Ductal carcinoma in situ diagnosed by breast needle biopsy: Predictors of invasion in the excision specimen

Abstract Background A substantial proportion of women with a pre-operative diagnosis of pure ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) has a final diagnosis of invasive breast cancer (IBC) after surgical excision and, consequently, a potential indication for lymph node staging. The aim of our study was to ide...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Breast (Edinburgh) 2016-06, Vol.27, p.15-21
Hauptverfasser: Doebar, S.C, de Monyé, C, Stoop, H, Rothbarth, J, Willemsen, S.P, van Deurzen, C.H.M
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 21
container_issue
container_start_page 15
container_title Breast (Edinburgh)
container_volume 27
creator Doebar, S.C
de Monyé, C
Stoop, H
Rothbarth, J
Willemsen, S.P
van Deurzen, C.H.M
description Abstract Background A substantial proportion of women with a pre-operative diagnosis of pure ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) has a final diagnosis of invasive breast cancer (IBC) after surgical excision and, consequently, a potential indication for lymph node staging. The aim of our study was to identify novel predictors of invasion in patients with a needle-biopsy diagnosis of DCIS that would help us to select patients that may benefit from a sentinel node biopsy (SNB). Patients and Methods We included 153 patients with a needle-biopsy diagnosis of DCIS between 2000 and 2014, which was followed by surgical excision. Several pre-operative clinical, radiological and pathological features were assessed and correlated with the presence of invasion in the excision specimen. Features that were significantly associated with upstaging in the univariable analysis were combined to calculate upstaging risks. Results Overall, 22% (34/155) of the patients were upstaged to IBC. The following risk factors were significantly associated with upstaging: palpability, age ≤40 years, mammographic mass lesion, moderate to severe periductal inflammation and periductal loss of decorin expression. The upstaging-risk correlated with the number of risk factors present: e.g. 9% for patients without risk factors, 29% for patients with 1 risk factor, 37% for patients with 2 risk factors and 54% for patients with ≥3 risk factors. Conclusion The identified risk factors may be helpful to predict the upstaging-risk for patients with a needle-biopsy diagnosis of pure DCIS, which facilitates the performance of a selective SNB for high-risk patients and avoid this procedure in low-risk patients.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.breast.2016.02.014
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1790925508</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S0960977616000291</els_id><sourcerecordid>1790925508</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c529t-a1fae59a75a88156e8c8589d6428653b29b0e802436d3dc6611512f815db8dfe3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU9v1DAQxa0KRLeFb1AhH7kktZ21Y3NAQv0DlSqBBJwtx54UbxN7sZOK_fZ1msKBC6fRSO-90fweQmeU1JRQcb6ruwQmTzUrW01YTej2CG0ob1jVEEleoA1RglSqbcUxOsl5RwhRjZCv0DFrGWVC8Q26v5ztZAZsTbI-xNFgH3D204ydN3chZnC4O-D1FA4AbgDc-bjPh_f4awLn7RRTxrEvxgeTfQxLwvQTMPy2_mnPe7B-hPAavezNkOHN8zxFP66vvl98rm6_fLq5-HhbWc7UVBnaG-DKtNxISbkAaSWXyoktk4I3HVMdAUnYthGucVYISjllfZG6TroemlP0bs3dp_hrhjzp0WcLw2ACxDlr2iqiGOdEFul2ldoUc07Q633yo0kHTYleMOudXn_XC2ZNmC6Yi-3t84W5G8H9Nf3hWgQfVgGUPx88JJ2th2ALrwR20i76_134N8AOPnhrhns4QN7FOYXCUFOdi0F_W6pemqaitMwUbR4BolGljw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1790925508</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Ductal carcinoma in situ diagnosed by breast needle biopsy: Predictors of invasion in the excision specimen</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Doebar, S.C ; de Monyé, C ; Stoop, H ; Rothbarth, J ; Willemsen, S.P ; van Deurzen, C.H.M</creator><creatorcontrib>Doebar, S.C ; de Monyé, C ; Stoop, H ; Rothbarth, J ; Willemsen, S.P ; van Deurzen, C.H.M</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Background A substantial proportion of women with a pre-operative diagnosis of pure ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) has a final diagnosis of invasive breast cancer (IBC) after surgical excision and, consequently, a potential indication for lymph node staging. The aim of our study was to identify novel predictors of invasion in patients with a needle-biopsy diagnosis of DCIS that would help us to select patients that may benefit from a sentinel node biopsy (SNB). Patients and Methods We included 153 patients with a needle-biopsy diagnosis of DCIS between 2000 and 2014, which was followed by surgical excision. Several pre-operative clinical, radiological and pathological features were assessed and correlated with the presence of invasion in the excision specimen. Features that were significantly associated with upstaging in the univariable analysis were combined to calculate upstaging risks. Results Overall, 22% (34/155) of the patients were upstaged to IBC. The following risk factors were significantly associated with upstaging: palpability, age ≤40 years, mammographic mass lesion, moderate to severe periductal inflammation and periductal loss of decorin expression. The upstaging-risk correlated with the number of risk factors present: e.g. 9% for patients without risk factors, 29% for patients with 1 risk factor, 37% for patients with 2 risk factors and 54% for patients with ≥3 risk factors. Conclusion The identified risk factors may be helpful to predict the upstaging-risk for patients with a needle-biopsy diagnosis of pure DCIS, which facilitates the performance of a selective SNB for high-risk patients and avoid this procedure in low-risk patients.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0960-9776</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-3080</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2016.02.014</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27212695</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Biopsy, Needle - methods ; Breast ; Breast - pathology ; Breast Neoplasms - pathology ; Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast - pathology ; Carcinoma, Intraductal, Noninfiltrating - pathology ; Ductal carcinoma in situ ; Female ; Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Medicine ; Humans ; Middle Aged ; Needle biopsy ; Patient Selection ; Prediction of invasion ; Retrospective Studies ; Risk Factors ; Sentinel Lymph Node - pathology ; Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy - methods</subject><ispartof>Breast (Edinburgh), 2016-06, Vol.27, p.15-21</ispartof><rights>Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>2016 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c529t-a1fae59a75a88156e8c8589d6428653b29b0e802436d3dc6611512f815db8dfe3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c529t-a1fae59a75a88156e8c8589d6428653b29b0e802436d3dc6611512f815db8dfe3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-1675-2931</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960977616000291$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27212695$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Doebar, S.C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Monyé, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stoop, H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rothbarth, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Willemsen, S.P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Deurzen, C.H.M</creatorcontrib><title>Ductal carcinoma in situ diagnosed by breast needle biopsy: Predictors of invasion in the excision specimen</title><title>Breast (Edinburgh)</title><addtitle>Breast</addtitle><description>Abstract Background A substantial proportion of women with a pre-operative diagnosis of pure ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) has a final diagnosis of invasive breast cancer (IBC) after surgical excision and, consequently, a potential indication for lymph node staging. The aim of our study was to identify novel predictors of invasion in patients with a needle-biopsy diagnosis of DCIS that would help us to select patients that may benefit from a sentinel node biopsy (SNB). Patients and Methods We included 153 patients with a needle-biopsy diagnosis of DCIS between 2000 and 2014, which was followed by surgical excision. Several pre-operative clinical, radiological and pathological features were assessed and correlated with the presence of invasion in the excision specimen. Features that were significantly associated with upstaging in the univariable analysis were combined to calculate upstaging risks. Results Overall, 22% (34/155) of the patients were upstaged to IBC. The following risk factors were significantly associated with upstaging: palpability, age ≤40 years, mammographic mass lesion, moderate to severe periductal inflammation and periductal loss of decorin expression. The upstaging-risk correlated with the number of risk factors present: e.g. 9% for patients without risk factors, 29% for patients with 1 risk factor, 37% for patients with 2 risk factors and 54% for patients with ≥3 risk factors. Conclusion The identified risk factors may be helpful to predict the upstaging-risk for patients with a needle-biopsy diagnosis of pure DCIS, which facilitates the performance of a selective SNB for high-risk patients and avoid this procedure in low-risk patients.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Biopsy, Needle - methods</subject><subject>Breast</subject><subject>Breast - pathology</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast - pathology</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Intraductal, Noninfiltrating - pathology</subject><subject>Ductal carcinoma in situ</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Medicine</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Needle biopsy</subject><subject>Patient Selection</subject><subject>Prediction of invasion</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>Sentinel Lymph Node - pathology</subject><subject>Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy - methods</subject><issn>0960-9776</issn><issn>1532-3080</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkU9v1DAQxa0KRLeFb1AhH7kktZ21Y3NAQv0DlSqBBJwtx54UbxN7sZOK_fZ1msKBC6fRSO-90fweQmeU1JRQcb6ruwQmTzUrW01YTej2CG0ob1jVEEleoA1RglSqbcUxOsl5RwhRjZCv0DFrGWVC8Q26v5ztZAZsTbI-xNFgH3D204ydN3chZnC4O-D1FA4AbgDc-bjPh_f4awLn7RRTxrEvxgeTfQxLwvQTMPy2_mnPe7B-hPAavezNkOHN8zxFP66vvl98rm6_fLq5-HhbWc7UVBnaG-DKtNxISbkAaSWXyoktk4I3HVMdAUnYthGucVYISjllfZG6TroemlP0bs3dp_hrhjzp0WcLw2ACxDlr2iqiGOdEFul2ldoUc07Q633yo0kHTYleMOudXn_XC2ZNmC6Yi-3t84W5G8H9Nf3hWgQfVgGUPx88JJ2th2ALrwR20i76_134N8AOPnhrhns4QN7FOYXCUFOdi0F_W6pemqaitMwUbR4BolGljw</recordid><startdate>20160601</startdate><enddate>20160601</enddate><creator>Doebar, S.C</creator><creator>de Monyé, C</creator><creator>Stoop, H</creator><creator>Rothbarth, J</creator><creator>Willemsen, S.P</creator><creator>van Deurzen, C.H.M</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1675-2931</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20160601</creationdate><title>Ductal carcinoma in situ diagnosed by breast needle biopsy: Predictors of invasion in the excision specimen</title><author>Doebar, S.C ; de Monyé, C ; Stoop, H ; Rothbarth, J ; Willemsen, S.P ; van Deurzen, C.H.M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c529t-a1fae59a75a88156e8c8589d6428653b29b0e802436d3dc6611512f815db8dfe3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Biopsy, Needle - methods</topic><topic>Breast</topic><topic>Breast - pathology</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast - pathology</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Intraductal, Noninfiltrating - pathology</topic><topic>Ductal carcinoma in situ</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Medicine</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Needle biopsy</topic><topic>Patient Selection</topic><topic>Prediction of invasion</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>Sentinel Lymph Node - pathology</topic><topic>Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy - methods</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Doebar, S.C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Monyé, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stoop, H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rothbarth, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Willemsen, S.P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Deurzen, C.H.M</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Breast (Edinburgh)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Doebar, S.C</au><au>de Monyé, C</au><au>Stoop, H</au><au>Rothbarth, J</au><au>Willemsen, S.P</au><au>van Deurzen, C.H.M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Ductal carcinoma in situ diagnosed by breast needle biopsy: Predictors of invasion in the excision specimen</atitle><jtitle>Breast (Edinburgh)</jtitle><addtitle>Breast</addtitle><date>2016-06-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>27</volume><spage>15</spage><epage>21</epage><pages>15-21</pages><issn>0960-9776</issn><eissn>1532-3080</eissn><abstract>Abstract Background A substantial proportion of women with a pre-operative diagnosis of pure ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) has a final diagnosis of invasive breast cancer (IBC) after surgical excision and, consequently, a potential indication for lymph node staging. The aim of our study was to identify novel predictors of invasion in patients with a needle-biopsy diagnosis of DCIS that would help us to select patients that may benefit from a sentinel node biopsy (SNB). Patients and Methods We included 153 patients with a needle-biopsy diagnosis of DCIS between 2000 and 2014, which was followed by surgical excision. Several pre-operative clinical, radiological and pathological features were assessed and correlated with the presence of invasion in the excision specimen. Features that were significantly associated with upstaging in the univariable analysis were combined to calculate upstaging risks. Results Overall, 22% (34/155) of the patients were upstaged to IBC. The following risk factors were significantly associated with upstaging: palpability, age ≤40 years, mammographic mass lesion, moderate to severe periductal inflammation and periductal loss of decorin expression. The upstaging-risk correlated with the number of risk factors present: e.g. 9% for patients without risk factors, 29% for patients with 1 risk factor, 37% for patients with 2 risk factors and 54% for patients with ≥3 risk factors. Conclusion The identified risk factors may be helpful to predict the upstaging-risk for patients with a needle-biopsy diagnosis of pure DCIS, which facilitates the performance of a selective SNB for high-risk patients and avoid this procedure in low-risk patients.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>27212695</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.breast.2016.02.014</doi><tpages>7</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1675-2931</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0960-9776
ispartof Breast (Edinburgh), 2016-06, Vol.27, p.15-21
issn 0960-9776
1532-3080
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1790925508
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Biopsy, Needle - methods
Breast
Breast - pathology
Breast Neoplasms - pathology
Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast - pathology
Carcinoma, Intraductal, Noninfiltrating - pathology
Ductal carcinoma in situ
Female
Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Medicine
Humans
Middle Aged
Needle biopsy
Patient Selection
Prediction of invasion
Retrospective Studies
Risk Factors
Sentinel Lymph Node - pathology
Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy - methods
title Ductal carcinoma in situ diagnosed by breast needle biopsy: Predictors of invasion in the excision specimen
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T10%3A39%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Ductal%20carcinoma%20in%20situ%20diagnosed%20by%20breast%20needle%20biopsy:%20Predictors%20of%20invasion%20in%20the%20excision%20specimen&rft.jtitle=Breast%20(Edinburgh)&rft.au=Doebar,%20S.C&rft.date=2016-06-01&rft.volume=27&rft.spage=15&rft.epage=21&rft.pages=15-21&rft.issn=0960-9776&rft.eissn=1532-3080&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.breast.2016.02.014&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1790925508%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1790925508&rft_id=info:pmid/27212695&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S0960977616000291&rfr_iscdi=true