Life cycle assessment of lignocellulosic ethanol: a review of key factors and methods affecting calculated GHG emissions and energy use

•System boundaries, N2O emissions, soil carbon and LUC remain contentious issues.•Differences in process efficiency and chemical use can strongly impact LCA metrics.•GHG emissions are impacted by allocation methods and co-product credits.•Wide variation in key parameters reported in the literature i...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Current opinion in biotechnology 2016-04, Vol.38, p.63-70
Hauptverfasser: Gerbrandt, Kelsey, Chu, Pei Lin, Simmonds, Allison, Mullins, Kimberley A, MacLean, Heather L, Griffin, W Michael, Saville, Bradley A
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 70
container_issue
container_start_page 63
container_title Current opinion in biotechnology
container_volume 38
creator Gerbrandt, Kelsey
Chu, Pei Lin
Simmonds, Allison
Mullins, Kimberley A
MacLean, Heather L
Griffin, W Michael
Saville, Bradley A
description •System boundaries, N2O emissions, soil carbon and LUC remain contentious issues.•Differences in process efficiency and chemical use can strongly impact LCA metrics.•GHG emissions are impacted by allocation methods and co-product credits.•Wide variation in key parameters reported in the literature impacts GHG emissions.•Indirect/consequential effects can be important and warrant further study. Lignocellulosic ethanol has potential for lower life cycle greenhouse gas emissions compared to gasoline and conventional grain-based ethanol. Ethanol production ‘pathways’ need to meet economic and environmental goals. Numerous life cycle assessments of lignocellulosic ethanol have been published over the last 15 years, but gaps remain in understanding life cycle performance due to insufficient data, and model and methodological issues. We highlight key aspects of these issues, drawing on literature and a case study of corn stover ethanol. Challenges include the complexity of feedstock/ecosystems and market-mediated aspects and the short history of commercial lignocellulosic ethanol facilities, which collectively have led to uncertainty in GHG emissions estimates, and to debates on LCA methods and the role of uncertainty in decision making.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.copbio.2015.12.021
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1790942391</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0958166916000033</els_id><sourcerecordid>1790942391</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c450t-106a8247bc03d85984fe0ffe01044c2c09e0ddf81e92731153a02ed5ddccac463</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkrGO1DAQhiME4paDN0DIJU3CjOMkDgUSOsEe0koUQG157cniJWsvdnJon4DXxlEOChqo7OKbGfv_piieI1QI2L46Viac9y5UHLCpkFfA8UGxQdn1JQjePyw20DeyxLbtr4onKR0BoKk7eFxc8VZC16DYFD93biBmLmYkplOilE7kJxYGNrqDD4bGcR5DcobR9FX7ML5mmkW6c_Rjgb7RhQ3aTCEmpr1lp0wFm-_DQGZy_sCMHs086oks295uGZ1cSi74FSdP8XBhc6KnxaNBj4me3Z_XxZf37z7f3Ja7j9sPN293pRENTCVCqyUX3d5AbWXTSzEQ5FmAIIThBnoCaweJ1POuRmxqDZxsY60x2oi2vi5ern3PMXyfKU0qP2j5pfYU5qSw66EXvO7xP1AJDbaSy4yKFTUxpBRpUOfoTjpeFIJabKmjWm2pxZZCrrKtXPbifsK8P5H9U_RbTwberADlSHLmUSXjyBuyLuZ8lQ3uXxP-bmBG512Wks1ROoY5-hy3QpVygfq0bMyyMNjmZYG6rn8BdJ--AA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1780516828</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Life cycle assessment of lignocellulosic ethanol: a review of key factors and methods affecting calculated GHG emissions and energy use</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Gerbrandt, Kelsey ; Chu, Pei Lin ; Simmonds, Allison ; Mullins, Kimberley A ; MacLean, Heather L ; Griffin, W Michael ; Saville, Bradley A</creator><creatorcontrib>Gerbrandt, Kelsey ; Chu, Pei Lin ; Simmonds, Allison ; Mullins, Kimberley A ; MacLean, Heather L ; Griffin, W Michael ; Saville, Bradley A</creatorcontrib><description>•System boundaries, N2O emissions, soil carbon and LUC remain contentious issues.•Differences in process efficiency and chemical use can strongly impact LCA metrics.•GHG emissions are impacted by allocation methods and co-product credits.•Wide variation in key parameters reported in the literature impacts GHG emissions.•Indirect/consequential effects can be important and warrant further study. Lignocellulosic ethanol has potential for lower life cycle greenhouse gas emissions compared to gasoline and conventional grain-based ethanol. Ethanol production ‘pathways’ need to meet economic and environmental goals. Numerous life cycle assessments of lignocellulosic ethanol have been published over the last 15 years, but gaps remain in understanding life cycle performance due to insufficient data, and model and methodological issues. We highlight key aspects of these issues, drawing on literature and a case study of corn stover ethanol. Challenges include the complexity of feedstock/ecosystems and market-mediated aspects and the short history of commercial lignocellulosic ethanol facilities, which collectively have led to uncertainty in GHG emissions estimates, and to debates on LCA methods and the role of uncertainty in decision making.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0958-1669</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-0429</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.copbio.2015.12.021</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26807514</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Animals ; Biomass ; Cellulose - metabolism ; Distillation ; Ethanol - metabolism ; Fermentation ; Greenhouse Effect ; Hydrolysis ; Internal Medicine ; Zea mays - metabolism</subject><ispartof>Current opinion in biotechnology, 2016-04, Vol.38, p.63-70</ispartof><rights>Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>2016 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c450t-106a8247bc03d85984fe0ffe01044c2c09e0ddf81e92731153a02ed5ddccac463</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c450t-106a8247bc03d85984fe0ffe01044c2c09e0ddf81e92731153a02ed5ddccac463</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0958166916000033$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26807514$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gerbrandt, Kelsey</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chu, Pei Lin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Simmonds, Allison</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mullins, Kimberley A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MacLean, Heather L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Griffin, W Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saville, Bradley A</creatorcontrib><title>Life cycle assessment of lignocellulosic ethanol: a review of key factors and methods affecting calculated GHG emissions and energy use</title><title>Current opinion in biotechnology</title><addtitle>Curr Opin Biotechnol</addtitle><description>•System boundaries, N2O emissions, soil carbon and LUC remain contentious issues.•Differences in process efficiency and chemical use can strongly impact LCA metrics.•GHG emissions are impacted by allocation methods and co-product credits.•Wide variation in key parameters reported in the literature impacts GHG emissions.•Indirect/consequential effects can be important and warrant further study. Lignocellulosic ethanol has potential for lower life cycle greenhouse gas emissions compared to gasoline and conventional grain-based ethanol. Ethanol production ‘pathways’ need to meet economic and environmental goals. Numerous life cycle assessments of lignocellulosic ethanol have been published over the last 15 years, but gaps remain in understanding life cycle performance due to insufficient data, and model and methodological issues. We highlight key aspects of these issues, drawing on literature and a case study of corn stover ethanol. Challenges include the complexity of feedstock/ecosystems and market-mediated aspects and the short history of commercial lignocellulosic ethanol facilities, which collectively have led to uncertainty in GHG emissions estimates, and to debates on LCA methods and the role of uncertainty in decision making.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Biomass</subject><subject>Cellulose - metabolism</subject><subject>Distillation</subject><subject>Ethanol - metabolism</subject><subject>Fermentation</subject><subject>Greenhouse Effect</subject><subject>Hydrolysis</subject><subject>Internal Medicine</subject><subject>Zea mays - metabolism</subject><issn>0958-1669</issn><issn>1879-0429</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkrGO1DAQhiME4paDN0DIJU3CjOMkDgUSOsEe0koUQG157cniJWsvdnJon4DXxlEOChqo7OKbGfv_piieI1QI2L46Viac9y5UHLCpkFfA8UGxQdn1JQjePyw20DeyxLbtr4onKR0BoKk7eFxc8VZC16DYFD93biBmLmYkplOilE7kJxYGNrqDD4bGcR5DcobR9FX7ML5mmkW6c_Rjgb7RhQ3aTCEmpr1lp0wFm-_DQGZy_sCMHs086oks295uGZ1cSi74FSdP8XBhc6KnxaNBj4me3Z_XxZf37z7f3Ja7j9sPN293pRENTCVCqyUX3d5AbWXTSzEQ5FmAIIThBnoCaweJ1POuRmxqDZxsY60x2oi2vi5ern3PMXyfKU0qP2j5pfYU5qSw66EXvO7xP1AJDbaSy4yKFTUxpBRpUOfoTjpeFIJabKmjWm2pxZZCrrKtXPbifsK8P5H9U_RbTwberADlSHLmUSXjyBuyLuZ8lQ3uXxP-bmBG512Wks1ROoY5-hy3QpVygfq0bMyyMNjmZYG6rn8BdJ--AA</recordid><startdate>20160401</startdate><enddate>20160401</enddate><creator>Gerbrandt, Kelsey</creator><creator>Chu, Pei Lin</creator><creator>Simmonds, Allison</creator><creator>Mullins, Kimberley A</creator><creator>MacLean, Heather L</creator><creator>Griffin, W Michael</creator><creator>Saville, Bradley A</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160401</creationdate><title>Life cycle assessment of lignocellulosic ethanol: a review of key factors and methods affecting calculated GHG emissions and energy use</title><author>Gerbrandt, Kelsey ; Chu, Pei Lin ; Simmonds, Allison ; Mullins, Kimberley A ; MacLean, Heather L ; Griffin, W Michael ; Saville, Bradley A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c450t-106a8247bc03d85984fe0ffe01044c2c09e0ddf81e92731153a02ed5ddccac463</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Biomass</topic><topic>Cellulose - metabolism</topic><topic>Distillation</topic><topic>Ethanol - metabolism</topic><topic>Fermentation</topic><topic>Greenhouse Effect</topic><topic>Hydrolysis</topic><topic>Internal Medicine</topic><topic>Zea mays - metabolism</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gerbrandt, Kelsey</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chu, Pei Lin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Simmonds, Allison</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mullins, Kimberley A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MacLean, Heather L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Griffin, W Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saville, Bradley A</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Current opinion in biotechnology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gerbrandt, Kelsey</au><au>Chu, Pei Lin</au><au>Simmonds, Allison</au><au>Mullins, Kimberley A</au><au>MacLean, Heather L</au><au>Griffin, W Michael</au><au>Saville, Bradley A</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Life cycle assessment of lignocellulosic ethanol: a review of key factors and methods affecting calculated GHG emissions and energy use</atitle><jtitle>Current opinion in biotechnology</jtitle><addtitle>Curr Opin Biotechnol</addtitle><date>2016-04-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>38</volume><spage>63</spage><epage>70</epage><pages>63-70</pages><issn>0958-1669</issn><eissn>1879-0429</eissn><abstract>•System boundaries, N2O emissions, soil carbon and LUC remain contentious issues.•Differences in process efficiency and chemical use can strongly impact LCA metrics.•GHG emissions are impacted by allocation methods and co-product credits.•Wide variation in key parameters reported in the literature impacts GHG emissions.•Indirect/consequential effects can be important and warrant further study. Lignocellulosic ethanol has potential for lower life cycle greenhouse gas emissions compared to gasoline and conventional grain-based ethanol. Ethanol production ‘pathways’ need to meet economic and environmental goals. Numerous life cycle assessments of lignocellulosic ethanol have been published over the last 15 years, but gaps remain in understanding life cycle performance due to insufficient data, and model and methodological issues. We highlight key aspects of these issues, drawing on literature and a case study of corn stover ethanol. Challenges include the complexity of feedstock/ecosystems and market-mediated aspects and the short history of commercial lignocellulosic ethanol facilities, which collectively have led to uncertainty in GHG emissions estimates, and to debates on LCA methods and the role of uncertainty in decision making.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>26807514</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.copbio.2015.12.021</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0958-1669
ispartof Current opinion in biotechnology, 2016-04, Vol.38, p.63-70
issn 0958-1669
1879-0429
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1790942391
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Animals
Biomass
Cellulose - metabolism
Distillation
Ethanol - metabolism
Fermentation
Greenhouse Effect
Hydrolysis
Internal Medicine
Zea mays - metabolism
title Life cycle assessment of lignocellulosic ethanol: a review of key factors and methods affecting calculated GHG emissions and energy use
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T01%3A52%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Life%20cycle%20assessment%20of%20lignocellulosic%20ethanol:%20a%20review%20of%20key%20factors%20and%20methods%20affecting%20calculated%20GHG%20emissions%20and%20energy%20use&rft.jtitle=Current%20opinion%20in%20biotechnology&rft.au=Gerbrandt,%20Kelsey&rft.date=2016-04-01&rft.volume=38&rft.spage=63&rft.epage=70&rft.pages=63-70&rft.issn=0958-1669&rft.eissn=1879-0429&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.copbio.2015.12.021&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1790942391%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1780516828&rft_id=info:pmid/26807514&rft_els_id=S0958166916000033&rfr_iscdi=true