates to generate forest influence is important in designing and implementing aggregated retention harvesting practices. This study tested whether retained aggregates generated similar levels of forest influence as mature forest surrounding harvested areas. Microclimatic forest influence was examined by monitoring spatial changes in air temperature and relative humidity along transects running from within standing mature forest into harvested forest. Intact forest and aggregate transects were located in the direction of maximum expected forest influence (south-facing edges). Results showed that forest influence was mostly similar in both depth and magnitude regardless of the type of forest from which it was generated. Temporal examination of forest influence showed that it changed throughout the day and across the year, with peaks in magnitude occurring during the middle of the day, and in months close to the equinoxes. Shade derived from standing trees was a potential driver of temporal patterns in microclimatic forest influence. At its peak magnitude, the microclimatic forest influence observed will likely have significant impacts on habitat suitability and thus, presumably, species recolonisation after disturbance. Results indicated that aggregated retention is an effective method for generating forest influence within harvested areas. Therefore, aggregated retention has the potential to be a valuable harvesting technique to alter microclimate and have beneficial impacts on the recovery of harvested forests.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0378-1127</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-7042</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2016.01.022</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Aggregated retention ; Aggregates ; Clearcutting ; Disturbance ; Disturbances ; Edge effects ; Forest influence ; Forests ; Harvesting ; Microclimate ; Microclimates ; Monitoring ; Running ; Trees</subject><ispartof>Forest ecology and management, 2016-04, Vol.365, p.128-136</ispartof><rights>2016 Elsevier B.V.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-b20929f214278988b3426413cf6be7bc64a95b4c3a967342d3b65651584a45383</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-b20929f214278988b3426413cf6be7bc64a95b4c3a967342d3b65651584a45383</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2016.01.022$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3549,27923,27924,45994</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Baker, Thomas P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jordan, Gregory J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baker, Susan C.</creatorcontrib><title>Microclimatic edge effects in a recently harvested forest: Do remnant forest patches create the same impact as large forest areas?</title><title>Forest ecology and management</title><description>•Distance to mature forest (forest influence) drives microclimate in harvested areas.•The depth and magnitude of forest influence change with time (daily and monthly).•Forest influence made conditions near edges ⩽16% more humid and ⩽4°C cooler.•Retained aggregates were efficient in generating microclimatic forest influence.•Shade was a significant driver of microclimatic forest influence. Microclimatic forest influence (edge effects into open or regenerating areas) occurs within harvested forest, but the depth and magnitude may change depending on the design of the harvested area. This is an important consideration for managers, because gradients in microclimate can significant affect the ability of species to recolonise following disturbance. One harvesting method that can increase the amount of forest influence is aggregated retention. This technique involves leaving groups of trees (aggregates) within the harvested area, thus increasing the amount of regenerating forest that is near to an edge and therefore under forest influence. However, differences in the scale of forest influence generated from aggregates compared to unlogged forests surrounding harvested areas have not been tested. Understanding the ability of retained aggregates to generate forest influence is important in designing and implementing aggregated retention harvesting practices. This study tested whether retained aggregates generated similar levels of forest influence as mature forest surrounding harvested areas. Microclimatic forest influence was examined by monitoring spatial changes in air temperature and relative humidity along transects running from within standing mature forest into harvested forest. Intact forest and aggregate transects were located in the direction of maximum expected forest influence (south-facing edges). Results showed that forest influence was mostly similar in both depth and magnitude regardless of the type of forest from which it was generated. Temporal examination of forest influence showed that it changed throughout the day and across the year, with peaks in magnitude occurring during the middle of the day, and in months close to the equinoxes. Shade derived from standing trees was a potential driver of temporal patterns in microclimatic forest influence. At its peak magnitude, the microclimatic forest influence observed will likely have significant impacts on habitat suitability and thus, presumably, species recolonisation after disturbance. Results indicated that aggregated retention is an effective method for generating forest influence within harvested areas. Therefore, aggregated retention has the potential to be a valuable harvesting technique to alter microclimate and have beneficial impacts on the recovery of harvested forests.</description><subject>Aggregated retention</subject><subject>Aggregates</subject><subject>Clearcutting</subject><subject>Disturbance</subject><subject>Disturbances</subject><subject>Edge effects</subject><subject>Forest influence</subject><subject>Forests</subject><subject>Harvesting</subject><subject>Microclimate</subject><subject>Microclimates</subject><subject>Monitoring</subject><subject>Running</subject><subject>Trees</subject><issn>0378-1127</issn><issn>1872-7042</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkbtuGzEQRYkgBizL-QMXLNPsmm9yUzgInPgByHDj1ASXOxtR2IdM0gLU-stNQaqNVAPOnLkXnIvQFSU1JVRdb-p-juDnmpVXTWhNGPuCFtRoVmki2Fe0IFybilKmz9FFShtCiJTCLND7U_Bx9kMYXQ4eQ_cPMPQ9-JxwmLDDRRemPOzx2sUdpAwdPpil_AP_nst0nNyUTy28ddmvIWEfwWXAeQ04uRFwGLfOZ-wSHlwsDifcFSz9vERnvRsSfDvVJfp79-fl9qFaPd8_3v5aVZ5rlquWkYY1PaOCadMY03LBlKDc96oF3XolXCNb4blrlC6zjrdKKkmlEU5IbvgSfT_qbuP8-lb87RiSh2FwE8xvyVLdcCYEkfw_UGWkFkKrgoojWs6YUoTebmM5ZtxbSuwhHbuxx3TsIR1LqC3plLWb4xqUH-8CRJt8gMlDFwqbbTeHzwU-AMelmiY</recordid><startdate>20160401</startdate><enddate>20160401</enddate><creator>Baker, Thomas P.