Surgical Risk Preoperative Assessment System (SURPAS): I. Parsimonious, Clinically Meaningful Groups of Postoperative Complications by Factor Analysis

OBJECTIVE:To use factor analysis to cluster the 18 American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS NSQIP) perioperative complications into a reproducible, smaller number of clinically meaningful groups of postoperative complications, facilitating and streamlining futu...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Annals of surgery 2016-06, Vol.263 (6), p.1042-1048
Hauptverfasser: Meguid, Robert A, Bronsert, Michael R, Juarez-Colunga, Elizabeth, Hammermeister, Karl E, Henderson, William G
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1048
container_issue 6
container_start_page 1042
container_title Annals of surgery
container_volume 263
creator Meguid, Robert A
Bronsert, Michael R
Juarez-Colunga, Elizabeth
Hammermeister, Karl E
Henderson, William G
description OBJECTIVE:To use factor analysis to cluster the 18 American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS NSQIP) perioperative complications into a reproducible, smaller number of clinically meaningful groups of postoperative complications, facilitating and streamlining future study and application in live clinical settings. BACKGROUND:The ACS NSQIP collects and reports on eighteen 30-day postoperative complications (excluding mortality), which are variably grouped in published analyses using ACS NSQIP data. This hinders comparison between studies of this widely used quality improvement dataset. METHODS:Factor analysis was used to develop a series of complication clusters, which were then analyzed to identify a parsimonious, clinically meaningful grouping, using 2,275,240 surgical cases in the ACS NSQIP Participant Use File (PUF), 2005 to 2012. The main outcome measures are reproducible, data-driven, clinically meaningful clusters of complications derived from factor solutions. RESULTS:Factor analysis solutions for 5 to 9 latent factors were examined for their percent of total variance, parsimony, and clinical interpretability. Applying the first 2 of these criteria, we identified the 7-factor solution, which included clusters of pulmonary, infectious, wound disruption, cardiac/transfusion, venous thromboembolic, renal, and neurological complications, as the best solution for parsimony and clinical meaningfulness. Applying the last (clinical interpretability), we combined the wound disruption with the infectious clusters resulting in 6 clusters for future clinical applications. CONCLUSIONS:Factor analysis of ACS NSQIP postoperative complication data provides 6 clinically meaningful complication clusters in lieu of 18 postoperative morbidities, which will facilitate comparisons and clinical implementation of studies of postoperative morbidities.
doi_str_mv 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001669
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1789493898</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1789493898</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3509-96ffdfdde029a206a667461e2ab3818b0350299be65cd3320e1d5049c46559923</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkc1u1DAUhSMEotPCGyDkZZHIYDuJY7OLRrRUGsSooevISW5aUydOfROqvEifFw9TfsQCvLF89J1zdX2i6BWja0ZV_q7cFmv6x2FCqCfRimVcxoyl9Gm0CmoSpyrhR9Ex4tfApJLmz6MjLlSWSpWvoody9tem0ZZcGrwlOw9uBK8n8w1IgQiIPQwTKRecoCen5dXlrijfvCcXa7LTHk3vBuNmfEs21gz7HLuQT6AHM1x3syXn3s0jEteRncPpd_TG9aMN-GTcgKReyJluJudJMWi7oMEX0bNOW4SXj_dJdHX24cvmY7z9fH6xKbZxk2RUxUp0Xdu1LVCuNKdCC5GnggHXdSKZrGmguFI1iKxpk4RTYG1GU9WkIsuU4slJdHrIHb27mwGnqjfYgLV6gLBWxXKpwgdKJQOaHtDGO0QPXTV602u_VIxW-0aq0Ej1dyPB9vpxwlz30P4y_awgAPIA3Ds7gcdbO9-Dr25A2-nmf9npP6w_OJHJmAeaivCI9wpPvgPJL6hc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1789493898</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Surgical Risk Preoperative Assessment System (SURPAS): I. Parsimonious, Clinically Meaningful Groups of Postoperative Complications by Factor Analysis</title><source>Journals@Ovid Ovid Autoload</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Meguid, Robert A ; Bronsert, Michael R ; Juarez-Colunga, Elizabeth ; Hammermeister, Karl E ; Henderson, William G</creator><creatorcontrib>Meguid, Robert A ; Bronsert, Michael R ; Juarez-Colunga, Elizabeth ; Hammermeister, Karl E ; Henderson, William G</creatorcontrib><description>OBJECTIVE:To use factor analysis to cluster the 18 American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS NSQIP) perioperative complications into a reproducible, smaller number of clinically meaningful groups of postoperative complications, facilitating and streamlining future study and application in live clinical settings. BACKGROUND:The ACS NSQIP collects and reports on eighteen 30-day postoperative complications (excluding mortality), which are variably grouped in published analyses using ACS NSQIP data. This hinders comparison between studies of this widely used quality improvement dataset. METHODS:Factor analysis was used to develop a series of complication clusters, which were then analyzed to identify a parsimonious, clinically meaningful grouping, using 2,275,240 surgical cases in the ACS NSQIP Participant Use File (PUF), 2005 to 2012. The main outcome measures are reproducible, data-driven, clinically meaningful clusters of complications derived from factor solutions. RESULTS:Factor analysis solutions for 5 to 9 latent factors were examined for their percent of total variance, parsimony, and clinical interpretability. Applying the first 2 of these criteria, we identified the 7-factor solution, which included clusters of pulmonary, infectious, wound disruption, cardiac/transfusion, venous thromboembolic, renal, and neurological complications, as the best solution for parsimony and clinical meaningfulness. Applying the last (clinical interpretability), we combined the wound disruption with the infectious clusters resulting in 6 clusters for future clinical applications. CONCLUSIONS:Factor analysis of ACS NSQIP postoperative complication data provides 6 clinically meaningful complication clusters in lieu of 18 postoperative morbidities, which will facilitate comparisons and clinical implementation of studies of postoperative morbidities.