Functional Traits, Flocking Propensity, and Perceived Predation Risk in an Amazonian Understory Bird Community
Within a community, different species might share similar predation risks, and, thus, the ability of species to signal and interpret heterospecific threat information may determine species’ associations. We combined observational, experimental, and phylogenetic approaches to determine the extent to...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The American naturalist 2016-05, Vol.187 (5), p.607-619 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 619 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 607 |
container_title | The American naturalist |
container_volume | 187 |
creator | Martínez, Ari E. Gomez, Juan P. Ponciano, José Miguel Robinson, Scott K. |
description | Within a community, different species might share similar predation risks, and, thus, the ability of species to signal and interpret heterospecific threat information may determine species’ associations. We combined observational, experimental, and phylogenetic approaches to determine the extent to which evolutionary history and functional traits determined flocking propensity and perceived predation risk (response to heterospecific alarm calls) in a lowland Amazonian bird community. We predicted that small birds that feed myopically and out in the open would have higher flocking propensities and account for a higher proportion of positive responses to alarms. Using generalized linear models and the incorporation of phylogeny on data from 56 species, our results suggest that phylogenetic relationships alongside body size, foraging height, vegetation density, and response to alarm calls influence flocking propensity. Conversely, phylogenetic relationships did not influence response to heterospecific alarm calls. Among functional traits, however, foraging strategy, foraging density, and flocking propensity partially explained responses to alarm calls. Our results suggest that flocking propensity and perceived predation risk are positively related and that functional ecological traits and evolutionary history may explain certain species’ associations. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1086/685894 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1790928872</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>26519351</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>26519351</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-ffa382003ecf71d03af902878087b1afcfcf928d25f4e56eee435151b15c66d03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkV9LHDEUxUOp1K3ab2AJCNIHp-bPZJI8bpeuCkJFdp-HbOaOZJ1JtslMYf30ZrtWoU-Sh9xwfzk3OQehL5R8p0RVl5USSpcf0IQKLgvBGf-IJoQQXhBaykP0OaV1PupSi0_okElKSq35BPn56O3ggjcdXkTjhnSB512wj84_4LsYNuCTG7YX2PgG30G04P5AriI0ZncN37v0iJ3PfTztzVPwLldL30BMQ4hb_MPFBs9C348-6xyjg9Z0CU5e9iO0nP9czK6L219XN7PpbWF5xYaibQ1XLL8ebCtpQ7hpNWFKKqLkiprW5qWZaphoSxAVAJRcUEFXVNiqyvwR-rbX3cTwe4Q01L1LFrrOeAhjqqnUJAsoyd6BKq5ZNlll9Ow_dB3GmK37S0lZMaZ2s8_3lI0hpQhtvYmuN3FbU1Lvwqr3YWXw64vcuOqhecX-pZOB0z2w3nn51q8E1fm__BmW_ZcH</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1787762280</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Functional Traits, Flocking Propensity, and Perceived Predation Risk in an Amazonian Understory Bird Community</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><creator>Martínez, Ari E. ; Gomez, Juan P. ; Ponciano, José Miguel ; Robinson, Scott K.</creator><creatorcontrib>Martínez, Ari E. ; Gomez, Juan P. ; Ponciano, José Miguel ; Robinson, Scott K.</creatorcontrib><description>Within a community, different species might share similar predation risks, and, thus, the ability of species to signal and interpret heterospecific threat information may determine species’ associations. We combined observational, experimental, and phylogenetic approaches to determine the extent to which evolutionary history and functional traits determined flocking propensity and perceived predation risk (response to heterospecific alarm calls) in a lowland Amazonian bird community. We predicted that small birds that feed myopically and out in the open would have higher flocking propensities and account for a higher proportion of positive responses to alarms. Using generalized linear models and the incorporation of phylogeny on data from 56 species, our results suggest that phylogenetic relationships alongside body size, foraging height, vegetation density, and response to alarm calls influence flocking propensity. Conversely, phylogenetic relationships did not influence response to heterospecific alarm calls. Among functional traits, however, foraging strategy, foraging density, and flocking propensity partially explained responses to alarm calls. Our results suggest that flocking propensity and perceived predation risk are positively related and that functional ecological traits and evolutionary history may explain certain species’ associations.