Composition, potential emissions and agricultural value of pig slurry from Spanish commercial farms

Pig slurry is a valuable fertilizer for crop production but at the same time its management may pose environmental risks. Slurry samples were collected from 77 commercial farms of four animal categories (gestating and lactating sows, nursery piglets and growing pigs) and analyzed for macronutrients,...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Nutrient cycling in agroecosystems 2016-03, Vol.104 (2), p.159-173
Hauptverfasser: Antezana, W, De Blas, C, García-Rebollar, P, Rodríguez, C, Beccaccia, A, Ferrer, P, Cerisuelo, A, Moset, V, Estellés, F, Cambra-López, M, Calvet, S
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 173
container_issue 2
container_start_page 159
container_title Nutrient cycling in agroecosystems
container_volume 104
creator Antezana, W
De Blas, C
García-Rebollar, P
Rodríguez, C
Beccaccia, A
Ferrer, P
Cerisuelo, A
Moset, V
Estellés, F
Cambra-López, M
Calvet, S
description Pig slurry is a valuable fertilizer for crop production but at the same time its management may pose environmental risks. Slurry samples were collected from 77 commercial farms of four animal categories (gestating and lactating sows, nursery piglets and growing pigs) and analyzed for macronutrients, micronutrients, heavy metals and volatile fatty acids. Emissions of ammonia (NH₃) and biochemical methane potential (BMP) were quantified. Slurry electrical conductivity, pH, dry matter content and ash content were also determined. Data analysis included an analysis of correlations among variables, the development of prediction models for gaseous emissions and the analysis of nutritional content of slurries for crop production. Descriptive information is provided in this work and shows a wide range of variability in all studied variables. Animal category affected some physicochemical parameters, probably as a consequence of different slurry management and use of cleaning water. Slurries from gestating sows and growing pigs tended to be more concentrated in nutrients, whereas the slurry from lactating sows and nursery piglets tended to be more diluted. Relevant relationships were found among slurry characteristics expressed in fresh basis and gas emissions. Predictive models using on-farm measurable parameters were obtained for NH₃ (R² = 0.51) and CH₄ (R² = 0.76), which suggests that BMP may be estimated in commercial farms from easily determined slurry characteristics. Finally, slurry nutrient composition was highly variable. Therefore, complete analyses of slurries should be performed for an effective and environmental friendly land application.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s10705-016-9764-3
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1790950299</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1790950299</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c373t-c8e8bb2cb021e998196cc15937d3740d3a41329dda063a18b0e9f1ac13d622ac3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc1q3TAQRk1JoGmSB-iqgm66qJMZjW1Jy3DpHwSySLIWurJ862BbrsYO5O2jiwuFLrKSkM75GH0qio8IVwigrhlBQV0CNqVRTVXSu-IMa0Ul6Ead5D3pukTC6n3xgfkJskO6Oiv8Lo5z5H7p4_RVzHEJ09K7QYSxZ85nLNzUCndIvV-HZU356tkNaxCxE3N_EDysKb2ILsVR3M9u6vm38HEcQ_LHmM6lkS-K084NHC7_rufF4_dvD7uf5e3dj1-7m9vSk6Kl9Dro_V76PUgMxmg0jfdYG1ItqQpachWSNG3roCGHeg_BdOg8UttI6TydF1-23DnFP2vgxeZH-DAMbgpxZYvKgKlBGpPRz_-hT3FNU57OSlkbTUAGMoUb5VNkTqGzc-pHl14sgj3Wbrfaba7dHmu3lB25OZzZ6RDSv-S3pE-b1Lloj2WzfbyXGQDIfyZR0ytxoY74</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2259830390</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Composition, potential emissions and agricultural value of pig slurry from Spanish commercial farms</title><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><creator>Antezana, W ; De Blas, C ; García-Rebollar, P ; Rodríguez, C ; Beccaccia, A ; Ferrer, P ; Cerisuelo, A ; Moset, V ; Estellés, F ; Cambra-López, M ; Calvet, S</creator><creatorcontrib>Antezana, W ; De Blas, C ; García-Rebollar, P ; Rodríguez, C ; Beccaccia, A ; Ferrer, P ; Cerisuelo, A ; Moset, V ; Estellés, F ; Cambra-López, M ; Calvet, S</creatorcontrib><description>Pig slurry is a valuable fertilizer for crop production but at the same time its management may pose environmental risks. Slurry samples were collected from 77 commercial farms of four animal categories (gestating and lactating sows, nursery piglets and growing pigs) and analyzed for macronutrients, micronutrients, heavy metals and volatile fatty acids. Emissions of ammonia (NH₃) and biochemical methane potential (BMP) were quantified. Slurry electrical conductivity, pH, dry matter content and ash content were also determined. Data analysis included an analysis of correlations among variables, the development of prediction models for gaseous emissions and the analysis of nutritional