Hatching from the sediment egg-bank, or aerial dispersing? - the use of mesocosms in assessing rotifer biodiversity
Rotifer emergence from dry billabong sediments was studied from 3 sites on the River Murray floodplain, near Wodonga, northern Victoria, Australia. The sites had different flood histories, ranging from annual to approximately 25-year flooding intervals. Half of each sediment type was sterilized by γ...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Hydrobiologia 2001-03, Vol.446-447 (1), p.203-211 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 211 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 203 |
container_title | Hydrobiologia |
container_volume | 446-447 |
creator | Langley, Jm Shiel, Rj Nielsen, Dl Green, Jd |
description | Rotifer emergence from dry billabong sediments was studied from 3 sites on the River Murray floodplain, near Wodonga, northern Victoria, Australia. The sites had different flood histories, ranging from annual to approximately 25-year flooding intervals. Half of each sediment type was sterilized by γ-radiation to contrast the contribution of recruitment from the egg bank with recruitment from passive dispersal. A series of mesocosms was employed to assess differences between treatments, i.e. sediment sterilization and flood history. Analysis by Canonical Correspondence Analysis and Similarity Percentages suggested that some species were passively dispersed. Of the 54 species colonizing after 35 days, four were undescribed, one was a new record to Australia, three species had previously been recorded only from Tasmania and five more were new to the study area. Overall, 22% of species were previously unrecorded from the study area. This suggests that habitat poor mesocosms, may be more successful in locating passively dispersed taxa than examination of natural temporary waters.[PUBLICATION ABSTRACT] |
doi_str_mv | 10.1023/A:1017515809966 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_17908259</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2222937561</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c257t-b2e689fbded84e370a412ed55ae80d592cedac84b7b89c456a86596ee73df1973</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdjj1PwzAURS0EEqUws1oMTAT8nDi2WVBV8SVVYoG5cuKX1qWJi1-CxL8nBSamO9xzri5j5yCuQcj8ZnYLArQCZYS1ZXnAJqB0nikAfcgmQoDJzFgesxOijRBCWykmjJ5cX69Dt-JNii3v18gJfWix6zmuVlnluvcrHhN3mILbch9oh4lG4Y5nP_hAyGPDW6RYR2qJh447IqQ9xFPsQ4OJVyH68Lk3-69TdtS4LeHZX07Z28P96_wpW7w8Ps9ni6yWSvdZJbE0tqk8elNgroUrQKJXyqERXllZo3e1KSpdGVsXqnSmVLZE1LlvwOp8yi5_d3cpfgxI_bINVON26zqMAy1BW2GksiN48Q_cxCF147elkSBLsKDzb_bda3Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>821261917</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Hatching from the sediment egg-bank, or aerial dispersing? - the use of mesocosms in assessing rotifer biodiversity</title><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Langley, Jm ; Shiel, Rj ; Nielsen, Dl ; Green, Jd</creator><creatorcontrib>Langley, Jm ; Shiel, Rj ; Nielsen, Dl ; Green, Jd</creatorcontrib><description>Rotifer emergence from dry billabong sediments was studied from 3 sites on the River Murray floodplain, near Wodonga, northern Victoria, Australia. The sites had different flood histories, ranging from annual to approximately 25-year flooding intervals. Half of each sediment type was sterilized by γ-radiation to contrast the contribution of recruitment from the egg bank with recruitment from passive dispersal. A series of mesocosms was employed to assess differences between treatments, i.e. sediment sterilization and flood history. Analysis by Canonical Correspondence Analysis and Similarity Percentages suggested that some species were passively dispersed. Of the 54 species colonizing after 35 days, four were undescribed, one was a new record to Australia, three species had previously been recorded only from Tasmania and five more were new to the study area. Overall, 22% of species were previously unrecorded from the study area. This suggests that habitat poor mesocosms, may be more successful in locating passively dispersed taxa than examination of natural temporary waters.[PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</description><identifier>ISSN: 0018-8158</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-5117</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1023/A:1017515809966</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Nature B.V</publisher><subject>Australia, Victoria, Murray R ; Floodplains ; Floods ; Freshwater ; Hatching ; Rotifera ; Sediments ; Sterilization</subject><ispartof>Hydrobiologia, 2001-03, Vol.446-447 (1), p.203-211</ispartof><rights>Kluwer Academic Publishers 2001</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c257t-b2e689fbded84e370a412ed55ae80d592cedac84b7b89c456a86596ee73df1973</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Langley, Jm</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shiel, Rj</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nielsen, Dl</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Green, Jd</creatorcontrib><title>Hatching from the sediment egg-bank, or aerial dispersing? - the use of mesocosms in assessing rotifer biodiversity</title><title>Hydrobiologia</title><description>Rotifer emergence from dry billabong sediments was studied from 3 sites on the River Murray floodplain, near Wodonga, northern Victoria, Australia. The sites had different flood histories, ranging from annual to approximately 25-year flooding intervals. Half of each sediment type was sterilized by γ-radiation to contrast the contribution of recruitment from the egg bank with recruitment from passive dispersal. A series of mesocosms was employed to assess differences between treatments, i.e. sediment sterilization and flood history. Analysis by Canonical Correspondence Analysis and Similarity Percentages suggested that some species were passively dispersed. Of the 54 species colonizing after 35 days, four were undescribed, one was a new record to Australia, three species had previously been recorded only from Tasmania and five more were new to the study area. Overall, 22% of species were previously unrecorded from the study area. This suggests that habitat poor mesocosms, may be more successful in locating passively dispersed taxa than examination of natural temporary waters.[PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</description><subject>Australia, Victoria, Murray R</subject><subject>Floodplains</subject><subject>Floods</subject><subject>Freshwater</subject><subject>Hatching</subject><subject>Rotifera</subject><subject>Sediments</subject><subject>Sterilization</subject><issn>0018-8158</issn><issn>1573-5117</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2001</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNpdjj1PwzAURS0EEqUws1oMTAT8nDi2WVBV8SVVYoG5cuKX1qWJi1-CxL8nBSamO9xzri5j5yCuQcj8ZnYLArQCZYS1ZXnAJqB0nikAfcgmQoDJzFgesxOijRBCWykmjJ5cX69Dt-JNii3v18gJfWix6zmuVlnluvcrHhN3mILbch9oh4lG4Y5nP_hAyGPDW6RYR2qJh447IqQ9xFPsQ4OJVyH68Lk3-69TdtS4LeHZX07Z28P96_wpW7w8Ps9ni6yWSvdZJbE0tqk8elNgroUrQKJXyqERXllZo3e1KSpdGVsXqnSmVLZE1LlvwOp8yi5_d3cpfgxI_bINVON26zqMAy1BW2GksiN48Q_cxCF147elkSBLsKDzb_bda3Q</recordid><startdate>20010301</startdate><enddate>20010301</enddate><creator>Langley, Jm</creator><creator>Shiel, Rj</creator><creator>Nielsen, Dl</creator><creator>Green, Jd</creator><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20010301</creationdate><title>Hatching from the sediment egg-bank, or aerial dispersing? - the use of mesocosms in assessing rotifer biodiversity</title><author>Langley, Jm ; Shiel, Rj ; Nielsen, Dl ; Green, Jd</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c257t-b2e689fbded84e370a412ed55ae80d592cedac84b7b89c456a86596ee73df1973</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2001</creationdate><topic>Australia, Victoria, Murray R</topic><topic>Floodplains</topic><topic>Floods</topic><topic>Freshwater</topic><topic>Hatching</topic><topic>Rotifera</topic><topic>Sediments</topic><topic>Sterilization</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Langley, Jm</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shiel, Rj</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nielsen, Dl</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Green, Jd</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences & Living Resources</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Hydrobiologia</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Langley, Jm</au><au>Shiel, Rj</au><au>Nielsen, Dl</au><au>Green, Jd</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Hatching from the sediment egg-bank, or aerial dispersing? - the use of mesocosms in assessing rotifer biodiversity</atitle><jtitle>Hydrobiologia</jtitle><date>2001-03-01</date><risdate>2001</risdate><volume>446-447</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>203</spage><epage>211</epage><pages>203-211</pages><issn>0018-8158</issn><eissn>1573-5117</eissn><abstract>Rotifer emergence from dry billabong sediments was studied from 3 sites on the River Murray floodplain, near Wodonga, northern Victoria, Australia. The sites had different flood histories, ranging from annual to approximately 25-year flooding intervals. Half of each sediment type was sterilized by γ-radiation to contrast the contribution of recruitment from the egg bank with recruitment from passive dispersal. A series of mesocosms was employed to assess differences between treatments, i.e. sediment sterilization and flood history. Analysis by Canonical Correspondence Analysis and Similarity Percentages suggested that some species were passively dispersed. Of the 54 species colonizing after 35 days, four were undescribed, one was a new record to Australia, three species had previously been recorded only from Tasmania and five more were new to the study area. Overall, 22% of species were previously unrecorded from the study area. This suggests that habitat poor mesocosms, may be more successful in locating passively dispersed taxa than examination of natural temporary waters.[PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Nature B.V</pub><doi>10.1023/A:1017515809966</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0018-8158 |
ispartof | Hydrobiologia, 2001-03, Vol.446-447 (1), p.203-211 |
issn | 0018-8158 1573-5117 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_17908259 |
source | SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
subjects | Australia, Victoria, Murray R Floodplains Floods Freshwater Hatching Rotifera Sediments Sterilization |
title | Hatching from the sediment egg-bank, or aerial dispersing? - the use of mesocosms in assessing rotifer biodiversity |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T19%3A52%3A28IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Hatching%20from%20the%20sediment%20egg-bank,%20or%20aerial%20dispersing?%20-%20the%20use%20of%20mesocosms%20in%20assessing%20rotifer%20biodiversity&rft.jtitle=Hydrobiologia&rft.au=Langley,%20Jm&rft.date=2001-03-01&rft.volume=446-447&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=203&rft.epage=211&rft.pages=203-211&rft.issn=0018-8158&rft.eissn=1573-5117&rft_id=info:doi/10.1023/A:1017515809966&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E2222937561%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=821261917&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |