Ephemeral gully channel width and erosion simulation technology
Concentrated surface runoff, such as associated with ephemeral gully channels, increases erosion and transfers fine sediment and associated agrichemicals from upland areas to stream channels. Ephemeral gully erosion on cropland may contribute up to 40 % or more of the sediment delivered to the edge...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Natural hazards (Dordrecht) 2016-02, Vol.80 (3), p.1949-1966 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1966 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 1949 |
container_title | Natural hazards (Dordrecht) |
container_volume | 80 |
creator | Bingner, R. L. Wells, R. R. Momm, H. G. Rigby, J. R. Theurer, F. D. |
description | Concentrated surface runoff, such as associated with ephemeral gully channels, increases erosion and transfers fine sediment and associated agrichemicals from upland areas to stream channels. Ephemeral gully erosion on cropland may contribute up to 40 % or more of the sediment delivered to the edge of agricultural fields, significantly threatening the health of downstream ecological services. Typically, conservation practices developed for sheet and rill erosion are also expected to treat ephemeral gully erosion, but technology and tools are needed to account for the separate benefits and effects of practices on various sediment sources. Without improved research studies, subjective observations will continue to be used to satisfy quality criteria in lieu of scientifically defensible, quantitative methods to estimate the impact of gully erosion. Ephemeral gully channels evolve by one, or combination of, complex physical process in the form of incision, headcut migration upslope, and channel sidewalls expansion (widening). This study focused on the latter, ephemeral gully channel widening relationships. The impact of various width functions on erosion can be very significant and is dependent on discharge, slope, soil properties, and management conditions. A description is provided on six ephemeral gully widening relationships, followed by recommended improvements, comparative application, and identification of future research needs. Improvements in the development of ephemeral gully width algorithms are critical to understanding the impact of conservation practices on controlling ephemeral gully erosion. Tools are needed to predict and quantify ephemeral gully erosion, including the capability to evaluate the effect of conservation practices to control erosion. An improved critical shear stress equation was developed and described that provides an approach to incorporating impacts of management practices on the resulting gully erodibility. Conservation management planning by organizations needs a systematic approach to determining the extent of ephemeral gully erosion problems on a field, watershed, or national basis, or to predict the recurring or new locations of ephemeral gullies prior to their development. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s11069-015-2053-7 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1793220444</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3921878831</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c485t-75393b99b4fed3f80ca7609384c059e9fc63875d12a5e5b52980fbcef65bd56e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkEtLxDAUhYMoOI7-AHcFN26iN-9mJTKMDxhwo-AupGk67ZBJx6ZF5t_boS5EEFzds_jOgfshdEnghgCo20QISI2BCExBMKyO0IwIxTDkHI7RDDQlGBi8n6KzlDYAhEiqZ-huuav91nc2ZOshhH3mahujD9lnU_Z1ZmOZ-a5NTRuz1GyHYPtD7L2rYxva9f4cnVQ2JH_xfefo7WH5unjCq5fH58X9Cjueix4rwTQrtC545UtW5eCskqBZzh0I7XXlJMuVKAm1wotCUJ1DVThfSVGUQno2R9fT7q5rPwaferNtkvMh2OjbIRmiNKMUOOf_QKXQSnItRvTqF7pphy6Oj4yUkBpySuVIkYlyo4nU-crsumZru70hYA72zWTfjPbNwb5RY4dOnTSyce27H8t_lr4Ai4iGTQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1756908226</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Ephemeral gully channel width and erosion simulation technology</title><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><creator>Bingner, R. L. ; Wells, R. R. ; Momm, H. G. ; Rigby, J. R. ; Theurer, F. D.</creator><creatorcontrib>Bingner, R. L. ; Wells, R. R. ; Momm, H. G. ; Rigby, J. R. ; Theurer, F. D.