Raindrop Size Distribution and Rain Characteristics during the 2013 Great Colorado Flood

Drop size distributions observed by four Particle Size Velocity (PARSIVEL) disdrometers during the 2013 Great Colorado Flood are used to diagnose rain characteristics during intensive rainfall episodes. The analysis focuses on 30 h of intense rainfall in the vicinity of Boulder, Colorado, from 2200...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of hydrometeorology 2016-01, Vol.17 (1), p.53-72
Hauptverfasser: Friedrich, Katja, Kalina, Evan A., Aikins, Joshua, Steiner, Matthias, Gochis, David, Kucera, Paul A., Ikeda, Kyoko, Sun, Juanzhen
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 72
container_issue 1
container_start_page 53
container_title Journal of hydrometeorology
container_volume 17
creator Friedrich, Katja
Kalina, Evan A.
Aikins, Joshua
Steiner, Matthias
Gochis, David
Kucera, Paul A.
Ikeda, Kyoko
Sun, Juanzhen
description Drop size distributions observed by four Particle Size Velocity (PARSIVEL) disdrometers during the 2013 Great Colorado Flood are used to diagnose rain characteristics during intensive rainfall episodes. The analysis focuses on 30 h of intense rainfall in the vicinity of Boulder, Colorado, from 2200 UTC 11 September to 0400 UTC 13 September 2013. Rainfall rates R, median volume diameters D₀, reflectivity Z, drop size distributions (DSDs), and gamma DSD parameters were derived and compared between the foothills and adjacent plains locations. Rainfall throughout the entire event was characterized by a large number of small- to medium-sized raindrops (diameters smaller than 1.5 mm) resulting in small values of Z (
doi_str_mv 10.1175/jhm-d-14-0184.1
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1790966181</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>24915556</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>24915556</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c431t-c1f1c6aba4c300121c729a6c0f4731a2d17dbc0cb6fc8e9676bfc75358d3d7c03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkM9LwzAUx4soOKdnT0LAi5dueU2TtEfZ3KZMBH_AbiFNUpfSNTNpD_rX2zLZwdN78P18H49PFF0DngBwOq22u1jHkMYYsnQCJ9EIaEJjTlM4Pe50cx5dhFBhjNMcslG0eZW20d7t0Zv9MWhuQ-tt0bXWNUg2Gg0xmm2ll6o1vk-tCkh33jafqN0alGAgaOmNbNHM1c5L7dCidk5fRmelrIO5-pvj6GPx8D5bxeuX5ePsfh2rlEAbKyhBMVnIVBGMIQHFk1wyhcuUE5CJBq4LhVXBSpWZnHFWlIpTQjNNNFeYjKO7w929d1-dCa3Y2aBMXcvGuC4I4DnOGYMMevT2H1q5zjf9dwLyhPE8pzBQ0wOlvAvBm1Lsvd1J_y0Ai8G0eFo9i7mAVAymxdC4OTSq0Dp_xJPeMKWUkV9iXHpf</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1926799511</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Raindrop Size Distribution and Rain Characteristics during the 2013 Great Colorado Flood</title><source>American Meteorological Society</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Friedrich, Katja ; Kalina, Evan A. ; Aikins, Joshua ; Steiner, Matthias ; Gochis, David ; Kucera, Paul A. ; Ikeda, Kyoko ; Sun, Juanzhen</creator><creatorcontrib>Friedrich, Katja ; Kalina, Evan A. ; Aikins, Joshua ; Steiner, Matthias ; Gochis, David ; Kucera, Paul A. ; Ikeda, Kyoko ; Sun, Juanzhen</creatorcontrib><description>Drop size distributions observed by four Particle Size Velocity (PARSIVEL) disdrometers during the 2013 Great Colorado Flood are used to diagnose rain characteristics during intensive rainfall episodes. The analysis focuses on 30 h of intense rainfall in the vicinity of Boulder, Colorado, from 2200 UTC 11 September to 0400 UTC 13 September 2013. Rainfall rates R, median volume diameters D₀, reflectivity Z, drop size distributions (DSDs), and gamma DSD parameters were derived and compared between the foothills and adjacent plains locations. Rainfall throughout the entire event was characterized by a large number of small- to medium-sized raindrops (diameters smaller than 1.5 mm) resulting in small values of Z (&lt;40 dBZ), differential reflectivity Z dr (&lt;1.3 dB), specific differential phase K dp (&lt;1° km−1), and D₀ (&lt;1 mm). In addition, high liquid water content was present throughout the entire event. Raindrops observed in