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0003-4932</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1528-1140</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001669</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26954897</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Copyright Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved</publisher><subject>Factor Analysis, Statistical ; Health Services Research ; Humans ; Outcome Assessment (Health Care) - methods ; Postoperative Complications - epidemiology ; Quality Improvement ; Quality Indicators, Health Care ; Reproducibility of Results ; Risk Assessment - methods ; United States - epidemiology</subject><ispartof>Annals of surgery, 2016-06, Vol.263 (6), p.1042-1048</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2016 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3509-96ffdfdde029a206a667461e2ab3818b0350299be65cd3320e1d5049c46559923</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26954897$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Meguid, Robert A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bronsert, Michael R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Juarez-Colunga, Elizabeth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hammermeister, Karl E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Henderson, William G</creatorcontrib><title>Surgical Risk Preoperative Assessment System (SURPAS): I. Parsimonious, Clinically Meaningful Groups of Postoperative Complications by Factor Analysis</title><title>Annals of surgery</title><addtitle>Ann Surg</addtitle><description>OBJECTIVE:To use factor analysis to cluster the 18 American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS NSQIP) perioperative complications into a reproducible, smaller number of clinically meaningful groups of postoperative complications, facilitating and streamlining future study and application in live clinical settings. BACKGROUND:The ACS NSQIP collects and reports on eighteen 30-day postoperative complications (excluding mortality), which are variably grouped in published analyses using ACS NSQIP data. This hinders comparison between studies of this widely used quality improvement dataset. METHODS:Factor analysis was used to develop a series of complication clusters, which were then analyzed to identify a parsimonious, clinically meaningful grouping, using 2,275,240 surgical cases in the ACS NSQIP Participant Use File (PUF), 2005 to 2012. The main outcome measures are reproducible, data-driven, clinically meaningful clusters of complications derived from factor solutions. RESULTS:Factor analysis solutions for 5 to 9 latent factors were examined for their percent of total variance, parsimony, and clinical interpretability. Applying the first 2 of these criteria, we identified the 7-factor solution, which included clusters of pulmonary, infectious, wound disruption, cardiac/transfusion, venous thromboembolic, renal, and neurological complications, as the best solution for parsimony and clinical meaningfulness. Applying the last (clinical interpretability), we combined the wound disruption with the infectious clusters resulting in 6 clusters for future clinical applications. CONCLUSIONS:Factor analysis of ACS NSQIP postoperative complication data provides 6 clinically meaningful complication clusters in lieu of 18 postoperative morbidities, which will facilitate comparisons and clinical implementation of studies of postoperative morbidities.</description><subject>Factor Analysis, Statistical</subject><subject>Health Services Research</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Outcome Assessment (Health Care) - methods</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications - epidemiology</subject><subject>Quality Improvement</subject><subject>Quality Indicators, Health Care</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Risk Assessment - methods</subject><subject>United States - epidemiology</subject><issn>0003-4932</issn><issn>1528-1140</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkc1u1DAUhSMEotPCGyDkZZHIYDuJY7OLRrRUGsSooevISW5aUydOfROqvEifFw9TfsQCvLF89J1zdX2i6BWja0ZV_q7cFmv6x2FCqCfRimVcxoyl9Gm0CmoSpyrhR9Ex4tfApJLmz6MjLlSWSpWvoody9tem0ZZcGrwlOw9uBK8n8w1IgQiIPQwTKRecoCen5dXlrijfvCcXa7LTHk3vBuNmfEs21gz7HLuQT6AHM1x3syXn3s0jEteRncPpd_TG9aMN-GTcgKReyJluJudJMWi7oMEX0bNOW4SXj_dJdHX24cvmY7z9fH6xKbZxk2RUxUp0Xdu1LVCuNKdCC5GnggHXdSKZrGmguFI1iKxpk4RTYG1GU9WkIsuU4slJdHrIHb27mwGnqjfYgLV6gLBWxXKpwgdKJQOaHtDGO0QPXTV602u_VIxW-0aq0Ej1dyPB9vpxwlz30P4y_awgAPIA3Ds7gcdbO9-Dr25A2-nmf9npP6w_OJHJmAeaivCI9wpPvgPJL6hc</recordid><startdate>201606</startdate><enddate>201606</enddate><creator>Meguid, Robert A</creator><creator>Bronsert, Michael R</creator><creator>Juarez-Colunga, Elizabeth</creator><creator>Hammermeister, Karl E</creator><creator>Henderson, William G</creator><general>Copyright Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201606</creationdate><title>Surgical