Acute Physiological Responses to Strongman Training Compared to Traditional Strength Training

ABSTRACTHarris, NK, Woulfe, CJ, Wood, MR, Dulson, DK, Gluchowski, AK, and Keogh, JB. Acute physiological responses to strongman training compared to traditional strength training. J Strength Cond Res 30(5)1397–1408, 2016—Strongman training (ST) has become an increasingly popular modality, but data o...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of strength and conditioning research 2016-05, Vol.30 (5), p.1397-1408
Hauptverfasser: Harris, Nigel K, Woulfe, Colm J, Wood, Matthew R, Dulson, Deborah K, Gluchowski, Ashley K, Keogh, Justin B
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1408
container_issue 5
container_start_page 1397
container_title Journal of strength and conditioning research
container_volume 30
creator Harris, Nigel K
Woulfe, Colm J
Wood, Matthew R
Dulson, Deborah K
Gluchowski, Ashley K
Keogh, Justin B
description ABSTRACTHarris, NK, Woulfe, CJ, Wood, MR, Dulson, DK, Gluchowski, AK, and Keogh, JB. Acute physiological responses to strongman training compared to traditional strength training. J Strength Cond Res 30(5)1397–1408, 2016—Strongman training (ST) has become an increasingly popular modality, but data on physiological responses are limited. This study sought to determine physiological responses to an ST session compared to a traditional strength exercise training (RST) session. Ten healthy men (23.6 ± 27.5 years, 85.8 ± 10.3 kg) volunteered in a crossover design, where all participants performed an ST session, an RST session, and a resting session within 7 days apart. The ST consisted of sled drag, farmerʼs walk, 1 arm dumbbell clean and press, and tire flip at loads eliciting approximately 30 seconds of near maximal effort per set. The RST consisted of squat, deadlift, bench press, and power clean, progressing to 75% of 1 repetition maximum. Sessions were equated for approximate total set duration. Blood lactate and salivary testosterone were recorded immediately before and after training sessions. Heart rate, caloric expenditure, and substrate utilization were measured throughout the resting session, both training protocols and for 80 minutes after training sessions. Analyses were conducted to determine differences in physiological responses within and between protocols. No significant changes in testosterone occurred at any time point for either session. Lactate increased significantly immediately after both sessions. Heart rate, caloric expenditure, and substrate utilization were all elevated significantly during ST and RST. Heart rate and fat expenditure were significantly elevated compared to resting in both sessionsʼ recovery periods; calorie and carbohydrate expenditures were not. Compared to RST, ST represents an equivalent physiological stimulus on key parameters indicative of potential training-induced adaptive responses. Such adaptations could conceivably include cardiovascular conditioning.
doi_str_mv 10.1519/JSC.0000000000001217
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1790950450</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>4055649121</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4637-fe7fb06b5039db6ab59b81cf80f7e6ee6254b8580a4ff8f5a3c6b3fb4abdc1af3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkV1LwzAUhoMofkz_gUjBG286kyZp0ksZfjJQ_LiUkrQnW7VtZtIy9u_N3BziheYiOeQ87xtyXoSOCR4STrLzu6fREP9YJCFiC-0TTmnMEim2Q41TFktMyB468P4N44RzTnfRXpIymgkh99HrRdF3ED1MF76ytZ1UhaqjR_Az23rwUWejp87ZdtKoNnp2qmqrdhKNbDNTDsplO1yWVVfZNugCCu2km27IQ7RjVO3haH0O0MvV5fPoJh7fX9-OLsZxwVIqYgPCaJxqjmlW6lRpnmlJCiOxEZACpAlnWnKJFTNGGq5okWpqNFO6LIgydIDOVr4zZz968F3eVL6AulYt2N7nRGQ445iFB_5HJc0IwxkL6Okv9M32Lnz0i5IibGHYA8RWVOGs9w5MPnNVo9wiJzhfJpWHpPLfSQXZydq81w2UG9F3NAGQK2Bu6w6cf6_7Obh8Cqrupn97fwKV5aAs</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1788717853</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Acute Physiological Responses to Strongman Training Compared to Traditional Strength Training</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><creator>Harris, Nigel K ; Woulfe, Colm J ; Wood, Matthew R ; Dulson, Deborah K ; Gluchowski, Ashley K ; Keogh, Justin B</creator><creatorcontrib>Harris, Nigel K ; Woulfe, Colm J ; Wood, Matthew R ; Dulson, Deborah K ; Gluchowski, Ashley K ; Keogh, Justin B</creatorcontrib><description>ABSTRACTHarris, NK, Woulfe, CJ, Wood, MR, Dulson, DK, Gluchowski, AK, and Keogh, JB. Acute physiological responses to strongman training compared to traditional strength training. J Strength Cond Res 30(5)1397–1408, 2016—Strongman training (ST) has become an increasingly popular modality, but data on physiological responses are limited. This study sought to determine physiological responses to an ST session compared to a traditional strength exercise training (RST) session. Ten healthy men (23.6 ± 27.5 years, 85.8 ± 10.3 kg) volunteered in a crossover design, where all participants performed an ST session, an RST session, and a resting session within 7 days apart. The ST consisted of sled drag, farmerʼs walk, 1 arm dumbbell clean and press, and tire flip at loads eliciting approximately 30 seconds of near maximal effort per set. The RST consisted of squat, deadlift, bench press, and power clean, progressing to 75% of 1 repetition maximum. Sessions were equated for approximate total set duration. Blood lactate and salivary testosterone were recorded immediately before and after training sessions. Heart rate, caloric expenditure, and substrate utilization were measured throughout the resting session, both training protocols and for 80 minutes after training sessions. Analyses were conducted to determine differences in physiological responses within and between protocols. No significant changes in testosterone occurred at any time point for either session. Lactate increased significantly immediately after both sessions. Heart rate, caloric expenditure, and substrate utilization were all elevated significantly during ST and RST. Heart rate and fat expenditure were significantly elevated compared to resting in both sessionsʼ recovery periods; calorie and carbohydrate expenditures were not. Compared to RST, ST represents an equivalent physiological stimulus on key parameters indicative of potential training-induced adaptive responses. Such adaptations could conceivably include cardiovascular conditioning.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1064-8011</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1533-4287</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000001217</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26439778</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Copyright by the National Strength &amp; Conditioning Association</publisher><subject>Adaptation, Physiological ; Adult ; Cross-Over Studies ; Energy Metabolism - physiology ; Exercise ; Exercise - physiology ; Heart rate ; Heart Rate - physiology ; Humans ; Lactic Acid - blood ; Male ; Oxygen Consumption - physiology ; Physiology ; Resistance Training - methods ; Sports training ; Testosterone ; Testosterone - metabolism</subject><ispartof>Journal of strength and conditioning research, 2016-05, Vol.30 (5), p.1397-1408</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2016 by the National Strength &amp; Conditioning Association.</rights><rights>Copyright Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins May 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4637-fe7fb06b5039db6ab59b81cf80f7e6ee6254b8580a4ff8f5a3c6b3fb4abdc1af3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4637-fe7fb06b5039db6ab59b81cf80f7e6ee6254b8580a4ff8f5a3c6b3fb4abdc1af3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27905,27906</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26439778$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Harris, Nigel K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Woulfe, Colm J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wood, Matthew R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dulson, Deborah K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gluchowski, Ashley K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Keogh, Justin B</creatorcontrib><title>Acute Physiological Responses to Strongman Training Compared to Traditional Strength Training</title><title>Journal of strength and conditioning research</title><addtitle>J Strength Cond Res</addtitle><description>ABSTRACTHarris, NK, Woulfe, CJ, Wood, MR, Dulson, DK, Gluchowski, AK, and Keogh, JB. Acute physiological responses to strongman training compared to traditional strength training. J Strength Cond Res 30(5)1397–1408, 2016—Strongman training (ST) has become an increasingly popular modality, but data on physiological responses are limited. This study sought to determine physiological responses to an ST session compared to a traditional strength exercise training (RST) session. Ten healthy men (23.6 ± 27.5 years, 85.8 ± 10.3 kg) volunteered in a crossover design, where all participants performed an ST session, an