the plains were generally larger than those in the foothills. DSDs observed in the foothills were characterized by a large concentration of small-sized drops (d &lt; 1 mm). Heavy rainfall rates with slightly larger drops were observed during the first intense rainfall episode (0000–0800 UTC 12 September) and were associated with areas of enhanced low-level convergence and vertical velocity according to the wind fields derived from the Variational Doppler Radar Analysis System. The disdrometer-derived Z–R relationships reflect how unusual the DSDs were during the 2013 Great Colorado Flood. As a result, Z–R relations commonly used by the operational NEXRAD strongly underestimated rainfall rates by up to 43%.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1525-755X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1525-7541</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1175/jhm-d-14-0184.1</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Boston: American Meteorological Society</publisher><subject>Disdrometers ; Doppler radar ; Doppler sonar ; Drop size ; Floods ; Foothills ; Heavy rainfall ; Heavy rainfall rates ; Hydrology ; Moisture content ; Nexrad ; Particle size distribution ; Plains ; Precipitation ; Radar ; Rain ; Raindrop size distribution ; Raindrop velocity ; Raindrops ; Rainfall ; Rainfall rate ; Reflectance ; Size distribution ; Studies ; Velocity ; Vertical velocities ; Water ; Water content ; Wind fields</subject><ispartof>Journal of hydrometeorology, 2016-01, Vol.17 (1), p.53-72</ispartof><rights>2016 American Meteorological Society</rights><rights>Copyright American Meteorological Society Jan 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c431t-c1f1c6aba4c300121c729a6c0f4731a2d17dbc0cb6fc8e9676bfc75358d3d7c03</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c431t-c1f1c6aba4c300121c729a6c0f4731a2d17dbc0cb6fc8e9676bfc75358d3d7c03</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/24915556$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/24915556$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,3672,27915,27916,58008,58241</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Friedrich, Katja</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kalina, Evan A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aikins, Joshua</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Steiner, Matthias</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gochis, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kucera, Paul A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ikeda, Kyoko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sun, Juanzhen</creatorcontrib><title>Raindrop Size Distribution and Rain Characteristics during the 2013 Great Colorado Flood</title><title>Journal of hydrometeorology</title><description>Drop size distributions observed by four Particle Size Velocity (PARSIVEL) disdrometers during the 2013 Great Colorado Flood are used to diagnose rain characteristics during intensive rainfall episodes. The analysis focuses on 30 h of intense rainfall in the vicinity of Boulder, Colorado, from 2200 UTC 11 September to 0400 UTC 13 September 2013. Rainfall rates R, median volume diameters D₀, reflectivity Z, drop size distributions (DSDs), and gamma DSD parameters were derived and compared between the foothills and adjacent plains locations. Rainfall throughout the entire event was characterized by a large number of small- to medium-sized raindrops (diameters smaller than 1.5 mm) resulting in small values of Z (&lt;40 dBZ), differential reflectivity Z dr (&lt;1.3 dB), specific differential phase K dp (&lt;1° km−1), and D₀ (&lt;1 mm). In addition, high liquid water content was present throughout the entire event. Raindrops observed in the plains were generally larger than those in the foothills. DSDs observed in the foothills were characterized by a large concentration of small-sized drops (d &lt; 1 mm). Heavy rainfall rates with slightly larger drops were observed during the first intense rainfall episode (0000–0800 UTC 12 September) and were associated with areas of enhanced low-level convergence and vertical velocity according to the wind fields derived from the Variational Doppler Radar Analysis System. The disdrometer-derived Z–R relationships reflect how unusual the DSDs were during the 2013 Great Colorado Flood. As a result, Z–R relations commonly used by the operational NEXRAD strongly underestimated rainfall rates by up to 43%.