</creator><creator>Jordan, Gregory J.</creator><creator>Baker, Susan C.</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160401</creationdate><title>Microclimatic edge effects in a recently harvested forest: Do remnant forest patches create the same impact as large forest areas?</title><author>Baker, Thomas P. ; Jordan, Gregory J. ; Baker, Susan C.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-b20929f214278988b3426413cf6be7bc64a95b4c3a967342d3b65651584a45383</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Aggregated retention</topic><topic>Aggregates</topic><topic>Clearcutting</topic><topic>Disturbance</topic><topic>Disturbances</topic><topic>Edge effects</topic><topic>Forest influence</topic><topic>Forests</topic><topic>Harvesting</topic><topic>Microclimate</topic><topic>Microclimates</topic><topic>Monitoring</topic><topic>Running</topic><topic>Trees</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Baker, Thomas P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jordan, Gregory J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baker, Susan C.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Forest ecology and management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Baker, Thomas P.</au><au>Jordan, Gregory J.</au><au>Baker, Susan C.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Microclimatic edge effects in a recently harvested forest: Do remnant forest patches create the same impact as large forest areas?</atitle><jtitle>Forest ecology and management</jtitle><date>2016-04-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>365</volume><spage>128</spage><epage>136</epage><pages>128-136</pages><issn>0378-1127</issn><eissn>1872-7042</eissn><abstract>•Distance to mature forest (forest influence) drives microclimate in harvested areas.•The depth and magnitude of forest influence change with time (daily and monthly).•Forest influence made conditions near edges ⩽16% more humid and ⩽4°C cooler.•Retained aggregates were efficient in generating microclimatic forest influence.•Shade was a significant driver of microclimatic forest influence. Microclimatic forest influence (edge effects into open or regenerating areas) occurs within harvested forest, but the depth and magnitude may change depending on the design of the harvested area. This is an important consideration for managers, because gradients in microclimate can significant affect the ability of species to recolonise following disturbance. One harvesting method that can increase the amount of forest influence is aggregated retention. This technique involves leaving groups of trees (aggregates) within the harvested area, thus increasing the amount of regenerating forest that is near to an edge and therefore under forest influence. However, differences in the scale of forest influence generated from aggregates compared to unlogged forests surrounding harvested areas have not been tested. Understanding the ability of retained aggregates to generate forest influence is important in designing and implementing aggregated retention harvesting practices. This study tested whether retained aggregates generated similar levels of forest influence as mature forest surrounding harvested areas. Microclimatic forest influence was examined by monitoring spatial changes in air temperature and relative humidity along transects running from within standing mature forest into harvested forest. Intact forest and aggregate transects were located in the direction of maximum expected forest influence (south-facing edges). Results showed that forest influence was mostly similar in both depth and magnitude regardless of the type of forest from which it was generated. Temporal examination of forest influence showed that it changed throughout the day and across the year, with peaks in magnitude occurring during the middle of the day, and in months close to the equinoxes. Shade derived from standing trees was a potential driver of temporal patterns in microclimatic forest influence. At its peak magnitude, the microclimatic forest influence observed will likely have significant impacts on habitat suitability and thus, presumably, species recolonisation after disturbance. Results indicated that aggregated retention is an effective method for generating forest influence within harvested areas. Therefore, aggregated retention has the potential to be a valuable harvesting technique to alter microclimate and have beneficial impacts on the recovery of harvested forests.</abstract><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.foreco.2016.01.022</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0378-1127
ispartof Forest ecology and management, 2016-04, Vol.365, p.128-136
issn 0378-1127
1872-7042
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1793244053
source ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)
subjects Aggregated retention
Aggregates
Clearcutting
Disturbance
Disturbances
Edge effects
Forest influence
Forests
Harvesting
Microclimate
Microclimates
Monitoring
Running
Trees
title Microclimatic edge effects in a recently harvested forest: Do remnant forest patches create the same impact as large forest areas?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T20%3A23%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Microclimatic%20edge%20effects%20in%20a%20recently%20harvested%20forest:%20Do%20remnant%20forest%20patches%20create%20the%20same%20impact%20as%20large%20forest%20areas?&rft.jtitle=Forest%20ecology%20and%20management&rft.au=Baker,%20Thomas%20P.&rft.date=2016-04-01&rft.volume=365&rft.spage=128&rft.epage=136&rft.pages=128-136&rft.issn=0378-1127&rft.eissn=1872-7042&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.foreco.2016.01.022&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1793244053%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1768574476&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0378112716000232&rfr_iscdi=true