Rufous hummingbirds' memory for flower location

We used an open-field analogue of the eight-arm radial maze to investigate the role of memory during foraging by rufous hummingbirds, Selasphorus rufus. In experiment 1 we attempted to determine whether birds were able to differentiate between flowers of the same type that they had emptied, flowers...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Animal behaviour 2001-05, Vol.61 (5), p.981-986
Hauptverfasser: Henderson, Jonathan, Hurly, T.Andrew, Healy, Susan D.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 986
container_issue 5
container_start_page 981
container_title Animal behaviour
container_volume 61
creator Henderson, Jonathan
Hurly, T.Andrew
Healy, Susan D.
description We used an open-field analogue of the eight-arm radial maze to investigate the role of memory during foraging by rufous hummingbirds, Selasphorus rufus. In experiment 1 we attempted to determine whether birds were able to differentiate between flowers of the same type that they had emptied, flowers they had seen but not visited and new flowers. They were tested with three trial types, all of which involved birds visiting four rewarded flowers in the first phase of a trial. In ‘free’ trials, the bird was allowed to choose four from eight flowers. In ‘forced’ trials there were only four flowers available in phase 1 and in ‘mixed’ trials the bird could choose four from six available flowers. In all trial types eight flowers (including all those in the same locations as in phase 1) were presented to the bird on its return in phase 2. The four rewarded flowers were those not visited in phase 1. In free and mixed trials, birds were better than chance at avoiding the flowers they had emptied in phase 1. In mixed trials, birds were more likely to visit the new flowers that were unique to phase 2. In experiment 2 we tested whether flower height was a floral feature remembered by birds. Birds were given forced and free trials in which the flowers in the radial maze were presented at two heights. As performance in both trial types was better than chance we suggest that hummingbirds use flower height to remember the locations of flowers.
doi_str_mv 10.1006/anbe.2000.1670
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_17891507</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0003347200916701</els_id><sourcerecordid>75390382</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c373t-f7544c24856ae875cc7e5d77528976035208a0620b466fab5c3a045897d856db3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE1LxDAQhoMouK5ePRcRPXU3TTpJehTxCxYE0XNI00SztM2atMr-e1N2QRA8DTN53snwIHRe4EWBMVuqvjYLgnFqGccHaFbgCnJBBDlEszSmOS05OUYnMa5TywDDDC1fRuvHmH2MXef699qFJl5nnel82GbWh8y2_tuErPVaDc73p-jIqjaas32do7f7u9fbx3z1_PB0e7PKNeV0yC2HstSkFMCUERy05gYazoGIijNMgWChMCO4LhmzqgZNFS4hPTYp0tR0jq52ezfBf44mDrJzUZu2Vb1J98qCi6oAzBN48Qdc-zH06TZJSAnAKIcELXaQDj7GYKzcBNepsJUFlpM8OcmTkzw5yUuBy_1WFbVqbVC9dvE3VVBSQZUwscNMUvHlTJBRO9Nr07hg9CAb7_774QcbY3-2</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>224556375</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Rufous hummingbirds' memory for flower location</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Henderson, Jonathan ; Hurly, T.Andrew ; Healy, Susan D.</creator><creatorcontrib>Henderson, Jonathan ; Hurly, T.Andrew ; Healy, Susan D.</creatorcontrib><description>We used an open-field analogue of the eight-arm radial maze to investigate the role of memory during foraging by rufous hummingbirds, Selasphorus rufus. In experiment 1 we attempted to determine whether birds were able to differentiate between flowers of the same type that they had emptied, flowers they had seen but not visited and new flowers. They were tested with three trial types, all of which involved birds visiting four rewarded flowers in the first phase of a trial. In ‘free’ trials, the bird was allowed to choose four from eight flowers. In ‘forced’ trials there were only four flowers available in phase 1 and in ‘mixed’ trials the bird could choose four from six available flowers. In all trial types eight flowers (including all those in the same locations as in phase 1) were presented to the bird on its return in phase 2. The four rewarded flowers were those not visited in phase 1. In free and mixed trials, birds were better than chance at avoiding the flowers they had emptied in phase 1. In mixed trials, birds were more likely to visit the new flowers that were unique to phase 2. In experiment 2 we tested whether flower height was a floral feature remembered by birds. Birds were given forced and free trials in which the flowers in the radial maze were presented at two heights. As performance in both trial types was better than chance we suggest that hummingbirds use flower height to remember the locations of flowers.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0003-3472</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1095-8282</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1006/anbe.2000.1670</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ANBEA8</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Kent: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Animal behavior ; Animal ethology ; Aves ; Biological and medical sciences ; Birds ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Memory ; Plant location ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Selasphorus rufus ; Vertebrata</subject><ispartof>Animal behaviour, 2001-05, Vol.61 (5), p.981-986</ispartof><rights>2001 The Association for the Study of Animal Behaviour</rights><rights>2001 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Harcourt Brace Jovanovich Ltd. May 2001</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c373t-f7544c24856ae875cc7e5d77528976035208a0620b466fab5c3a045897d856db3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c373t-f7544c24856ae875cc7e5d77528976035208a0620b466fab5c3a045897d856db3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1006/anbe.2000.1670$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3548,27923,27924,45994</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=1132959$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Henderson, Jonathan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hurly, T.Andrew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Healy, Susan D.