</creatorcontrib><description>Concentrated surface runoff, such as associated with ephemeral gully channels, increases erosion and transfers fine sediment and associated agrichemicals from upland areas to stream channels. Ephemeral gully erosion on cropland may contribute up to 40 % or more of the sediment delivered to the edge of agricultural fields, significantly threatening the health of downstream ecological services. Typically, conservation practices developed for sheet and rill erosion are also expected to treat ephemeral gully erosion, but technology and tools are needed to account for the separate benefits and effects of practices on various sediment sources. Without improved research studies, subjective observations will continue to be used to satisfy quality criteria in lieu of scientifically defensible, quantitative methods to estimate the impact of gully erosion. Ephemeral gully channels evolve by one, or combination of, complex physical process in the form of incision, headcut migration upslope, and channel sidewalls expansion (widening). This study focused on the latter, ephemeral gully channel widening relationships. The impact of various width functions on erosion can be very significant and is dependent on discharge, slope, soil properties, and management conditions. A description is provided on six ephemeral gully widening relationships, followed by recommended improvements, comparative application, and identification of future research needs. Improvements in the development of ephemeral gully width algorithms are critical to understanding the impact of conservation practices on controlling ephemeral gully erosion. Tools are needed to predict and quantify ephemeral gully erosion, including the capability to evaluate the effect of conservation practices to control erosion. An improved critical shear stress equation was developed and described that provides an approach to incorporating impacts of management practices on the resulting gully erodibility. Conservation management planning by organizations needs a systematic approach to determining the extent of ephemeral gully erosion problems on a field, watershed, or national basis, or to predict the recurring or new locations of ephemeral gullies prior to their development.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0921-030X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-0840</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11069-015-2053-7</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>Agricultural land ; Agrochemicals ; Channels ; Civil Engineering ; Conservation ; Conservation practices ; Earth and Environmental Science ; Earth Sciences ; Environmental Management ; Erosion ; Erosion control ; Geophysics/Geodesy ; Geotechnical Engineering & Applied Earth Sciences ; Gullies ; Gully erosion ; Hydrogeology ; Management planning ; Mathematical analysis ; Natural Hazards ; Original Paper ; Rill erosion ; Sediments ; Shear stress ; Soil erosion ; Soil properties ; Surface runoff ; Watersheds ; Widening</subject><ispartof>Natural hazards (Dordrecht), 2016-02, Vol.80 (3), p.1949-1966</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht (outside the USA) 2015</rights><rights>Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c485t-75393b99b4fed3f80ca7609384c059e9fc63875d12a5e5b52980fbcef65bd56e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c485t-75393b99b4fed3f80ca7609384c059e9fc63875d12a5e5b52980fbcef65bd56e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11069-015-2053-7$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11069-015-2053-7$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bingner, R. L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wells, R. R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Momm, H. G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rigby, J. R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Theurer, F. D.</creatorcontrib><title>Ephemeral gully channel width and erosion simulation technology</title><title>Natural hazards (Dordrecht)</title><addtitle>Nat Hazards</addtitle><description>Concentrated surface runoff, such as associated with ephemeral gully channels, increases erosion and transfers fine sediment and associated agrichemicals from upland areas to stream channels. Ephemeral gully erosion on cropland may contribute up to 40 % or more of the sediment delivered to the edge of agricultural fields, significantly threatening the health of downstream ecological services. Typically, conservation practices developed for sheet and rill erosion are also expected to treat ephemeral gully erosion, but technology and tools are needed to account for the separate benefits and effects of practices on various sediment sources. Without improved research studies, subjective observations will continue to be used to satisfy quality criteria in lieu of scientifically defensible, quantitative methods to estimate the impact of gully erosion. Ephemeral gully channels evolve