A comparison between occlusive and exposure dressing in the management of burn wound
Highlights • Exposure dressing of burn wounds was more susceptible to contamination than occlusive dressing. • The mean duration of treatment based on epithelialization and healing in occlusive dressing was longer than that for exposure dressing. • The incidence of burns due to hot liquid was higher...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Burns 2016-05, Vol.42 (3), p.578-582 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 582 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 3 |
| container_start_page | 578 |
| container_title | Burns |
| container_volume | 42 |
| creator | Soltan Dallal, M.M Safdari, R Emadi Koochak, H Sharifi-Yazdi, S Akhoondinasab, M.R Pourmand, M.R Hadayatpour, A Sharifi-Yazdi, M.K |
| description | Highlights • Exposure dressing of burn wounds was more susceptible to contamination than occlusive dressing. • The mean duration of treatment based on epithelialization and healing in occlusive dressing was longer than that for exposure dressing. • The incidence of burns due to hot liquid was higher than burns of other etiologies. • Pseudomonas aeruginosa was the most common organism encountered in burn infection. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.burns.2015.05.001 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1791722715</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0305417915001291</els_id><sourcerecordid>1791722715</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c414t-4c9bf6c7596937a5e3ebd9f5595417f49ce4ad84064f36ef24ddbc48831e14f03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU1v1DAQhi0EapfCL0BCPnLJ4ontJD6AVFVAK1Xi0PZsOfakeEnsxU768e9xuoUDF0YjzeV95-MZQt4B2wKD5uNu2y8p5G3NQG5ZSQYvyAa6VlUgmHpJNowzWQlo1TF5nfOOlZAdOyLHdaNa1vFuQ65PqY3T3iSfY6A9zveIgUZrxyX7O6QmOIoP-5iXhNQlzNmHW-oDnX8gnUwwtzhhmGkc6LoNvY9LcG_Iq8GMGd8-1xNy8_XL9dl5dfn928XZ6WVlBYi5Elb1Q2NbqRrFWyORY-_UIKWSZelBKIvCuE6wRgy8waEWzvVWdB0HBDEwfkI-HPruU_y1YJ715LPFcTQB45J1uRzaum5BFik_SG2KOScc9D75yaRHDUyvOPVOP-HUK07NSjIorvfPA5Z-QvfX84dfEXw6CLCceecx6Ww9BovOJ7SzdtH_Z8Dnf_x29MFbM_7ER8y7WByFoAada8301frR9aEgi7tWwH8D2CKcrw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1791722715</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A comparison between occlusive and exposure dressing in the management of burn wound</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Soltan Dallal, M.M ; Safdari, R ; Emadi Koochak, H ; Sharifi-Yazdi, S ; Akhoondinasab, M.R ; Pourmand, M.R ; Hadayatpour, A ; Sharifi-Yazdi, M.K</creator><creatorcontrib>Soltan Dallal, M.M ; Safdari, R ; Emadi Koochak, H ; Sharifi-Yazdi, S ; Akhoondinasab, M.R ; Pourmand, M.R ; Hadayatpour, A ; Sharifi-Yazdi, M.K</creatorcontrib><description>Highlights • Exposure dressing of burn wounds was more susceptible to contamination than occlusive dressing. • The mean duration of treatment based on epithelialization and healing in occlusive dressing was longer than that for exposure dressing. • The incidence of burns due to hot liquid was higher than burns of other etiologies. • Pseudomonas aeruginosa was the most common organism encountered in burn infection.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0305-4179</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-1409</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.burns.2015.05.001</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26970838</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Acinetobacter Infections - epidemiology ; Bacterial prevalence ; Bandages ; Burn wound infection ; Burns - microbiology ; Burns - therapy ; Critical Care ; Enterobacteriaceae Infections - epidemiology ; Escherichia coli Infections - epidemiology ; Exposure dressing ; Female ; Humans ; Iran - epidemiology ; Male ; Occlusive dressing ; Occlusive Dressings ; Pseudomonas aeruginosa ; Pseudomonas Infections - epidemiology ; Re-Epithelialization ; Staphylococcal Infections - epidemiology ; Time Factors ; Wound Healing ; Wound Infection - epidemiology ; Wound Infection - microbiology</subject><ispartof>Burns, 2016-05, Vol.42 (3), p.578-582</ispartof><rights>Elsevier Ltd and ISBI</rights><rights>2015 Elsevier Ltd and ISBI</rights><rights>Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd and ISBI. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c414t-4c9bf6c7596937a5e3ebd9f5595417f49ce4ad84064f36ef24ddbc48831e14f03</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c414t-4c9bf6c7596937a5e3ebd9f5595417f49ce4ad84064f36ef24ddbc48831e14f03</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305417915001291$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26970838$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Soltan Dallal, M.M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Safdari, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Emadi Koochak, H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sharifi-Yazdi, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Akhoondinasab, M.R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pourmand, M.R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hadayatpour, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sharifi-Yazdi, M.K</creatorcontrib><title>A comparison between occlusive and exposure dressing in the management of burn wound</title><title>Burns</title><addtitle>Burns</addtitle><description>Highlights • Exposure dressing of burn wounds was more susceptible to contamination than occlusive dressing. • The mean duration of treatment based on epithelialization and healing in occlusive dressing was longer than that for exposure dressing. • The incidence of burns due to hot liquid was higher than burns of other etiologies. • Pseudomonas aeruginosa was the most common organism encountered in burn infection.</description><subject>Acinetobacter Infections - epidemiology</subject><subject>Bacterial prevalence</subject><subject>Bandages</subject><subject>Burn wound infection</subject><subject>Burns - microbiology</subject><subject>Burns - therapy</subject><subject>Critical Care</subject><subject>Enterobacteriaceae Infections - epidemiology</subject><subject>Escherichia coli Infections - epidemiology</subject><subject>Exposure dressing</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Iran - epidemiology</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Occlusive dressing</subject><subject>Occlusive Dressings</subject><subject>Pseudomonas aeruginosa</subject><subject>Pseudomonas Infections - epidemiology</subject><subject>Re-Epithelialization</subject><subject>Staphylococcal Infections - epidemiology</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Wound Healing</subject><subject>Wound Infection - epidemiology</subject><subject>Wound Infection - microbiology</subject><issn>0305-4179</issn><issn>1879-1409</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkU1v1DAQhi0EapfCL0BCPnLJ4ontJD6AVFVAK1Xi0PZsOfakeEnsxU768e9xuoUDF0YjzeV95-MZQt4B2wKD5uNu2y8p5G3NQG5ZSQYvyAa6VlUgmHpJNowzWQlo1TF5nfOOlZAdOyLHdaNa1vFuQ65PqY3T3iSfY6A9zveIgUZrxyX7O6QmOIoP-5iXhNQlzNmHW-oDnX8gnUwwtzhhmGkc6LoNvY9LcG_Iq8GMGd8-1xNy8_XL9dl5dfn928XZ6WVlBYi5Elb1Q2NbqRrFWyORY-_UIKWSZelBKIvCuE6wRgy8waEWzvVWdB0HBDEwfkI-HPruU_y1YJ715LPFcTQB45J1uRzaum5BFik_SG2KOScc9D75yaRHDUyvOPVOP-HUK07NSjIorvfPA5Z-QvfX84dfEXw6CLCceecx6Ww9BovOJ7SzdtH_Z8Dnf_x29MFbM_7ER8y7WByFoAada8301frR9aEgi7tWwH8D2CKcrw</recordid><startdate>20160501</startdate><enddate>20160501</enddate><creator>Soltan Dallal, M.M</creator><creator>Safdari, R</creator><creator>Emadi Koochak, H</creator><creator>Sharifi-Yazdi, S</creator><creator>Akhoondinasab, M.R</creator><creator>Pourmand, M.R</creator><creator>Hadayatpour, A</creator><creator>Sharifi-Yazdi, M.K</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160501</creationdate><title>A comparison between occlusive and exposure dressing in the management of burn wound</title><author>Soltan Dallal, M.M ; Safdari, R ; Emadi Koochak, H ; Sharifi-Yazdi, S ; Akhoondinasab, M.R ; Pourmand, M.R ; Hadayatpour, A ; Sharifi-Yazdi, M.K</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c414t-4c9bf6c7596937a5e3ebd9f5595417f49ce4ad84064f36ef24ddbc48831e14f03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Acinetobacter Infections - epidemiology</topic><topic>Bacterial prevalence</topic><topic>Bandages</topic><topic>Burn wound infection</topic><topic>Burns - microbiology</topic><topic>Burns - therapy</topic><topic>Critical Care</topic><topic>Enterobacteriaceae Infections - epidemiology</topic><topic>Escherichia coli Infections - epidemiology</topic><topic>Exposure dressing</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Iran - epidemiology</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Occlusive dressing</topic><topic>Occlusive Dressings</topic><topic>Pseudomonas aeruginosa</topic><topic>Pseudomonas Infections - epidemiology</topic><topic>Re-Epithelialization</topic><topic>Staphylococcal Infections - epidemiology</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Wound Healing</topic><topic>Wound Infection - epidemiology</topic><topic>Wound Infection - microbiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Soltan Dallal, M.M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Safdari, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Emadi Koochak, H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sharifi-Yazdi, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Akhoondinasab, M.R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pourmand, M.R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hadayatpour, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sharifi-Yazdi, M.K</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Burns</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Soltan Dallal, M.M</au><au>Safdari, R</au><au>Emadi Koochak, H</au><au>Sharifi-Yazdi, S</au><au>Akhoondinasab, M.R</au><au>Pourmand, M.R</au><au>Hadayatpour, A</au><au>Sharifi-Yazdi, M.K</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A comparison between occlusive and exposure dressing in the management of burn wound</atitle><jtitle>Burns</jtitle><addtitle>Burns</addtitle><date>2016-05-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>42</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>578</spage><epage>582</epage><pages>578-582</pages><issn>0305-4179</issn><eissn>1879-1409</eissn><abstract>Highlights • Exposure dressing of burn wounds was more susceptible to contamination than occlusive dressing. • The mean duration of treatment based on epithelialization and healing in occlusive dressing was longer than that for exposure dressing. • The incidence of burns due to hot liquid was higher than burns of other etiologies. • Pseudomonas aeruginosa was the most common organism encountered in burn infection.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>26970838</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.burns.2015.05.001</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0305-4179 |
| ispartof | Burns, 2016-05, Vol.42 (3), p.578-582 |
| issn | 0305-4179 1879-1409 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1791722715 |
| source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
| subjects | Acinetobacter Infections - epidemiology Bacterial prevalence Bandages Burn wound infection Burns - microbiology Burns - therapy Critical Care Enterobacteriaceae Infections - epidemiology Escherichia coli Infections - epidemiology Exposure dressing Female Humans Iran - epidemiology Male Occlusive dressing Occlusive Dressings Pseudomonas aeruginosa Pseudomonas Infections - epidemiology Re-Epithelialization Staphylococcal Infections - epidemiology Time Factors Wound Healing Wound Infection - epidemiology Wound Infection - microbiology |
| title | A comparison between occlusive and exposure dressing in the management of burn wound |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T16%3A49%3A34IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20comparison%20between%20occlusive%20and%20exposure%20dressing%20in%20the%20management%20of%20burn%20wound&rft.jtitle=Burns&rft.au=Soltan%20Dallal,%20M.M&rft.date=2016-05-01&rft.volume=42&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=578&rft.epage=582&rft.pages=578-582&rft.issn=0305-4179&rft.eissn=1879-1409&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.burns.2015.05.001&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1791722715%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1791722715&rft_id=info:pmid/26970838&rft_els_id=S0305417915001291&rfr_iscdi=true |