Perioperative Antibiotics in the Setting of Oropharyngeal Reconstruction: Less Is More

BACKGROUNDRecipient-site infection after oropharyngeal reconstruction is a potentially disastrous complication. Although studies suggest that perioperative antibiotics reduces infection rates in these patients from 87% to 20%, there is no consensus regarding what constitutes the most appropriate ant...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Annals of plastic surgery 2016-06, Vol.76 (6), p.663-667
Hauptverfasser: Cohen, Leslie E, Finnerty, Brendan M, Golas, Alyssa Reiffel, Ketner, Jill J, Weinstein, Andrew, Boyko, Tatiana, Rohde, Christine H, Kutler, David, Spector, Jason A
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 667
container_issue 6
container_start_page 663
container_title Annals of plastic surgery
container_volume 76
creator Cohen, Leslie E
Finnerty, Brendan M
Golas, Alyssa Reiffel
Ketner, Jill J
Weinstein, Andrew
Boyko, Tatiana
Rohde, Christine H
Kutler, David
Spector, Jason A
description BACKGROUNDRecipient-site infection after oropharyngeal reconstruction is a potentially disastrous complication. Although studies suggest that perioperative antibiotics reduces infection rates in these patients from 87% to 20%, there is no consensus regarding what constitutes the most appropriate antibiotic regimen and duration of treatment. METHODSA retrospective review of perioperative antibiotic administration was performed of all patients who underwent local, pedicled, or free flap oropharyngeal reconstruction after oncologic resection by a single surgeon at a single institution between 2007 and 2013 to assess for recipient-site complications. RESULTSNinety-seven patients underwent 100 reconstructions (61 free flap reconstructions, 39 pedicled/local flap reconstructions) and all received a combination of intravenous (IV) antibiotic agents designed to cover oral flora. There were 23 (23%) recipient-site complications, which included cellulitis (9%), mucocutaneous fistula (5%), abscess (5%), and wound dehiscence (4%). Duration of antibiotic prophylaxis, defined as less than 48 hours (short-course) or greater than 48 hours (long-course), was not a significant predictor of recipient-site complication. Significant risk factors for recipient-site complications were clindamycin prophylaxis (P < 0.008), increased duration of surgery (P < 0.047), and advanced age (P < 0.034). Recipient-site complication was found to be a significant predictor of both increased length of hospital stay (P < 0.001) and increased time to the resumption of enteral feeds (P < 0.035). CONCLUSIONSThese data suggest that extended courses of perioperative antibiotics do not confer additional benefits in patients undergoing oropharyngeal reconstruction. We recommend a limited 48-hour course of prophylactic antibiotics with sufficient aerobic and anaerobic coverage to help minimize the incidence of antibiotic-related morbidities.
doi_str_mv 10.1097/SAP.0000000000000291
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1789036966</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1789036966</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3751-59138a40fd6266e64bb3e501c9a1f12862ed57b905344c5a67645574440697043</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEtPwzAQhC0EoqXwDxDykUuKnfiRcKsqHpWKWlHgGiXppjGkcbAdKv49rloQ4sBe9jIzO_shdE7JkJJEXi1G8yH5PWFCD1Cf8kgEkSTxIeoTyuJAEhb10Im1r4TQMGbiGPVCThljVPbRyxyM0i2YzKkPwKPGqVxppwqLVYNdBXgBzqlmhXWJZ0a3VWY-mxVkNX6EQjfWma5wSjfXeArW4onFD9rAKToqs9rC2X4P0PPtzdP4PpjO7ibj0TQoIslpwBMaxRkj5VKEQoBgeR4BJ7RIMlr6siKEJZd5QnjEWMEzIQXjXPruRCTbxwbocpfbGv3egXXpWtkC6jprQHc2pTJOSCQSIbyU7aSF0dYaKNPWqLX_JqUk3RJNPdH0L1Fvu9hf6PI1LH9M3wi9IN4JNrp2YOxb3W3ApJVH5Kr_s78ANZaAgg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1789036966</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Perioperative Antibiotics in the Setting of Oropharyngeal Reconstruction: Less Is More</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><creator>Cohen, Leslie E ; Finnerty, Brendan M ; Golas, Alyssa Reiffel ; Ketner, Jill J ; Weinstein, Andrew ; Boyko, Tatiana ; Rohde, Christine H ; Kutler, David ; Spector, Jason A</creator><creatorcontrib>Cohen, Leslie E ; Finnerty, Brendan M ; Golas, Alyssa Reiffel ; Ketner, Jill J ; Weinstein, Andrew ; Boyko, Tatiana ; Rohde, Christine H ; Kutler, David ; Spector, Jason A</creatorcontrib><description>BACKGROUNDRecipient-site infection after oropharyngeal reconstruction is a potentially disastrous complication. Although studies suggest that perioperative antibiotics reduces infection rates in these patients from 87% to 20%, there is no consensus regarding what constitutes the most appropriate antibiotic regimen and duration of treatment. METHODSA retrospective