Comparison of Different Methods of Valsalva Maneuver for Right-to-left Shunt Detection by Contrast-Enhanced Transcranial Doppler

Abstract We evaluated 298 patients for right-to-left shunt (RLS) detection by contrast-enhanced transcranial Doppler at rest state (RS), during the conventional Valsalva maneuver (CM), and during the modified Valsalva maneuver (BM: blowing into the connecting tube of a sphygmomanometer at 40 mm Hg f...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Ultrasound in medicine & biology 2016-05, Vol.42 (5), p.1124-1129
Hauptverfasser: Guo, Yu-Zhu, Gao, Yong-Sheng, Guo, Zhen-Ni, Niu, Peng-Peng, Yang, Yi, Xing, Ying-Qi
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1129
container_issue 5
container_start_page 1124
container_title Ultrasound in medicine & biology
container_volume 42
creator Guo, Yu-Zhu
Gao, Yong-Sheng
Guo, Zhen-Ni
Niu, Peng-Peng
Yang, Yi
Xing, Ying-Qi
description Abstract We evaluated 298 patients for right-to-left shunt (RLS) detection by contrast-enhanced transcranial Doppler at rest state (RS), during the conventional Valsalva maneuver (CM), and during the modified Valsalva maneuver (BM: blowing into the connecting tube of a sphygmomanometer at 40 mm Hg for 10 s) in random order, and the degree of RLS along the time of the first microbubble occurrence was recorded. The positive rates were 21.8%, 36.9% and 47.3% for RS, CM and BM, respectively ( p  
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2015.12.020
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1790966329</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0301562916000053</els_id><sourcerecordid>1790966329</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c468t-f016b90d50deece4b60b6bf197930090c3e6abc44bd27f3696a8f8dda3b175c93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNUk1vEzEUtBCIhsJfQBYnLrv1R9a75oCEkkKRWiHRgrhZtveZOGzWwfZGyo2fjlcpCHHqxZbsmXnvzTyEXlFSU0LFxbaehhx12kFvfKgZoU1NWU0YeYQWtGtlxST99hgtCCe0agSTZ-hZSltCSCt4-xSdMSFZxzhfoF-rsNvr6FMYcXB47Z2DCGPGN5A3oU_z41c9JD0cNL7RI0wHiNiFiD_775tc5VAN4DK-3UyFtIYMNvuiZY54Fca5y1xdjhs9WujxXdRjsuXwesDrsN8PEJ-jJ67ow4v7-xx9eX95t7qqrj99-Lh6d13Zpehy5crgRpK-IT2AhaURxAjjqGwlJ0QSy0FoY5dL07PWcSGF7lzX95ob2jZW8nP0-qS7j-HnBCmrnU8WhqHMFKakaCuJFIKzh0DblrSN4F2BvjlBbQwpRXBqH_1Ox6OiRM1hqa36Nyw1h6UoUyWsQn55X2cy5fsv9U86BbA-AaAYc_AQVbIeZit9LD6rPviH1Xn7n4wd_OitHn7AEdI2THEs1iuqUiGo23lt5q2homwMaTj_DUo0w6g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1777075638</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of Different Methods of Valsalva Maneuver for Right-to-left Shunt Detection by Contrast-Enhanced Transcranial Doppler</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Guo, Yu-Zhu ; Gao, Yong-Sheng ; Guo, Zhen-Ni ; Niu, Peng-Peng ; Yang, Yi ; Xing, Ying-Qi</creator><creatorcontrib>Guo, Yu-Zhu ; Gao, Yong-Sheng ; Guo, Zhen-Ni ; Niu, Peng-Peng ; Yang, Yi ; Xing, Ying-Qi</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract We evaluated 298 patients for right-to-left shunt (RLS) detection by contrast-enhanced transcranial Doppler at rest state (RS), during the conventional Valsalva maneuver (CM), and during the modified Valsalva maneuver (BM: blowing into the connecting tube of a sphygmomanometer at 40 mm Hg for 10 s) in random order, and the degree of RLS along the time of the first microbubble occurrence was recorded. The positive rates were 21.8%, 36.9% and 47.3% for RS, CM and BM, respectively ( p  &lt; 0.001). BM resulted in a significantly higher positive rate ( p  = 0.010), and there was a significant difference between the two different methods of VM in terms of the degree of RLS detection ( p  &lt; 0.001). Further, the first microbubble occurred later during BM than CM (10.22 ± 3.77 s vs. 9.44 ± 4.36 s, p  &lt; 0.05). This modified maneuver is an alternative to the conventional one, especially for those who cannot perform the conventional maneuver adequately, but are highly suspected of having RLS.