Functional Traits, Flocking Propensity, and Perceived Predation Risk in an Amazonian Understory Bird Community

Within a community, different species might share similar predation risks, and, thus, the ability of species to signal and interpret heterospecific threat information may determine species’ associations. We combined observational, experimental, and phylogenetic approaches to determine the extent to...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The American naturalist 2016-05, Vol.187 (5), p.607-619
Hauptverfasser: Martínez, Ari E., Gomez, Juan P., Ponciano, José Miguel, Robinson, Scott K.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 619
container_issue 5
container_start_page 607
container_title The American naturalist
container_volume 187
creator Martínez, Ari E.
Gomez, Juan P.
Ponciano, José Miguel
Robinson, Scott K.
description Within a community, different species might share similar predation risks, and, thus, the ability of species to signal and interpret heterospecific threat information may determine species’ associations. We combined observational, experimental, and phylogenetic approaches to determine the extent to which evolutionary history and functional traits determined flocking propensity and perceived predation risk (response to heterospecific alarm calls) in a lowland Amazonian bird community. We predicted that small birds that feed myopically and out in the open would have higher flocking propensities and account for a higher proportion of positive responses to alarms. Using generalized linear models and the incorporation of phylogeny on data from 56 species, our results suggest that phylogenetic relationships alongside body size, foraging height, vegetation density, and response to alarm calls influence flocking propensity. Conversely, phylogenetic relationships did not influence response to heterospecific alarm calls. Among functional traits, however, foraging strategy, foraging density, and flocking propensity partially explained responses to alarm calls. Our results suggest that flocking propensity and perceived predation risk are positively related and that functional ecological traits and evolutionary history may explain certain species’ associations.
doi_str_mv 10.1086/685894
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1790928872</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>26519351</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>26519351</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-ffa382003ecf71d03af902878087b1afcfcf928d25f4e56eee435151b15c66d03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkV9LHDEUxUOp1K3ab2AJCNIHp-bPZJI8bpeuCkJFdp-HbOaOZJ1JtslMYf30ZrtWoU-Sh9xwfzk3OQehL5R8p0RVl5USSpcf0IQKLgvBGf-IJoQQXhBaykP0OaV1PupSi0_okElKSq35BPn56O3ggjcdXkTjhnSB512wj84_4LsYNuCTG7YX2PgG30G04P5AriI0ZncN37v0iJ3PfTztzVPwLldL30BMQ4hb_MPFBs9C348-6xyjg9Z0CU5e9iO0nP9czK6L219XN7PpbWF5xYaibQ1XLL8ebCtpQ7hpNWFKKqLkiprW5qWZaphoSxAVAJRcUEFXVNiqyvwR-rbX3cTwe4Q01L1LFrrOeAhjqqnUJAsoyd6BKq5ZNlll9Ow_dB3GmK37S0lZMaZ2s8_3lI0hpQhtvYmuN3FbU1Lvwqr3YWXw64vcuOqhecX-pZOB0z2w3nn51q8E1fm__BmW_ZcH</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1787762280</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Functional Traits, Flocking Propensity, and Perceived Predation Risk in an Amazonian Understory Bird Community</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><creator>Martínez, Ari E. ; Gomez, Juan P. ; Ponciano, José Miguel ; Robinson, Scott K.</creator><creatorcontrib>Martínez, Ari E. ; Gomez, Juan P. ; Ponciano, José Miguel ; Robinson, Scott K.</creatorcontrib><description>Within a community, different species might share similar predation risks, and, thus, the ability of species to signal and interpret heterospecific threat information may determine species’ associations. We combined observational, experimental, and phylogenetic approaches to determine the extent to which evolutionary history and functional traits determined flocking propensity and perceived predation risk (response to heterospecific alarm calls) in a lowland Amazonian bird community. We predicted that small birds that feed myopically and out in the open would have higher flocking propensities and account for a higher proportion of positive responses to alarms. Using generalized linear models and the incorporation of phylogeny on data from 56 species, our results suggest that phylogenetic relationships alongside body size, foraging height, vegetation density, and response to alarm calls influence flocking propensity. Conversely, phylogenetic relationships did not influence response to heterospecific alarm calls. Among functional traits, however, foraging strategy, foraging density, and flocking propensity partially explained responses to alarm calls. Our results suggest that flocking propensity and perceived predation risk are positively related and that functional ecological traits and evolutionary history may explain certain species’ associations.