Femoral implantation and pull through as an adjunct to traditional methods in cardiac resynchronization therapy
Background We have described the use of femoral access followed by pull through of the lead to a pectoral position to circumvent difficulty in implanting a left ventricular (LV) lead by standard methods. Objective The purpose of this study was to establish the effect of femoral implantation and pull...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Heart rhythm 2016-06, Vol.13 (6), p.1260-1265 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1265 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 1260 |
container_title | Heart rhythm |
container_volume | 13 |
creator | Gonna, Hanney, MB Domenichini, Giulia, MD, PhD Zuberi, Zia, MB, PhD Adhya, Shaumik, MD Sharma, Rajan, MD Anderson, Lisa J., MD Beeton, Ian, MB Dhillon, Paramdeep S., MB, PhD Gallagher, Mark M., MD |
description | Background We have described the use of femoral access followed by pull through of the lead to a pectoral position to circumvent difficulty in implanting a left ventricular (LV) lead by standard methods. Objective The purpose of this study was to establish the effect of femoral implantation and pull through on the overall rate of success in percutaneous implantation of LV leads. Methods We collected data prospectively in all attempts at LV lead implantation from the time that we envisioned the femoral pull-through approach. Results In the 6 years to the end of September 2014, our group attempted to implant a new LV lead in 736 patients, including 16 who previously had failed attempts by other groups. A standard superior approach was successful in 726 of 731 cases (99.3%) in whom it was attempted. In 5 cases, we failed to deliver a lead from a superior approach; in 5, we judged that previous attempts had been exhaustive. In all 10 cases, LV lead placement was achieved from a femoral approach, with the procedure time being 186 ± 65 minutes. In the first case attempted, the pull through failed; the lead was tunneled to the pectoral generator. In 1 case, the coronary sinus was found to be occluded at the os: a transseptal approach was used with the subsequent pull through. No complication occurred. At 22.3 ± 18.5 months after the implantation, all systems implanted by a femoral approach continued to function. Conclusion Used as an adjunct to standard methods, the femoral access and pull through method allows percutaneous LV lead placement in virtually all cases. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.hrthm.2016.01.027 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1791324985</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S1547527116001272</els_id><sourcerecordid>1791324985</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c414t-7b834349f5c5e545f752f14bacc45a2c88f4b91e3e0dce05b31c8fad86eef7a03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU-L1jAQxoMo7rr6CQTJ0Utr_jbtQUEWV4UFD-o5pMnUprZNTdKF109v6rt68OJpMuF5Znh-g9BzSmpKaPNqqseYx6VmpakJrQlTD9AllbKpeKvow-MtVCWZohfoSUoTIaxrCH-MLljTMiJJd4nCDSwhmhn7ZZvNmk32YcVmdXjb5xnnMYb924hNKn_YuGlfbcY54ByN84e2WBfIY3AJ-xVbE503FkdIp9UW8-p_nkfmEaLZTk_Ro8HMCZ7d1yv09ebdl-sP1e2n9x-v395WVlCRK9W3XHDRDdJKkEIOSrKBit5YK6Rhtm0H0XcUOBBngcieU9sOxrUNwKAM4Vfo5XnuFsOPHVLWi08W5pIRwp40VR3lTHStLFJ-ltoYUoow6C36xcSTpkQfpPWkf5PWB2lNqC6ki-vF_YK9X8D99fxBWwSvzwIoMe88RJ2sh9WC8xFs1i74_yx484_fzn711szf4QRpCnss8EsSnZgm-vNx7OPWtCGEMsX4L1aVqBs</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1791324985</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Femoral implantation and pull through as an adjunct to traditional methods in cardiac resynchronization therapy</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete - AutoHoldings</source><source>MEDLINE</source><creator>Gonna, Hanney, MB ; Domenichini, Giulia, MD, PhD ; Zuberi, Zia, MB, PhD ; Adhya, Shaumik, MD ; Sharma, Rajan, MD ; Anderson, Lisa J., MD ; Beeton, Ian, MB ; Dhillon, Paramdeep S., MB, PhD ; Gallagher, Mark M., MD</creator><creatorcontrib>Gonna, Hanney, MB ; Domenichini, Giulia, MD, PhD ; Zuberi, Zia, MB, PhD ; Adhya, Shaumik, MD ; Sharma, Rajan, MD ; Anderson, Lisa J., MD ; Beeton, Ian, MB ; Dhillon, Paramdeep S., MB, PhD ; Gallagher, Mark M., MD</creatorcontrib><description>Background We have described the use of femoral access followed by pull through of the lead to a pectoral position to circumvent difficulty in implanting a left ventricular (LV) lead by standard methods. Objective The purpose of this study was to establish the effect of femoral