RST session, and a resting session within 7 days apart. The ST consisted of sled drag, farmerʼs walk, 1 arm dumbbell clean and press, and tire flip at loads eliciting approximately 30 seconds of near maximal effort per set. The RST consisted of squat, deadlift, bench press, and power clean, progressing to 75% of 1 repetition maximum. Sessions were equated for approximate total set duration. Blood lactate and salivary testosterone were recorded immediately before and after training sessions. Heart rate, caloric expenditure, and substrate utilization were measured throughout the resting session, both training protocols and for 80 minutes after training sessions. Analyses were conducted to determine differences in physiological responses within and between protocols. No significant changes in testosterone occurred at any time point for either session. Lactate increased significantly immediately after both sessions. Heart rate, caloric expenditure, and substrate utilization were all elevated significantly during ST and RST. Heart rate and fat expenditure were significantly elevated compared to resting in both sessionsʼ recovery periods; calorie and carbohydrate expenditures were not. Compared to RST, ST represents an equivalent physiological stimulus on key parameters indicative of potential training-induced adaptive responses. Such adaptations could conceivably include cardiovascular conditioning.</description><subject>Adaptation, Physiological</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Cross-Over Studies</subject><subject>Energy Metabolism - physiology</subject><subject>Exercise</subject><subject>Exercise - physiology</subject><subject>Heart rate</subject><subject>Heart Rate - physiology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Lactic Acid - blood</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Oxygen Consumption - physiology</subject><subject>Physiology</subject><subject>Resistance Training - methods</subject><subject>Sports training</subject><subject>Testosterone</subject><subject>Testosterone - metabolism</subject><issn>1064-8011</issn><issn>1533-4287</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkV1LwzAUhoMofkz_gUjBG286kyZp0ksZfjJQ_LiUkrQnW7VtZtIy9u_N3BziheYiOeQ87xtyXoSOCR4STrLzu6fREP9YJCFiC-0TTmnMEim2Q41TFktMyB468P4N44RzTnfRXpIymgkh99HrRdF3ED1MF76ytZ1UhaqjR_Az23rwUWejp87ZdtKoNnp2qmqrdhKNbDNTDsplO1yWVVfZNugCCu2km27IQ7RjVO3haH0O0MvV5fPoJh7fX9-OLsZxwVIqYgPCaJxqjmlW6lRpnmlJCiOxEZACpAlnWnKJFTNGGq5okWpqNFO6LIgydIDOVr4zZz968F3eVL6AulYt2N7nRGQ445iFB_5HJc0IwxkL6Okv9M32Lnz0i5IibGHYA8RWVOGs9w5MPnNVo9wiJzhfJpWHpPLfSQXZydq81w2UG9F3NAGQK2Bu6w6cf6_7Obh8Cqrupn97fwKV5aAs</recordid><startdate>201605</startdate><enddate>201605</enddate><creator>Harris, Nigel K</creator><creator>Woulfe, Colm J</creator><creator>Wood, Matthew R</creator><creator>Dulson, Deborah K</creator><creator>Gluchowski, Ashley K</creator><creator>Keogh, Justin B</creator><general>Copyright by the National Strength &amp; Conditioning Association</general><general>Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins Ovid Technologies</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TS</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201605</creationdate><title>Acute Physiological Responses to Strongman Training Compared to Traditional Strength Training</title><author>Harris, Nigel K ; Woulfe, Colm J ; Wood, Matthew R ; Dulson, Deborah K ; Gluchowski, Ashley K ; Keogh, Justin B</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4637-fe7fb06b5039db6ab59b81cf80f7e6ee6254b8580a4ff8f5a3c6b3fb4abdc1af3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Adaptation, Physiological</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Cross-Over Studies</topic><topic>Energy Metabolism - physiology</topic><topic>Exercise</topic><topic>Exercise - physiology</topic><topic>Heart rate</topic><topic>Heart Rate - physiology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Lactic Acid - blood</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Oxygen Consumption - physiology</topic><topic>Physiology</topic><topic>Resistance Training - methods</topic><topic>Sports training</topic><topic>Testosterone</topic><topic>Testosterone - metabolism</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Harris, Nigel K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Woulfe, Colm J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wood, Matthew R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dulson, Deborah K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gluchowski, Ashley