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0003-0147</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1537-5323</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1086/685894</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27104993</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AMNTA4</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: The University of Chicago Press</publisher><subject>Animals ; Appetitive Behavior ; Aves ; Behavior, Animal ; Biological Evolution ; Biota ; Birds ; Birds - physiology ; Body Size ; French Guiana ; Generalized linear models ; Phylogenetics ; Phylogeny ; Predation ; Predatory Behavior ; Risk assessment ; Social Behavior ; Vocalization, Animal</subject><ispartof>The American naturalist, 2016-05, Vol.187 (5), p.607-619</ispartof><rights>2016 by The University of Chicago</rights><rights>Copyright University of Chicago, acting through its Press May 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-ffa382003ecf71d03af902878087b1afcfcf928d25f4e56eee435151b15c66d03</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-ffa382003ecf71d03af902878087b1afcfcf928d25f4e56eee435151b15c66d03</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/26519351$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/26519351$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,782,786,805,27933,27934,58026,58259</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27104993$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Martínez, Ari E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gomez, Juan P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ponciano, José Miguel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Robinson, Scott K.</creatorcontrib><title>Functional Traits, Flocking Propensity, and Perceived Predation Risk in an Amazonian Understory Bird Community</title><title>The American naturalist</title><addtitle>Am Nat</addtitle><description>Within a community, different species might share similar predation risks, and, thus, the ability of species to signal and interpret heterospecific threat information may determine species’ associations. We combined observational, experimental, and phylogenetic approaches to determine the extent to which evolutionary history and functional traits determined flocking propensity and perceived predation risk (response to heterospecific alarm calls) in a lowland Amazonian bird community. We predicted that small birds that feed myopically and out in the open would have higher flocking propensities and account for a higher proportion of positive responses to alarms. Using generalized linear models and the incorporation of phylogeny on data from 56 species, our results suggest that phylogenetic relationships alongside body size, foraging height, vegetation density, and response to alarm calls influence flocking propensity. Conversely, phylogenetic relationships did not influence response to heterospecific alarm calls. Among functional traits, however, foraging strategy, foraging density, and flocking propensity partially explained responses to alarm calls. Our results suggest that flocking propensity and perceived predation risk are positively related and that functional ecological traits and evolutionary history may explain certain species’ associations.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Appetitive Behavior</subject><subject>Aves</subject><subject>Behavior, Animal</subject><subject>Biological Evolution</subject><subject>Biota</subject><subject>Birds</subject><subject>Birds - physiology</subject><subject>Body Size</subject><subject>French Guiana</subject><subject>Generalized linear models</subject><subject>Phylogenetics</subject><subject>Phylogeny</subject><subject>Predation</subject><subject>Predatory Behavior</subject><subject>Risk assessment</subject><subject>Social Behavior</subject><subject>Vocalization, Animal</subject><issn>0003-0147</issn><issn>1537-5323</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkV9LHDEUxUOp1K3ab2AJCNIHp-bPZJI8bpeuCkJFdp-HbOaOZJ1JtslMYf30ZrtWoU-Sh9xwfzk3OQehL5R8p0RVl5USSpcf0IQKLgvBGf-IJoQQXhBaykP0OaV1PupSi0_okElKSq35BPn56O3ggjcdXkTjhnSB512wj84_4LsYNuCTG7YX2PgG30G04P5AriI0ZncN37v0iJ3PfTztzVPwLldL30BMQ4hb_MPFBs9C348-6xyjg9Z0CU5e9iO0nP9czK6L219XN7PpbWF5xYaibQ1XLL8ebCtpQ7hpNWFKKqLkiprW5qWZaphoSxAVAJRcUEFXVNiqyvwR-rbX3cTwe4Q01L1LFrrOeAhjqqnUJAsoyd6BKq5ZNlll9Ow_dB3GmK37S0lZMaZ2s8_3lI0hpQhtvYmuN3FbU1Lvwqr3YWXw64vcuOqhecX-pZOB0z2w3nn51q8E1fm__BmW_ZcH</recordid><startdate>20160501</startdate><enddate>20160501</enddate><creator>Martínez, Ari E.</creator><creator>Gomez, Juan P.</creator><creator>Ponciano, José Miguel</creator><creator>Robinson, Scott K.</creator><general>The University of Chicago Press</general><general>University of Chicago, acting through its Press</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160501</creationdate><title>Functional Traits, Flocking Propensity, and Perceived Predation Risk in an Amazonian Understory Bird Community</title><author>Martínez, Ari E. ; Gomez, Juan P. ; Ponciano, José Miguel ; Robinson, Scott K.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-ffa382003ecf71d03af902878087b1afcfcf928d25f4e56eee435151b15c66d03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Appetitive Behavior</topic><topic>Aves</topic><topic>Behavior, Animal</topic><topic>Biological Evolution</topic><topic>Biota</topic><topic>Birds</topic><topic>Birds - physiology</topic><topic>Body Size</topic><topic>French Guiana</topic><topic>Generalized linear models</topic><topic>Phylogenetics</topic><topic>Phylogeny</topic><topic>Predation</topic><topic>Predatory Behavior</topic><topic>Risk assessment</topic><topic>Social Behavior</topic><topic>Vocalization, Animal</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Martínez, Ari E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gomez, Juan P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ponciano, José Miguel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Robinson, Scott K.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The American naturalist</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Martínez, Ari E.</au><au>Gomez, Juan P.</au><au>Ponciano, José Miguel</au><au>Robinson, Scott K.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Functional Traits, Flocking Propensity, and Perceived Predation Risk in an Amazonian Understory Bird Community</atitle><jtitle>The American naturalist</jtitle><addtitle>Am Nat</addtitle><date>2016-05-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>187</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>607</spage><epage>619</epage><pages>607-619</pages><issn>0003-0147</issn><eissn>1537-5323</eissn><coden>AMNTA4</coden><abstract>Within a community, different species might share similar predation risks, and, thus, the ability of species to signal and interpret heterospecific threat information may determine species’ associations. We combined observational, experimental, and phylogenetic approaches to determine the extent to which evolutionary history and functional traits determined flocking propensity and perceived predation risk (response to heterospecific alarm calls) in a lowland Amazonian bird community. We predicted that small birds that feed myopically and out in the open would have higher flocking propensities and account for a higher proportion of positive responses to alarms. Using generalized linear models and the incorporation of phylogeny on data from 56 species, our results suggest that phylogenetic relationships alongside body size, foraging height, vegetation density, and response to alarm calls influence flocking propensity. Conversely, phylogenetic relationships did not influence response to heterospecific alarm calls. Among functional traits, however, foraging strategy, foraging density, and flocking propensity partially explained responses to alarm calls. Our results suggest that flocking propensity and perceived predation risk are positively related and that functional ecological traits and evolutionary history may explain certain species’ associations.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>The University of Chicago Press</pub><pmid>27104993</pmid><doi>10.1086/685894</doi><tpages>13</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0003-0147
ispartof The American naturalist, 2016-05, Vol.187 (5), p.607-619
issn 0003-0147
1537-5323
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1790928872
source MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing
subjects Animals
Appetitive Behavior
Aves
Behavior, Animal
Biological Evolution
Biota
Birds
Birds - physiology
Body Size
French Guiana
Generalized linear models
Phylogenetics
Phylogeny
Predation
Predatory Behavior
Risk assessment
Social Behavior
Vocalization, Animal
title Functional Traits, Flocking Propensity, and Perceived Predation Risk in an Amazonian Understory Bird Community
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-02T20%3A51%3A22IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Functional%20Traits,%20Flocking%20Propensity,%20and%20Perceived%20Predation%20Risk%20in%20an%20Amazonian%20Understory%20Bird%20Community&rft.jtitle=The%20American%20naturalist&rft.au=Mart%C3%ADnez,%20Ari%20E.&rft.date=2016-05-01&rft.volume=187&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=607&rft.epage=619&rft.pages=607-619&rft.issn=0003-0147&rft.eissn=1537-5323&rft.coden=AMNTA4&rft_id=info:doi/10.1086/685894&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E26519351%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1787762280&rft_id=info:pmid/27104993&rft_jstor_id=26519351&rfr_iscdi=true