Five-Day Intravascular Methotrexate Versus Biweekly Actinomycin-D in the Treatment of Low-Risk Gestational Trophoblastic Neoplasia: A Clinical Randomized Trial

OBJECTIVESMethotrexate (MTX) and Actinomycin-D (Act-D) are effective drugs used in the treatment of low-risk gestational trophoblastic neoplasia (LRGTNs). The aim of the present study was to compare intravenous (IV) MTX and IV Act-D in the treatment of LRGTNs. MATERIALS AND METHODSSixty-two patients...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International journal of gynecological cancer 2016-06, Vol.26 (5), p.971-976
Hauptverfasser: Yarandi, Fariba, Mousavi, Azamsadat, Abbaslu, Fereshteh, Aminimoghaddam, Soheila, Nekuie, Sepideh, Adabi, Khadijeh, Hanjani, Parviz
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 976
container_issue 5
container_start_page 971
container_title International journal of gynecological cancer
container_volume 26
creator Yarandi, Fariba
Mousavi, Azamsadat
Abbaslu, Fereshteh
Aminimoghaddam, Soheila
Nekuie, Sepideh
Adabi, Khadijeh
Hanjani, Parviz
description OBJECTIVESMethotrexate (MTX) and Actinomycin-D (Act-D) are effective drugs used in the treatment of low-risk gestational trophoblastic neoplasia (LRGTNs). The aim of the present study was to compare intravenous (IV) MTX and IV Act-D in the treatment of LRGTNs. MATERIALS AND METHODSSixty-two patients with LRGTN were enrolled in a prospective randomized clinical trial between 2010 and 2013 in Moheb e Yas Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences. Primary treatment regimens were IV MTX, 0.4 mg/kg daily for 5 days every 14 days (25 mg maximum daily dose), and IV Act-D, 1.25 mg/m (2 mg maximum dose) every 14 days. RESULTSThirty-two and 30 patients were enrolled to MTX and Act-D groups, respectively. Complete remission after receiving first-line chemotherapy was achieved in 79% of all cases, 80% in the Act-D group and 78.1% in the MTX group.Twenty percent of the Act-D patients and 21.9% of the MTX patients showed resistance to the first-line chemotherapy, of which 16.7% and 15.6% responded completely to the second-line monotherapy, respectively. Multiple drug therapy was needed in 3.3% of the Act-D group and 6.3% of the MTX group.We did not find any correlation between treatment response and beta–human chorionic gonadotropin level, uterine mass size, lung metastasis, antecedent pregnancy, and duration from diagnosis to treatment. Adverse effects were not statistically different between the 2 groups. CONCLUSIONSSingle-agent chemotherapy in the treatment of LRGTNs resulted in an overall complete remission rate of 79%, 80% in the Act-D group and 78.1% in MTX group, with no statistically significant difference. Whereas this study represents an important step in comparing single-agent treatments, comparison of other regimens will be required to determine the optimal single-agent therapy.
doi_str_mv 10.1097/IGC.0000000000000687
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1790466936</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1790466936</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3397-5f2ce863727f4a51abbe303f9dd28bd0f68cdeabd75e436278ce7ca3ce2af2583</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpd0c1u1DAQB_AIgWgpvAFClrhwSfFHEjvcli1dVlpAqgriZk2cidZdJ15sp8vyMrwqRi0Sqi8zh59G4_kXxUtGzxlt5dv1anlO_3-Nko-KU1bzumSVUI9zTytVqpZ9PymexXiTTctp-7Q44ZJRVit2Wvy-tLdYXsCRrKcU4BaimR0E8gnT1qeAPyEh-YYhzpG8twfEnTuShUl28uPR2Km8IHYiaYvkOiCkEadE_EA2_lBe2bgjK4wJkvUTuCz8fus7BzFZQz6j3-fWwjuyIEtnJ2uyuYKp96P9hX3mFtzz4skALuKL-3pWfL38cL38WG6-rNbLxaY0QrSyrAduUDVCcjlUUDPoOhRUDG3fc9X1dGiU6RG6XtZYiYZLZVAaEAY5DLxW4qx4czd3H_yPOS-tRxsNOgcT-jlqJltaNU0rmkxfP6A3fg75g1HzOjOleM2zenWv5m7EXu-DHSEc9b_TZ6DuwMG7lA-8c_MBg94iuLTVjOq_Keucsn6YsvgDpPSaZA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2579088252</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Five-Day Intravascular Methotrexate Versus Biweekly Actinomycin-D in the Treatment of Low-Risk Gestational Trophoblastic Neoplasia: A Clinical Randomized Trial</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><creator>Yarandi, Fariba ; Mousavi, Azamsadat ; Abbaslu, Fereshteh ; Aminimoghaddam, Soheila ; Nekuie, Sepideh ; Adabi, Khadijeh ; Hanjani, Parviz</creator><creatorcontrib>Yarandi, Fariba ; Mousavi, Azamsadat ; Abbaslu, Fereshteh ; Aminimoghaddam, Soheila ; Nekuie, Sepideh ; Adabi, Khadijeh ; Hanjani, Parviz</creatorcontrib><description>OBJECTIVESMethotrexate (MTX) and Actinomycin-D (Act-D) are effective drugs used in the treatment of low-risk gestational trophoblastic neoplasia (LRGTNs). The aim of the present study was to compare intravenous (IV) MTX and IV Act-D in the treatment of LRGTNs. MATERIALS AND METHODSSixty-two patients with LRGTN were enrolled in a prospective randomized clinical trial between 2010 and 2013 in Moheb e Yas Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences. Primary treatment regimens were IV MTX, 0.4 mg/kg daily for 5 days every 14 days (25 mg maximum daily dose), and IV Act-D, 1.25 mg/m (2 mg maximum dose) every 14 days. RESULTSThirty-two and 30 patients were enrolled to MTX and Act-D groups, respectively. Complete remission after receiving first-line chemotherapy was achieved in 79% of all cases, 80% in the Act-D group and 78.1% in the MTX group.Twenty percent of the Act-D patients and 21.9% of the MTX patients showed resistance to the first-line chemotherapy, of which 16.7% and 15.6% responded completely to the second-line monotherapy, respectively. Multiple drug therapy was needed in 3.3% of the Act-D group and 6.3% of the MTX group.We did not find any correlation between treatment response and beta–human chorionic gonadotropin level, uterine mass size, lung metastasis, antecedent pregnancy, and duration from diagnosis to treatment. Adverse effects were not statistically different between the 2 groups. CONCLUSIONSSingle-agent chemotherapy in the treatment of LRGTNs resulted in an overall complete remission rate of 79%, 80% in the Act-D group and 78.1% in MTX group, with no statistically significant difference. Whereas this study represents an important step in comparing single-agent treatments, comparison of other regimens will be required to determine the optimal single-agent therapy.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1048-891X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1525-1438</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/IGC.0000000000000687</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27101581</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: by the International Gynecologic Cancer Society and the European Society of Gynaecological Oncology</publisher><subject>Adult ; Antibiotics, Antineoplastic - administration &amp; dosage ; Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic - administration &amp; dosage ; Chemotherapy ; Dactinomycin - administration &amp; dosage ; Drug Administration Schedule ; Female ; Gestational Trophoblastic Disease - drug therapy ; Humans ; Injections, Intramuscular ; Injections, Intravenous ; Methotrexate - administration &amp; dosage ; Pregnancy ; Prospective Studies</subject><ispartof>International journal of gynecological cancer, 2016-06, Vol.26 (5), p.971-976</ispartof><rights>2016 by the International Gynecologic Cancer Society and the European Society of Gynaecological Oncology.</rights><rights>2016 2016 by the International Gynecologic Cancer Society and the European Society of Gynaecological Oncology.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3397-5f2ce863727f4a51abbe303f9dd28bd0f68cdeabd75e436278ce7ca3ce2af2583</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27101581$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Yarandi, Fariba</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mousavi, Azamsadat</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abbaslu, Fereshteh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aminimoghaddam, Soheila</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nekuie, Sepideh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Adabi, Khadijeh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hanjani, Parviz</creatorcontrib><title>Five-Day Intravascular Methotrexate Versus Biweekly Actinomycin-D in the Treatment of Low-Risk Gestational Trophoblastic Neoplasia: A Clinical Randomized Trial</title><title>International journal of gynecological cancer</title><addtitle>Int J Gynecol Cancer</addtitle><description>OBJECTIVESMethotrexate (MTX) and Actinomycin-D (Act-D) are effective drugs used in the treatment of low-risk gestational trophoblastic neoplasia (LRGTNs). The aim of the present study was to compare intravenous (IV) MTX and IV Act-D in the treatment of LRGTNs. MATERIALS AND METHODSSixty-two patients with LRGTN were enrolled in a prospective randomized clinical trial between 2010 and 2013 in Moheb e Yas Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences. Primary treatment regimens were IV MTX, 0.4 mg/kg daily for 5 days every 14 days (25 mg maximum daily dose), and IV Act-D, 1.25 mg/m (2 mg maximum dose) every 14 days. RESULTSThirty-two and 30 patients were enrolled to MTX and Act-D groups, respectively. Complete remission after receiving first-line chemotherapy was achieved in 79% of all cases, 80% in the Act-D group and 78.1% in the MTX group.Twenty percent of the Act-D patients and 21.9% of the MTX patients showed resistance to the first-line chemotherapy, of which 16.7% and 15.6% responded completely to the second-line monotherapy, respectively. Multiple drug therapy was needed in 3.3% of the Act-D group and 6.3% of the MTX group.We did not find any correlation between treatment response and beta–human chorionic gonadotropin level, uterine mass size, lung metastasis, antecedent pregnancy, and duration from diagnosis to treatment. Adverse effects were not statistically different between the 2 groups. CONCLUSIONSSingle-agent chemotherapy in the treatment of LRGTNs resulted in an overall complete remission rate of 79%, 80% in the Act-D group and 78.1% in MTX group, with no statistically significant difference. Whereas this study represents an important step in comparing single-agent treatments, comparison of other regimens will be required to determine the optimal single-agent therapy.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Antibiotics, Antineoplastic - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Chemotherapy</subject><subject>Dactinomycin - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Drug Administration Schedule</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Gestational Trophoblastic Disease - drug therapy</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Injections, Intramuscular</subject><subject>Injections, Intravenous</subject><subject>Methotrexate - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><issn>1048-891X</issn><issn>1525-1438</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><recordid>eNpd0c1u1DAQB_AIgWgpvAFClrhwSfFHEjvcli1dVlpAqgriZk2cidZdJ15sp8vyMrwqRi0Sqi8zh59G4_kXxUtGzxlt5dv1anlO_3-Nko-KU1bzumSVUI9zTytVqpZ9PymexXiTTctp-7Q44ZJRVit2Wvy-tLdYXsCRrKcU4BaimR0E8gnT1qeAPyEh-YYhzpG8twfEnTuShUl28uPR2Km8IHYiaYvkOiCkEadE_EA2_lBe2bgjK4wJkvUTuCz8fus7BzFZQz6j3-fWwjuyIEtnJ2uyuYKp96P9hX3mFtzz4skALuKL-3pWfL38cL38WG6-rNbLxaY0QrSyrAduUDVCcjlUUDPoOhRUDG3fc9X1dGiU6RG6XtZYiYZLZVAaEAY5DLxW4qx4czd3H_yPOS-tRxsNOgcT-jlqJltaNU0rmkxfP6A3fg75g1HzOjOleM2zenWv5m7EXu-DHSEc9b_TZ6DuwMG7lA-8c_MBg94iuLTVjOq_Keucsn6YsvgDpPSaZA</recordid><startdate>201606</startdate><enddate>201606</enddate><creator>Yarandi, Fariba</creator><creator>Mousavi, Azamsadat</creator><creator>Abbaslu, Fereshteh</creator><creator>Aminimoghaddam, Soheila</creator><creator>Nekuie, Sepideh</creator><creator>Adabi, Khadijeh</creator><creator>Hanjani, Parviz</creator><general>by the International Gynecologic Cancer Society and the European Society of Gynaecological Oncology</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201606</creationdate><title>Five-Day Intravascular Methotrexate Versus Biweekly Actinomycin-D in the Treatment of Low-Risk Gestational Trophoblastic Neoplasia: A Clinical Randomized Trial</title><author>Yarandi, Fariba ; Mousavi, Azamsadat ; Abbaslu, Fereshteh ; Aminimoghaddam, Soheila ; Nekuie, Sepideh ; Adabi, Khadijeh ; Hanjani, Parviz</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3397-5f2ce863727f4a51abbe303f9dd28bd0f68cdeabd75e436278ce7ca3ce2af2583</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Antibiotics, Antineoplastic - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Chemotherapy</topic><topic>Dactinomycin - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Drug Administration Schedule</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Gestational Trophoblastic Disease - drug therapy</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Injections, Intramuscular</topic><topic>Injections, Intravenous</topic><topic>Methotrexate - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Yarandi, Fariba</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mousavi, Azamsadat</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abbaslu, Fereshteh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aminimoghaddam, Soheila</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nekuie, Sepideh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Adabi, Khadijeh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hanjani, Parviz</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>International journal of gynecological cancer</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Yarandi, Fariba</au><au>Mousavi, Azamsadat</au><au>Abbaslu, Fereshteh</au><au>Aminimoghaddam, Soheila</au><au>Nekuie, Sepideh</au><au>Adabi, Khadijeh</au><au>Hanjani, Parviz</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Five-Day Intravascular Methotrexate Versus Biweekly Actinomycin-D in the Treatment of Low-Risk Gestational Trophoblastic Neoplasia: A Clinical Randomized Trial</atitle><jtitle>International journal of gynecological cancer</jtitle><addtitle>Int J Gynecol Cancer</addtitle><date>2016-06</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>26</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>971</spage><epage>976</epage><pages>971-976</pages><issn>1048-891X</issn><eissn>1525-1438</eissn><abstract>OBJECTIVESMethotrexate (MTX) and Actinomycin-D (Act-D) are effective drugs used in the treatment of low-risk gestational trophoblastic neoplasia (LRGTNs). The aim of the present study was to compare intravenous (IV) MTX and IV Act-D in the treatment of LRGTNs. MATERIALS AND METHODSSixty-two patients with LRGTN were enrolled in a prospective randomized clinical trial between 2010 and 2013 in Moheb e Yas Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences. Primary treatment regimens were IV MTX, 0.4 mg/kg daily for 5 days every 14 days (25 mg maximum daily dose), and IV Act-D, 1.25 mg/m (2 mg maximum dose) every 14 days. RESULTSThirty-two and 30 patients were enrolled to MTX and Act-D groups, respectively. Complete remission after receiving first-line chemotherapy was achieved in 79% of all cases, 80% in the Act-D group and 78.1% in the MTX group.Twenty percent of the Act-D patients and 21.9% of the MTX patients showed resistance to the first-line chemotherapy, of which 16.7% and 15.6% responded completely to the second-line monotherapy, respectively. Multiple drug therapy was needed in 3.3% of the Act-D group and 6.3% of the MTX group.We did not find any correlation between treatment response and beta–human chorionic gonadotropin level, uterine mass size, lung metastasis, antecedent pregnancy, and duration from diagnosis to treatment. Adverse effects were not statistically different between the 2 groups. CONCLUSIONSSingle-agent chemotherapy in the treatment of LRGTNs resulted in an overall complete remission rate of 79%, 80% in the Act-D group and 78.1% in MTX group, with no statistically significant difference. Whereas this study represents an important step in comparing single-agent treatments, comparison of other regimens will be required to determine the optimal single-agent therapy.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>by the International Gynecologic Cancer Society and the European Society of Gynaecological Oncology</pub><pmid>27101581</pmid><doi>10.1097/IGC.0000000000000687</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1048-891X
ispartof International journal of gynecological cancer, 2016-06, Vol.26 (5), p.971-976
issn 1048-891X
1525-1438
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1790466936
source MEDLINE; Journals@Ovid Complete
subjects Adult
Antibiotics, Antineoplastic - administration & dosage
Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic - administration & dosage
Chemotherapy
Dactinomycin - administration & dosage
Drug Administration Schedule
Female
Gestational Trophoblastic Disease - drug therapy
Humans
Injections, Intramuscular
Injections, Intravenous
Methotrexate - administration & dosage
Pregnancy
Prospective Studies
title Five-Day Intravascular Methotrexate Versus Biweekly Actinomycin-D in the Treatment of Low-Risk Gestational Trophoblastic Neoplasia: A Clinical Randomized Trial
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-23T10%3A55%3A36IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Five-Day%20Intravascular%20Methotrexate%20Versus%20Biweekly%20Actinomycin-D%20in%20the%20Treatment%20of%20Low-Risk%20Gestational%20Trophoblastic%20Neoplasia:%20A%20Clinical%20Randomized%20Trial&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20gynecological%20cancer&rft.au=Yarandi,%20Fariba&rft.date=2016-06&rft.volume=26&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=971&rft.epage=976&rft.pages=971-976&rft.issn=1048-891X&rft.eissn=1525-1438&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/IGC.0000000000000687&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1790466936%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2579088252&rft_id=info:pmid/27101581&rfr_iscdi=true