Is the matrix really inhospitable? Vole runway distribution in an experimentally fragmented landscape

Habitat fragmentation is a common feature of modern landscapes, with significant impacts on the population densities of and space use by animals. A frequent model system for studying these effects is that of voles (Microtus spp.) and other rodents in experimentally fragmented grasslands. Design of t...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Oikos 2004-01, Vol.104 (1), p.5-14
Hauptverfasser: Cook, William M., Anderson, Reuben M., Schweiger, E. William
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 14
container_issue 1
container_start_page 5
container_title Oikos
container_volume 104
creator Cook, William M.
Anderson, Reuben M.
Schweiger, E. William
description Habitat fragmentation is a common feature of modern landscapes, with significant impacts on the population densities of and space use by animals. A frequent model system for studying these effects is that of voles (Microtus spp.) and other rodents in experimentally fragmented grasslands. Design of these study sites is motivated by landscape theory, and often assumes that the matrix between discrete experimental habitat patches is inhospitable to focal species. Our census of M. ochrogaster runways in an experimentally fragmented landscape in eastern Kansas indicates that voles make substantial use of the mowed matrix, and that such use increases with degree of habitat fragmentation. Census season (winter, summer) was also an important predictor of observed runway distributions. Our results suggest that voles may have home ranges that include multiple small fragments and also the intervening matrix, leading to overestimates of population density. While the assumption that the matrix is inhospitable in experimentally fragmented habitats may be justified in many cases, studies using the model system of Microtus spp. or ecologically similar rodents in grasslands should incorporate methods that account for use of the matrix.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/j.0030-1299.2004.12761.x
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_17880672</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>3548310</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>3548310</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4321-1b72f404d9f2b2ac9852d3fc0f85cd748edf3f9fbc554162e8ed6c79cc17ff6d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkUtv1DAUhS1EJYbCP2DhDewS_IjjZANCFQyjVq1ABSQ2luNcUw-eJLUzaubf40yqYVtv_LjfOfY9RghTktM03m9zQjjJKKvrnBFS5JTJkubTM7SiJSEZkaR8jlYn6AV6GeOWECKlLFYINhGPd4B3egxuwgG09wfsurs-Dm7UjYeP-GfvAYd996APuHUxgc1-dH2XMKw7DNMAwe2gG49aG_SfeQMt9rpro9EDvEJnVvsIrx_nc_Tjy-fbi6_Z1c16c_HpKjMFZzSjjWS2IEVbW9YwbepKsJZbQ2wlTCuLClrLbW0bI0RBSwbpoDSyNoZKa8uWn6N3i-8Q-vs9xFHtXDTg00Og30dFZVWRUrIEVgtoQh9jAKuG1IIOB0WJmnNVWzVHpubI1JyrOuaqpiR9-3iHTr351G5nXPyvF4JKIXjiPizcg_NweLK_utlcHpfJ4M1isI1jH04GXBQVpySVs6WcfgSmU1mHv6qUXAr163qtLq9v5fr772-q5v8AjGymxA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>17880672</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Is the matrix really inhospitable? Vole runway distribution in an experimentally fragmented landscape</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Cook, William M. ; Anderson, Reuben M. ; Schweiger, E. William</creator><creatorcontrib>Cook, William M. ; Anderson, Reuben M. ; Schweiger, E. William</creatorcontrib><description>Habitat fragmentation is a common feature of modern landscapes, with significant impacts on the population densities of and space use by animals. A frequent model system for studying these effects is that of voles (Microtus spp.) and other rodents in experimentally fragmented grasslands. Design of these study sites is motivated by landscape theory, and often assumes that the matrix between discrete experimental habitat patches is inhospitable to focal species. Our census of M. ochrogaster runways in an experimentally fragmented landscape in eastern Kansas indicates that voles make substantial use of the mowed matrix, and that such use increases with degree of habitat fragmentation. Census season (winter, summer) was also an important predictor of observed runway distributions. Our results suggest that voles may have home ranges that include multiple small fragments and also the intervening matrix, leading to overestimates of population density. While the assumption that the matrix is inhospitable in experimentally fragmented habitats may be justified in many cases, studies using the model system of Microtus spp. or ecologically similar rodents in grasslands should incorporate methods that account for use of the matrix.