Integrated land-sea management: recommendations for planning, implementation and management

Marine, freshwater and terrestrial ecosystems face increasing anthropogenic threats that are exacerbated by the ecological connectivity between realms; integrated land-sea management (ILSM) is a framework that can help address this connectivity. However, gaps in our knowledge regarding ILSM remain....

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Environmental conservation 2016-06, Vol.43 (2), p.181-198
Hauptverfasser: REUTER, KIM E., JUHN, DANIEL, GRANTHAM, HEDLEY S.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 198
container_issue 2
container_start_page 181
container_title Environmental conservation
container_volume 43
creator REUTER, KIM E.
JUHN, DANIEL
GRANTHAM, HEDLEY S.
description Marine, freshwater and terrestrial ecosystems face increasing anthropogenic threats that are exacerbated by the ecological connectivity between realms; integrated land-sea management (ILSM) is a framework that can help address this connectivity. However, gaps in our knowledge regarding ILSM remain. This study reviewed 108 relevant studies to understand how ILSM is being utilized. Summarized are: (1) characteristics of integrated land-sea programs; (2) recommendations made from the literature for program planning, implementation and management; (3) how applied programs have been planned, implemented and managed; and (4) recommendations for undertaking ILSM. It was found that applied programs did not often adhere to the strategies recommended by theoretical papers. Applied programs were less likely than theoretical papers to specifically name the land-sea connection, over 50% did not apply a framework or governance approach, many did not include key stakeholders, and over 80% listed at least one conflict or hurdle that decreased program success. This study highlighted the difficulties of undertaking ILSM given the high number of stakeholders, government agencies and experts involved. Based on the findings, recommendations for future ILSM programs are provided.
doi_str_mv 10.1017/S0376892916000023
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1790957294</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_S0376892916000023</cupid><jstor_id>26320650</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>26320650</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-4fb688c27bd10befa067f9fcf26d992f81272897ee522046721ab6e1f9f1d0683</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kEtLxDAUhYMoOI7-ABdiwY0Lq0na5uFOBh8DAy7GWbkIaXtTOrTNmHQW_nvT6SCimM0NnO_cc7gInRN8SzDhd0uccCYklYTh8GhygCYkZTJOE8EP0WSQ40E_RiferwPCMi4m6H3e9VA53UMZNborYw86anWnK2ih6-8jB4Vtw7fUfW07Hxnrok0gu7qrbqK63TQ7cKdGYcEP8yk6MrrxcLafU7R6enybvcSL1-f57GERF4lkfZyanAlRUJ6XBOdgNGbcSFMYykopqRGEciokB8goxSnjlOicAQkMKTETyRRdj3s3zn5swfeqrX0BTWgJdusV4RLLjFOZBvTqF7q2W9eFdoESPAtFJA0UGanCWe8dGLVxdavdpyJYDedWf84dPBejZ-17674NlCU0nBoH_XLUjbZKV672arWkePATkclsSE32qbrNXV1W8KPcv7lfRiCUaw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1787568892</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Integrated land-sea management: recommendations for planning, implementation and management</title><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><source>Cambridge University Press Journals Complete</source><creator>REUTER, KIM E. ; JUHN, DANIEL ; GRANTHAM, HEDLEY S.</creator><creatorcontrib>REUTER, KIM E. ; JUHN, DANIEL ; GRANTHAM, HEDLEY S.</creatorcontrib><description>Marine, freshwater and terrestrial ecosystems face increasing anthropogenic threats that are exacerbated by the ecological connectivity between realms; integrated land-sea management (ILSM) is a framework that can help address this connectivity. However, gaps in our knowledge regarding ILSM remain. This study reviewed 108 relevant studies to understand how ILSM is being utilized. Summarized are: (1) characteristics of integrated land-sea programs; (2) recommendations made from the literature for program planning, implementation and management; (3) how applied programs have been planned, implemented and managed; and (4) recommendations for undertaking ILSM. It was found that applied programs did not often adhere to the strategies recommended by theoretical papers. Applied programs were less likely than theoretical papers to specifically name the land-sea connection, over 50% did not apply a framework or governance approach, many did not include key stakeholders, and over 80% listed at least one conflict or hurdle that decreased program success. This study highlighted the difficulties of undertaking ILSM given the high number of stakeholders, government agencies and experts involved. Based on the findings, recommendations for future ILSM programs are provided.