review of perioperative antibiotic administration was performed of all patients who underwent local, pedicled, or free flap oropharyngeal reconstruction after oncologic resection by a single surgeon at a single institution between 2007 and 2013 to assess for recipient-site complications. RESULTSNinety-seven patients underwent 100 reconstructions (61 free flap reconstructions, 39 pedicled/local flap reconstructions) and all received a combination of intravenous (IV) antibiotic agents designed to cover oral flora. There were 23 (23%) recipient-site complications, which included cellulitis (9%), mucocutaneous fistula (5%), abscess (5%), and wound dehiscence (4%). Duration of antibiotic prophylaxis, defined as less than 48 hours (short-course) or greater than 48 hours (long-course), was not a significant predictor of recipient-site complication. Significant risk factors for recipient-site complications were clindamycin prophylaxis (P &lt; 0.008), increased duration of surgery (P &lt; 0.047), and advanced age (P &lt; 0.034). Recipient-site complication was found to be a significant predictor of both increased length of hospital stay (P &lt; 0.001) and increased time to the resumption of enteral feeds (P &lt; 0.035). CONCLUSIONSThese data suggest that extended courses of perioperative antibiotics do not confer additional benefits in patients undergoing oropharyngeal reconstruction. We recommend a limited 48-hour course of prophylactic antibiotics with sufficient aerobic and anaerobic coverage to help minimize the incidence of antibiotic-related morbidities.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0148-7043</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1536-3708</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000000291</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25144417</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Copyright Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged, 80 and over ; Anti-Bacterial Agents - administration &amp; dosage ; Anti-Bacterial Agents - therapeutic use ; Antibiotic Prophylaxis - methods ; Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - surgery ; Drug Administration Schedule ; Female ; Humans ; Logistic Models ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Oropharyngeal Neoplasms - surgery ; Perioperative Care - methods ; Reconstructive Surgical Procedures - methods ; Retrospective Studies ; Surgical Flaps ; Surgical Wound Dehiscence - epidemiology ; Surgical Wound Dehiscence - prevention &amp; control ; Surgical Wound Infection - epidemiology ; Surgical Wound Infection - prevention &amp; control ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>Annals of plastic surgery, 2016-06, Vol.76 (6), p.663-667</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2016 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3751-59138a40fd6266e64bb3e501c9a1f12862ed57b905344c5a67645574440697043</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25144417$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Cohen, Leslie E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Finnerty, Brendan M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Golas, Alyssa Reiffel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ketner, Jill J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weinstein, Andrew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boyko, Tatiana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rohde, Christine H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kutler, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Spector, Jason A</creatorcontrib><title>Perioperative Antibiotics in the Setting of Oropharyngeal Reconstruction: Less Is More</title><title>Annals of plastic surgery</title><addtitle>Ann Plast Surg</addtitle><description>BACKGROUNDRecipient-site infection after oropharyngeal reconstruction is a potentially disastrous complication. Although studies suggest that perioperative antibiotics reduces infection rates in these patients from 87% to 20%, there is no consensus regarding what constitutes the most appropriate antibiotic regimen and duration of treatment. METHODSA retrospective review of perioperative antibiotic administration was performed of all patients who underwent local, pedicled, or free flap oropharyngeal reconstruction after oncologic resection by a single surgeon at a single institution between 2007 and 2013 to assess for recipient-site complications. RESULTSNinety-seven patients underwent 100 reconstructions (61 free flap reconstructions, 39 pedicled/local flap reconstructions) and all received a combination of intravenous (IV) antibiotic agents designed to cover oral flora. There were 23 (23%) recipient-site complications, which included cellulitis (9%), mucocutaneous fistula (5%), abscess (5%), and wound dehiscence (4%). Duration of antibiotic prophylaxis, defined as less than 48 hours (short-course) or greater than 48 hours (long-course), was not a significant predictor of recipient-site complication. Significant risk factors for recipient-site complications were clindamycin prophylaxis (P &lt; 0.008), increased duration of surgery (P &lt; 0.047), and advanced age (P &lt; 0.034). Recipient-site complication was found to be a significant predictor of both increased length of hospital stay (P &lt; 0.001) and increased time to the resumption of enteral feeds (P &lt; 0.035). CONCLUSIONSThese data suggest that extended courses of perioperative antibiotics do not confer additional benefits in patients undergoing oropharyngeal reconstruction. We recommend a limited 48-hour course of prophylactic antibiotics with sufficient aerobic and anaerobic coverage to help minimize the incidence of antibiotic-related morbidities.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Anti-Bacterial Agents - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Anti-Bacterial Agents - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Antibiotic Prophylaxis - methods</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - surgery</subject><subject>Drug Administration Schedule</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Logistic Models</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Oropharyngeal Neoplasms - surgery</subject><subject>Perioperative Care - methods</subject><subject>Reconstructive Surgical Procedures - methods</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Surgical Flaps</subject><subject>Surgical Wound Dehiscence - epidemiology</subject><subject>Surgical Wound Dehiscence - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Surgical Wound Infection - epidemiology</subject><subject>Surgical Wound Infection - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>0148-7043</issn><issn>1536-3708</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kEtPwzAQhC0EoqXwDxDykUuKnfiRcKsqHpWKWlHgGiXppjGkcbAdKv49rloQ4sBe9jIzO_shdE7JkJJEXi1G8yH5PWFCD1Cf8kgEkSTxIeoTyuJAEhb10Im1r4TQMGbiGPVCThljVPbRyxyM0i2YzKkPwKPGqVxppwqLVYNdBXgBzqlmhXWJZ0a3VWY-mxVkNX6EQjfWma5wSjfXeArW4onFD9rAKToqs9rC2X4P0PPtzdP4PpjO7ibj0TQoIslpwBMaxRkj5VKEQoBgeR4BJ7RIMlr6siKEJZd5QnjEWMEzIQXjXPruRCTbxwbocpfbGv3egXXpWtkC6jprQHc2pTJOSCQSIbyU7aSF0dYaKNPWqLX_JqUk3RJNPdH0L1Fvu9hf6PI1LH9M3wi9IN4JNrp2YOxb3W3ApJVH5Kr_s78ANZaAgg</recordid><startdate>201606</startdate><enddate>201606</enddate><creator>Cohen, Leslie E</creator><creator>Finnerty, Brendan M</creator><creator>Golas, Alyssa Reiffel</creator><creator>Ketner, Jill J</creator><creator>Weinstein, Andrew</creator><creator>Boyko, Tatiana</creator><creator>Rohde, Christine H</creator><creator>Kutler, David</creator><creator>Spector, Jason A</creator><general>Copyright Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201606</creationdate><title>Perioperative Antibiotics in the Setting of Oropharyngeal Reconstruction: Less Is More</title><author>Cohen, Leslie E ; Finnerty, Brendan M ; Golas, Alyssa Reiffel ; Ketner, Jill J ; Weinstein, Andrew ; Boyko, Tatiana ; Rohde, Christine H ; Kutler, David ; Spector, Jason A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3751-59138a40fd6266e64bb3e501c9a1f12862ed57b905344c5a67645574440697043</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Anti-Bacterial Agents - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Anti-Bacterial Agents - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Antibiotic Prophylaxis - methods</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - surgery</topic><topic>Drug Administration Schedule</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Logistic Models</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Oropharyngeal Neoplasms - surgery</topic><topic>Perioperative Care - methods</topic><topic>Reconstructive Surgical Procedures - methods</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Surgical Flaps</topic><topic>Surgical Wound Dehiscence - epidemiology</topic><topic>Surgical Wound Dehiscence - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Surgical Wound Infection - epidemiology</topic><topic>Surgical Wound Infection - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Cohen, Leslie E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Finnerty, Brendan M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Golas, Alyssa Reiffel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ketner, Jill J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weinstein, Andrew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boyko, Tatiana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rohde, Christine