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0030-1299</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1600-0706</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.0030-1299.2004.12761.x</identifier><identifier>CODEN: OIKSAA</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Copenhagen: Munksgaard International Publishers</publisher><subject>Animal and plant ecology ; Animal, plant and microbial ecology ; Animals ; Autoecology ; Biological and medical sciences ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Habitat fragmentation ; Landscape ecology ; Landscapes ; Mammalia ; Mammals ; Metapopulation ecology ; Microtus ochrogaster ; Population density ; Rodents ; Summer ; Vertebrata ; Voles ; Winter</subject><ispartof>Oikos, 2004-01, Vol.104 (1), p.5-14</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2004 Oikos</rights><rights>2004 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4321-1b72f404d9f2b2ac9852d3fc0f85cd748edf3f9fbc554162e8ed6c79cc17ff6d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4321-1b72f404d9f2b2ac9852d3fc0f85cd748edf3f9fbc554162e8ed6c79cc17ff6d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/3548310$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/3548310$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,1411,4010,27900,27901,27902,45550,45551,57992,58225</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=15517553$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Cook, William M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anderson, Reuben M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schweiger, E. William</creatorcontrib><title>Is the matrix really inhospitable? Vole runway distribution in an experimentally fragmented landscape</title><title>Oikos</title><addtitle>Oikos</addtitle><description>Habitat fragmentation is a common feature of modern landscapes, with significant impacts on the population densities of and space use by animals. A frequent model system for studying these effects is that of voles (Microtus spp.) and other rodents in experimentally fragmented grasslands. Design of these study sites is motivated by landscape theory, and often assumes that the matrix between discrete experimental habitat patches is inhospitable to focal species. Our census of M. ochrogaster runways in an experimentally fragmented landscape in eastern Kansas indicates that voles make substantial use of the mowed matrix, and that such use increases with degree of habitat fragmentation. Census season (winter, summer) was also an important predictor of observed runway distributions. Our results suggest that voles may have home ranges that include multiple small fragments and also the intervening matrix, leading to overestimates of population density. While the assumption that the matrix is inhospitable in experimentally fragmented habitats may be justified in many cases, studies using the model system of Microtus spp. or ecologically similar rodents in grasslands should incorporate methods that account for use of the matrix.</description><subject>Animal and plant ecology</subject><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Autoecology</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Habitat fragmentation</subject><subject>Landscape ecology</subject><subject>Landscapes</subject><subject>Mammalia</subject><subject>Mammals</subject><subject>Metapopulation ecology</subject><subject>Microtus ochrogaster</subject><subject>Population density</subject><subject>Rodents</subject><subject>Summer</subject><subject>Vertebrata</subject><subject>Voles</subject><subject>Winter</subject><issn>0030-1299</issn><issn>1600-0706</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkUtv1DAUhS1EJYbCP2DhDewS_IjjZANCFQyjVq1ABSQ2luNcUw-eJLUzaubf40yqYVtv_LjfOfY9RghTktM03m9zQjjJKKvrnBFS5JTJkubTM7SiJSEZkaR8jlYn6AV6GeOWECKlLFYINhGPd4B3egxuwgG09wfsurs-Dm7UjYeP-GfvAYd996APuHUxgc1-dH2XMKw7DNMAwe2gG49aG_SfeQMt9rpro9EDvEJnVvsIrx_nc_Tjy-fbi6_Z1c16c_HpKjMFZzSjjWS2IEVbW9YwbepKsJZbQ2wlTCuLClrLbW0bI0RBSwbpoDSyNoZKa8uWn6N3i-8Q-vs9xFHtXDTg00Og30dFZVWRUrIEVgtoQh9jAKuG1IIOB0WJmnNVWzVHpubI1JyrOuaqpiR9-3iHTr351G5nXPyvF4JKIXjiPizcg_NweLK_utlcHpfJ4M1isI1jH04GXBQVpySVs6WcfgSmU1mHv6qUXAr163qtLq9v5fr772-q5v8AjGymxA</recordid><startdate>200401</startdate><enddate>200401</enddate><creator>Cook, William M.</creator><creator>Anderson, Reuben M.