Pencil beam scanning proton therapy for pediatric intracranial ependymoma
To assess the clinical outcome and late side effect profile of pencil beam scanning proton therapy (PT) delivered to children with intracranial ependymoma. Between July-2004 and March-2013, 50 patients with intracranial ependymoma (n = 46, grade 3) received involved-field PT at Paul Scherrer Institu...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of neuro-oncology 2016-05, Vol.128 (1), p.137-145 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 145 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 137 |
container_title | Journal of neuro-oncology |
container_volume | 128 |
creator | Ares, Carmen Albertini, Francesca Frei-Welte, Martina Bolsi, Alessandra Grotzer, Michael A. Goitein, Gudrun Weber, Damien C. |
description | To assess the clinical outcome and late side effect profile of pencil beam scanning proton therapy (PT) delivered to children with intracranial ependymoma. Between July-2004 and March-2013, 50 patients with intracranial ependymoma (n = 46, grade 3) received involved-field PT at Paul Scherrer Institute (PSI). Median age at time of PT was 2.6 years (range 1.1–15.2). Thirty-six patients had infratentorial and 14 supratentorial ependymomas. Seventeen patients presented with macroscopic residual disease after subtotal resection before starting PT (8 with ≤1.5 cc and 9 with >1.5 cc residual tumor respectively). Forty-three (86 %) patients received post-operative chemotherapy before PT according to protocols; 44 (88 %) patients younger than 5 years required general anesthesia. Median prescribed dose was 59.4 Gy (RBE) (range 54–60) delivered in 1.8–2 Gy (RBE) per fraction. Late toxicity was assessed according to CTCAE v4.0. With a mean follow-up time of 43.4 months (range 8.5–113.7) seven patients experienced local failure (6 with infratentorial tumors and 1 with supratentorial tumor); four of the local failures were in patients with residual disease ≥1.5 cc at the time of PT and 3 without residual macroscopic disease. Five patients died from tumor progression. Actuarial 5-year Local Control rates were 78 ± 7.5 % and 5-year OS rates were 84 ± 6.8 %. Three patients developed grade ≥3 toxicity: 2 developed unilateral deafness (infratentorial tumors infiltrating into the internal acoustic canal), one patient developed a fatal brainstem necrosis. Repeated general anesthesia in children younger than 5 years was delivered without complications. Our data indicate the safety and the effectiveness of PT for pediatric ependymomas. Local control and survival rates are encouraging considering the high grade histology in 92 % of the patients and the number of patients with residual tumor ≥1.5 cc. The rates of late effects compare favorably with published photon-treated cohorts. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s11060-016-2090-4 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1790934672</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1789037096</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c471t-29e1e610de6449212d1df6a2d32668d12149ad32de6709211859a93cb964753b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkU9LAzEQxYMotlY_gBdZ8OJldSbJJpujFP8UCnpQ8BbS3bRu2c2uyfbQb2_KVhFB8DQM7zdvJnmEnCNcI4C8CYggIAUUKQUFKT8gY8wkSyWT7JCMoyDTTPG3ETkJYQ0AXDI8JiMqFM-yHMZk9mxdUdXJwpomCYVxrnKrpPNt37qkf7fedNtk2fqks2Vlel8VSeV6bwpvXGXqxHbWldumbcwpOVqaOtizfZ2Q1_u7l-ljOn96mE1v52nBJfYpVRatQCit4FxRpCWWS2FoyagQeYkUuTKxibqEqGOeKaNYsVCCy4wt2IRcDb7xyI-NDb1uqlDYujbOtpugUSpQjAtJ_4HmClhcIyJ6-Qtdtxvv4kN2VI45osgihQNV-DYEb5e681Vj_FYj6F0keohEx5_Xu0g0jzMXe-fNorHl98RXBhGgAxCi5FbW_1j9p-sng_KUTA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1788181165</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Pencil beam scanning proton therapy for pediatric intracranial ependymoma</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Ares, Carmen ; Albertini, Francesca ; Frei-Welte, Martina ; Bolsi, Alessandra ; Grotzer, Michael A. ; Goitein, Gudrun ; Weber, Damien C.</creator><creatorcontrib>Ares, Carmen ; Albertini, Francesca ; Frei-Welte, Martina ; Bolsi, Alessandra ; Grotzer, Michael A. ; Goitein, Gudrun ; Weber, Damien C.