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0376-8929</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1469-4387</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1469-4387</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S0376892916000023</identifier><identifier>CODEN: EVCNA4</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Anthropogenic factors ; Aquatic ecosystems ; conservation ; Conservation biology ; experts ; freshwater ; governance ; Government agencies ; integrated land-sea management ; Land management ; land-sea boundary ; marine ; Marine conservation ; Marine ecosystems ; program planning ; protected area ; stakeholders ; terrestrial ; Terrestrial ecosystems</subject><ispartof>Environmental conservation, 2016-06, Vol.43 (2), p.181-198</ispartof><rights>Copyright © Foundation for Environmental Conservation 2016</rights><rights>Foundation for Environmental Conservation 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-4fb688c27bd10befa067f9fcf26d992f81272897ee522046721ab6e1f9f1d0683</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-4fb688c27bd10befa067f9fcf26d992f81272897ee522046721ab6e1f9f1d0683</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/26320650$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0376892916000023/type/journal_article$$EHTML$$P50$$Gcambridge$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>164,315,782,786,805,27933,27934,55637,58026,58259</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>REUTER, KIM E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>JUHN, DANIEL</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>GRANTHAM, HEDLEY S.</creatorcontrib><title>Integrated land-sea management: recommendations for planning, implementation and management</title><title>Environmental conservation</title><addtitle>Envir. Conserv</addtitle><description>Marine, freshwater and terrestrial ecosystems face increasing anthropogenic threats that are exacerbated by the ecological connectivity between realms; integrated land-sea management (ILSM) is a framework that can help address this connectivity. However, gaps in our knowledge regarding ILSM remain. This study reviewed 108 relevant studies to understand how ILSM is being utilized. Summarized are: (1) characteristics of integrated land-sea programs; (2) recommendations made from the literature for program planning, implementation and management; (3) how applied programs have been planned, implemented and managed; and (4) recommendations for undertaking ILSM. It was found that applied programs did not often adhere to the strategies recommended by theoretical papers. Applied programs were less likely than theoretical papers to specifically name the land-sea connection, over 50% did not apply a framework or governance approach, many did not include key stakeholders, and over 80% listed at least one conflict or hurdle that decreased program success. This study highlighted the difficulties of undertaking ILSM given the high number of stakeholders, government agencies and experts involved. Based on the findings, recommendations for future ILSM programs are provided.</description><subject>Anthropogenic factors</subject><subject>Aquatic ecosystems</subject><subject>conservation</subject><subject>Conservation biology</subject><subject>experts</subject><subject>freshwater</subject><subject>governance</subject><subject>Government agencies</subject><subject>integrated land-sea management</subject><subject>Land management</subject><subject>land-sea boundary</subject><subject>marine</subject><subject>Marine conservation</subject><subject>Marine ecosystems</subject><subject>program planning</subject><subject>protected area</subject><subject>stakeholders</subject><subject>terrestrial</subject><subject>Terrestrial ecosystems</subject><issn>0376-8929</issn><issn>1469-4387</issn><issn>1469-4387</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kEtLxDAUhYMoOI7-ABdiwY0Lq0na5uFOBh8DAy7GWbkIaXtTOrTNmHQW_nvT6SCimM0NnO_cc7gInRN8SzDhd0uccCYklYTh8GhygCYkZTJOE8EP0WSQ40E_RiferwPCMi4m6H3e9VA53UMZNborYw86anWnK2ih6-8jB4Vtw7fUfW07Hxnrok0gu7qrbqK63TQ7cKdGYcEP8yk6MrrxcLafU7R6enybvcSL1-f57GERF4lkfZyanAlRUJ6XBOdgNGbcSFMYykopqRGEciokB8goxSnjlOicAQkMKTETyRRdj3s3zn5swfeqrX0BTWgJdusV4RLLjFOZBvTqF7q2W9eFdoESPAtFJA0UGanCWe8dGLVxdavdpyJYDedWf84dPBejZ-17674NlCU0nBoH_XLUjbZKV672arWkePATkclsSE32qbrNXV1W8KPcv7lfRiCUaw</recordid><startdate>20160601</startdate><enddate>20160601</enddate><creator>REUTER, KIM E.</creator><creator>JUHN, DANIEL</creator><creator>GRANTHAM, HEDLEY S.