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0003-0147</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1537-5323</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1086/685894</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27104993</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AMNTA4</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: The University of Chicago Press</publisher><subject>Animals ; Appetitive Behavior ; Aves ; Behavior, Animal ; Biological Evolution ; Biota ; Birds ; Birds - physiology ; Body Size ; French Guiana ; Generalized linear models ; Phylogenetics ; Phylogeny ; Predation ; Predatory Behavior ; Risk assessment ; Social Behavior ; Vocalization, Animal</subject><ispartof>The American naturalist, 2016-05, Vol.187 (5), p.607-619</ispartof><rights>2016 by The University of Chicago</rights><rights>Copyright University of Chicago, acting through its Press May 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-ffa382003ecf71d03af902878087b1afcfcf928d25f4e56eee435151b15c66d03</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-ffa382003ecf71d03af902878087b1afcfcf928d25f4e56eee435151b15c66d03</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/26519351$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/26519351$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,782,786,805,27933,27934,58026,58259</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27104993$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Martínez, Ari E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gomez, Juan P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ponciano, José Miguel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Robinson, Scott K.</creatorcontrib><title>Functional Traits, Flocking Propensity, and Perceived Predation Risk in an Amazonian Understory Bird Community</title><title>The American naturalist</title><addtitle>Am Nat</addtitle><description>Within a community, different species might share similar predation risks, and, thus, the ability of species to signal and interpret heterospecific threat information may determine species’ associations. We combined observational, experimental, and phylogenetic approaches to determine the extent to which evolutionary history and functional traits determined flocking propensity and perceived predation risk (response to heterospecific alarm calls) in a lowland Amazonian bird community. We predicted that small birds that feed myopically and out in the open would have higher flocking propensities and account for a higher proportion of positive responses to alarms. Using generalized linear models and the incorporation of phylogeny on data from 56 species, our results suggest that phylogenetic relationships alongside body size, foraging height, vegetation density, and response to alarm calls influence flocking propensity. Conversely, phylogenetic relationships did not influence response to heterospecific alarm calls. Among functional traits, however, foraging strategy, foraging density, and flocking propensity partially explained responses to alarm calls. Our results suggest that flocking propensity and perceived predation risk are positively related and that functional ecological traits and evolutionary history may explain certain species’ associations.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Appetitive Behavior</subject><subject>Aves</subject><subject>Behavior, Animal</subject><subject>Biological Evolution</subject><subject>Biota</subject><subject>Birds</subject><subject>Birds - physiology</subject><subject>Body Size</subject><subject>French Guiana</subject><subject>Generalized linear models</subject><subject>Phylogenetics</subject><subject>Phylogeny</subject><subject>Predation</subject><subject>Predatory Behavior</subject><subject>Risk assessment</subject><subject>Social Behavior</subject><subject>Vocalization, Animal</subject><issn>0003-0147</issn><issn>1537-5323</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkV9LHDEUxUOp1K3ab2AJCNIHp-bPZJI8bpeuCkJFdp-HbOaOZJ1JtslMYf30ZrtWoU-Sh9xwfzk3OQehL5R8p0RVl5USSpcf0IQKLgvBGf-IJoQQXhBaykP0OaV1PupSi0_okElKSq35BPn56O3ggjcdXkTjhnSB512wj84_4LsYNuCTG7YX2PgG30G04P5AriI0ZncN37v0iJ3PfTztzVPwLldL30BMQ4hb_MPFBs9C348-6xyjg9Z0CU5e9iO0nP9czK6L219XN7PpbWF5xYaibQ1XLL8ebCtpQ7hpNWFKKqLkiprW5qWZaphoSxAVAJRcUEFXVNiqyvwR-rbX3cTwe4Q01L1LFrrOeAhjqqnUJAsoyd6BKq5ZNlll9Ow_dB3GmK37S0lZMaZ2s8_3lI0hpQhtvYmuN3FbU1Lvwqr3YWXw64vcuOqhecX-pZOB0z2w3nn51q8E1fm__BmW_ZcH</recordid><startdate>20160501</startdate><enddate>20160501</enddate><creator>Martínez, Ari E.</creator><creator>Gomez, Juan P.</creator><creator>Ponciano, José Miguel</creator><creator>Robinson, Scott K.</creator><general>The University of Chicago Press</general><general>University of Chicago, acting through its Press</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160501</creationdate><title>Functional Traits, Flocking Propensity, and Perceived Predation Risk in an Amazonian Understory Bird Community</title><author>Martínez, Ari E. ; Gomez, Juan P. ; Ponciano, José Miguel ; Robinson, Scott K.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-ffa382003ecf71d03af902878087b1afcfcf928d25f4e56eee435151b15c66d03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Appetitive Behavior</topic><topic>Aves</topic><topic>Behavior, Animal</topic><topic>Biological Evolution</topic><topic>Biota</topic><topic>Birds</topic><topic>Birds - physiology</topic><topic>Body Size</topic><topic>French Guiana</topic><topic>Generalized linear models</topic><topic>Phylogenetics</topic><topic>Phylogeny</topic><topic>Predation</topic><topic>Predatory Behavior</topic><topic>Risk assessment</topic><topic>Social Behavior</topic><topic>Vocalization, Animal</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Martínez, Ari E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gomez, Juan P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ponciano, José Miguel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Robinson, Scott K.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The American naturalist</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Martínez, Ari E.</au><au>Gomez, Juan P.</au><au>Ponciano, José Miguel</au><au>Robinson, Scott K.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Functional Traits, Flocking Propensity, and Perceived Predation Risk in an Amazonian Understory Bird Community</atitle><jtitle>The American naturalist</jtitle><addtitle>Am Nat</addtitle><date>2016-05-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>187</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>607</spage><epage>619</epage><pages>607-619</pages><issn>0003-0147</issn><eissn>1537-5323</eissn><coden>AMNTA4</coden><abstract>Within a community, different species might share similar predation risks, and, thus, the ability of species to signal and interpret heterospecific threat information may determine species’ associations. We combined observational, experimental, and phylogenetic approaches to determine the extent to which evolutionary history and functional traits determined flocking propensity and perceived predation risk (response to heterospecific alarm calls) in a lowland Amazonian bird community. We predicted that small birds that feed myopically and out in the open would have higher flocking propensities and account for a higher proportion of positive responses to alarms. Using generalized linear models and the incorporation of phylogeny on data from 56 species, our results suggest that phylogenetic relationships alongside body size, foraging height, vegetation density, and response to alarm calls influence flocking propensity. Conversely, phylogenetic relationships did not influence response to heterospecific alarm calls. Among functional traits, however, foraging strategy, foraging density, and flocking propensity partially explained responses to alarm calls. Our results suggest that flocking propensity and perceived predation risk are positively related and that functional ecological traits and evolutionary history may explain certain species’ associations.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>The University of Chicago Press</pub><pmid>27104993</pmid><doi>10.1086/685894</doi><tpages>13</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0003-0147 |
ispartof | The American naturalist, 2016-05, Vol.187 (5), p.607-619 |
issn | 0003-0147 1537-5323 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1790928872 |
source | MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing |
subjects | Animals Appetitive Behavior Aves Behavior, Animal Biological Evolution Biota Birds Birds - physiology Body Size French Guiana Generalized linear models Phylogenetics Phylogeny Predation Predatory Behavior Risk assessment Social Behavior Vocalization, Animal |
title | Functional Traits, Flocking Propensity, and Perceived Predation Risk in an Amazonian Understory Bird Community |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-02T20%3A51%3A22IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Functional%20Traits,%20Flocking%20Propensity,%20and%20Perceived%20Predation%20Risk%20in%20an%20Amazonian%20Understory%20Bird%20Community&rft.jtitle=The%20American%20naturalist&rft.au=Mart%C3%ADnez,%20Ari%20E.&rft.date=2016-05-01&rft.volume=187&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=607&rft.epage=619&rft.pages=607-619&rft.issn=0003-0147&rft.eissn=1537-5323&rft.coden=AMNTA4&rft_id=info:doi/10.1086/685894&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E26519351%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1787762280&rft_id=info:pmid/27104993&rft_jstor_id=26519351&rfr_iscdi=true |