H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kutler, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Spector, Jason A</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Annals of plastic surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Cohen, Leslie E</au><au>Finnerty, Brendan M</au><au>Golas, Alyssa Reiffel</au><au>Ketner, Jill J</au><au>Weinstein, Andrew</au><au>Boyko, Tatiana</au><au>Rohde, Christine H</au><au>Kutler, David</au><au>Spector, Jason A</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Perioperative Antibiotics in the Setting of Oropharyngeal Reconstruction: Less Is More</atitle><jtitle>Annals of plastic surgery</jtitle><addtitle>Ann Plast Surg</addtitle><date>2016-06</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>76</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>663</spage><epage>667</epage><pages>663-667</pages><issn>0148-7043</issn><eissn>1536-3708</eissn><abstract>BACKGROUNDRecipient-site infection after oropharyngeal reconstruction is a potentially disastrous complication. Although studies suggest that perioperative antibiotics reduces infection rates in these patients from 87% to 20%, there is no consensus regarding what constitutes the most appropriate antibiotic regimen and duration of treatment. METHODSA retrospective review of perioperative antibiotic administration was performed of all patients who underwent local, pedicled, or free flap oropharyngeal reconstruction after oncologic resection by a single surgeon at a single institution between 2007 and 2013 to assess for recipient-site complications. RESULTSNinety-seven patients underwent 100 reconstructions (61 free flap reconstructions, 39 pedicled/local flap reconstructions) and all received a combination of intravenous (IV) antibiotic agents designed to cover oral flora. There were 23 (23%) recipient-site complications, which included cellulitis (9%), mucocutaneous fistula (5%), abscess (5%), and wound dehiscence (4%). Duration of antibiotic prophylaxis, defined as less than 48 hours (short-course) or greater than 48 hours (long-course), was not a significant predictor of recipient-site complication. Significant risk factors for recipient-site complications were clindamycin prophylaxis (P &lt; 0.008), increased duration of surgery (P &lt; 0.047), and advanced age (P &lt; 0.034). Recipient-site complication was found to be a significant predictor of both increased length of hospital stay (P &lt; 0.001) and increased time to the resumption of enteral feeds (P &lt; 0.035). CONCLUSIONSThese data suggest that extended courses of perioperative antibiotics do not confer additional benefits in patients undergoing oropharyngeal reconstruction. We recommend a limited 48-hour course of prophylactic antibiotics with sufficient aerobic and anaerobic coverage to help minimize the incidence of antibiotic-related morbidities.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Copyright Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved</pub><pmid>25144417</pmid><doi>10.1097/SAP.0000000000000291</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0148-7043
ispartof Annals of plastic surgery, 2016-06, Vol.76 (6), p.663-667
issn 0148-7043
1536-3708
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1789036966
source MEDLINE; Journals@Ovid Complete
subjects Adult
Aged, 80 and over
Anti-Bacterial Agents - administration & dosage
Anti-Bacterial Agents - therapeutic use
Antibiotic Prophylaxis - methods
Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - surgery
Drug Administration Schedule
Female
Humans
Logistic Models
Male
Middle Aged
Oropharyngeal Neoplasms - surgery
Perioperative Care - methods
Reconstructive Surgical Procedures - methods
Retrospective Studies
Surgical Flaps
Surgical Wound Dehiscence - epidemiology
Surgical Wound Dehiscence - prevention & control
Surgical Wound Infection - epidemiology
Surgical Wound Infection - prevention & control
Treatment Outcome
title Perioperative Antibiotics in the Setting of Oropharyngeal Reconstruction: Less Is More
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-11T06%3A00%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Perioperative%20Antibiotics%20in%20the%20Setting%20of%20Oropharyngeal%20Reconstruction:%20Less%20Is%20More&rft.jtitle=Annals%20of%20plastic%20surgery&rft.au=Cohen,%20Leslie%20E&rft.date=2016-06&rft.volume=76&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=663&rft.epage=667&rft.pages=663-667&rft.issn=0148-7043&rft.eissn=1536-3708&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/SAP.0000000000000291&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1789036966%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1789036966&rft_id=info:pmid/25144417&rfr_iscdi=true