content of slurries for crop production. Descriptive information is provided in this work and shows a wide range of variability in all studied variables. Animal category affected some physicochemical parameters, probably as a consequence of different slurry management and use of cleaning water. Slurries from gestating sows and growing pigs tended to be more concentrated in nutrients, whereas the slurry from lactating sows and nursery piglets tended to be more diluted. Relevant relationships were found among slurry characteristics expressed in fresh basis and gas emissions. Predictive models using on-farm measurable parameters were obtained for NH₃ (R² = 0.51) and CH₄ (R² = 0.76), which suggests that BMP may be estimated in commercial farms from easily determined slurry characteristics. Finally, slurry nutrient composition was highly variable. Therefore, complete analyses of slurries should be performed for an effective and environmental friendly land application.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1385-1314</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-0867</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10705-016-9764-3</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>Agricultural management ; Agriculture ; Ammonia ; Animal wastes ; ash content ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Commercial farms ; Composition ; Correlation analysis ; Crop production ; Data analysis ; Dry matter ; dry matter content ; Electrical conductivity ; Electrical resistivity ; Emission measurements ; Environmental management ; Environmental risk ; Farms ; Fatty acids ; fertilizers ; gas emissions ; Heavy metals ; Hogs ; lactation ; Land application ; Life Sciences ; Mathematical models ; Methane ; Micronutrients ; nutrient content ; Nutrients ; Original Article ; Parameters ; Physicochemical properties ; Pig manure ; piglets ; Prediction models ; risk ; Slurries ; sows ; Swine ; time management ; Volatile fatty acids</subject><ispartof>Nutrient cycling in agroecosystems, 2016-03, Vol.104 (2), p.159-173</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016</rights><rights>Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems is a copyright of Springer, (2016). All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c373t-c8e8bb2cb021e998196cc15937d3740d3a41329dda063a18b0e9f1ac13d622ac3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c373t-c8e8bb2cb021e998196cc15937d3740d3a41329dda063a18b0e9f1ac13d622ac3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10705-016-9764-3$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10705-016-9764-3$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904,41467,42536,51298</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Antezana, W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Blas, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>García-Rebollar, P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rodríguez, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beccaccia, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ferrer, P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cerisuelo, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moset, V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Estellés, F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cambra-López, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Calvet, S</creatorcontrib><title>Composition, potential emissions and agricultural value of pig slurry from Spanish commercial farms</title><title>Nutrient cycling in agroecosystems</title><addtitle>Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst</addtitle><description>Pig slurry is a valuable fertilizer for crop production but at the same time its management may pose environmental risks. Slurry samples were collected from 77 commercial farms of four animal categories (gestating and lactating sows, nursery piglets and growing pigs) and analyzed for macronutrients, micronutrients, heavy metals and volatile fatty acids. Emissions of ammonia (NH₃) and biochemical methane potential (BMP) were quantified. Slurry electrical conductivity, pH, dry matter content and ash content were also determined. Data analysis included an analysis of correlations among variables, the development of prediction models for gaseous emissions and the analysis of nutritional content of slurries for crop production. Descriptive information is provided in this work and shows a wide range of variability in all studied variables. Animal category affected some physicochemical parameters, probably as a consequence of different slurry management and use of cleaning water. Slurries from gestating sows and growing pigs tended to be more concentrated in nutrients, whereas the slurry from lactating sows and nursery piglets tended to be more diluted. Relevant relationships were found among slurry characteristics expressed in fresh basis and gas emissions. Predictive models using on-farm measurable parameters were obtained for NH₃ (R² = 0.51) and CH₄ (R² = 0.76), which suggests that BMP may be estimated in commercial farms from easily determined slurry characteristics. Finally, slurry nutrient composition was highly variable. Therefore, complete analyses of slurries should be performed for an effective and environmental friendly land application.</description><subject>Agricultural management</subject><subject>Agriculture</subject><subject>Ammonia</subject><subject>Animal wastes</subject><subject>ash content</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Commercial farms</subject><subject>Composition</subject><subject>Correlation analysis</subject><subject>Crop production</subject><subject>Data analysis</subject><subject>Dry matter</subject><subject>dry matter content</subject><subject>Electrical conductivity</subject><subject>Electrical resistivity</subject><subject>Emission measurements</subject><subject>Environmental management</subject><subject>Environmental risk</subject><subject>Farms</subject><subject>Fatty acids</subject><subject>fertilizers</subject><subject>gas emissions</subject><subject>Heavy metals</subject><subject>Hogs</subject><subject>lactation</subject><subject>Land application</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Methane</subject><subject>Micronutrients</subject><subject>nutrient content</subject><subject>Nutrients</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Parameters</subject><subject>Physicochemical properties</subject><subject>Pig manure</subject><subject>piglets</subject><subject>Prediction models</subject><subject>risk</subject><subject>Slurries</subject><subject>sows</subject><subject>Swine</subject><subject>time management</subject><subject>Volatile fatty acids</subject><issn>1385-1314</issn><issn>1573-0867</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kc1q3TAQRk1JoGmSB-iqgm66qJMZjW1Jy3DpHwSySLIWurJ862BbrsYO5O2jiwuFLrKSkM75GH0qio8IVwigrhlBQV0CNqVRTVXSu-IMa0Ul6Ead5D3pukTC6n3xgfkJskO6Oiv8Lo5z5H7p4_RVzHEJ09K7QYSxZ85nLNzUCndIvV-HZU356tkNaxCxE3N_EDysKb2ILsVR3M9u6vm38HEcQ_LHmM6lkS-K084NHC7_rufF4_dvD7uf5e3dj1-7m9vSk6Kl9Dro_V76PUgMxmg0jfdYG1ItqQpachWSNG3roCGHeg_BdOg8UttI6TydF1-23DnFP2vgxeZH-DAMbgpxZYvKgKlBGpPRz_-hT3FNU57OSlkbTUAGMoUb5VNkTqGzc-pHl14sgj3Wbrfaba7dHmu3lB25OZzZ6RDSv-S3pE-b1Lloj2WzfbyXGQDIfyZR0ytxoY74</recordid><startdate>20160301</startdate><enddate>20160301</enddate><creator>Antezana, W</creator><creator>De Blas, C</creator><creator>García-Rebollar, P</creator><creator>Rodríguez, C</creator><creator>Beccaccia, A</creator><creator>Ferrer, P</creator><creator>Cerisuelo, A</creator><creator>Moset, V</creator><creator>Estellés, F</creator><creator>Cambra-López, M</creator><creator>Calvet, S</creator><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160301</creationdate><title>Composition, potential emissions and agricultural value of pig slurry from Spanish commercial farms</title><author>Antezana, W ; De Blas, C ; García-Rebollar, P ; Rodríguez, C ; Beccaccia, A ; Ferrer, P ; Cerisuelo, A ; Moset, V ; Estellés, F ; Cambra-López, M ; Calvet, S</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c373t-c8e8bb2cb021e998196cc15937d3740d3a41329dda063a18b0e9f1ac13d622ac3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Agricultural management</topic><topic>Agriculture</topic><topic>Ammonia</topic><topic>Animal wastes</topic><topic>ash content</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Commercial farms</topic><topic>Composition</topic><topic>Correlation analysis</topic><topic>Crop production</topic><topic>Data analysis</topic><topic>Dry matter</topic><topic>dry matter content</topic><topic>Electrical conductivity</topic><topic>Electrical resistivity</topic><topic>Emission measurements</topic><topic>Environmental management</topic><topic>Environmental risk</topic><topic>Farms</topic><topic>Fatty acids</topic><topic>fertilizers</topic><topic>gas emissions</topic><topic>Heavy metals</topic><topic>Hogs</topic><topic>lactation</topic><topic>Land application</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Methane</topic><topic>Micronutrients</topic><topic>nutrient content</topic><topic>Nutrients</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Parameters</topic><topic>Physicochemical properties</topic><topic>Pig manure</topic><topic>piglets</topic><topic>Prediction models</topic><topic>risk</topic><topic>Slurries</topic><topic>sows</topic><topic>Swine</topic><topic>time management</topic><topic>Volatile fatty