by one, or combination of, complex physical process in the form of incision, headcut migration upslope, and channel sidewalls expansion (widening). This study focused on the latter, ephemeral gully channel widening relationships. The impact of various width functions on erosion can be very significant and is dependent on discharge, slope, soil properties, and management conditions. A description is provided on six ephemeral gully widening relationships, followed by recommended improvements, comparative application, and identification of future research needs. Improvements in the development of ephemeral gully width algorithms are critical to understanding the impact of conservation practices on controlling ephemeral gully erosion. Tools are needed to predict and quantify ephemeral gully erosion, including the capability to evaluate the effect of conservation practices to control erosion. An improved critical shear stress equation was developed and described that provides an approach to incorporating impacts of management practices on the resulting gully erodibility. Conservation management planning by organizations needs a systematic approach to determining the extent of ephemeral gully erosion problems on a field, watershed, or national basis, or to predict the recurring or new locations of ephemeral gullies prior to their development.</description><subject>Agricultural land</subject><subject>Agrochemicals</subject><subject>Channels</subject><subject>Civil Engineering</subject><subject>Conservation</subject><subject>Conservation practices</subject><subject>Earth and Environmental Science</subject><subject>Earth Sciences</subject><subject>Environmental Management</subject><subject>Erosion</subject><subject>Erosion control</subject><subject>Geophysics/Geodesy</subject><subject>Geotechnical Engineering & Applied Earth Sciences</subject><subject>Gullies</subject><subject>Gully erosion</subject><subject>Hydrogeology</subject><subject>Management planning</subject><subject>Mathematical analysis</subject><subject>Natural Hazards</subject><subject>Original Paper</subject><subject>Rill erosion</subject><subject>Sediments</subject><subject>Shear stress</subject><subject>Soil erosion</subject><subject>Soil properties</subject><subject>Surface runoff</subject><subject>Watersheds</subject><subject>Widening</subject><issn>0921-030X</issn><issn>1573-0840</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkEtLxDAUhYMoOI7-AHcFN26iN-9mJTKMDxhwo-AupGk67ZBJx6ZF5t_boS5EEFzds_jOgfshdEnghgCo20QISI2BCExBMKyO0IwIxTDkHI7RDDQlGBi8n6KzlDYAhEiqZ-huuav91nc2ZOshhH3mahujD9lnU_Z1ZmOZ-a5NTRuz1GyHYPtD7L2rYxva9f4cnVQ2JH_xfefo7WH5unjCq5fH58X9Cjueix4rwTQrtC545UtW5eCskqBZzh0I7XXlJMuVKAm1wotCUJ1DVThfSVGUQno2R9fT7q5rPwaferNtkvMh2OjbIRmiNKMUOOf_QKXQSnItRvTqF7pphy6Oj4yUkBpySuVIkYlyo4nU-crsumZru70hYA72zWTfjPbNwb5RY4dOnTSyce27H8t_lr4Ai4iGTQ</recordid><startdate>20160201</startdate><enddate>20160201</enddate><creator>Bingner, R. L.</creator><creator>Wells, R. R.</creator><creator>Momm, H. G.</creator><creator>Rigby, J. R.</creator><creator>Theurer, F. D.</creator><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160201</creationdate><title>Ephemeral gully channel width and erosion simulation technology</title><author>Bingner, R. L. ; Wells, R. R. ; Momm, H. G. ; Rigby, J. R. ; Theurer, F. D.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c485t-75393b99b4fed3f80ca7609384c059e9fc63875d12a5e5b52980fbcef65bd56e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Agricultural land</topic><topic>Agrochemicals</topic><topic>Channels</topic><topic>Civil Engineering</topic><topic>Conservation</topic><topic>Conservation practices</topic><topic>Earth and Environmental Science</topic><topic>Earth Sciences</topic><topic>Environmental Management</topic><topic>Erosion</topic><topic>Erosion control</topic><topic>Geophysics/Geodesy</topic><topic>Geotechnical Engineering & Applied Earth Sciences</topic><topic>Gullies</topic><topic>Gully erosion</topic><topic>Hydrogeology</topic><topic>Management planning</topic><topic>Mathematical analysis</topic><topic>Natural Hazards</topic><topic>Original Paper</topic><topic>Rill erosion</topic><topic>Sediments</topic><topic>Shear stress</topic><topic>Soil erosion</topic><topic>Soil properties</topic><topic>Surface runoff</topic><topic>Watersheds</topic><topic>Widening</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bingner, R. L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wells, R. R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Momm, H. G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rigby, J. R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Theurer, F. D.