</creatorcontrib><title>Rufous hummingbirds' memory for flower location</title><title>Animal behaviour</title><description>We used an open-field analogue of the eight-arm radial maze to investigate the role of memory during foraging by rufous hummingbirds, Selasphorus rufus. In experiment 1 we attempted to determine whether birds were able to differentiate between flowers of the same type that they had emptied, flowers they had seen but not visited and new flowers. They were tested with three trial types, all of which involved birds visiting four rewarded flowers in the first phase of a trial. In ‘free’ trials, the bird was allowed to choose four from eight flowers. In ‘forced’ trials there were only four flowers available in phase 1 and in ‘mixed’ trials the bird could choose four from six available flowers. In all trial types eight flowers (including all those in the same locations as in phase 1) were presented to the bird on its return in phase 2. The four rewarded flowers were those not visited in phase 1. In free and mixed trials, birds were better than chance at avoiding the flowers they had emptied in phase 1. In mixed trials, birds were more likely to visit the new flowers that were unique to phase 2. In experiment 2 we tested whether flower height was a floral feature remembered by birds. Birds were given forced and free trials in which the flowers in the radial maze were presented at two heights. As performance in both trial types was better than chance we suggest that hummingbirds use flower height to remember the locations of flowers.</description><subject>Animal behavior</subject><subject>Animal ethology</subject><subject>Aves</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Birds</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Memory</subject><subject>Plant location</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Selasphorus rufus</subject><subject>Vertebrata</subject><issn>0003-3472</issn><issn>1095-8282</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2001</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kE1LxDAQhoMouK5ePRcRPXU3TTpJehTxCxYE0XNI00SztM2atMr-e1N2QRA8DTN53snwIHRe4EWBMVuqvjYLgnFqGccHaFbgCnJBBDlEszSmOS05OUYnMa5TywDDDC1fRuvHmH2MXef699qFJl5nnel82GbWh8y2_tuErPVaDc73p-jIqjaas32do7f7u9fbx3z1_PB0e7PKNeV0yC2HstSkFMCUERy05gYazoGIijNMgWChMCO4LhmzqgZNFS4hPTYp0tR0jq52ezfBf44mDrJzUZu2Vb1J98qCi6oAzBN48Qdc-zH06TZJSAnAKIcELXaQDj7GYKzcBNepsJUFlpM8OcmTkzw5yUuBy_1WFbVqbVC9dvE3VVBSQZUwscNMUvHlTJBRO9Nr07hg9CAb7_774QcbY3-2</recordid><startdate>20010501</startdate><enddate>20010501</enddate><creator>Henderson, Jonathan</creator><creator>Hurly, T.Andrew</creator><creator>Healy, Susan D.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><general>Harcourt Brace Jovanovich Ltd</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>C1K</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20010501</creationdate><title>Rufous hummingbirds' memory for flower location</title><author>Henderson, Jonathan ; Hurly, T.Andrew ; Healy, Susan D.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c373t-f7544c24856ae875cc7e5d77528976035208a0620b466fab5c3a045897d856db3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2001</creationdate><topic>Animal behavior</topic><topic>Animal ethology</topic><topic>Aves</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Birds</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Memory</topic><topic>Plant location</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Selasphorus rufus</topic><topic>Vertebrata</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Henderson, Jonathan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hurly, T.Andrew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Healy, Susan D.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><jtitle>Animal behaviour</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Henderson, Jonathan</au><au>Hurly, T.Andrew</au><au>Healy, Susan D.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Rufous hummingbirds' memory for flower location</atitle><jtitle>Animal behaviour</jtitle><date>2001-05-01</date><risdate>2001</risdate><volume>61</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>981</spage><epage>986</epage><pages>981-986</pages><issn>0003-3472</issn><eissn>1095-8282</eissn><coden>ANBEA8</coden><abstract>We used an open-field analogue of the eight-arm radial maze to investigate the role of memory during foraging by rufous hummingbirds, Selasphorus rufus. In experiment 1 we attempted to determine whether birds were able to differentiate between flowers of the same type that they had emptied, flowers they had seen but not visited and new flowers. They were tested with three trial types, all of which involved birds visiting four rewarded flowers in the first phase of a trial. In ‘free’ trials, the bird was allowed to choose four from eight flowers. In ‘forced’ trials there were only four flowers available in phase 1 and in ‘mixed’ trials the bird could choose four from six available flowers. In all trial types eight flowers (including all those in the same locations as in phase 1) were presented to the bird on its return in phase 2. The four rewarded flowers were those not visited in phase 1. In free and mixed trials, birds were better than chance at avoiding the flowers they had emptied in phase 1. In mixed trials, birds were more likely to visit the new flowers that were unique to phase 2. In experiment 2 we tested whether flower height was a floral feature remembered by birds. Birds were given forced and free trials in which the flowers in the radial maze were presented at two heights. As performance in both trial types was better than chance we suggest that hummingbirds use flower height to remember the locations of flowers.</abstract><cop>Kent</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1006/anbe.2000.1670</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0003-3472
ispartof Animal behaviour, 2001-05, Vol.61 (5), p.981-986
issn 0003-3472
1095-8282
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_17891507
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete
subjects Animal behavior
Animal ethology
Aves
Biological and medical sciences
Birds
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Memory
Plant location
Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry
Selasphorus rufus
Vertebrata
title Rufous hummingbirds' memory for flower location
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-10T14%3A03%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Rufous%20hummingbirds'%20memory%20for%20flower%20location&rft.jtitle=Animal%20behaviour&rft.au=Henderson,%20Jonathan&rft.date=2001-05-01&rft.volume=61&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=981&rft.epage=986&rft.pages=981-986&rft.issn=0003-3472&rft.eissn=1095-8282&rft.coden=ANBEA8&rft_id=info:doi/10.1006/anbe.2000.1670&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E75390382%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=224556375&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0003347200916701&rfr_iscdi=true