A new approach to species distributional indicators for the Marine Strategy Framework Directive (MSFD)

•New distributional indicators applicable to the MSFD are proposed for use in Spain.•Two indicators used together address the population distributional criterion well.•The proposed approach outlines fish spatial behavior.•The approach is a tool for summarizing spatial-pattern time series.•These indi...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Ecological indicators 2016-08, Vol.67, p.21-30
Hauptverfasser: Modica, Larissa, Córdoba, Pilar, Rodríguez-Cabello, Cristina, Sánchez, Francisco, Velasco, Francisco
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:•New distributional indicators applicable to the MSFD are proposed for use in Spain.•Two indicators used together address the population distributional criterion well.•The proposed approach outlines fish spatial behavior.•The approach is a tool for summarizing spatial-pattern time series.•These indicators, accessible for managers and politicians, reduce the use of maps. We propose alternative fish-populations spatial indicators for use in the Marine Strategy Framework Directive (MSFD). Following Commission Decision 2010/477, we have applied two different spatial indicators to three fish populations with “slow type” life-history traits, i.e. slow growing like Helicolenus dactylopterus, or large bodied like Merluccius merluccius and Lophius budegassa. We tested their efficiency separately and combined. One of these indicators, the presence/absence of the population in sampling squares, had already been applied during the initial assessment of the MSFD in Spain. Another indicator, the geographical spread, is proposed here as a new monitoring tool for the MSFD in Spanish waters. The results demonstrate for the three populations analyzed that neither indicator was sufficient alone to describe the population spatial pattern or its evolution. Thus, the approach to implementing the MSFD indicated in Commission Decision 2010/477 is not sufficient to provide integrated information about the spatial behavior of the fish populations analyzed. Although numerical targets or threshold values cannot be set, directional targets could be proposed, based on the results of both indicators, if evaluation of them is extended to more species and more geographical areas. The analysis could be extended to other “slow type” populations within the fish community and also to different ecoregions. We propose an approach including the estimation of two different indicators to monitoring both the area occupied and the geographical spread of fish populations within communities, interpreting them together to generate a more complete picture of the spatial patterns of those populations. In spite of the difficulties in fixing numerical targets or thresholds, or in distinguishing between environmentally and human driven changes in the population spatial distributions, this approach helps to summarize fish spatial behavior. It improves information from the indicators applied alone and reduces the requirement for a large number of maps (except for some particular event or population). The prop
ISSN:1470-160X
1872-7034
DOI:10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.02.010