</creatorcontrib><description>To assess the clinical outcome and late side effect profile of pencil beam scanning proton therapy (PT) delivered to children with intracranial ependymoma. Between July-2004 and March-2013, 50 patients with intracranial ependymoma (n = 46, grade 3) received involved-field PT at Paul Scherrer Institute (PSI). Median age at time of PT was 2.6 years (range 1.1–15.2). Thirty-six patients had infratentorial and 14 supratentorial ependymomas. Seventeen patients presented with macroscopic residual disease after subtotal resection before starting PT (8 with ≤1.5 cc and 9 with >1.5 cc residual tumor respectively). Forty-three (86 %) patients received post-operative chemotherapy before PT according to protocols; 44 (88 %) patients younger than 5 years required general anesthesia. Median prescribed dose was 59.4 Gy (RBE) (range 54–60) delivered in 1.8–2 Gy (RBE) per fraction. Late toxicity was assessed according to CTCAE v4.0. With a mean follow-up time of 43.4 months (range 8.5–113.7) seven patients experienced local failure (6 with infratentorial tumors and 1 with supratentorial tumor); four of the local failures were in patients with residual disease ≥1.5 cc at the time of PT and 3 without residual macroscopic disease. Five patients died from tumor progression. Actuarial 5-year Local Control rates were 78 ± 7.5 % and 5-year OS rates were 84 ± 6.8 %. Three patients developed grade ≥3 toxicity: 2 developed unilateral deafness (infratentorial tumors infiltrating into the internal acoustic canal), one patient developed a fatal brainstem necrosis. Repeated general anesthesia in children younger than 5 years was delivered without complications. Our data indicate the safety and the effectiveness of PT for pediatric ependymomas. Local control and survival rates are encouraging considering the high grade histology in 92 % of the patients and the number of patients with residual tumor ≥1.5 cc. The rates of late effects compare favorably with published photon-treated cohorts.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0167-594X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-7373</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11060-016-2090-4</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26945580</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Chemotherapy, Adjuvant ; Child ; Child, Preschool ; Clinical Study ; Dose-Response Relationship, Radiation ; Ependymoma - drug therapy ; Ependymoma - radiotherapy ; Ependymoma - surgery ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Humans ; Infant ; Infratentorial Neoplasms - drug therapy ; Infratentorial Neoplasms - radiotherapy ; Infratentorial Neoplasms - surgery ; Male ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Neurology ; Oncology ; Proton Therapy - adverse effects ; Proton Therapy - methods ; Radiotherapy Dosage ; Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted ; Supratentorial Neoplasms - drug therapy ; Supratentorial Neoplasms - radiotherapy ; Supratentorial Neoplasms - surgery ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>Journal of neuro-oncology, 2016-05, Vol.128 (1), p.137-145</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c471t-29e1e610de6449212d1df6a2d32668d12149ad32de6709211859a93cb964753b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c471t-29e1e610de6449212d1df6a2d32668d12149ad32de6709211859a93cb964753b3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-3909-779X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11060-016-2090-4$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11060-016-2090-4$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26945580$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ares, Carmen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Albertini, Francesca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Frei-Welte, Martina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bolsi, Alessandra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grotzer, Michael A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goitein, Gudrun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weber, Damien C.</creatorcontrib><title>Pencil beam scanning proton therapy for pediatric intracranial ependymoma</title><title>Journal of neuro-oncology</title><addtitle>J Neurooncol</addtitle><addtitle>J Neurooncol</addtitle><description>To assess the clinical outcome and late side effect profile of pencil beam scanning proton therapy (PT) delivered to children with intracranial ependymoma. Between July-2004 and March-2013, 50 patients with intracranial ependymoma (n = 46, grade 3) received involved-field PT at Paul Scherrer Institute (PSI). Median age at time of PT was 2.6 years (range 1.1–15.2). Thirty-six patients had infratentorial and 14 supratentorial ependymomas. Seventeen patients presented with macroscopic residual disease after subtotal resection before starting PT (8 with ≤1.5 cc and 9 with >1.5 cc residual tumor respectively). Forty-three (86 %) patients received post-operative chemotherapy before PT according to protocols; 44 (88 %) patients younger than 5 years required general anesthesia. Median prescribed dose was 59.4 Gy (RBE) (range 54–60) delivered in 1.8–2 Gy (RBE) per fraction. Late toxicity was assessed according to CTCAE v4.0. With a mean follow-up time of 43.4 months (range 8.5–113.7) seven patients experienced local