K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Keogh, Justin B</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of strength and conditioning research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Harris, Nigel K</au><au>Woulfe, Colm J</au><au>Wood, Matthew R</au><au>Dulson, Deborah K</au><au>Gluchowski, Ashley K</au><au>Keogh, Justin B</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Acute Physiological Responses to Strongman Training Compared to Traditional Strength Training</atitle><jtitle>Journal of strength and conditioning research</jtitle><addtitle>J Strength Cond Res</addtitle><date>2016-05</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>30</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>1397</spage><epage>1408</epage><pages>1397-1408</pages><issn>1064-8011</issn><eissn>1533-4287</eissn><abstract>ABSTRACTHarris, NK, Woulfe, CJ, Wood, MR, Dulson, DK, Gluchowski, AK, and Keogh, JB. Acute physiological responses to strongman training compared to traditional strength training. J Strength Cond Res 30(5)1397–1408, 2016—Strongman training (ST) has become an increasingly popular modality, but data on physiological responses are limited. This study sought to determine physiological responses to an ST session compared to a traditional strength exercise training (RST) session. Ten healthy men (23.6 ± 27.5 years, 85.8 ± 10.3 kg) volunteered in a crossover design, where all participants performed an ST session, an RST session, and a resting session within 7 days apart. The ST consisted of sled drag, farmerʼs walk, 1 arm dumbbell clean and press, and tire flip at loads eliciting approximately 30 seconds of near maximal effort per set. The RST consisted of squat, deadlift, bench press, and power clean, progressing to 75% of 1 repetition maximum. Sessions were equated for approximate total set duration. Blood lactate and salivary testosterone were recorded immediately before and after training sessions. Heart rate, caloric expenditure, and substrate utilization were measured throughout the resting session, both training protocols and for 80 minutes after training sessions. Analyses were conducted to determine differences in physiological responses within and between protocols. No significant changes in testosterone occurred at any time point for either session. Lactate increased significantly immediately after both sessions. Heart rate, caloric expenditure, and substrate utilization were all elevated significantly during ST and RST. Heart rate and fat expenditure were significantly elevated compared to resting in both sessionsʼ recovery periods; calorie and carbohydrate expenditures were not. Compared to RST, ST represents an equivalent physiological stimulus on key parameters indicative of potential training-induced adaptive responses. Such adaptations could conceivably include cardiovascular conditioning.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Copyright by the National Strength &amp; Conditioning Association</pub><pmid>26439778</pmid><doi>10.1519/JSC.0000000000001217</doi><tpages>12</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1064-8011
ispartof Journal of strength and conditioning research, 2016-05, Vol.30 (5), p.1397-1408
issn 1064-8011
1533-4287
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1790950450
source MEDLINE; Journals@Ovid Complete
subjects Adaptation, Physiological
Adult
Cross-Over Studies
Energy Metabolism - physiology
Exercise
Exercise - physiology
Heart rate
Heart Rate - physiology
Humans
Lactic Acid - blood
Male
Oxygen Consumption - physiology
Physiology
Resistance Training - methods
Sports training
Testosterone
Testosterone - metabolism
title Acute Physiological Responses to Strongman Training Compared to Traditional Strength Training
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-20T20%3A04%3A46IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Acute%20Physiological%20Responses%20to%20Strongman%20Training%20Compared%20to%20Traditional%20Strength%20Training&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20strength%20and%20conditioning%20research&rft.au=Harris,%20Nigel%20K&rft.date=2016-05&rft.volume=30&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=1397&rft.epage=1408&rft.pages=1397-1408&rft.issn=1064-8011&rft.eissn=1533-4287&rft_id=info:doi/10.1519/JSC.0000000000001217&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E4055649121%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1788717853&rft_id=info:pmid/26439778&rfr_iscdi=true