implantation and pull through on the overall rate of success in percutaneous implantation of LV leads. Methods We collected data prospectively in all attempts at LV lead implantation from the time that we envisioned the femoral pull-through approach. Results In the 6 years to the end of September 2014, our group attempted to implant a new LV lead in 736 patients, including 16 who previously had failed attempts by other groups. A standard superior approach was successful in 726 of 731 cases (99.3%) in whom it was attempted. In 5 cases, we failed to deliver a lead from a superior approach; in 5, we judged that previous attempts had been exhaustive. In all 10 cases, LV lead placement was achieved from a femoral approach, with the procedure time being 186 ± 65 minutes. In the first case attempted, the pull through failed; the lead was tunneled to the pectoral generator. In 1 case, the coronary sinus was found to be occluded at the os: a transseptal approach was used with the subsequent pull through. No complication occurred. At 22.3 ± 18.5 months after the implantation, all systems implanted by a femoral approach continued to function. Conclusion Used as an adjunct to standard methods, the femoral access and pull through method allows percutaneous LV lead placement in virtually all cases.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1547-5271</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1556-3871</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2016.01.027</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26820509</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Aged ; Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy - methods ; Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Devices ; Cardiovascular ; Catheterization, Peripheral - methods ; Endocardial left ventricular pacing ; Female ; Femoral approach ; Femoral Vein - surgery ; Heart Failure - therapy ; Humans ; Left ventricular pacing ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Outcome and Process Assessment (Health Care) ; Prospective Studies ; Prosthesis Implantation - methods ; Pull through ; Surgical left ventricular pacing ; Transseptal left ventricular pacing ; United Kingdom</subject><ispartof>Heart rhythm, 2016-06, Vol.13 (6), p.1260-1265</ispartof><rights>Heart Rhythm Society</rights><rights>2016 Heart Rhythm Society</rights><rights>Copyright © 2016 Heart Rhythm Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c414t-7b834349f5c5e545f752f14bacc45a2c88f4b91e3e0dce05b31c8fad86eef7a03</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c414t-7b834349f5c5e545f752f14bacc45a2c88f4b91e3e0dce05b31c8fad86eef7a03</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.hrthm.2016.01.027$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3548,27922,27923,45993</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26820509$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gonna, Hanney, MB</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Domenichini, Giulia, MD, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zuberi, Zia, MB, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Adhya, Shaumik, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sharma, Rajan, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anderson, Lisa J., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beeton, Ian, MB</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dhillon, Paramdeep S., MB, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gallagher, Mark M., MD</creatorcontrib><title>Femoral implantation and pull through as an adjunct to traditional methods in cardiac resynchronization therapy</title><title>Heart rhythm</title><addtitle>Heart Rhythm</addtitle><description>Background We have described the use of femoral access followed by pull through of the lead to a pectoral position to circumvent difficulty in implanting a left ventricular (LV) lead by standard methods. Objective The purpose of this study was to establish the effect of femoral implantation and pull through on the overall rate of success in percutaneous implantation of LV leads. Methods We collected data prospectively in all attempts at LV lead implantation from the time that we envisioned the femoral pull-through approach. Results In the 6 years to the end of September 2014, our group attempted to implant a new LV lead in 736 patients, including 16 who previously had failed attempts by other groups. A standard superior approach was successful in 726 of 731 cases (99.3%) in whom