</description><subject>Disdrometers</subject><subject>Doppler radar</subject><subject>Doppler sonar</subject><subject>Drop size</subject><subject>Floods</subject><subject>Foothills</subject><subject>Heavy rainfall</subject><subject>Heavy rainfall rates</subject><subject>Hydrology</subject><subject>Moisture content</subject><subject>Nexrad</subject><subject>Particle size distribution</subject><subject>Plains</subject><subject>Precipitation</subject><subject>Radar</subject><subject>Rain</subject><subject>Raindrop size distribution</subject><subject>Raindrop velocity</subject><subject>Raindrops</subject><subject>Rainfall</subject><subject>Rainfall rate</subject><subject>Reflectance</subject><subject>Size distribution</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Velocity</subject><subject>Vertical velocities</subject><subject>Water</subject><subject>Water content</subject><subject>Wind fields</subject><issn>1525-755X</issn><issn>1525-7541</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkM9LwzAUx4soOKdnT0LAi5dueU2TtEfZ3KZMBH_AbiFNUpfSNTNpD_rX2zLZwdN78P18H49PFF0DngBwOq22u1jHkMYYsnQCJ9EIaEJjTlM4Pe50cx5dhFBhjNMcslG0eZW20d7t0Zv9MWhuQ-tt0bXWNUg2Gg0xmm2ll6o1vk-tCkh33jafqN0alGAgaOmNbNHM1c5L7dCidk5fRmelrIO5-pvj6GPx8D5bxeuX5ePsfh2rlEAbKyhBMVnIVBGMIQHFk1wyhcuUE5CJBq4LhVXBSpWZnHFWlIpTQjNNNFeYjKO7w929d1-dCa3Y2aBMXcvGuC4I4DnOGYMMevT2H1q5zjf9dwLyhPE8pzBQ0wOlvAvBm1Lsvd1J_y0Ai8G0eFo9i7mAVAymxdC4OTSq0Dp_xJPeMKWUkV9iXHpf</recordid><startdate>20160101</startdate><enddate>20160101</enddate><creator>Friedrich, Katja</creator><creator>Kalina, Evan A.</creator><creator>Aikins, Joshua</creator><creator>Steiner, Matthias</creator><creator>Gochis, David</creator><creator>Kucera, Paul A.</creator><creator>Ikeda, Kyoko</creator><creator>Sun, Juanzhen</creator><general>American Meteorological Society</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160101</creationdate><title>Raindrop Size Distribution and Rain Characteristics during the 2013 Great Colorado Flood</title><author>Friedrich, Katja ; Kalina, Evan A. ; Aikins, Joshua ; Steiner, Matthias ; Gochis, David ; Kucera, Paul A. ; Ikeda, Kyoko ; Sun, Juanzhen</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c431t-c1f1c6aba4c300121c729a6c0f4731a2d17dbc0cb6fc8e9676bfc75358d3d7c03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Disdrometers</topic><topic>Doppler radar</topic><topic>Doppler sonar</topic><topic>Drop size</topic><topic>Floods</topic><topic>Foothills</topic><topic>Heavy rainfall</topic><topic>Heavy rainfall rates</topic><topic>Hydrology</topic><topic>Moisture content</topic><topic>Nexrad</topic><topic>Particle size distribution</topic><topic>Plains</topic><topic>Precipitation</topic><topic>Radar</topic><topic>Rain</topic><topic>Raindrop size distribution</topic><topic>Raindrop velocity</topic><topic>Raindrops</topic><topic>Rainfall</topic><topic>Rainfall rate</topic><topic>Reflectance</topic><topic>Size distribution</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Velocity</topic><topic>Vertical velocities</topic><topic>Water</topic><topic>Water content</topic><topic>Wind fields</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Friedrich, Katja</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kalina, Evan A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aikins, Joshua</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Steiner, Matthias</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gochis, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kucera, Paul A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ikeda, Kyoko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sun, Juanzhen</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><jtitle>Journal of hydrometeorology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Friedrich, Katja</au><au>Kalina, Evan A.</au><au>Aikins, Joshua</au><au>Steiner, Matthias</au><au>Gochis, David</au><au>Kucera, Paul A.</au><au>Ikeda, Kyoko</au><au>Sun, Juanzhen</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Raindrop Size Distribution and Rain Characteristics during the 2013 Great Colorado Flood</atitle><jtitle>Journal of hydrometeorology</jtitle><date>2016-01-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>17</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>53</spage><epage>72</epage><pages>53-72</pages><issn>1525-755X</issn><eissn>1525-7541</eissn><abstract>Drop size distributions observed by four Particle Size Velocity (PARSIVEL) disdrometers during the 2013 Great Colorado Flood are used to diagnose rain characteristics during intensive rainfall episodes. The analysis focuses on 30 h of intense rainfall in the vicinity of Boulder, Colorado, from 2200 UTC 11 September to 0400 UTC 13 September 2013. Rainfall rates R, median volume diameters D₀, reflectivity Z, drop size distributions (DSDs), and gamma DSD parameters were derived and compared between the foothills and adjacent plains locations. Rainfall throughout the entire event was characterized by a large number of small- to medium-sized raindrops (diameters smaller than 1.5 mm) resulting in small values of Z (&lt;40 dBZ), differential reflectivity Z dr (&lt;1.3 dB), specific differential phase K dp (&lt;1° km−1), and D₀ (&lt;1 mm). In addition, high liquid water content was present throughout the entire event. Raindrops observed in the plains were generally larger than those in the foothills. DSDs observed in the foothills were characterized by a large concentration of small-sized drops (d &lt; 1 mm). Heavy rainfall rates with slightly larger drops were observed during the first intense rainfall episode (0000–0800 UTC 12 September) and were associated with areas of enhanced low-level convergence and vertical velocity according to the wind fields derived from the Variational Doppler Radar Analysis System. The disdrometer-derived Z–R relationships reflect how unusual the DSDs were during the 2013 Great Colorado Flood. As a result, Z–R relations commonly used by the operational NEXRAD strongly underestimated rainfall rates by up to 43%.</abstract><cop>Boston</cop><pub>American Meteorological Society</pub><doi>10.1175/jhm-d-14-0184.1</doi><tpages>20</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1525-755X
ispartof Journal of hydrometeorology, 2016-01, Vol.17 (1), p.53-72
issn 1525-755X
1525-7541
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1790966181
source American Meteorological Society; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Jstor Complete Legacy; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Disdrometers
Doppler radar
Doppler sonar
Drop size
Floods
Foothills
Heavy rainfall
Heavy rainfall rates
Hydrology
Moisture content
Nexrad
Particle size distribution
Plains
Precipitation
Radar
Rain
Raindrop size distribution
Raindrop velocity
Raindrops
Rainfall
Rainfall rate
Reflectance
Size distribution
Studies
Velocity
Vertical velocities
Water
Water content
Wind fields
title Raindrop Size Distribution and Rain Characteristics during the 2013 Great Colorado Flood
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-15T03%3A40%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Raindrop%20Size%20Distribution%20and%20Rain%20Characteristics%20during%20the%202013%20Great%20Colorado%20Flood&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20hydrometeorology&rft.au=Friedrich,%20Katja&rft.date=2016-01-01&rft.volume=17&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=53&rft.epage=72&rft.pages=53-72&rft.issn=1525-755X&rft.eissn=1525-7541&rft_id=info:doi/10.1175/jhm-d-14-0184.1&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E24915556%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1926799511&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=24915556&rfr_iscdi=true