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0301-5629</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-291X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2015.12.020</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26928233</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Algorithms ; Contrast-enhanced transcranial Doppler ; Female ; Foramen Ovale, Patent - diagnostic imaging ; Humans ; Image Enhancement - methods ; Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted - methods ; Male ; Radiology ; Reproducibility of Results ; Right-to-left shunt ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Ultrasonography, Doppler, Transcranial - methods ; Valsalva Maneuver</subject><ispartof>Ultrasound in medicine &amp; biology, 2016-05, Vol.42 (5), p.1124-1129</ispartof><rights>World Federation for Ultrasound in Medicine &amp; Biology</rights><rights>2016 World Federation for Ultrasound in Medicine &amp; Biology</rights><rights>Copyright © 2016 World Federation for Ultrasound in Medicine &amp; Biology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c468t-f016b90d50deece4b60b6bf197930090c3e6abc44bd27f3696a8f8dda3b175c93</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c468t-f016b90d50deece4b60b6bf197930090c3e6abc44bd27f3696a8f8dda3b175c93</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-0680-1821</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2015.12.020$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3536,27903,27904,45974</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26928233$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Guo, Yu-Zhu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gao, Yong-Sheng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guo, Zhen-Ni</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Niu, Peng-Peng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yang, Yi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xing, Ying-Qi</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of Different Methods of Valsalva Maneuver for Right-to-left Shunt Detection by Contrast-Enhanced Transcranial Doppler</title><title>Ultrasound in medicine &amp; biology</title><addtitle>Ultrasound Med Biol</addtitle><description>Abstract We evaluated 298 patients for right-to-left shunt (RLS) detection by contrast-enhanced transcranial Doppler at rest state (RS), during the conventional Valsalva maneuver (CM), and during the modified Valsalva maneuver (BM: blowing into the connecting tube of a sphygmomanometer at 40 mm Hg for 10 s) in random order, and the degree of RLS along the time of the first microbubble occurrence was recorded. The positive rates were 21.8%, 36.9% and 47.3% for RS, CM and BM, respectively ( p  &lt; 0.001). BM resulted in a significantly higher positive rate ( p  = 0.010), and there was a significant difference between the two different methods of VM in terms of the degree of RLS detection ( p  &lt; 0.001). Further, the first microbubble occurred later during BM than CM (10.22 ± 3.77 s vs. 9.44 ± 4.36 s, p  &lt; 0.05). This modified maneuver is an alternative to the conventional one, especially for those who cannot perform the conventional maneuver adequately, but are highly suspected of having RLS.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Contrast-enhanced transcranial Doppler</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Foramen Ovale, Patent - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Image Enhancement - methods</subject><subject>Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted - methods</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Radiology</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Right-to-left shunt</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>Ultrasonography, Doppler, Transcranial - methods</subject><subject>Valsalva Maneuver</subject><issn>0301-5629</issn><issn>1879-291X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNUk1vEzEUtBCIhsJfQBYnLrv1R9a75oCEkkKRWiHRgrhZtveZOGzWwfZGyo2fjlcpCHHqxZbsmXnvzTyEXlFSU0LFxbaehhx12kFvfKgZoU1NWU0YeYQWtGtlxST99hgtCCe0agSTZ-hZSltCSCt4-xSdMSFZxzhfoF-rsNvr6FMYcXB47Z2DCGPGN5A3oU_z41c9JD0cNL7RI0wHiNiFiD_775tc5VAN4DK-3UyFtIYMNvuiZY54Fca5y1xdjhs9WujxXdRjsuXwesDrsN8PEJ-jJ67ow4v7-xx9eX95t7qqrj99-Lh6d13Zpehy5crgRpK-IT2AhaURxAjjqGwlJ0QSy0FoY5dL07PWcSGF7lzX95ob2jZW8nP0-qS7j-HnBCmrnU8WhqHMFKakaCuJFIKzh0DblrSN4F2BvjlBbQwpRXBqH_1Ox6OiRM1hqa36Nyw1h6UoUyWsQn55X2cy5fsv9U86BbA-AaAYc_AQVbIeZit9LD6rPviH1Xn7n4wd_OitHn7AEdI2THEs1iuqUiGo23lt5q2homwMaTj_DUo0w6g</recordid><startdate>20160501</startdate><enddate>20160501</enddate><creator>Guo, Yu-Zhu</creator><creator>Gao, Yong-Sheng</creator><creator>Guo, Zhen-Ni</creator><creator>Niu, Peng-Peng</creator><creator>Yang, Yi</creator><creator>Xing, Ying-Qi</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0680-1821</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20160501</creationdate><title>Comparison of Different Methods of Valsalva Maneuver for Right-to-left Shunt Detection by Contrast-Enhanced Transcranial Doppler</title><author>Guo, Yu-Zhu ; Gao, Yong-Sheng ; Guo, Zhen-Ni ; Niu, Peng-Peng ; Yang, Yi ; Xing, Ying-Qi</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c468t-f016b90d50deece4b60b6bf197930090c3e6abc44bd27f3696a8f8dda3b175c93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Contrast-enhanced transcranial Doppler</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Foramen Ovale, Patent - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Image Enhancement - methods</topic><topic>Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted - methods</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Radiology</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Right-to-left shunt</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>Ultrasonography, Doppler, Transcranial - methods</topic><topic>Valsalva Maneuver</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Guo, Yu-Zhu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gao, Yong-Sheng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guo, Zhen-Ni</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Niu, Peng-Peng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yang, Yi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xing, Ying-Qi</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Ultrasound in medicine &amp; biology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Guo, Yu-Zhu</au><au>Gao, Yong-Sheng</au><au>Guo, Zhen-Ni</au><au>Niu, Peng-Peng</au><au>Yang, Yi</au><au>Xing, Ying-Qi</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of Different Methods of Valsalva Maneuver for Right-to-left Shunt Detection by Contrast-Enhanced Transcranial Doppler</atitle><jtitle>Ultrasound in medicine &amp; biology</jtitle><addtitle>Ultrasound Med Biol</addtitle><date>2016-05-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>42</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>1124</spage><epage>1129</epage><pages>1124-1129</pages><issn>0301-5629</issn><eissn>1879-291X</eissn><abstract>Abstract We evaluated 298 patients for right-to-left shunt (RLS) detection by contrast-enhanced transcranial Doppler at rest state (RS), during the conventional Valsalva maneuver (CM), and during the modified Valsalva maneuver (BM: blowing into the connecting tube of a sphygmomanometer at 40 mm Hg for 10 s) in random order, and the degree of RLS along the time of the first microbubble occurrence was recorded. The positive rates were 21.8%, 36.9% and 47.3% for RS, CM and BM, respectively ( p  &lt; 0.001). BM resulted in a significantly higher positive rate ( p  = 0.010), and there was a significant difference between the two different methods of VM in terms of the degree of RLS detection ( p  &lt; 0.001). Further, the first microbubble occurred later during BM than CM (10.22 ± 3.77 s vs. 9.44 ± 4.36 s, p  &lt; 0.05). This modified maneuver is an alternative to the conventional one, especially for those who cannot perform the conventional maneuver adequately, but are highly suspected of having RLS.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>26928233</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2015.12.020</doi><tpages>6</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0680-1821</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0301-5629
ispartof Ultrasound in medicine & biology, 2016-05, Vol.42 (5), p.1124-1129
issn 0301-5629
1879-291X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1790966329
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Adult
Algorithms
Contrast-enhanced transcranial Doppler
Female
Foramen Ovale, Patent - diagnostic imaging
Humans
Image Enhancement - methods
Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted - methods
Male
Radiology
Reproducibility of Results
Right-to-left shunt
Sensitivity and Specificity
Ultrasonography, Doppler, Transcranial - methods
Valsalva Maneuver
title Comparison of Different Methods of Valsalva Maneuver for Right-to-left Shunt Detection by Contrast-Enhanced Transcranial Doppler
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-23T02%3A20%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20Different%20Methods%20of%20Valsalva%20Maneuver%20for%20Right-to-left%20Shunt%20Detection%20by%20Contrast-Enhanced%20Transcranial%20Doppler&rft.jtitle=Ultrasound%20in%20medicine%20&%20biology&rft.au=Guo,%20Yu-Zhu&rft.date=2016-05-01&rft.volume=42&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=1124&rft.epage=1129&rft.pages=1124-1129&rft.issn=0301-5629&rft.eissn=1879-291X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2015.12.020&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1790966329%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1777075638&rft_id=info:pmid/26928233&rft_els_id=S0301562916000053&rfr_iscdi=true