it was attempted. In 5 cases, we failed to deliver a lead from a superior approach; in 5, we judged that previous attempts had been exhaustive. In all 10 cases, LV lead placement was achieved from a femoral approach, with the procedure time being 186 ± 65 minutes. In the first case attempted, the pull through failed; the lead was tunneled to the pectoral generator. In 1 case, the coronary sinus was found to be occluded at the os: a transseptal approach was used with the subsequent pull through. No complication occurred. At 22.3 ± 18.5 months after the implantation, all systems implanted by a femoral approach continued to function. Conclusion Used as an adjunct to standard methods, the femoral access and pull through method allows percutaneous LV lead placement in virtually all cases.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy - methods</subject><subject>Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Devices</subject><subject>Cardiovascular</subject><subject>Catheterization, Peripheral - methods</subject><subject>Endocardial left ventricular pacing</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Femoral approach</subject><subject>Femoral Vein - surgery</subject><subject>Heart Failure - therapy</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Left ventricular pacing</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Outcome and Process Assessment (Health Care)</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Prosthesis Implantation - methods</subject><subject>Pull through</subject><subject>Surgical left ventricular pacing</subject><subject>Transseptal left ventricular pacing</subject><subject>United Kingdom</subject><issn>1547-5271</issn><issn>1556-3871</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkU-L1jAQxoMo7rr6CQTJ0Utr_jbtQUEWV4UFD-o5pMnUprZNTdKF109v6rt68OJpMuF5Znh-g9BzSmpKaPNqqseYx6VmpakJrQlTD9AllbKpeKvow-MtVCWZohfoSUoTIaxrCH-MLljTMiJJd4nCDSwhmhn7ZZvNmk32YcVmdXjb5xnnMYb924hNKn_YuGlfbcY54ByN84e2WBfIY3AJ-xVbE503FkdIp9UW8-p_nkfmEaLZTk_Ro8HMCZ7d1yv09ebdl-sP1e2n9x-v395WVlCRK9W3XHDRDdJKkEIOSrKBit5YK6Rhtm0H0XcUOBBngcieU9sOxrUNwKAM4Vfo5XnuFsOPHVLWi08W5pIRwp40VR3lTHStLFJ-ltoYUoow6C36xcSTpkQfpPWkf5PWB2lNqC6ki-vF_YK9X8D99fxBWwSvzwIoMe88RJ2sh9WC8xFs1i74_yx484_fzn711szf4QRpCnss8EsSnZgm-vNx7OPWtCGEMsX4L1aVqBs</recordid><startdate>20160601</startdate><enddate>20160601</enddate><creator>Gonna, Hanney, MB</creator><creator>Domenichini, Giulia, MD, PhD</creator><creator>Zuberi, Zia, MB, PhD</creator><creator>Adhya, Shaumik, MD</creator><creator>Sharma, Rajan, MD</creator><creator>Anderson, Lisa J., MD</creator><creator>Beeton, Ian, MB</creator><creator>Dhillon, Paramdeep S., MB, PhD</creator><creator>Gallagher, Mark M., MD</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160601</creationdate><title>Femoral implantation and pull through as an adjunct to traditional methods in cardiac resynchronization therapy</title><author>Gonna, Hanney, MB ; Domenichini, Giulia, MD, PhD ; Zuberi, Zia, MB, PhD ; Adhya, Shaumik, MD ; Sharma, Rajan, MD ; Anderson, Lisa J., MD ; Beeton, Ian, MB ; Dhillon, Paramdeep S., MB, PhD ; Gallagher, Mark M., MD</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c414t-7b834349f5c5e545f752f14bacc45a2c88f4b91e3e0dce05b31c8fad86eef7a03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy - methods</topic><topic>Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Devices</topic><topic>Cardiovascular</topic><topic>Catheterization, Peripheral - methods</topic><topic>Endocardial left ventricular pacing</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Femoral approach</topic><topic>Femoral Vein - surgery</topic><topic>Heart Failure - therapy</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Left ventricular pacing</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Outcome and Process Assessment (Health Care)</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Prosthesis Implantation - methods</topic><topic>Pull through</topic><topic>Surgical left ventricular pacing</topic><topic>Transseptal left ventricular pacing</topic><topic>United Kingdom</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gonna, Hanney, MB</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Domenichini, Giulia, MD, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zuberi, Zia, MB, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Adhya, Shaumik, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sharma, Rajan, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anderson, Lisa J., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beeton, Ian, MB</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dhillon, Paramdeep S., MB, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gallagher, Mark M., MD</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Heart rhythm</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gonna, Hanney, MB</au><au>Domenichini, Giulia, MD, PhD</au><au>Zuberi, Zia, MB, PhD</au><au>Adhya, Shaumik, MD</au><au>Sharma, Rajan, MD</au><au>Anderson, Lisa J., MD</au><au>Beeton, Ian, MB</au><au>Dhillon, Paramdeep S., MB, PhD</au><au>Gallagher, Mark M., MD</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Femoral implantation and pull through as an adjunct to traditional methods in cardiac resynchronization therapy</atitle><jtitle>Heart rhythm</jtitle><addtitle>Heart Rhythm</addtitle><date>2016-06-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>13</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1260</spage><epage>1265</epage><pages>1260-1265</pages><issn>1547-5271</issn><eissn>1556-3871</eissn><abstract>Background We have described the use of femoral access followed by pull through of the lead to a pectoral position to circumvent difficulty in implanting a left ventricular (LV) lead by standard methods. Objective The purpose of this study was to establish the effect of femoral implantation and pull through on the overall rate of success in percutaneous implantation of LV leads. Methods We collected data prospectively in all attempts at LV lead implantation from the time that we envisioned the femoral pull-through approach. Results In the 6 years to the end of September 2014, our group attempted to implant a new LV lead in 736 patients, including 16 who previously had failed attempts by other groups. A standard superior approach was successful in 726 of 731 cases (99.3%) in whom it was attempted. In 5 cases, we failed to deliver a lead from a superior approach; in 5, we judged that previous attempts had been exhaustive. In all 10 cases, LV lead placement was achieved from a femoral approach, with the procedure time being 186 ± 65 minutes. In the first case attempted, the pull through failed; the lead was tunneled to the pectoral generator. In 1 case, the coronary sinus was found to be occluded at the os: a transseptal approach was used with the subsequent pull through. No complication occurred. At 22.3 ± 18.5 months after the implantation, all systems implanted by a femoral approach continued to function. Conclusion Used as an adjunct to standard methods, the femoral access and pull through method allows percutaneous LV lead placement in virtually all cases.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>26820509</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.hrthm.2016.01.027</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1547-5271 |
ispartof | Heart rhythm, 2016-06, Vol.13 (6), p.1260-1265 |
issn | 1547-5271 1556-3871 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1791324985 |
source | Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete - AutoHoldings; MEDLINE |
subjects | Aged Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy - methods Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Devices Cardiovascular Catheterization, Peripheral - methods Endocardial left ventricular pacing Female Femoral approach Femoral Vein - surgery Heart Failure - therapy Humans Left ventricular pacing Male Middle Aged Outcome and Process Assessment (Health Care) Prospective Studies Prosthesis Implantation - methods Pull through Surgical left ventricular pacing Transseptal left ventricular pacing United Kingdom |
title | Femoral implantation and pull through as an adjunct to traditional methods in cardiac resynchronization therapy |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-09T17%3A28%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Femoral%20implantation%20and%20pull%20through%20as%20an%20adjunct%20to%20traditional%20methods%20in%20cardiac%20resynchronization%20therapy&rft.jtitle=Heart%20rhythm&rft.au=Gonna,%20Hanney,%20MB&rft.date=2016-06-01&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1260&rft.epage=1265&rft.pages=1260-1265&rft.issn=1547-5271&rft.eissn=1556-3871&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.hrthm.2016.01.027&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1791324985%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1791324985&rft_id=info:pmid/26820509&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S1547527116001272&rfr_iscdi=true |