Risk Preoperative Assessment System (SURPAS): I. Parsimonious, Clinically Meaningful Groups of Postoperative Complications by Factor Analysis</title><author>Meguid, Robert A ; Bronsert, Michael R ; Juarez-Colunga, Elizabeth ; Hammermeister, Karl E ; Henderson, William G</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3509-96ffdfdde029a206a667461e2ab3818b0350299be65cd3320e1d5049c46559923</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Factor Analysis, Statistical</topic><topic>Health Services Research</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Outcome Assessment (Health Care) - methods</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications - epidemiology</topic><topic>Quality Improvement</topic><topic>Quality Indicators, Health Care</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Risk Assessment - methods</topic><topic>United States - epidemiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Meguid, Robert A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bronsert, Michael R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Juarez-Colunga, Elizabeth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hammermeister, Karl E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Henderson, William G</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Annals of surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Meguid, Robert A</au><au>Bronsert, Michael R</au><au>Juarez-Colunga, Elizabeth</au><au>Hammermeister, Karl E</au><au>Henderson, William G</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Surgical Risk Preoperative Assessment System (SURPAS): I. Parsimonious, Clinically Meaningful Groups of Postoperative Complications by Factor Analysis</atitle><jtitle>Annals of surgery</jtitle><addtitle>Ann Surg</addtitle><date>2016-06</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>263</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1042</spage><epage>1048</epage><pages>1042-1048</pages><issn>0003-4932</issn><eissn>1528-1140</eissn><abstract>OBJECTIVE:To use factor analysis to cluster the 18 American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS NSQIP) perioperative complications into a reproducible, smaller number of clinically meaningful groups of postoperative complications, facilitating and streamlining future study and application in live clinical settings. BACKGROUND:The ACS NSQIP collects and reports on eighteen 30-day postoperative complications (excluding mortality), which are variably grouped in published analyses using ACS NSQIP data. This hinders comparison between studies of this widely used quality improvement dataset. METHODS:Factor analysis was used to develop a series of complication clusters, which were then analyzed to identify a parsimonious, clinically meaningful grouping, using 2,275,240 surgical cases in the ACS NSQIP Participant Use File (PUF), 2005 to 2012. The main outcome measures are reproducible, data-driven, clinically meaningful clusters of complications derived from factor solutions. RESULTS:Factor analysis solutions for 5 to 9 latent factors were examined for their percent of total variance, parsimony, and clinical interpretability. Applying the first 2 of these criteria, we identified the 7-factor solution, which included clusters of pulmonary, infectious, wound disruption, cardiac/transfusion, venous thromboembolic, renal, and neurological complications, as the best solution for parsimony and clinical meaningfulness. Applying the last (clinical interpretability), we combined the wound disruption with the infectious clusters resulting in 6 clusters for future clinical applications. CONCLUSIONS:Factor analysis of ACS NSQIP postoperative complication data provides 6 clinically meaningful complication clusters in lieu of 18 postoperative morbidities, which will facilitate comparisons and clinical implementation of studies of postoperative morbidities.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Copyright Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved</pub><pmid>26954897</pmid><doi>10.1097/SLA.0000000000001669</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0003-4932
ispartof Annals of surgery, 2016-06, Vol.263 (6), p.1042-1048
issn 0003-4932
1528-1140
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1789493898
source Journals@Ovid Ovid Autoload; MEDLINE; PubMed Central
subjects Factor Analysis, Statistical
Health Services Research
Humans
Outcome Assessment (Health Care) - methods
Postoperative Complications - epidemiology
Quality Improvement
Quality Indicators, Health Care
Reproducibility of Results
Risk Assessment - methods
United States - epidemiology
title Surgical Risk Preoperative Assessment System (SURPAS): I. Parsimonious, Clinically Meaningful Groups of Postoperative Complications by Factor Analysis
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-10T21%3A42%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Surgical%20Risk%20Preoperative%20Assessment%20System%20(SURPAS):%20I.%20Parsimonious,%20Clinically%20Meaningful%20Groups%20of%20Postoperative%20Complications%20by%20Factor%20Analysis&rft.jtitle=Annals%20of%20surgery&rft.au=Meguid,%20Robert%20A&rft.date=2016-06&rft.volume=263&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1042&rft.epage=1048&rft.pages=1042-1048&rft.issn=0003-4932&rft.eissn=1528-1140&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/SLA.0000000000001669&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1789493898%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1789493898&rft_id=info:pmid/26954897&rfr_iscdi=true