failure (6 with infratentorial tumors and 1 with supratentorial tumor); four of the local failures were in patients with residual disease ≥1.5 cc at the time of PT and 3 without residual macroscopic disease. Five patients died from tumor progression. Actuarial 5-year Local Control rates were 78 ± 7.5 % and 5-year OS rates were 84 ± 6.8 %. Three patients developed grade ≥3 toxicity: 2 developed unilateral deafness (infratentorial tumors infiltrating into the internal acoustic canal), one patient developed a fatal brainstem necrosis. Repeated general anesthesia in children younger than 5 years was delivered without complications. Our data indicate the safety and the effectiveness of PT for pediatric ependymomas. Local control and survival rates are encouraging considering the high grade histology in 92 % of the patients and the number of patients with residual tumor ≥1.5 cc. The rates of late effects compare favorably with published photon-treated cohorts.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Chemotherapy, Adjuvant</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Child, Preschool</subject><subject>Clinical Study</subject><subject>Dose-Response Relationship, Radiation</subject><subject>Ependymoma - drug therapy</subject><subject>Ependymoma - radiotherapy</subject><subject>Ependymoma - surgery</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infant</subject><subject>Infratentorial Neoplasms - drug therapy</subject><subject>Infratentorial Neoplasms - radiotherapy</subject><subject>Infratentorial Neoplasms - surgery</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Neurology</subject><subject>Oncology</subject><subject>Proton Therapy - adverse effects</subject><subject>Proton Therapy - methods</subject><subject>Radiotherapy Dosage</subject><subject>Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted</subject><subject>Supratentorial Neoplasms - drug therapy</subject><subject>Supratentorial Neoplasms - radiotherapy</subject><subject>Supratentorial Neoplasms - surgery</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>0167-594X</issn><issn>1573-7373</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkU9LAzEQxYMotlY_gBdZ8OJldSbJJpujFP8UCnpQ8BbS3bRu2c2uyfbQb2_KVhFB8DQM7zdvJnmEnCNcI4C8CYggIAUUKQUFKT8gY8wkSyWT7JCMoyDTTPG3ETkJYQ0AXDI8JiMqFM-yHMZk9mxdUdXJwpomCYVxrnKrpPNt37qkf7fedNtk2fqks2Vlel8VSeV6bwpvXGXqxHbWldumbcwpOVqaOtizfZ2Q1_u7l-ljOn96mE1v52nBJfYpVRatQCit4FxRpCWWS2FoyagQeYkUuTKxibqEqGOeKaNYsVCCy4wt2IRcDb7xyI-NDb1uqlDYujbOtpugUSpQjAtJ_4HmClhcIyJ6-Qtdtxvv4kN2VI45osgihQNV-DYEb5e681Vj_FYj6F0keohEx5_Xu0g0jzMXe-fNorHl98RXBhGgAxCi5FbW_1j9p-sng_KUTA</recordid><startdate>20160501</startdate><enddate>20160501</enddate><creator>Ares, Carmen</creator><creator>Albertini, Francesca</creator><creator>Frei-Welte, Martina</creator><creator>Bolsi, Alessandra</creator><creator>Grotzer, Michael A.</creator><creator>Goitein, Gudrun</creator><creator>Weber, Damien C.</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3909-779X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20160501</creationdate><title>Pencil beam scanning proton therapy for pediatric intracranial ependymoma</title><author>Ares, Carmen ; Albertini, Francesca ; Frei-Welte, Martina ; Bolsi, Alessandra ; Grotzer, Michael A. ; Goitein, Gudrun ; Weber, Damien C.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c471t-29e1e610de6449212d1df6a2d32668d12149ad32de6709211859a93cb964753b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Chemotherapy, Adjuvant</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Child, Preschool</topic><topic>Clinical Study</topic><topic>Dose-Response Relationship, Radiation</topic><topic>Ependymoma - drug therapy</topic><topic>Ependymoma - radiotherapy</topic><topic>Ependymoma - surgery</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infant</topic><topic>Infratentorial Neoplasms - drug therapy</topic><topic>Infratentorial Neoplasms - radiotherapy</topic><topic>Infratentorial Neoplasms - surgery</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Neurology</topic><topic>Oncology</topic><topic>Proton Therapy - adverse effects</topic><topic>Proton Therapy - methods</topic><topic>Radiotherapy Dosage</topic><topic>Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted</topic><topic>Supratentorial Neoplasms - drug therapy</topic><topic>Supratentorial Neoplasms - radiotherapy</topic><topic>Supratentorial Neoplasms - surgery</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ares, Carmen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Albertini, Francesca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Frei-Welte, Martina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bolsi, Alessandra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grotzer, Michael A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goitein, Gudrun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weber, Damien C.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of neuro-oncology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ares, Carmen</au><au>Albertini, Francesca</au><au>Frei-Welte, Martina</au><au>Bolsi, Alessandra</au><au>Grotzer, Michael A.</au><au>Goitein, Gudrun</au><au>Weber, Damien C.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Pencil beam scanning proton therapy for pediatric intracranial ependymoma</atitle><jtitle>Journal of neuro-oncology</jtitle><stitle>J Neurooncol</stitle><addtitle>J Neurooncol</addtitle><date>2016-05-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>128</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>137</spage><epage>145</epage><pages>137-145</pages><issn>0167-594X</issn><eissn>1573-7373</eissn><abstract>To assess the clinical outcome and late side effect profile of pencil beam scanning proton therapy (PT) delivered to children with intracranial ependymoma. Between July-2004 and March-2013, 50 patients with intracranial ependymoma (n = 46, grade 3) received involved-field PT at Paul Scherrer Institute (PSI). Median age at time of PT was 2.6 years (range 1.1–15.2). Thirty-six patients had infratentorial and 14 supratentorial ependymomas. Seventeen patients presented with macroscopic residual disease after subtotal resection before starting PT (8 with ≤1.5 cc and 9 with >1.5 cc residual tumor respectively). Forty-three (86 %) patients received post-operative chemotherapy before PT according to protocols; 44 (88 %) patients younger than 5 years required general anesthesia. Median prescribed dose was 59.4 Gy (RBE) (range 54–60) delivered in 1.8–2 Gy (RBE) per fraction. Late toxicity was assessed according to CTCAE v4.0. With a mean follow-up time of 43.4 months (range 8.5–113.7) seven patients experienced local failure (6 with infratentorial tumors and 1 with supratentorial tumor); four of the local failures were in patients with residual disease ≥1.5 cc at the time of PT and 3 without residual macroscopic disease. Five patients died from tumor progression. Actuarial 5-year Local Control rates were 78 ± 7.5 % and 5-year OS rates were 84 ± 6.8 %. Three patients developed grade ≥3 toxicity: 2 developed unilateral deafness (infratentorial tumors infiltrating into the internal acoustic canal), one patient developed a fatal brainstem necrosis. Repeated general anesthesia in children younger than 5 years was delivered without complications. Our data indicate the safety and the effectiveness of PT for pediatric ependymomas. Local control and survival rates are encouraging considering the high grade histology in 92 % of the patients and the number of patients with residual tumor ≥1.5 cc. The rates of late effects compare favorably with published photon-treated cohorts.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><pmid>26945580</pmid><doi>10.1007/s11060-016-2090-4</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3909-779X</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0167-594X |
ispartof | Journal of neuro-oncology, 2016-05, Vol.128 (1), p.137-145 |
issn | 0167-594X 1573-7373 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1790934672 |
source | MEDLINE; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
subjects | Adolescent Chemotherapy, Adjuvant Child Child, Preschool Clinical Study Dose-Response Relationship, Radiation Ependymoma - drug therapy Ependymoma - radiotherapy Ependymoma - surgery Female Follow-Up Studies Humans Infant Infratentorial Neoplasms - drug therapy Infratentorial Neoplasms - radiotherapy Infratentorial Neoplasms - surgery Male Medicine Medicine & Public Health Neurology Oncology Proton Therapy - adverse effects Proton Therapy - methods Radiotherapy Dosage Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted Supratentorial Neoplasms - drug therapy Supratentorial Neoplasms - radiotherapy Supratentorial Neoplasms - surgery Treatment Outcome |
title | Pencil beam scanning proton therapy for pediatric intracranial ependymoma |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T05%3A51%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Pencil%20beam%20scanning%20proton%20therapy%20for%20pediatric%20intracranial%20ependymoma&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20neuro-oncology&rft.au=Ares,%20Carmen&rft.date=2016-05-01&rft.volume=128&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=137&rft.epage=145&rft.pages=137-145&rft.issn=0167-594X&rft.eissn=1573-7373&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11060-016-2090-4&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1789037096%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1788181165&rft_id=info:pmid/26945580&rfr_iscdi=true |