acids</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Antezana, W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Blas, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>García-Rebollar, P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rodríguez, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beccaccia, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ferrer, P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cerisuelo, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moset, V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Estellés, F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cambra-López, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Calvet, S</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Nutrient cycling in agroecosystems</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Antezana, W</au><au>De Blas, C</au><au>García-Rebollar, P</au><au>Rodríguez, C</au><au>Beccaccia, A</au><au>Ferrer, P</au><au>Cerisuelo, A</au><au>Moset, V</au><au>Estellés, F</au><au>Cambra-López, M</au><au>Calvet, S</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Composition, potential emissions and agricultural value of pig slurry from Spanish commercial farms</atitle><jtitle>Nutrient cycling in agroecosystems</jtitle><stitle>Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst</stitle><date>2016-03-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>104</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>159</spage><epage>173</epage><pages>159-173</pages><issn>1385-1314</issn><eissn>1573-0867</eissn><abstract>Pig slurry is a valuable fertilizer for crop production but at the same time its management may pose environmental risks. Slurry samples were collected from 77 commercial farms of four animal categories (gestating and lactating sows, nursery piglets and growing pigs) and analyzed for macronutrients, micronutrients, heavy metals and volatile fatty acids. Emissions of ammonia (NH₃) and biochemical methane potential (BMP) were quantified. Slurry electrical conductivity, pH, dry matter content and ash content were also determined. Data analysis included an analysis of correlations among variables, the development of prediction models for gaseous emissions and the analysis of nutritional content of slurries for crop production. Descriptive information is provided in this work and shows a wide range of variability in all studied variables. Animal category affected some physicochemical parameters, probably as a consequence of different slurry management and use of cleaning water. Slurries from gestating sows and growing pigs tended to be more concentrated in nutrients, whereas the slurry from lactating sows and nursery piglets tended to be more diluted. Relevant relationships were found among slurry characteristics expressed in fresh basis and gas emissions. Predictive models using on-farm measurable parameters were obtained for NH₃ (R² = 0.51) and CH₄ (R² = 0.76), which suggests that BMP may be estimated in commercial farms from easily determined slurry characteristics. Finally, slurry nutrient composition was highly variable. Therefore, complete analyses of slurries should be performed for an effective and environmental friendly land application.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Netherlands</pub><doi>10.1007/s10705-016-9764-3</doi><tpages>15</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1385-1314
ispartof Nutrient cycling in agroecosystems, 2016-03, Vol.104 (2), p.159-173
issn 1385-1314
1573-0867
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1790950299
source Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals
subjects Agricultural management
Agriculture
Ammonia
Animal wastes
ash content
Biomedical and Life Sciences
Commercial farms
Composition
Correlation analysis
Crop production
Data analysis
Dry matter
dry matter content
Electrical conductivity
Electrical resistivity
Emission measurements
Environmental management
Environmental risk
Farms
Fatty acids
fertilizers
gas emissions
Heavy metals
Hogs
lactation
Land application
Life Sciences
Mathematical models
Methane
Micronutrients
nutrient content
Nutrients
Original Article
Parameters
Physicochemical properties
Pig manure
piglets
Prediction models
risk
Slurries
sows
Swine
time management
Volatile fatty acids
title Composition, potential emissions and agricultural value of pig slurry from Spanish commercial farms
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-21T16%3A31%3A40IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Composition,%20potential%20emissions%20and%20agricultural%20value%20of%20pig%20slurry%20from%20Spanish%20commercial%20farms&rft.jtitle=Nutrient%20cycling%20in%20agroecosystems&rft.au=Antezana,%20W&rft.date=2016-03-01&rft.volume=104&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=159&rft.epage=173&rft.pages=159-173&rft.issn=1385-1314&rft.eissn=1573-0867&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10705-016-9764-3&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1790950299%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2259830390&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true