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Natural hazards (Dordrecht)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bingner, R. L.</au><au>Wells, R. R.</au><au>Momm, H. G.</au><au>Rigby, J. R.</au><au>Theurer, F. D.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Ephemeral gully channel width and erosion simulation technology</atitle><jtitle>Natural hazards (Dordrecht)</jtitle><stitle>Nat Hazards</stitle><date>2016-02-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>80</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>1949</spage><epage>1966</epage><pages>1949-1966</pages><issn>0921-030X</issn><eissn>1573-0840</eissn><abstract>Concentrated surface runoff, such as associated with ephemeral gully channels, increases erosion and transfers fine sediment and associated agrichemicals from upland areas to stream channels. Ephemeral gully erosion on cropland may contribute up to 40 % or more of the sediment delivered to the edge of agricultural fields, significantly threatening the health of downstream ecological services. Typically, conservation practices developed for sheet and rill erosion are also expected to treat ephemeral gully erosion, but technology and tools are needed to account for the separate benefits and effects of practices on various sediment sources. Without improved research studies, subjective observations will continue to be used to satisfy quality criteria in lieu of scientifically defensible, quantitative methods to estimate the impact of gully erosion. Ephemeral gully channels evolve by one, or combination of, complex physical process in the form of incision, headcut migration upslope, and channel sidewalls expansion (widening). This study focused on the latter, ephemeral gully channel widening relationships. The impact of various width functions on erosion can be very significant and is dependent on discharge, slope, soil properties, and management conditions. A description is provided on six ephemeral gully widening relationships, followed by recommended improvements, comparative application, and identification of future research needs. Improvements in the development of ephemeral gully width algorithms are critical to understanding the impact of conservation practices on controlling ephemeral gully erosion. Tools are needed to predict and quantify ephemeral gully erosion, including the capability to evaluate the effect of conservation practices to control erosion. An improved critical shear stress equation was developed and described that provides an approach to incorporating impacts of management practices on the resulting gully erodibility. Conservation management planning by organizations needs a systematic approach to determining the extent of ephemeral gully erosion problems on a field, watershed, or national basis, or to predict the recurring or new locations of ephemeral gullies prior to their development.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Netherlands</pub><doi>10.1007/s11069-015-2053-7</doi><tpages>18</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0921-030X |
ispartof | Natural hazards (Dordrecht), 2016-02, Vol.80 (3), p.1949-1966 |
issn | 0921-030X 1573-0840 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1793220444 |
source | Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals |
subjects | Agricultural land Agrochemicals Channels Civil Engineering Conservation Conservation practices Earth and Environmental Science Earth Sciences Environmental Management Erosion Erosion control Geophysics/Geodesy Geotechnical Engineering & Applied Earth Sciences Gullies Gully erosion Hydrogeology Management planning Mathematical analysis Natural Hazards Original Paper Rill erosion Sediments Shear stress Soil erosion Soil properties Surface runoff Watersheds Widening |
title | Ephemeral gully channel width and erosion simulation technology |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-10T04%3A49%3A25IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Ephemeral%20gully%20channel%20width%20and%20erosion%20simulation%20technology&rft.jtitle=Natural%20hazards%20(Dordrecht)&rft.au=Bingner,%20R.%20L.&rft.date=2016-02-01&rft.volume=80&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=1949&rft.epage=1966&rft.pages=1949-1966&rft.issn=0921-030X&rft.eissn=1573-0840&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11069-015-2053-7&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3921878831%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1756908226&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |