Efficacy and Safety of Belimumab Plus Standard Therapy in Patients With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: A Meta-analysis

Abstract Purpose The treatment of belimumab plus standard therapy in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) has been studied extensively in recent years. Our aim was to estimate the efficacy and safety of this therapy compared with placebo plus standard therapy in patients with SLE. Method...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Clinical therapeutics 2016-05, Vol.38 (5), p.1134-1140
Hauptverfasser: Wei, Li-qiang, MS, Liang, Yong-gang, BS, Zhao, Yong, MS, Liang, Hui-tao, BS, Qin, Dong-chun, MS, She, Ming-cong, MS
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1140
container_issue 5
container_start_page 1134
container_title Clinical therapeutics
container_volume 38
creator Wei, Li-qiang, MS
Liang, Yong-gang, BS
Zhao, Yong, MS
Liang, Hui-tao, BS
Qin, Dong-chun, MS
She, Ming-cong, MS
description Abstract Purpose The treatment of belimumab plus standard therapy in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) has been studied extensively in recent years. Our aim was to estimate the efficacy and safety of this therapy compared with placebo plus standard therapy in patients with SLE. Methods PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Chinese Biomedical Literature Database (CBM, Chinese), and Wanfang Database (Chinese) were searched for all randomized clinical trials that mainly studied the efficacy and safety of belimumab plus standard therapy before June 2015. We extracted or calculated the rate of the SLE Response Index and adverse event rate at 52 weeks in all the included studies. The odds ratio (OR) with 95% CI between the 2 groups in this meta-analysis was conducted by using a random-effects model. Sensitivity and publication bias analyses were also performed. All statistical tests were performed by using Stata software version 12.0 (StataCorp., College Station, Texas). Findings In the overall samples (4 studies, N = 4692 ), a significantly higher SLE Response Index rate at 52 weeks was found in belimumab plus standard therapy group compared with the placebo plus standard therapy group in all studies (OR = 1.49; 95% CI, 1.26–1.77 ; P < 0.001 ). When assessed with the incidence of serious adverse events, the data revealed that there was no significant difference between the 2 groups, with pooled OR = 1.08; 95% CI, 0.83–1.39; P = 0.573; OR = 1.23; 95% CI, 1.02–1.48; P = 0.029; and OR = 1.07; 95% CI, 0.88–1.29; P = 0.506. Implications The results suggest that treatment with belimumab plus standard therapy is more effective than placebo plus standard therapy in SLE patients, which represents major progress in the treatment of SLE. Regardless of the statistical analyses, further research is necessary to optimize treatment effects.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.clinthera.2016.02.022
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1790460919</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S0149291816300911</els_id><sourcerecordid>4316742321</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c454t-22cb133f303724783b84ad4b0b8d6ee0265db4303668d2a9d1583d1cc0134b7f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkl1rFDEUhoModlv9CxrwxptZ87WTiRfCWratsGJhK3oXMskZmnU-tkmmMP_eDFtb6JUQCOQ87zkn5z0IvadkSQktP-2XtvV9uoVgliw_LAnLh71AC1pJVVAqfr9EC0KFKpii1Qk6jXFPCOFqxV6jEyYJoyWRCzRumsZbYydseod3poE04aHBX6H13diZGl-3Y8S7lMMmOHwzlzxM2Pf42iQPfYr4l0-3eDfFBJ23eDsesmATptxdZ9IQx_gZr_F3SKYwvWmn6OMb9KoxbYS3D_cZ-nmxuTm_KrY_Lr-dr7eFFSuRCsZsTTlvOOGSCVnxuhLGiZrUlSsBCCtXrhY5WpaVY0Y5uqq4o9YSykUtG36GPh7zHsJwN0JMuvPRQtuaHoYxaioVESVRVGX0wzN0P4wh95upShLFpVIzJY-UDUOMARp9CL4zYdKU6NkZvdePzujZGU1YPiwr3z3kH-sO3KPunxUZWB8ByAO59xB0tHm-FpwPYJN2g_-PIl-e5Zi57G_7ByaITz_SMQv0bl6QeT9oyUmeAuV_Afjwt88</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1870937999</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Efficacy and Safety of Belimumab Plus Standard Therapy in Patients With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: A Meta-analysis</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><source>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</source><creator>Wei, Li-qiang, MS ; Liang, Yong-gang, BS ; Zhao, Yong, MS ; Liang, Hui-tao, BS ; Qin, Dong-chun, MS ; She, Ming-cong, MS</creator><creatorcontrib>Wei, Li-qiang, MS ; Liang, Yong-gang, BS ; Zhao, Yong, MS ; Liang, Hui-tao, BS ; Qin, Dong-chun, MS ; She, Ming-cong, MS</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Purpose The treatment of belimumab plus standard therapy in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) has been studied extensively in recent years. Our aim was to estimate the efficacy and safety of this therapy compared with placebo plus standard therapy in patients with SLE. Methods PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Chinese Biomedical Literature Database (CBM, Chinese), and Wanfang Database (Chinese) were searched for all randomized clinical trials that mainly studied the efficacy and safety of belimumab plus standard therapy before June 2015. We extracted or calculated the rate of the SLE Response Index and adverse event rate at 52 weeks in all the included studies. The odds ratio (OR) with 95% CI between the 2 groups in this meta-analysis was conducted by using a random-effects model. Sensitivity and publication bias analyses were also performed. All statistical tests were performed by using Stata software version 12.0 (StataCorp., College Station, Texas). Findings In the overall samples (4 studies, N = 4692 ), a significantly higher SLE Response Index rate at 52 weeks was found in belimumab plus standard therapy group compared with the placebo plus standard therapy group in all studies (OR = 1.49; 95% CI, 1.26–1.77 ; P &lt; 0.001 ). When assessed with the incidence of serious adverse events, the data revealed that there was no significant difference between the 2 groups, with pooled OR = 1.08; 95% CI, 0.83–1.39; P = 0.573; OR = 1.23; 95% CI, 1.02–1.48; P = 0.029; and OR = 1.07; 95% CI, 0.88–1.29; P = 0.506. Implications The results suggest that treatment with belimumab plus standard therapy is more effective than placebo plus standard therapy in SLE patients, which represents major progress in the treatment of SLE. Regardless of the statistical analyses, further research is necessary to optimize treatment effects.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0149-2918</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-114X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2016.02.022</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27021607</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>adverse event ; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized - administration &amp; dosage ; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized - adverse effects ; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized - therapeutic use ; belimumab ; Bias ; Clinical trials ; Ethnicity ; Hispanic Americans ; Humans ; Immunoglobulins ; Internal Medicine ; Lupus ; Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic - drug therapy ; Medical Education ; Meta-analysis ; Patients ; Quality ; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic ; Rheumatology ; Sensitivity analysis ; Studies ; systemic lupus erythematosus ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>Clinical therapeutics, 2016-05, Vol.38 (5), p.1134-1140</ispartof><rights>Elsevier HS Journals, Inc.</rights><rights>2016 Elsevier HS Journals, Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2016 Elsevier HS Journals, Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Limited May 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c454t-22cb133f303724783b84ad4b0b8d6ee0265db4303668d2a9d1583d1cc0134b7f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c454t-22cb133f303724783b84ad4b0b8d6ee0265db4303668d2a9d1583d1cc0134b7f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1870937999?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995,64385,64387,64389,72469</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27021607$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wei, Li-qiang, MS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liang, Yong-gang, BS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhao, Yong, MS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liang, Hui-tao, BS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Qin, Dong-chun, MS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>She, Ming-cong, MS</creatorcontrib><title>Efficacy and Safety of Belimumab Plus Standard Therapy in Patients With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: A Meta-analysis</title><title>Clinical therapeutics</title><addtitle>Clin Ther</addtitle><description>Abstract Purpose The treatment of belimumab plus standard therapy in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) has been studied extensively in recent years. Our aim was to estimate the efficacy and safety of this therapy compared with placebo plus standard therapy in patients with SLE. Methods PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Chinese Biomedical Literature Database (CBM, Chinese), and Wanfang Database (Chinese) were searched for all randomized clinical trials that mainly studied the efficacy and safety of belimumab plus standard therapy before June 2015. We extracted or calculated the rate of the SLE Response Index and adverse event rate at 52 weeks in all the included studies. The odds ratio (OR) with 95% CI between the 2 groups in this meta-analysis was conducted by using a random-effects model. Sensitivity and publication bias analyses were also performed. All statistical tests were performed by using Stata software version 12.0 (StataCorp., College Station, Texas). Findings In the overall samples (4 studies, N = 4692 ), a significantly higher SLE Response Index rate at 52 weeks was found in belimumab plus standard therapy group compared with the placebo plus standard therapy group in all studies (OR = 1.49; 95% CI, 1.26–1.77 ; P &lt; 0.001 ). When assessed with the incidence of serious adverse events, the data revealed that there was no significant difference between the 2 groups, with pooled OR = 1.08; 95% CI, 0.83–1.39; P = 0.573; OR = 1.23; 95% CI, 1.02–1.48; P = 0.029; and OR = 1.07; 95% CI, 0.88–1.29; P = 0.506. Implications The results suggest that treatment with belimumab plus standard therapy is more effective than placebo plus standard therapy in SLE patients, which represents major progress in the treatment of SLE. Regardless of the statistical analyses, further research is necessary to optimize treatment effects.</description><subject>adverse event</subject><subject>Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized - adverse effects</subject><subject>Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized - therapeutic use</subject><subject>belimumab</subject><subject>Bias</subject><subject>Clinical trials</subject><subject>Ethnicity</subject><subject>Hispanic Americans</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Immunoglobulins</subject><subject>Internal Medicine</subject><subject>Lupus</subject><subject>Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic - drug therapy</subject><subject>Medical Education</subject><subject>Meta-analysis</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Quality</subject><subject>Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic</subject><subject>Rheumatology</subject><subject>Sensitivity analysis</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>systemic lupus erythematosus</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>0149-2918</issn><issn>1879-114X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkl1rFDEUhoModlv9CxrwxptZ87WTiRfCWratsGJhK3oXMskZmnU-tkmmMP_eDFtb6JUQCOQ87zkn5z0IvadkSQktP-2XtvV9uoVgliw_LAnLh71AC1pJVVAqfr9EC0KFKpii1Qk6jXFPCOFqxV6jEyYJoyWRCzRumsZbYydseod3poE04aHBX6H13diZGl-3Y8S7lMMmOHwzlzxM2Pf42iQPfYr4l0-3eDfFBJ23eDsesmATptxdZ9IQx_gZr_F3SKYwvWmn6OMb9KoxbYS3D_cZ-nmxuTm_KrY_Lr-dr7eFFSuRCsZsTTlvOOGSCVnxuhLGiZrUlSsBCCtXrhY5WpaVY0Y5uqq4o9YSykUtG36GPh7zHsJwN0JMuvPRQtuaHoYxaioVESVRVGX0wzN0P4wh95upShLFpVIzJY-UDUOMARp9CL4zYdKU6NkZvdePzujZGU1YPiwr3z3kH-sO3KPunxUZWB8ByAO59xB0tHm-FpwPYJN2g_-PIl-e5Zi57G_7ByaITz_SMQv0bl6QeT9oyUmeAuV_Afjwt88</recordid><startdate>20160501</startdate><enddate>20160501</enddate><creator>Wei, Li-qiang, MS</creator><creator>Liang, Yong-gang, BS</creator><creator>Zhao, Yong, MS</creator><creator>Liang, Hui-tao, BS</creator><creator>Qin, Dong-chun, MS</creator><creator>She, Ming-cong, MS</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160501</creationdate><title>Efficacy and Safety of Belimumab Plus Standard Therapy in Patients With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: A Meta-analysis</title><author>Wei, Li-qiang, MS ; Liang, Yong-gang, BS ; Zhao, Yong, MS ; Liang, Hui-tao, BS ; Qin, Dong-chun, MS ; She, Ming-cong, MS</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c454t-22cb133f303724783b84ad4b0b8d6ee0265db4303668d2a9d1583d1cc0134b7f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>adverse event</topic><topic>Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized - adverse effects</topic><topic>Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized - therapeutic use</topic><topic>belimumab</topic><topic>Bias</topic><topic>Clinical trials</topic><topic>Ethnicity</topic><topic>Hispanic Americans</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Immunoglobulins</topic><topic>Internal Medicine</topic><topic>Lupus</topic><topic>Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic - drug therapy</topic><topic>Medical Education</topic><topic>Meta-analysis</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Quality</topic><topic>Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic</topic><topic>Rheumatology</topic><topic>Sensitivity analysis</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>systemic lupus erythematosus</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wei, Li-qiang, MS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liang, Yong-gang, BS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhao, Yong, MS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liang, Hui-tao, BS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Qin, Dong-chun, MS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>She, Ming-cong, MS</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Clinical therapeutics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wei, Li-qiang, MS</au><au>Liang, Yong-gang, BS</au><au>Zhao, Yong, MS</au><au>Liang, Hui-tao, BS</au><au>Qin, Dong-chun, MS</au><au>She, Ming-cong, MS</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Efficacy and Safety of Belimumab Plus Standard Therapy in Patients With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: A Meta-analysis</atitle><jtitle>Clinical therapeutics</jtitle><addtitle>Clin Ther</addtitle><date>2016-05-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>38</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>1134</spage><epage>1140</epage><pages>1134-1140</pages><issn>0149-2918</issn><eissn>1879-114X</eissn><abstract>Abstract Purpose The treatment of belimumab plus standard therapy in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) has been studied extensively in recent years. Our aim was to estimate the efficacy and safety of this therapy compared with placebo plus standard therapy in patients with SLE. Methods PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Chinese Biomedical Literature Database (CBM, Chinese), and Wanfang Database (Chinese) were searched for all randomized clinical trials that mainly studied the efficacy and safety of belimumab plus standard therapy before June 2015. We extracted or calculated the rate of the SLE Response Index and adverse event rate at 52 weeks in all the included studies. The odds ratio (OR) with 95% CI between the 2 groups in this meta-analysis was conducted by using a random-effects model. Sensitivity and publication bias analyses were also performed. All statistical tests were performed by using Stata software version 12.0 (StataCorp., College Station, Texas). Findings In the overall samples (4 studies, N = 4692 ), a significantly higher SLE Response Index rate at 52 weeks was found in belimumab plus standard therapy group compared with the placebo plus standard therapy group in all studies (OR = 1.49; 95% CI, 1.26–1.77 ; P &lt; 0.001 ). When assessed with the incidence of serious adverse events, the data revealed that there was no significant difference between the 2 groups, with pooled OR = 1.08; 95% CI, 0.83–1.39; P = 0.573; OR = 1.23; 95% CI, 1.02–1.48; P = 0.029; and OR = 1.07; 95% CI, 0.88–1.29; P = 0.506. Implications The results suggest that treatment with belimumab plus standard therapy is more effective than placebo plus standard therapy in SLE patients, which represents major progress in the treatment of SLE. Regardless of the statistical analyses, further research is necessary to optimize treatment effects.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>27021607</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.clinthera.2016.02.022</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0149-2918
ispartof Clinical therapeutics, 2016-05, Vol.38 (5), p.1134-1140
issn 0149-2918
1879-114X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1790460919
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete; ProQuest Central UK/Ireland
subjects adverse event
Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized - administration & dosage
Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized - adverse effects
Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized - therapeutic use
belimumab
Bias
Clinical trials
Ethnicity
Hispanic Americans
Humans
Immunoglobulins
Internal Medicine
Lupus
Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic - drug therapy
Medical Education
Meta-analysis
Patients
Quality
Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
Rheumatology
Sensitivity analysis
Studies
systemic lupus erythematosus
Treatment Outcome
title Efficacy and Safety of Belimumab Plus Standard Therapy in Patients With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: A Meta-analysis
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T05%3A00%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Efficacy%20and%20Safety%20of%20Belimumab%20Plus%20Standard%20Therapy%20in%20Patients%20With%20Systemic%20Lupus%20Erythematosus:%20A%20Meta-analysis&rft.jtitle=Clinical%20therapeutics&rft.au=Wei,%20Li-qiang,%20MS&rft.date=2016-05-01&rft.volume=38&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=1134&rft.epage=1140&rft.pages=1134-1140&rft.issn=0149-2918&rft.eissn=1879-114X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.clinthera.2016.02.022&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E4316742321%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1870937999&rft_id=info:pmid/27021607&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S0149291816300911&rfr_iscdi=true