</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160601</creationdate><title>Integrated land-sea management: recommendations for planning, implementation and management</title><author>REUTER, KIM E. ; JUHN, DANIEL ; GRANTHAM, HEDLEY S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-4fb688c27bd10befa067f9fcf26d992f81272897ee522046721ab6e1f9f1d0683</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Anthropogenic factors</topic><topic>Aquatic ecosystems</topic><topic>conservation</topic><topic>Conservation biology</topic><topic>experts</topic><topic>freshwater</topic><topic>governance</topic><topic>Government agencies</topic><topic>integrated land-sea management</topic><topic>Land management</topic><topic>land-sea boundary</topic><topic>marine</topic><topic>Marine conservation</topic><topic>Marine ecosystems</topic><topic>program planning</topic><topic>protected area</topic><topic>stakeholders</topic><topic>terrestrial</topic><topic>Terrestrial ecosystems</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>REUTER, KIM E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>JUHN, DANIEL</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>GRANTHAM, HEDLEY S.</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Environmental conservation</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>REUTER, KIM E.</au><au>JUHN, DANIEL</au><au>GRANTHAM, HEDLEY S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Integrated land-sea management: recommendations for planning, implementation and management</atitle><jtitle>Environmental conservation</jtitle><addtitle>Envir. Conserv</addtitle><date>2016-06-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>43</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>181</spage><epage>198</epage><pages>181-198</pages><issn>0376-8929</issn><issn>1469-4387</issn><eissn>1469-4387</eissn><coden>EVCNA4</coden><abstract>Marine, freshwater and terrestrial ecosystems face increasing anthropogenic threats that are exacerbated by the ecological connectivity between realms; integrated land-sea management (ILSM) is a framework that can help address this connectivity. However, gaps in our knowledge regarding ILSM remain. This study reviewed 108 relevant studies to understand how ILSM is being utilized. Summarized are: (1) characteristics of integrated land-sea programs; (2) recommendations made from the literature for program planning, implementation and management; (3) how applied programs have been planned, implemented and managed; and (4) recommendations for undertaking ILSM. It was found that applied programs did not often adhere to the strategies recommended by theoretical papers. Applied programs were less likely than theoretical papers to specifically name the land-sea connection, over 50% did not apply a framework or governance approach, many did not include key stakeholders, and over 80% listed at least one conflict or hurdle that decreased program success. This study highlighted the difficulties of undertaking ILSM given the high number of stakeholders, government agencies and experts involved. Based on the findings, recommendations for future ILSM programs are provided.</abstract><cop>Cambridge, UK</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.1017/S0376892916000023</doi><tpages>18</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0376-8929
ispartof Environmental conservation, 2016-06, Vol.43 (2), p.181-198
issn 0376-8929
1469-4387
1469-4387
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1790957294
source JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing; Cambridge University Press Journals Complete
subjects Anthropogenic factors
Aquatic ecosystems
conservation
Conservation biology
experts
freshwater
governance
Government agencies
integrated land-sea management
Land management
land-sea boundary
marine
Marine conservation
Marine ecosystems
program planning
protected area
stakeholders
terrestrial
Terrestrial ecosystems
title Integrated land-sea management: recommendations for planning, implementation and management
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-02T06%3A38%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Integrated%20land-sea%20management:%20recommendations%20for%20planning,%20implementation%20and%20management&rft.jtitle=Environmental%20conservation&rft.au=REUTER,%20KIM%20E.&rft.date=2016-06-01&rft.volume=43&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=181&rft.epage=198&rft.pages=181-198&rft.issn=0376-8929&rft.eissn=1469-4387&rft.coden=EVCNA4&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S0376892916000023&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E26320650%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1787568892&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_cupid=10_1017_S0376892916000023&rft_jstor_id=26320650&rfr_iscdi=true