</creator><creator>Schweiger, E. William</creator><general>Munksgaard International Publishers</general><general>Blackwell Publishers</general><general>Blackwell</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>C1K</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200401</creationdate><title>Is the matrix really inhospitable? Vole runway distribution in an experimentally fragmented landscape</title><author>Cook, William M. ; Anderson, Reuben M. ; Schweiger, E. William</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4321-1b72f404d9f2b2ac9852d3fc0f85cd748edf3f9fbc554162e8ed6c79cc17ff6d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>Animal and plant ecology</topic><topic>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Autoecology</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Habitat fragmentation</topic><topic>Landscape ecology</topic><topic>Landscapes</topic><topic>Mammalia</topic><topic>Mammals</topic><topic>Metapopulation ecology</topic><topic>Microtus ochrogaster</topic><topic>Population density</topic><topic>Rodents</topic><topic>Summer</topic><topic>Vertebrata</topic><topic>Voles</topic><topic>Winter</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Cook, William M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anderson, Reuben M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schweiger, E. William</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><jtitle>Oikos</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Cook, William M.</au><au>Anderson, Reuben M.</au><au>Schweiger, E. William</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Is the matrix really inhospitable? Vole runway distribution in an experimentally fragmented landscape</atitle><jtitle>Oikos</jtitle><addtitle>Oikos</addtitle><date>2004-01</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>104</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>5</spage><epage>14</epage><pages>5-14</pages><issn>0030-1299</issn><eissn>1600-0706</eissn><coden>OIKSAA</coden><abstract>Habitat fragmentation is a common feature of modern landscapes, with significant impacts on the population densities of and space use by animals. A frequent model system for studying these effects is that of voles (Microtus spp.) and other rodents in experimentally fragmented grasslands. Design of these study sites is motivated by landscape theory, and often assumes that the matrix between discrete experimental habitat patches is inhospitable to focal species. Our census of M. ochrogaster runways in an experimentally fragmented landscape in eastern Kansas indicates that voles make substantial use of the mowed matrix, and that such use increases with degree of habitat fragmentation. Census season (winter, summer) was also an important predictor of observed runway distributions. Our results suggest that voles may have home ranges that include multiple small fragments and also the intervening matrix, leading to overestimates of population density. While the assumption that the matrix is inhospitable in experimentally fragmented habitats may be justified in many cases, studies using the model system of Microtus spp. or ecologically similar rodents in grasslands should incorporate methods that account for use of the matrix.</abstract><cop>Copenhagen</cop><pub>Munksgaard International Publishers</pub><doi>10.1111/j.0030-1299.2004.12761.x</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0030-1299
ispartof Oikos, 2004-01, Vol.104 (1), p.5-14
issn 0030-1299
1600-0706
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_17880672
source Jstor Complete Legacy; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Animal and plant ecology
Animal, plant and microbial ecology
Animals
Autoecology
Biological and medical sciences
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Habitat fragmentation
Landscape ecology
Landscapes
Mammalia
Mammals
Metapopulation ecology
Microtus ochrogaster
Population density
Rodents
Summer
Vertebrata
Voles
Winter
title Is the matrix really inhospitable? Vole runway distribution in an experimentally fragmented landscape
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T23%3A06%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Is%20the%20matrix%20really%20inhospitable?%20Vole%20runway%20distribution%20in%20an%20experimentally%20fragmented%20landscape&rft.jtitle=Oikos&rft.au=Cook,%20William%20M.&rft.date=2004-01&rft.volume=104&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=5&rft.epage=14&rft.pages=5-14&rft.issn=0030-1299&rft.eissn=1600-0706&rft.coden=OIKSAA&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.0030-1299.2004.12761.x&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E3548310%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=17880672&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=3548310&rfr_iscdi=true